10D-046 Country Club Cookes DAM inspection 135 Main St LeedsCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
_ - W EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
wM 5• P.O. BOX 173, OLD COMMON RD., LANCASTER, MA 01523 PHONE �$ - -7716
FAX 792 -7718
NOTICE OF INSPECTION
Argeo Paul Cellucci Aug ust 2 7
GOVERNOR g , 1998
Trudy Coxe Look Memorial Park Association
SECRETARY 306 North Main St.
Northampton, MA 01060
Peter C. Webber
COMMISSIONER
Dear Sirs:
1
�S�' "Y
�AL MAN��
The Department of Environmental Management, Office of Dam
Safety performed a visual inspection on the Country Club Dam,
in Northamapton, as prescribed by the established Rules and
Regulations adopted under M.G.L. Chapter 253, S. 44 - 50.
our inspection Summary and Recommendations are attached for
your information as the record owner of this dam. While your
dam appears to generally be in good condition and without
significant deficiencies, operation and /or maintenance items
listed in the attached report should be attended to at your
earliest opportunity.
We will periodically reinspect the site according to the
frequency established by regulation to insure the structure
and its appurtenances are maintained in good condition.
No specific response is required to this Notice. However, if
you have any questions, please contact the Office of Dam
Safety.
Thank you for your cooperation.
. _,��ILIR. �����•1il(
R. David Clark, Acting Director
Office of Dam Safety
2A
printed on recycled paper
NIE-771
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PREFACE
i
I. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
1.1 General
1
1.2 Description of Project
1
— 1.3 Engineering Data
3
— II. VISUAL INSPECTION
4
2.1 General
4
_. 2.2 Operation and Maintenance
5
2.3 Hydraulic /Hydrologic Evaluation
6
III. ASSESSMENTS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND REMEDIAL MEASURES
7
— 3.1 Assessments
7
3.2 Recommendations
7
3.3 Remedial Measures
7
— 3.4 Alternatives
g
3.5 Cost for Recommended Repairs
g
— REFERENCES
g
'— APPENDIX A - Drawings
APPENDIX B - Photograph Location Plan and Photographs
APPENDIX C - Hydrologic Data and Computations
APPENDIX D - Visual Inspection Checklist
a.
No
I. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
1.1 General
A. Authority
The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management (DEM) contracted Haley
& Aldrich, Inc. to perform inspections and develop reports for a number of dams within
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The inspection report for the Country Club Dam
was conducted in accordance with that contract and also under the Authority of Chapter
253, Sections 44 -50 of the Massachusetts General Law.
B. Purpose of Work
The purpose of this investigation is to inspect and evaluate the present condition of the
dam and appurtenant structures. More specifically, it is to compare the existing
structural and hydraulic conditions of the dam to the conditions reported during previous
inspections, and to re- evaluate hazard and size classifications as they relate to present
Massachusetts 302 CMR 10.00 Dam Safety Rules and Regulations. DEM will use this
report to determine which owners have undertaken remedial action since the last
inspection and to determine if conditions have worsened since the last inspection.
C. Scope
The investigation is divided into four parts: 1) obtain and review readily available
_ reports, investigations, and data pertaining to the dam and appurtenant structures;
2) perform a visual inspection of the site; 3) evaluate the status, and need for an
emergency action plan for the site; 4) prepare and submit a final report presenting the
evaluation of the retention structure, including recommendations, remedial actions and
associated costs.
'— 1.2 Description of Project
A. Location
The Country Club Dam, also known as Cooke's Dam, consists of two curved stone
masonry spillways located in Northampton, Massachusetts. The dam creates an
impoundment of the Mill River north of the village of Florence. A general location of
r
the dam is shown on Figure 1 in Appendix A. The U.S.G.S. reference coordinates for
`� the dam are N42 ° 20.9' and W72 ° 42.1'.
low
B. Ownership and Purpose of the Dam
The owner's address and telephone number are given below:
Look Memorial Park Association
300 North Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060
(413) 584 -5457
The dam was formerly used for power generation. However, the penstock has been
sealed, and the former powerhouse is no longer present. The current purpose of the
dam is for recreational purposes.
C. Description of the Dam and Appurtenances
Country Club Dam is a run -of- the -river dam consisting of two curved cut stone masonry
spillways separated by a large bedrock outcrop in the middle of the river. The main
spillway is located on the left side of the bedrock outcrop, and the secondary spillway is
located on the right side. The main spillway is approximately 69 ft. long and 32 ft. high;
_ the secondary spillway is approximately 30 ft. long and 9 ft. high. Crest widths for the
main and secondary dams are 5'/2 and 4'/2 ft., respectively. Both spillways contain 2 ft.
square sluiceways located near the center, which outlet several feet above the riverbed.
A sketch of the plan layout of the dam is included herewith as Figure 2, Appendix A.
A bridge is present immediately downstream of each spillway. The bridge spans both
spillway discharge channels, and is supported on concrete and /or stone masonry walls
constructed on bedrock. The 1994 date inscribed on each end of the bridge indicates that
it was recently reconstructed. Bedrock is exposed within the river channels downstream
of both spillways.
D. Normal Operational Procedure
.� No normal operating procedures are in place for the Country Club Dam. Both sluiceways
have been reportedly sealed and are no longer operable.
