The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda and Minutes 2009-11-18 City of Northampton Community Preservation Committee 210 Main Street, City Hall Northampton, MA 01060 Community Preservation Committee DATE: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 TIME: 7:00pm nd PLACE: NOTE NEW LOCATION - City Hall, 2 Floor Hearing Room, 210 Main St. Contact: Fran Volkmann, Chair, Community Preservation Committee Franv@comcast.net Tom Parent, Vice Chair, Community Preservation Committee ParentBridge@hotmail.com Wayne Feiden, Community Preservation Planner wfeiden@northamptonma.gov (413) 587-1265 Agenda  General Public Comment  Acceptance of 11/4/2009 Minutes  Chair's Report  Continued Review of Round 2, 2009 Applications Further Discussion o Funding Recommendations o  Other Business For additional information please refer to the Community Preservation Committee website: http://www.northamptonma.gov/cpc MINUTES (APPROVED) Community Preservation Committee Date: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 Time: 7:00 pm nd Place: Hearing Room, 2 Floor City Hall Members Present: Fran Volkmann, George Kohout, Tom Parent, Downey Meyer, Lilly Lombard, Don Bianchi, Jack Hornor, David Drake and Joseph Defazio Staff Present: John Frey, Community Preservation Planner Wayne Feiden, Director of Planning Fran Volkmann opened the public meeting at 7:00pm. 1. PUBLIC COMMENT  Tris Metcalf stated public benefit of the Hospital Hill Chapel project is similar to that of the First Churches project. Also, partial funding would extend the maintenance capability. Historic Preservation tax credits are a possible way to leverage, but it is important to show you are already restoring the building.  Mark Landing spoke in favor of the Hospital Hill Chapel project stating the envelope is definitely suffering. Steeple is presenting a danger.  Reverend Maduka stated the architectural history of the Hospital Hill Chapel is the major reason for preservation of this structure. Also, they are beginning to raise money to leverage this project. They have invested money before they owned the building and they’ll do even more now.  Dee Clapp Boyle stated the Friends of the Chesterfield Dam realize it is best to defer their funding request for now until more public support is demonstrated. They will likely return for an expedited review by March, 2010.  Fran Volkmann clarified the mayor has decided to have a public process around this request in January. Better for the CPC to wait until that process has evolved. 2. ACCEPTENCE OF NOVEMBER 4, 2009 MINUTES  Fran Volkmann presented the November 4, 2009 minutes for discussion. With no corrections Fran Volkmann declared the minutes approved as read. 3. CHAIR’S REPORT  Fran Volkmann announced Senate Bill 90 was reported favorably in committee. It has a long way to go, but that is a good start.  Fran Volkmann announced Bruce Young’s replacement should be in place by January.  Fran Volkmann announced the clickable website should be in place by January 1.  Fran Volkmann announced the CPC mailing list is up and going.  Fran Volkmann announced the closing date is December 1, 2009 to apply for the vacant CPC position. She encouraged all current members to outreach as much as possible.  Jack Hornor stated he was disappointed by the lack of public outreach on the part of the City Council.  Fran Volkmann stated it is a Council initiative not CPC. Unfortunately, the CPC influence is limited.  Lilly Lombard stated the generic board application fails to list the CPC. Also, it is confusing distinguishing between Mayoral appointments and City Council appointments. 4A. CONTINUED REVIEW OF ROUND 2, 2009 PROJECTS – FURTHER DISCUSSION NORTHAMPTON CONSERVATION COMMISSION – HAYDENVILLE RD. PARCEL  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review.  Lilly Lombard motioned for provisional full funding, Downey Meyer seconded.  George Kohout asked how this parcel ranks as a priority versus the Bean property.  Downey Meyer stated this transaction is much further along toward fruition. Leverage of Land Grant is already in place. It would be a mistake to not pursue it in hopes of a project that is just beginning.  Don Bianchi agreed with Downey Meyer. He also noted that the CPC should only review what is currently in front of us.  Fran Volkmann agreed.  Lilly Lombard stated her belief the CPC should make a statement regarding a desire to re-consider usage of motorized vehicles.  Wayne Feiden stated current practice is to only allow if it’s an existing use. Options would be to condition this grant or to simply suggest the Conservation Commission re-address this issue in the future.  Tom Parent stated vehicle users are tax payers too and have history of usage here.  George Kohout stated the condition should be more neutral.  David Drake stated our mandate is to benefit as many taxpayers as possible.  All voted in favor of the motion. See appendix below for full details. LOOK PARK – RECREATION DESIGN  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review.  Jack Hornor motioned for provisional full funding, Tom Parent seconded.  Downey Meyer asked for a condition requiring meetings of the Look Park Trustees involving the use of these funds to be noticed and open to the public.  Tom Parent stated his concern that we don’t require this of all applicants. Why is this different?  Downey Meyer stated it is important here because it is a city owned property.  