E. DEM Size Classification
The dam has a maximum structural height of the 32 ft. and a maximum storage volume
of 110 acre -ft. Based on this information and according to DEM criteria contained in
302 CMR 10.00, this is considered an INTERMEDIATE sized dam.
•. 2
r
F. DEM Hazard Classification
No
A roadway bridge is present immediately downstream of each spillway. The
Northampton Country Club and Look Memorial Park are both located further
downstream along the banks of the Mill River. The downstream area is also used for
agricultural purposes. Results of the dam break analysis of the 1987 Inspection/Evaluation
Report indicate that depth of flooding in the Mill River range from about 9 ft immediately
downgradient of the dam to 5.5 ft at a point near Meadow Street in the village of Florence.
From the 1987 dam break analysis, it appears that failure of Country Club Dam will
seriously compromise the facilities of the Northampton Country Club and Look Memorial
Park. In the event of a dam failure, property damage could result, and may cause loss of
life. Based on the Hazard Potential Classification Table presented in 302 CMR 10.00,
this dam is considered a SIGNIFICANT hazard structure.
_ 1.3 Engineering Data
A. Design and Construction Records
There is no readily available information concerning the original construction of the dam
or its history. Some engineering data was available from prior inspection reports.
B. Drainage Area
Approximately 50 square miles of generally mountainous rural lands.
C. Reservoir Area
The reservoir area is approximately 3 acres.
D. Storage
Country Club Dam is a run -of -the -river dam having a storage capacity at normal pool
and maximum pool of approximately 110 acre -ft.
—
E. Elevations
All elevations are based on National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). The top of the
dam is approximately El. 307.5. The normal water surface is about El. 307.7.
F. Post - Construction Changes
There is no information on post - construction changes.
3
r..
No
II. VISUAL INSPECTION
2.1 General
On 20 March 1998, Haley & Aldrich, Inc. completed a visual inspection of Country
Club Dam. Reservoir level at the time of the site visit was El. 308.7, about 12 inches
above normal pool. Based on that inspection, the embankment, spillway and
appurtenances were found to be in fair condition. A copy of the DEM Inspection
Checklist with observations and comments from the inspection on 20 March 1998 is
included in Appendix D of this report. Selected photographs of the dam and appurtenant
structures and a photograph location plan are included in Appendix B.
A. Dam /Spillway
Country Club Dam consists of two curved cut stone masonry spillways separated by a
_ large bedrock outcrop in the middle of the river. As in the July 1987 DEM
Inspection/Evaluation Report (4), no seepage was observed at the right or central
abutment -dam contact areas. The July 1987 report indicated that seepage was occurring
through the stone masonry at the left abutment of the main spillway. Due to the
presence of a new chain link fence on the bridge and the high flow conditions, we could
not verify whether this issue had been addressed. However, the presence of open joints
_ on the upstream side of the masonry wall suggest that continued water flow through the
wall is still occurring. Brush was growing out of several of these joints and from joints
adjacent to the secondary spillway.
At the time of the inspection, water was flowing over both spillways. No unusual
movement was observed in the visible portions of the spillway channel. The approach
area of both spillways was clear of debris.
—
B. Appurtenant Structures
Each spillway contains a sluiceway reported to be 2 ft. by 2 ft. in dimension. Both
sluiceways could not be observed during the 20 March 1998 site visit and are reportedly
inoperable.
—
A penstock, which was earlier used in power generation and subsequently sealed, is
located approximately 50 ft. left of the main spillway abutment. A minor amount of
leakage (' /s gpm) was measured flowing from the outlet of the sealed penstock on the
downstream side of the roadway on the left side.
C. Downstream Area
The discharge channels of the two spillways meet downstream of the bridges to form the
river channel. Both discharge channels have rock bottoms and are in good condition.
4
L�
D. Evaluation of Observations
No
This assessment of the Country Club Dam is based on a review of the referenced
previous inspection reports and a site visit made on 20 March 1998. Information
aw developed for this evaluation is considered adequate to assess current conditions of the
dam.
The following conditions were identified during the inspection:
Open joints were observed in the masonry block wall on the upstream left side
of the main spillway. Brush was growing out of several of these joints.
El A minor amount of leakage C/e gal /min) was measured flowing from the outlet
of the sealed penstock on the downstream side of the roadway on the left side.
Seepage through the stone masonry at the left abutment of the main spillway.
El Although a new fence was established on the bridge, there are no fences or other
security measures at the abutment areas of the dam to prevent unauthorized
access.
El The sluice gates on each dam are inoperable, and should be repaired so that the
impoundment can be lowered.
2.2 Operation and Maintenance
A. General
Mr. Brian Elliot, Superintendent of the Look Memorial Park Association, was
interviewed concerning the operation and maintenance of the dam. The following is a
summary of the interview.
Country Club Dam was purchased by the Association to obtain additional land along the
Mill River. The dam has no direct use by the Association but is frequented by fishermen
and other recreational users. There are no normal operating procedures in place for the
dam. Both sluiceways are sealed and no longer operable.
The dam is maintained by personnel of the Look Memorial Park Association. The
facility is visited semi - annually, and every few years brush and debris are removed from
areas downstream of the dam. The Association plans on removing brush and
performing other maintenance items this fall. In addition, the Association monitors the
leakage from the downstream end of the penstock, as recommended in previous
inspection reports.
E
ft—
Um
B. Emergency Action Plan
..
There is no written Emergency Action Plan for the Country Club Dam.
aw C. Evaluation of Operation and Maintenance
The operation and maintenance procedures for the Country Club Dam are considered
fair. The dam is visited periodically by personnel of the Look Memorial Park
Association and general maintenance of the downstream area is performed every few
years. However, it is recommended that a formal maintenance program which includes
maintenance of the dam and the downstream area be implemented on an annual basis. In
addition, an Emergency Action Plan should be prepared to alert downstream residents in
case of an emergency. The plan should be filed with local officials.