David Drake stated not all planning processes are expected to involve the public.  Don Bianchi stated we don’t have much enforcement power. However, it would be relevant if they came back to us for more money.  Joseph Defazio stated his concern that this condition is too vague regarding its implementation.  Wayne Feiden stated conditions are easiest to enforce before funds are granted.  The motion for funding passed 8-0 with Lilly Lombard abstaining. See appendix below for full details. HABITAT FOR HUMANITY – GARFIELD AVENUE II  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review.  Jack Hornor motioned for provisional full funding, Tom Parent seconded.  All voted in favor of the motion. See appendix below for full details. NORTHAMPTON COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT – GROVE STREET INN  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review.  Don Bianchi motioned to provisionally grant $36,950 toward priority items of bathrooms, windows and pantry, Lilly Lombard seconded.  George Kohout expressed his concern that these funds may not cover all their priorities. The CPC should be prepared to increase the funding if the budget proves too optimistic  All voted in favor of the motion. See appendix below for full details. ACADEMY OF MUSIC – ACADEMY RESTORATION  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review. She expressed her desire for the CPC to consider bonding the full amount. Large public projects with large public benefit should be bonded with a full commitment, not required to come back for incremental funding.  John Frey presented a summary of bonding options.  Jack Hornor stated his appreciation of the ability to use bonding as our budget for this round is limited.  George Kohout expressed his concern that bonding could stifle potential future projects.  Fran Volkmann stated bonding should not be the standard but rather limited for truly high priority projects with high public benefit.  Lilly Lombard agreed with the Fran Volkmann’s bonding philosophy, however she expressed her belief that this project is not the highest public benefit project out there versus other open space and housing opportunities. She is in favor of paying for just the doors at this point as that is the Academy’s highest priority.  David Drake expressed his concern that the State match might drop so low that bonding would not be wise for the CPC as costs outweigh State leveraging.  Fran Volkmann stated the Capital Improvements Committee does not have the ability to fund these projects. The CPC must assume this role.  Downey Meyer stated bonding costs are low currently so opportunities should be taken. However, in this case, just the exterior needs are the high public priority.  Don Bianchi expressed his desire to fully fund the exterior work and possibly bond the interior work.  Jack Hornor expressed his hesitancy for bonding small amounts. It should be reserved for large, high priority projects that could only be accomplished with bonding.  Tom Parent agreed with Jack Hornor.  Don Bianchi suggested voting on this project on its merits only then waiting to discuss bonding later.  Don Bianchi motioned to provisionally support this project for $210,000, Downey Meyer seconded.  The motion passed 6-3 with Lilly Lombard, Jack Hornor, and Fran Volkmann voting against. See appendix below for full details. NORTHAMPTON CONSERVATION COMMISSION – BARRETT STREET MARSH  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review.  Tom Parent motioned for provisional full funding, Lilly Lombard seconded.  All voted in favor of the motion. See appendix below for full details. NORTHAMPTON CONSERVATION COMMISSION – CONSERVATION FUND III  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review.  Jack Hornor motioned not to fund. No one seconded the motion.  Lilly Lombard motioned for provisional partial funding of $10,000, Don Bianchi seconded.  Downey Meyer stated it is difficult to evaluate the success of this program because of the time lag in reviewing property values.  The motion passed 8-1, with Downey Meyer opposed. See appendix below for full details. VALLEY CDC – PRE-DEVELOPMENT FUND II  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review.  Lilly Lombard motioned for provisional partial funding of $10,000, Don Bianchi seconded.  The motion passed 8-0. Joseph Defazio abstained. See appendix below for full details. VALLEY CDC – HOMEOWNERSHIP SUSTAINABILITY  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review.  Lilly Lombard motioned for provisional partial funding of $30,000, Jack Hornor seconded.  Don Bianchi expressed reasons to justify the overhead costs noted in the budget.  Lilly Lombard amended her motion to $37,500, Jack Hornor seconded.  Fran Volkmann agreed that overhead costs are legitimate and 30% is normal.  All in voted favor of the motion. See appendix below for full details. NORTHAMPTON DPW – HOTEL BRIDGE STUDY  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review. She also noted public comment to her has included sentiment against funding any studies.  Jack Hornor motioned to not fund the project at this time, Lilly Lombard seconded.  Tom Parent stated while not a huge fan of this project, the CPC must recognize the Leeds neighborhood and automatically move this project to the next round.  Downey Meyer suggested partially funding to allow community the opportunity to match funding.  