2.3 Hydraulic /Hydrologic Evaluation
A. General
Based on the DEM size and hazard classification system, the selected test flood for the
Country Club Dam is the 100 -yr. storm. This is the same test flood that was used to
determine the overtopping potential in the 1987 DEM Inspection/Evaluation Report (4).
_ Based on the 1987 analyses, the 100 -yr. storm inflow to Country Club Reservoir is 6180
cfs. The peak, 100 -yr. storm outflow is also 6180 cfs, which corresponds to a reservoir
stage of about El. 314.5.
~" As the test flood for the 1987 report is still applicable for the 1998 inspection, reanalysis
was not performed. However, the calculations were reviewed and determined to be
applicable. For reference, copies of the calculations are included in Appendix C.
B. Overtopping Potential
The maximum surface water elevation in the reservoir during the test flood is El. 314.5,
which is about 4.2 ft. below the lowest elevation of the roadway bridge located immediately
downstream of the dam. Therefore, it is concluded that the combined spillway capacity is
sufficient to prevent overtopping of the roadway bridges under test flood conditions.
ft—
G
ft-
VW
MW 111. ASSESSMENTS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND REMEDIAL MEASURES
3.1 Assessments
Country Club Dam was found to be in fair condition. The dam, however, does have operational
issues that need to be addressed. The sluice gates on each dam are inoperable, and should be
repaired so that the impoundment can be lowered. The seepage through the stone masonry at the
left abutment of the main spillway, as noted in the 1987 report, should be investigated.
3.2 Recommendations
In addition to the remedial measures listed in Section 3.3 of this report, it is recommended that
the owner continue to monitor the leakage from the downstream end of the penstock. The results
should be documented on a quarterly basis. Any increase in the rate of flow should be reported
s
immediately to the DEM, Office of Dam Safety.
3.3 Remedial Measures
The remedial measures below are broken into two categories. The first category will require the
owner to hire a qualified engineer to prepare documents prior to implementing the remedial
measures. The second category can, if desired, be undertaken by the owner without the
assistance of an engineer. This work may require state, local or government permits that should
be investigated prior to starting work.
Remedial measures requiring assistance from a qualified engineer:
The control mechanisms for the sluice gates on each spillway should be repaired, or plans
should be made to install new outlet works, so that the impoundment can be lowered.
Open joints were observed in the masonry block wall on the upstream left side of the
main spillway, and leakage through the open joints is probably occurring. Joints in all of
the masonry block walls should be repointed.
An operations and maintenance plan should be established for the dam.
An emergency action plan (EAP) should be established and implemented to alert
downstream residences in case of an emergency.
Remedial measures that can be undertaken by the owner:
Protective fencing should be established at each abutment to prevent unauthorized
access.
VW
7
13 Brush growing out of the joints should be removed.
ME
3.4 Alternatives
No feasible alternatives exist for this site.
3.5 Cost For Recommended Repairs
— The costs given below are broken into the same categories used for the remedial measures shown
above. Please note that the construction costs, including estimated labor and material costs, are
based on limited investigations and are provided for general information only.
Actual
construction costs will vary.
Remedial measures requiring assistance from a qualified engineer:
REMEDIAL MEASURE. APPROXIMATE COST
— - Repair control mechanisms for each sluiceway
$30,000
- Repoint masonry joints
$5,000
- Prepare Operations and Maintenance Plan
$6,000
- Develop Emergency Action Plan
$6,500
Subtotal
47
$47,500
Engineering and Construction Contingencies (20 %)
..
, 500
Total
$57,000
Remedial measures that can be undertaken by the owner:
REMEDIAL MEASURE APPROXIMATE COST
- Remove brush
$500
- Install fence
$3,000
Subtotal
$3,500
Contingencies (20 %)
$500
Total
$4,000
Total estimated repair cost for Country Club Dam is approximately $61,000.
—
—
0
r
REFERENCES
1. "Inspection Report - Dams and Reservoirs," R. C. Salls, P. E., 11 September 1974.
2. Letter from Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Department of Environmental
Quality Engineering, Division of Waterways to Look Park Associates, dated 8 March
1977, and attached "Inspection Report - Dams and Reservoirs," Harold T. Shumway,
15 September 1976.
3. "Inspection Report - Dams and Reservoirs," D.C.Thoen, 15 May 1984.
s
4. Department of Environmental Management, Office of Dam Safety, "Municipally
Owned Dam Inspection / Evaluation Report," prepared by Keyes Associates, dated 21
�. July 1987.
6
ft—
3
St Marys
u
rck
San 1'
U k' Cern
6 �
�U ��- _ � ' f — BRes v :� °1' � —� _ � _� X1 48.>�,1 j' /�% �''11' I ' •
404.�
�j
1 1� 1,' � -, �=�� ^Rp ',,\ / ' r, ' .��' •_��• /''• r � � I � � \ Il �,' .
I '�� \ \ \. \\ .. G � o i• . Oo J " �• I w ./ � t UU VA
1�1\ •` \\ \� I � �,) ✓ .��U�` :1�' /��\ I I� ,C` 1`�U )� n �� \\\ \� 1 � �,; / /
J Iili iIII ,'I � �iJ� 7j.
L02 / \ I .'I: �,'� IRe °° ° Po / � ! •'a
E
I / UV I �/ i r '� 1 r, - < /1�.�- VA HQU
,1 / �j� ' /� ,✓ / .� ((, �'J �I � Il���lllr /i: �_�'c' --- _- -•� `� I ",��`�� i+; li'i'\ ;I� /�Sprr
SI
I r��j(r /( �' �'-`i / / ��� v' � �I) I I St3.': ° nLit,anrQtOn �\ U, ^� � •r � L r
.... I lij�'� !b /� r // �Q- \� U ' Il 'i' ountry CIu6� � \` i "fir \ � ''I L
Sex-
LOOk
-7 MEMORIAL
H PARK
1/,13M 788 --Gral*l ✓ s J /� r, i �U��� —� � UU�1(� _ _ U u\ • �Il, U_� _ �: �1\ �
x P"l
jto "I \j
%
Ro
Meado
in
fff I
-Y
V
P4 t —oo
k'
•\ �l II � -�,:: �/ C \ \\ �� .._ ar §i¢C8 =" iii �`
� i(�,I l,l� /''o � %i.�,, \ I I o ' � o � �-.����"�_`�: � .I.
I . ,. ICU - -� �.1- ., l� �� I 0 U , . \ JJ, � A'.
e
L IdWyl-_ i
b
U(
\ \ U / � � l ,o O '' o U�a (/ .,: _ 'r� ,r ms s.
s ,\\ • (� \��/ / U U � ��-- r u
U`�. ( \�a /I��U/1 i 1 ?UUI(! //_ �(V) A INN'- UU' :;. I! L
SITE COORDINATES. 42 72'42'06'W DEW DAM INSPECTIONS
COUNTRY CLUB DAM
NORTH HAMPTON. MASSACHUSETTS
N
%J PROJECT LOCUS
UNDOMMOUND
ENVOWN
04 U.S.C.S. QUADRANGLE: EASTHAMPTON, MA SoLunom UENTAL
APPROXIMATE SCAM 125,000 JUNE 1998
FIGURE I
um
a..
w
V
� T
O
w O
w
O
N
T
J
-N- J
Q
w Z
Z
C) U)
F- Q
U) m
Q
3
J
J_
w
O>-
U) Z
z
Z
c U)
\
a
r
W }
zQ
03
J
U) 0
c
t
t
L
c
J J
3 3
W W
U U
I O O
Q
3
Q
O
w
c9
0
m
0
z
Z Y
LLJ C)
� O
I z
L LJa
wLL-
U) O
I
J
3
z
z
Q
W
?I,7dI?I 77IW
LLJ
Q
3 0
o w
il J
c 'N
W
W
z cc
LL
N
2
N
O N
W O �
2V
}� Z W
o a
J o
o � = a. _
o?Z,
UZO
MZ
gwz.
PA
W r
a �
Z N Z
Q - 7
a
N
Q = Y X
W
00mz
rn 0 O
w M 0
>
o
y.
Wwa
3 ww
zW
t
z F Q Q
�QCJCJ
N Z a N m
N 7
°zac
0
to.
hu
WAW
r..
I-
W
Z <
O 3
F- J
J
} U) U LLJ
} 5
i
i
t
i
c
S
co
T
O
w O
w
., O
N
T
W
_U
J W
CD p UffAIU 77IN
m
lye \
3 p
p W
¢ J
O
D!
W
m
c %.0
z W
J z cc
IL
z (�
O
U.
U
N
z
'^ W
U
F d
w
N=, 2 Q
?� O
a .
MD 0
o v zz _ ~
a z
ZW
K K Z Z
�U .
H
W r
0
z'" z
¢- D
a
¢
Z
¢¢w
Z Y W
Z Y
-N- Q
d
0 0) W O
d O
3
o
F-
Q00
w J�
>� a�W0l
prn
}
J
W r
¢
Q d z Z
3
W
Wz
�¢
W
Ja
ZU)
Z
0zFa¢
IiQUV�
ww
U)
q
¢ �-
o ?¢U
to 0
3
3
LLJ
F-
w
W
U
U
i
O
Z
O
J
I Q
3
c9
z
Q
Q
Z
J
�
W
O
D'
}
z
U) Z
Z O
W
Z <
O 3
F- J
J
} U) U LLJ
} 5
i
i
t
i
c
S
co
T
O
w O
w
., O
N
T
W
_U
J W
CD p UffAIU 77IN
m
lye \
3 p
p W
¢ J
O
D!
W
m
c %.0
z W
J z cc
IL
z (�
O
U.
U
N
z
'^ W
U
F d
w
N=, 2 Q
?� O
a .
MD 0
o v zz _ ~
a z
ZW
K K Z Z
�U .
H
W r
z'" z
¢- D
a
¢
aNWL)
¢¢w
Z Y W
�
O
r, m Z
d
0 0) W O
O
o
0Jaa
Ws
Q00
w J�
>� a�W0l
prn
WW 04 w 0
~
w
J
W r
¢
Q d z Z
3
_
Q
�¢
r
Z
0zFa¢
IiQUV�
aY
a¢
1 - W O m
NZNN]
q
¢ �-
o ?¢U
w4 N
.�,Ei Pi fi
Z. �D /GS - SCS ,S�iG c�4C�:%� =' ramie ff.�/17 � . •, l e - ew c.✓��
6AI 60000.1 7tJ
-��`�/ Ql�� /�i •5, t ✓�oC �JL Gt�lGj,� - � ✓�/�7� r ti' / �, .� y Y...,
L'� _ �j / 6 � - Z � Lim ✓rs
7
14-
ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING PLANNING
Providence, RI 02903
Waltham, MA 02154
Wethersfield, CT 06109 pie °/
$ ublect ....... .....�� ................... ................
:-
............................
Computation .. - h--- -- G !.
�/ `1GZC.d(/� G5
..................... .....................
t a i :.'� .. ........................Checked
Computed by ............... ... ..
by........ ..... .....- ...-
te ........... S-
..................... Date............... �..........-......... ...............................