The motion to not fund the project passed 5-4 with Jack Hornor, Fran Volkmann, Lilly Lombard, David Drake and Don Bianchi in favor. Tom Parent, George Kohout, Downey Meyer and Joseph Defazio were opposed to the motion.  Joseph Defazio clarified he wanted to include this project on its own merits. Then discuss budget issues later as a whole.  David Drake stated his belief that $50,000 was too much investment to realize an answer that would likely be difficult to fund to fruition.  Jack Hornor stated his concern for presenting undo encouragement. Applicant should re-apply.  George Kohout stated his concern that we are typically re-funding the larger, usual applicants. Secondly, he is disappointed with lack of detail in the application on the DPW’s part.  Fran Volkmann stated she voted against the motion because the risk is too high compared to the potential benefit. RESURRECTION LIFE MINISTRIES – HOSPITAL HILL CHAPEL  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review.  Lilly Lombard motioned to provisionally fund the roof repair for $26,475, George Kohout seconded.  Downey Meyer suggested an amendment to fund some safety upgrades to the steeple.  Jack Hornor stated his concern the congregation would have difficulty raising any funds. He does not see the project as feasible at this point.  Don Bianchi stated he generally agreed with Jack Hornor. Only feasible if funded at a high level but cannot justify versus the other projects.  Downey Meyer echoed George Kohout’s sentiment that it is difficult for smaller applicants to leverage their projects. Larger projects often given benefit of doubt when they cannot leverage. The applicant has already invested and continues to invest in the property.  George Kohout stated he sees merit in preserving this building, but questioned cost projections.  Tom Parent agreed with Jack Hornor. Difficult to prioritize this over other projects.  Lilly Lombard stated her desire to keep the motion as is and encouraged the applicant to fundraise directly toward steeple repairs.  The motion passes 6-3 with Jack Hornor, Tom Parent and George Kohout opposed. See appendix below for full details. FRIENDS OF THE UPPER RESERVOIR – CHESTERFIELD ROAD DAM  Fran Volkmann stated the applicant has asked to defer the request to 2010.  George Kohout suggested voting now to send message as to where the CPC stands on this project.  Don Bianchi disagreed with George Kohout.  Jack Hornor suggested they must re-apply, with the same application if desired. But changes may be necessary as more is learned about the project.  David Drake proposed the CPC adopt a policy to universally not defer applications. We should not need to re-visit this issue each time asked.  Tom Parent motioned to allow their withdrawal, Downey Meyer seconded. They may re-submit without the eligibility form.  All voted in favor of the motion. CHILDS PARK – NORTH POND  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review.  Jack Hornor motioned for provisional full funding, Joseph Defazio seconded.  Lilly Lombard stated she does not see the public benefit, public support, or leverage of funds.  Tom Parent disagreed with Lilly Lombard as to the public support of this site.  George Kohout agreed with Lilly Lombard. He would rather see the money spent elsewhere.  The motion failed 4-5 with Tom Parent, David Drake, Joseph Defazio and Jack Hornor in favor. Opposed were Fran Volkmann, Lilly Lombard, Downey Meyer, Don Bianchi and George Kohout. MASONIC HEALTH SYSTEMS – OVERLOOK AT NORTHAMPTON  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review.  Tom Parent motioned to not fund, Jack Hornor seconded.  All voted in favor of the motion. COSTELLO, RICHARD – DORSEY-JONES HOUSE  Fran Volkmann presented a draft recommendation for review.  David Drake motioned to not fund, Jack Hornor seconded.  The motion passed 8-1, with Downey Meyer against.  Downey Meyer stated he does not agree with the sentiment against funding private structures. For example, the CPC has already funded a study of largely private homes. 4B. CONTINUED REVIEW OF ROUND 2, 2009 PROJECTS – FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS  Tom Parent motioned to accept the ten provisional motions, Don Bianchi seconded.  Jack Hornor and Fran Volkmann again pitched the idea of bonding for the Academy of Music project.  Downey Meyer stated his concern some Academy work might not be CPA eligible.  Don Bianchi stated if only funding $210,000, then pay all now instead of bonding. Also, he is against full funding. We have supported them extensively and they need to pursue all funding avenues. He is willing to support this institution if it proves true no other sources of funding are available.  Fran Volkmann stated it is possible to discuss bonding this later, up until the time the money is spent.  Tom Parent stated the City Council may say no to bonding anyhow.  Don Bianchi stated he is in favor of Tom Parent’s motion. We have seriously vetted these projects and amounts already. We are close enough to our target so let’s go with it.  All voted in favor of the motion. 