.�,Ei Pi fi
Z. �D /GS - SCS ,S�iG c�4C�:%� =' ramie ff.�/17 � . •, l e - ew c.✓��
6AI 60000.1 7tJ
-��`�/ Ql�� /�i •5, t ✓�oC �JL Gt�lGj,� - � ✓�/�7� r ti' / �, .� y Y...,
L'� _ �j / 6 � - Z � Lim ✓rs
7
14-
`ow KEYES ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING PLANNING
i Providence, RI 02903 Wahham, MA 02154 Wethersfield. CT 06109 Page......................
C ;�....CG B......- ?
Subject . .. � .......... .............................I. ............................. ............... ......................................................................................................
.� Computation_........ �y�2�� Gam � ............. y.,/4''. _ _
..... ... � .............................................................. ...............................
Computed by.........�!/ - e( �/ .....Checked by... ... ............................... ....Date....................:.. 7
---- �•-- -- 'ST'S'? ?� � .Sh7G.?�.�- �2!.,SZ".�s!%
307
,ez.E (% / / G��t�,�-
Tt3T�16
Z �O
D
d
ea¢
O
94
3 Off. 5
e57
7Z3
/70
S /G All " - IG
t 7Ler- ; pwys E
-}
�25Ep �.✓ Go6
��J �� � rs .s � uS c,� S .s7,�,�i.-r 6� cxr,
�
Oh/ /N /G G ,C:/dc t�
(.� T �1'1l �) � �/�7/ S�
/�,�c7 �.tJf/�✓QC„� - �/S �e5'
08 74�1
x
ZS-
4 0)
S ¢ X330
s
• ; �Z
s¢ 0
,�• = S8 ¢c� pis
10.30 .,
1�
KEYES ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTURE
ti ENGINEERING PLANNING 3
Providence, RI 02903 WakhsM MA 02154 Wethersfield, CT 06109 Pale
Subject .................... .......CG.`... . ........b..!.!:...................I ....................
Computation ........... .................................. ............................... ...............
Computed by.....Yt�"tl .................. ........................Checked by ......� .. Date ........G '.. �' 7
......................... ....................... ...............................
}�E,2�= �> S�•c/s� TI ✓er
�
✓ic1Lv�S
70 hrs
/8 7 .38' cFs
Z 5�:; 2. ¢
97o
55 3, o
3v 7
5
7-S sO
_
5 3 , 0
6� 80 .�.,�.��
,�,✓
r
, v4x y 31¢- 5
:5,Y 4,
6t?PQ2
GS /° /vll/'rwe /y G a 4PS717/,t
i"I /G C iQ /l/E2 >��1J /H /N /M,�t c tG D��'
a A �•1 / /DE FLOOo�G,a �/
Gd /Ti3/
a
SF(/4 41 GPvssi.��5 i•✓
L'<<.�e�u ,
�
�/S Ccs✓9JZOC s /!� 1' �,¢vr✓�,E S /6vc // F cw✓r /.. :. .siiC.v it/ /c c
r
N
( - !v/orre = 7&7 C¢�
x_r
Ss
_
C3J
4/G
- a L 2 17
Coe
z�,
KEM ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING PLANNING
Providence, RI 02903 Waltham, MA 02154 Wethersfield, CT 06109 Page .......... ...............
Subject ................... ...... IC- j�� ........ ?�� ................. .. .. ....... ........... ......................................................................................................
Computation ................... /,V .... 4 - ........ /.�/ .............................................................................................................................................................................................
Computed by .......... ?� ............................. Che&ed by ...... ................ .............. Date .......... :.
_g -2
eLTLC>-_� _AL2_,
Z A
IM -
4
a&O
210
OA5
& -SO
Z7(:)
,61(v
M
630
Z75
1"
z R�
e 4- 1 o
3a a
27S- zrao
/F&O , r7 -
9-77-,?70 ::V. 00 37
�o
/5 /mil -=
_g -2
eLTLC>-_� _AL2_,
Z A
IM -
4
a&O
210
24-0
& -SO
z - 3 8
76
03S
?2c)
235
I I CIQ
e 4- 1 o
24b0
27S- zrao
3230
6100
�o
/5 /mil -=
7
AF4e
7P, FO
2 2 66 0.
3 z 40, 4S
?Zia
5-
704c
24b0
Z7a
3230
X:
1730 -7
00 //73
7
AF4e
7P, FO
2 2 66 0.
3 z 40, 4S
?Zia
5-
704c
FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE HEC -1 (IBM XT 512K VERSION) -FED 1,1985
U.S. ARTY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THE HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER, 609 SECOND STREET, DAVIS, CA. 95616
+ +44
1
THIS HEC -1 VERSION CONTAINS ALL OPTIONS EXCEPT ECONOMICS, AND
THE NUMBER OF
PLANS ARE
REDUCED TO 3
1
NEC -1 INPUT
PAGE 1
LINE
ID
....... I
....... 2 ....... 3 ....... 4 ....... 5 ....... 6 .......
7
....... 8
....... 9 ......
10
I
ID
INSPECTION OF MUNICIPAL DAMS FOR MASS. DEN
2
ID
KEYES ASSOCIATES JOB NO. S 8704.02
3
ID
COUNTRY CLUB DAM, NORTHAMPTON, MA. 42 -8- 214
-18
4
ID
DAM BREAK ANALYSIS 24 HOUR 100 YEAR FLOOD
5
IT
6
IJAN87 0000 192 3JAN87 0000
-�+-
6
IO
4
7
JP
1
8
KK
BASIN
COMPUTE DESIGN STORM FOR ENTIRE WATERSHED
9
KO
3
_
10
BA
49.8
11
KM
24 -HOUR 100 -YEAR STORM DATA
-�`
12
IN
30
IJAN87 0000
13
PB
-
14
P1
.026
.0325 .0325 .033 .033 .039
.039
.039
.046
.039
15
PI
.052
.046 .059 .052 .065 .098
.098
.11
.12
.14
16
PI
.16
.21 .29 .83 1.78 .35
.234
.176
.149
.13
_
17
PI
.12
.104 .098 .078 .059 .052
.052
.045
.045
.045
18
PI
.039
.039 .039 .032 .039 .032
.032
.032
19
LS
50
20
UD
3.0
21
KK
DAM
COUNTRY CLUB DAM FLOOD ROUTING DATA
22
KO
I
23
KP
I
24
RS
I
ELEV 307.5
25
SV
0
90 110.5 115 121 128
137
146
150
155
26
SV
160
164 170
27
SB
0
0 0 257 723 1338
2096
3089
3737
4460
29
S9
5256
6128 7490
29
SE
280
304 307.5 308.5 309.5 310.5
311.5
312.5
313
313.5
-
30
SE
314
314.5 315.5
31
ST
307.5
70 0 1.5
32
SB
277
66 0 0.5 314
-
33
KK
RCHI
-'*
34
KO
3
35
KM
FIRST D/S CHANNEL X- SECTION
36
RS
i
FLOW 25
37
RC
0.08
0.045 0.08 i88o .0037
38
RX
0
280 520 540 610 630
1430
2190
_
39
RY
300
290 275 270 270 275
280
300
40
KK
RCH2
hi
vn
14
42
KM
SECOND D/S CHANNEL X- SECTION
IPRNT 4
PRINT CONTROL
43
RS
1
FLOW
25
IT
HYDROGRAPH TIME DATA
44
RC
0.08
0.045
0.08 1730 .0116
STARTING DATE
ITIME 0000
45
RX
0
460
2150 2215 2285
2350
2460
3230
46
RY
300
270
255 250 250
255
270
300
1
ENGLISH UNITS
JP
HEC -1 INPUT
PAGE 2
LINEID
.......
I ....... 2 .......
3 ....... 4 ....... 5 .......
6 .......
7 ....... 8 ....... 9 ...... 10
47
KK
RCH3
48
KO
3
49
KM
THIRD
D/S CHANNEL X- SECTION
50
RS
I
FLOW
25
51
RC
O.OB
0.045
0.08 6100 .0025
52
RX
0
210
650 750 820
1100
2410
2750
53
RY
260
240
238 235 235
240
250
260
54
ZZ
1
{}44
FLOOD
HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE HEC -1 (IBM XT
512K
VERSION)
-FEB 1.1985
U.S.
ARMY CORPS
OF ENGINEERS,
THE HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER, 609
SECOND STREET, DAVIS, CA. 95616
4444
ERROR 40
INSPECTION OF MUNICIPAL DAMS FOR MASS. DEN
KEYES ASSOCIATES JOB NO. S 8704.02
COUNTRY CLUB DAM, NORTHAMPTON, MA. 42 -8- 214 -18
DAM BREAK ANALYSIS 24 HOUR 100 YEAR FLOOD
6 IO
OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
IPRNT 4
PRINT CONTROL
IPLOT 0
PLOT CONTROL
OSCAL 0.
HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
IT
HYDROGRAPH TIME DATA
NMIN 6
MINUTES IN COMPUTATION INTERVAL
IDATE IJAN87
STARTING DATE
ITIME 0000
STARTING TIME
NQ 300
NUMBER OF HYDROGRAPH ORDINATES
NDDATE 2JAN87
ENDING DATE
NDTIME 0554
ENDING TIME
COMPUTATION INTERVAL
.10 HOURS
TOTAL TIME BASE
29.90 HOURS
ENGLISH UNITS
JP
MULTI-PLAN OPTION
NPLAN I
NUMBER OF PLANS
JR
MULTI-RATIO OPTION
RATIOS OF RUNOFF
1.00
4i4 444 444, 444 i4i iii iii iii 444 *if 444 44i 444 444 444 444 444 444 i*i Of iii iii 444 iii 4i4 iii 144 444 iii 444 444 iii i44
iii4444444ii4i
6 K,K i BASIN
COMPUTE DESIGN STORM FOR ENTIRE WATERSHED
} }
9 KO
OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
V
IPP.NT
3 PRINT CONTROL
.>r
IrLOT
0 PLOT CONTROL
9SCAL
0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
_
24 -HOUR 100 -YEAR STORM DATA
12 IN
TIME DATA FOR
INPUT TIME SERIES
JXMIN
30 TIME INTERVAL IN MINUTES
'
JXDATE
1JAN87 STARTING DATE
.�-
JXTIME
0 STARTING TIME
SUBBASIN RUNOFF
DATA
''-
10 BA
SUBBASIN CHARACTERISTICS
TAREA
49.84 SUBBASIN AREA
rr
PRECIPITATION
DATA
'o
13 PB
STORM
6.49 BASIN TOTAL PRECIPITATION
14 PI
INCREMENTAL
PRECIPITATION PATTERN
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
-or-
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02 .02 .02 -.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02 .02 .02 .02
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03 .03 .03 .03
.04
.04
.04
.04
.04
•
.06
.06 .06 .06 .06
.17
.17
.17
.17
.17
w „
.36
.36 .36 .36 .36
.07
.07
.07
.07
.07
.05
.05 .05 .05 .05
.04
.04
.04
.04
.04
.03
.03 .03 .03 .03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.02
.02 .02 .02 .02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02 .02 .02 .02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
19 LS
SCS LOSS RATE
STRTL
2.00 INITIAL ABSTRACTION
CRVNBR
50.00 CURVE NUMBER
•
RTIMP
.00 PERCENT IMPERVIOUS AREA
20 UD
5CS DIMENSIONLESS UNITGRAPH
TLAG
3.00 LAG
UNIT
HYDROGRAPH TRUNCATED FROM 152 TO 150 INT ERVALS
UNIT HYDROGRAPH
150 END -OF- PERIOD ORDINATES
`
VOLUME = 1.00
W. 155.
?A3. 4A9. 594. 771_
998.