5. OTHER BUSINESS  Fran Volkmann stated the appointment with the mayor is at noon, Monday, November 23, 2009. All are welcome to attend. Meeting adjourned at 10:38pm. APPENDIX A: CPC PROJECT RANKING CHART Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Northampton Conservation Commission – Haydenville Road Parcel (Beaver Brook/Broad Brook Headwaters) Amount of funding requested: $190,000 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $190,000 Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):_______________ Disbursement Schedule: _Full funding at time of closing_ Summary reasons for recommendation :  Protects approximately 100 acres of land  Strategically important location in Beaver Brook/Fitzgerald Lake area of city  Meets goals of Sustainable Northampton and Open Space and Recreation Plan  Leverages funds effectively Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:  Success of other funding initiatives  Measures to ensure land is permanently protected  Conservation Commission shall hold a community meeting about how public use of the property and permitted and prohibited uses (including snowmobiles on historic snowmobile trails) as part of the management plan for the property that is due prior to LAND grant reimbursement. Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Open Space Reserve (#2344930- 359931)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) November 19, 2009 Upon the recommendation of the Mayor Mary Clare Higgins and the Community Preservation Committee WHEREAS, on June 18, 2009, City Council authorized the purchase of the approximately 100 acres (Map ID 6-12 and 13) on Haydenville Road (Beaver Brook/Broad Brook Headwaters); and WHEREAS, the acquisition of this property will protect supports multiple active and passive recreational uses; and WHEREAS, the parcel is in a strategically important location in the Beaver Brook/Fitzgerald Lake area of city; and WHEREAS, the project addresses recommendations contained in the Sustainable Northampton Comprehensive Plan and the Northampton and Open Space and Recreation Plan; and WHEREAS, the project uses Community Preservation funds effectively to leverage a state LAND grant; WHEREAS, the final contract for such funds will include conditions to ensure the project is properly executed; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED, That City Council appropriates $190,000 from the Community Preservation Act Budgeted Reserve (#2344930-359930) for the Beaver Brook/Broad Brook Land Acquisition to preserve the parcel as permanent Conservation Commission managed open space, consistent with Article 97 of the amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution and the Community Preservation Act. Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Look Park – Recreation Design Amount of funding requested: $75,000 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $75,000 Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):_______________ Disbursement Schedule: five payments on schedule to be determined Summary reasons for recommendation :  Contributes to the preservation of Northampton’s unique character; enhances quality of life for its residents.  Supports multiple active and passive recreation uses  Leverages funds effectively Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:  Assurance from National Guard that they will donate the dredging of the pond  Assurance that funds have been allocated for the dredging  The Look Memorial Park Trustees shall advertise and hold a public meeting to provide the public with an opportunity to comment and discuss proposed use of funds prior to the Trustees making decisions on physical improvements funded or designed with CPA funds Additional comments from committee :  Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) November 19, 2009 Upon the recommendation of the Mayor Mary Clare Higgins and the Community Preservation Committee WHEREAS, designing recreation improvements at Look Memorial Park contributes to the preservation of Northampton’s unique character and enhances quality of life for its residents; and WHEREAS, Look Park recreation design supports multiple active and passive recreation uses; and WHEREAS, Look Park recreation design leverages community preservation funds effectively; and WHEREAS, the final contract for such funds will include conditions to ensure the project is properly executed; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED, That City Council appropriates $75,000 from the Community Preservation Act Budgeted Reserve (#2344930-359930) for the Look Park Recreation Design to design recreation improvements at Look Park. Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Habitat for Humanity – Garfield Avenue 2 Amount of funding requested: $180,000 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $180,000 Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):$60,000 per year for three years Disbursement Schedule: Annual payment starting 2010 Summary reasons for recommendation :  Creates community housing  Encourages use by diverse populations  Places high value on sustainable, ecologically responsible construction  Widely supported by community  Leverages funds effectively  Serves educational purpose in partnering with Smith Vocational High School Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:  Yearly progress reports  Sources of funds: Additional comments from committee :   Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Affordable Housing Reserve (#2344930-359933)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) November 19, 2009 Upon the recommendation of the Mayor Mary Clare Higgins and the Community Preservation Committee WHEREAS, the Garfield Avenue Habitat for Humanity housing creates community housing and encourages use by diverse populations; and WHEREAS, the Garfield Avenue housing places high value on sustainable, ecologically responsible construction; and WHEREAS, the Garfield Avenue housing is widely supported by community; and WHEREAS, the Garfield Avenue housing leverages funds effectively; and WHEREAS, the Garfield Avenue housing serves educational purpose in partnering with Smith Vocational High School; and WHEREAS, the final contract for such funds will include conditions to ensure the project is properly executed; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED, That City Council appropriates $60,000 from the Community Preservation Act Budgeted Reserve (#2344930-359930) for Garfield Avenue Habitat for Humanity housing. Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Northampton Community & Economic Development – Grove Street Inn Amount of funding requested: $120,000 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $36,950_________ Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):_______________ Disbursement Schedule: _Payable upon receipt of invoice_ Summary reasons for recommendation :  Provides housing for very low income residents  Supported by the Plan to End Homelessness  Receives broad community support  Provides housing that is harmonious with surrounding community  Demonstrates urgent need Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:  The use of these funds shall be limited to three bathrooms, storm windows, and pantry renovation Additional comments from committee :  Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Affordable Housing Reserve (#2344930-359933)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) November 19, 2009 Upon the recommendation of the Mayor Mary Clare Higgins and the Community Preservation Committee WHEREAS, the Grove Street Inn rehabilitation provides housing for very low income residents and is supported by the Plan to End Homelessness; and WHEREAS, the Grove Street Inn receives broad community support; and WHEREAS, the Grove Street Inn provides housing that is harmonious with surrounding community and demonstrates urgent need; WHEREAS, the final contract for such funds will include conditions to ensure the project is properly executed; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED, That City Council appropriates $36,950 from the Community Preservation Act Budgeted Reserve (#2344930-359930) for the Grove Street Inn Rehabilitation. Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Academy of Music – Academy Restoration Amount of funding requested: $525,125 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $210,000 Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):_______________ Disbursement Schedule: __Payable upon receipt of invoice and sign-off by project clerk Summary reasons for recommendation :  Historically significant structure located in center of city  In urgent need of preservation  Serves a broad public purpose  Boosts vitality of community  Project supported by public and by city boards Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:  Demonstrate financial soundness of institution  Present a plan for ongoing maintenance of building Source(s) of funds : CPC Historic Reserve Account (#…) Additional comments from committee :  Consider bonding for $500,000 for this project  Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Historic Preservation Reserve (#2344930-359932)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) November 19, 2009 Upon the recommendation of the Mayor Mary Clare Higgins and the Community Preservation Committee WHEREAS, the Academy of Music Restoration restores one of the most historically significant structures in center of city which is in urgent need of preservation; and WHEREAS, the Academy of Music Restoration serves a broad public purpose and boosts the vitality of community; and WHEREAS, the Academy of Music Restoration is supported by public and by city boards; WHEREAS, the final contract for such funds will include conditions to ensure the project is properly executed; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED, That City Council appropriates $210,000 from the Community Preservation Act Budgeted Reserve (#2344930-359930) for the Academy of Music Restoration. Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Northampton Conservation Commission – Barrett Street Marsh Amount of funding requested: $5,000 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $5,000__________ Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):_______________ Disbursement Schedule: __Payable upon receipt of invoice_ Summary reasons for recommendation :  Saves resources that would otherwise be threatened  Can be implemented expeditiously and within budget  Preserves surface water resources Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:   Additional comments from committee :   Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Open Space Reserve (#2344930- 359931)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) November 19, 2009 Upon the recommendation of the Mayor Mary Clare Higgins and the Community Preservation Committee WHEREAS, Barrett Street Marsh Beaver Preservation saves wildlife resources and habitat that would otherwise be threatened and preserves surface water resources; and WHEREAS, Barrett Street Marsh Beaver Preservation can be implemented expeditiously and within budget; and WHEREAS, the final contract for such funds will include conditions to ensure the project is properly executed; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED, That City Council appropriates $5,000 from the Community Preservation Act Budgeted Reserve (#2344930-359930) for Barrett Street Beaver Preservation. Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Northampton Conservation Commission – Conservation Fund 3 Amount of funding requested: $150,000 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $10,000___ Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):_______________ Disbursement Schedule: __Payable upon receipt of invoice Summary reasons for recommendation :  Enables the acquisition of high priority open space parcels under time-sensitive circumstances  Saves resources that would otherwise be threatened  May leverage additional public and/or private funds  Contributes to the broad community goal of open space preservation Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:  Allocation to be used for soft costs, hard costs under $20,000, and hard costs over $20,000 with approval of CPC.  Annual reporting of expenditures Additional comments from committee :   Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Open Space Reserve (#2344930- 359931)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) November 19, 2009 Upon the recommendation of the Mayor Mary Clare Higgins and the Community Preservation Committee WHEREAS, the Northampton Conservation Commission Conservation Fund enables the acquisition of high priority open space parcels under time-sensitive circumstances and saves resources that would otherwise be threatened; and WHEREAS, the Conservation Fund will leverage additional public and/or private funds; and WHEREAS, the Conservation Fund contributes to the broad community goal of open space preservation; and WHEREAS, the final contract for such funds will include conditions to ensure the project is properly executed; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED, That City Council appropriates $10,000 from the Community Preservation Act Budgeted Reserve (#2344930-359930) for the Conservation Commission Conservation Fund. Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Valley CDC – Pre-development Fund 2 Amount of funding requested: $90,000 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $10,000_____ Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):_______________ Disbursement Schedule: _______________ Summary reasons for recommendation :  Enables the acquisition of high priority affordable housing projects under time- sensitive circumstances  Saves resources that would otherwise be threatened  May leverage additional public and/or private funds  Contributes to the broad community goal of affordable housing development and preservation  Receives strong support from Northampton Housing Partnership Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:  May be used only for predevelopment expenses  Annual report of use of funds  Only for parcels in Northampton Source of Funds: Additional comments from committee :   Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Affordable Housing Reserve (#2344930-359933)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) November 19, 2009 Upon the recommendation of the Mayor Mary Clare Higgins and the Community Preservation Committee WHEREAS, the Valley Community Development Corporation Predevelopment Fund enables the acquisition of high priority affordable housing projects under time-sensitive circumstances and saves resources that would otherwise be threatened; and WHEREAS, the Valley CDC Predevelopment Fund may leverage additional public and/or private funds; and WHEREAS, the Predevelopment Fund contributes to the broad community goal of affordable housing development and preservation and receives strong support from Northampton Housing Partnership; and WHEREAS, the final contract for such funds will include conditions to ensure the project is properly executed; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED, That City Council appropriates $10,000 from the Community Preservation Act Budgeted Reserve (#2344930-359930) for the Valley Community Development Corporation Predevelopment Fund . Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Valley CDC – Homeowner Sustainability Amount of funding requested: $42,446 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $37,500_____ Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):3 six month installments_ Disbursement Schedule: 3 six month installments Summary reasons for recommendation :  Provides services for underserved populations  Enhances non-profit capacity for providing housing and related services  Program endorsed by Community Preservation Coalition and by Citizens Housing and Planning Association (CHAPA)  VCDC has demonstrated excellent track record for providing these services Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:  Services for Northampton residents only Additional comments from committee :  Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Affordable Housing Reserve (#2344930-359933)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) November 19, 2009 Upon the recommendation of the Mayor Mary Clare Higgins and the Community Preservation Committee WHEREAS, Valley Community Development Corporation Homeowner Sustainability provides services for underserved populations and enhances non-profit capacity for providing housing and related services; and WHEREAS, the Homeowner Sustainability program is endorsed by Community Preservation Coalition and by Citizens Housing and Planning Association (CHAPA); and WHEREAS, the Valley CDC has demonstrated excellent track record for providing these services; and WHEREAS, the final contract for such funds will include conditions to ensure the project is properly executed; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED, That City Council appropriates $12,500 from the Community Preservation Act Budgeted Reserve (#2344930-359930) for Valley Community Development Housing Sustainability. Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Northampton DPW & Leeds Civic Association – Hotel Bridge Study Amount of funding requested: $50,000 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $0____________ Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):_______________ Disbursement Schedule: _Payable upon receipt of invoice Summary reasons for recommendation :  Serves more than one CPA program area (Historic Preservation and Recreation)  May contribute to the preservation of an historically significant resource  Contributes to the preservation of Northampton’s unique character  Receives broad support from the residents of Leeds and from the Historical Commission Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:  Appropriate RFP and budget Additional comments from committee :  This investment does nothing to protect the bridge unless the work called for by the study can be carried out. There is no plan or funding for actually repairing/preserving the bridge.  Question of whether this project needs to go forward now or whether it might wait. Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Historic Preservation Reserve (#2344930-359932)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Resurrection Life Ministries – Hospital Hill Chapel Amount of funding requested: $575,245 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $26,475 Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):_______________ Disbursement Schedule: _______________ Summary reasons for recommendation :  Protect the most sensitive part of the building envelope, the roof Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:  Replace the roof  Additional comments from committee :  Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Historic Preservation Reserve (#2344930-359932)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) November 19, 2009 Upon the recommendation of the Mayor Mary Clare Higgins and the Community Preservation Committee WHEREAS, Resurrection Life Ministries – Hospital Hill Chapel WHEREAS, the final contract for such funds will include conditions to ensure the project is properly executed; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED, That City Council appropriates $26,475 from the Community Preservation Act Budgeted Reserve (#2344930-359930) for the Resurrection Life Ministries – Hospital Hill Chapel. Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Friends of the Upper Reservoir – Chesterfield Road Dam Amount of funding requested: $200,000 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $0_____________ Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):_______________ Disbursement Schedule: _______________ Summary reasons for recommendation :  Applicant asked to defer consideration to the spring round. CPC is allowing applicant to withdraw the application (CPC does not allow deferring for any application). Applicant should reapply if they want to be considered in the next round (but does not need to go back through the eligibility round). Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:  Additional comments from committee :  Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Historic Preservation Reserve (#2344930-359932)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Childs Park – North Pond Amount of funding requested: $6,650 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $0 Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):_______________ Disbursement Schedule: _______________ Summary reasons for recommendation :  Small project with small cost Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation  Additional comments from committee :  Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Open Space Reserve (#2344930- 359931)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Masonic Health Systems of Massachusetts – Overlook at Northampton Amount of funding requested: $250,000 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $0_____________ Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):_______________ Disbursement Schedule: _______________ Summary reasons for recommendation :   Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:   Additional comments from committee :   Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Affordable Housing reserve (#2344930-359933)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930) Community Preservation Committee Recommendation for Funding Date: November 18, 2009 Applicant: Costello, Richard – Dorsey-Jones House Amount of funding requested: $100,000 Amount of funding recommended by CPC: $0_______________ Time-frame of funding recommended (if not asap):_______________ Disbursement Schedule: _______________ Summary reasons for recommendation :   Conditions/contingencies attached to recommendation:   Additional comments from committee :   Funding Source :  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Historic Preservation Reserve (#2344930-359932)  Specifically, $… is appropriated from the CPA Budgeted Reserve (#2344930- 359930)