1231.
1464.
1763.
L
L
L
L
1
4 -.-
}i} } }} iii }i} fi} iii iii iii i}i iii w i}i iii i }} } ii iii }ii iii }i} iii ii} iii i}i iii iii }}i i}i ii} iii iii iii i}i } }}
} } } } } } } } } } } } }}
i }
21 KK } DAM i COUNTRY CLUB DAM FLOOD ROUTING DATA
i }
22 KO OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
IPRNT 1 PRINT CONTROL
IPLOT 0 PLOT CONTROL
QSCAL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
2073.
2383.
2777.
3190. 3604.
4076.
4568.
5059.
5496.
5910.
6324.
6654.
6938.
7223. 7429.
7585.
7740.
7824.
7850.
7876.
7876.
7850.
7824.
7740. 7585.
7429.
7264,
7083.
6902.
6712.
6505.
6298.
6075.
5817. 5558.
5287.
4976.
4666.
4366.
4107.
3849,
3602.
3421.
3239. 3061.
2906.
2751.
2597.
2467.
2338.
2209.
2114.
2020.
1926. 1631.
1737.
1642.
1563.
1486,
1408.
1330.
1253.
1175.
1118. 1067.
1015.
963.
911,
860.
817.
778.
739.
701.
662. 623.
590.
562.
533.
505.
477.
448.
424.
405.
385. 366.
347.
327.
310.
296.
281.
267.
253.
239.
226. 215.
205.
195.
184.
174.
164.
156.
149.
141.
133. 125.
118.
113.
107,
102.
97.
92.
87.
84.
81. 77.
74.
71.
68.
65.
62.
59.
56,
53.
50. 46.
43.
40.
38.
35.
32.
30.
27.
25.
22. 19.
17.
14.
12.
9.
6.
# }}
} }}
}ii
}ii
iii
HYDROGRAPH AT STATIGH BASIN
FOR PLAN 1, RATIO
= .00
TOTAL
RAINFALL =
6.49, TOTAL LOSS =
5.10, TOTAL EXCESS
=
1.39
PEAK. FLOW
TIME
MAXIMUM AVERAGE FLOW
6 -HR
24 -HR 72 -HR
29.90 -HR
+ (CFS)
(HR)
(CFS)
+ 6288.
16.00
4883.
1851. 1485.
1485,
(INCHES)
.912
1.382 1.382
1.382
(AC -FT)
2421.
3671. 3671.
3671.
CUMULATIVE
AREA =
49.80 S9 MI
HYDROGRAPH AT STATION BASIN
FOR PLAN 1, RATIO
= 1.00
PEAK FLOW
TIME
MAXIMUM AVERAGE FLOW
6 -HR
24-HR 72 -HR
29.90
-HR
+ (CFS)
(HR)
(CFS)
+ 6288.
16.00
4883.
1851. 1485.
1485.
(INCHES)
.912
1.382 1.382
1.382
(AC -FT)
2421.
3671. 3671.
3671.
CUMULATIVE
AREA =
49.80 SO MI
}i} } }} iii }i} fi} iii iii iii i}i iii w i}i iii i }} } ii iii }ii iii }i} iii ii} iii i}i iii iii }}i i}i ii} iii iii iii i}i } }}
} } } } } } } } } } } } }}
i }
21 KK } DAM i COUNTRY CLUB DAM FLOOD ROUTING DATA
i }
22 KO OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
IPRNT 1 PRINT CONTROL
IPLOT 0 PLOT CONTROL
QSCAL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
2lby.
2129.
2091.
2054.
2018.
1984.
1951.
1919,
1889.
1859.
1830.
1803.
1776.
M.O.
1725.
1701.
1677.
1654.
1632.
1611.
1590.
1570.
1551.
1532.
1514.
1496.
1479.
1461.
1444. .
1426.
1409.
1391.
1373.
1355.
1335.
1316.
1295.
1274.
1252.
1228.
1203.
1177.
1150.
1122.
1093.
1062.
1032.
1000.
968.
936.
903.
870.
838.
805.
772.
740.
708.
676.
645.
616.
M.
559.
532.
506.
481.
4!6.
le.
18.0 284.8
17.7 284.7
17.5 284.7
17.3 284.6
17.1 284.6
16.9 284.5
16.8 284.5
16.6 284.4
16.4 284.4
16.
16.
15.
15.1
15..
15.,
15.c
15.(
14.9
14.8
14,7
14.5
14.4
14.3
14.2
14.1
14.0
13.9
13.7
13.6
13.5
13.4
13.3
13.2
13.0
12.9
12.7
12.6
12.4
12.3
12.1
11.9
11.7
11.5
11.3
11.1
10.8
10.6
10.4
10.1
9.9
9.6
9.4
9.1
8.9
-8.6
8.4
8.1
7.9
7.6
7.4
7.1
6.9
6.7
6.4
1 JAN Me lb
Q.
11U.J 3Ui.D
+ 1 JAN 1141 lib
U.
11U.J 3U7.J
+ 1 JAN 219e 2ld
'
1 JAN 0148 19
0.
110.5 307.5
+ 1 JAN 1148 119
0.
110.5
307.5
+ i JAN 2148 219
�.
1 JAN 0154 20
0.
110.5 307.5
+ i JAN 1154 120
1.
110.5
307.5
} 1 JAN 2154 220
1 JAN 0200 21
0.
110.5 307.5 + 1 JAN 1200 121
3.
110.5 307.5
+ 1 JAN 2200 221
1 JAN 0206 22
0.
110.5 307.5 + 1 JAN 1206 122
6.
110.6 307.5
+ 1 JAN 2206 222
1 JAN 0212 23
0.
110.5 307.5 + 1 JAN 1212 123
13.
110.7 307.6
+ 1 JAN 2212 223
%W
1 JAN 0218 24
0.
110.5 307.5 + 1 JAN 1218 124
25.
110.9 307.6
+ 1 JAN 2218 224
1 JAN 0224 25
0.
110.5 307.5 + 1 JAN 1224 125
45.
111.3 307.7
+ 1 JAN 2224 225
1 JAN 0230 26
0.
110.5 307.5 + I JAN 1230 126
75,
111.8 307,8
+ 1 JAM 2230 226
1 JAN 0236 27
0.
110.5
307.5 + 1 JAN 1236 127
118.
112.6 308.0
+ 1 JAN 2236 227
1 JAN 0242 28
0.
110.5 307.5 +
1 JAN 1242 128
174.
113.5 308.2
+ 1 JAN 2242 228
r
1 JAN 0248 29
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1248 129
244.
114.8
308.4
+ 1 JAN 2248 229
1 JAN 0254 30
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1254 130
350.
116.2 308.7
+ 1 JAN 2254 230
1 JAN 0300 31
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1300 131
468.
117.7
309.0
+ 1 JAN 2300 231
1 JAN 0306 32
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1306 132
596.
119.4
309.2
+ 1 JAN 2306 232
1 JAN 0312 33
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1312 133
738.
121.2
309.5
+ 1 JAN 2312 233
1 JAN 0318 34
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1318 134
909.
123.1
309.8
+ 1 JAN 2318 234
1 JAN 0324 35
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1324 135
1091.
125.2
310.1
+ 1 JAN 2324 235
i JAN 0330 36
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1330 136
1288.
127.4
310.4
+ 1 JAN 2330 236
1 JAN 0336 37
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1336 137
1500.
129.9
310.7
+ 1 JAN 2336 237
1 JAN 0342 38
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1342 138
1731.
132.7
311.0
+ 1 JAN 2342 238
I JAN 0348 39
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1348 139
1983.
135.7
311.4
+ 1 JAN 2348 239
1 JAN 0354 40
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1354 140
2283.
138.7
311.7 + i JAN 2354 240
1 JAN 0400 41
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1400 141
2609.
141.6
312.0 + 2 JAN 0000 241
1 JAN 0406 42
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1406 142
2921.
144,5
312.3 f 2 JAN 0006 242
I JAN 0412 43
0.
110.5
307.5 }
1 JAN 1412 143
3264.
147.1
312.6 + 2 JAN 0012 243
1 JAN 0418 44
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1418 144
3616.
149.3
312.9 + 2 JAN 0018 244
1 JAN 0424 45
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1424 145
3891.
151.1
313.1 + 2 JAN 0024 245
1 JAN 0430 46
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1430 146
. 4169.
153.0
313.3 + 2 JAN 0030 246
1 JAN 0436 47
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1436 147
4429.
154.8
313.5 +
2 JAN 0036 247
t
1 JAN 0442 48
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1442 148
4693.
156,5
313.6 +
2 JAN 0042 248
1 JAN 0448 49
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1448 149
4936.
158.0
313.8 +
2 JAN 0048 249
1 JAN 0454 50
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1454 150
5155.
159.4
313.9 +
2 JAN 0054 250
1 JAN 0500 51
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1500 151
5361.
160.5
314.1 +
2 JAN 0100 251
1 JAN 0506 52
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1506 152
6531.
157.7
313.8 +
2 JAN 0106 252
_
I JAN 0512 53
0.
110.5
307.5 +
i JAN 1512 153
8061.
144.6
312.3 +
2 JAN 0112 253
1 JAN 0518 54
0.
110.5
307.5 +
i JAN 1518 154
9819.
118.1
309.0 +
2 JAN 0118 254
1 JAN 0524 55
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1524 155
10560.
81.2
301.7 +
2 JAN 0124 255
I JAN 0530 56
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1530 156
9586.
48.9
293.1 +
2 JAN 0130 256
1 JAN 0536 57
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1536 157
6515.
37.8
290.1 +
2 JAN 0136 257
.�
1 JAN 0542 58
0.
110.5
307.5 +
i JAN 1542 158
6246.
36.8
289.8 +
2 JAN 0142 258
1 JAN 0548 59
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1548 159
6250.
36.8
289.8 +
2 JAN 0148 259
-.
1 JAN 0554 60
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1554 160
6272.
36.9
289.8 +
2 JAN 0154 260
'�-
I JAN 0600 61
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1600 161
6284.
36.9
289.8 +
2 JAN 0200 261
I JAN 0606 62
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1606 162
6286.
36.9
289.9 +
2 JAN 0206 262
.
I JAN 0612 63
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1612 163
6276.
36.9
289.8 +
2 JAN 0212 263
I JAN 0618 64
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1618 164
6255.
36.8
289.8 +
2 JAN 0218 264
■�
I JAN 0624 65
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1624 165
6222.
36.7
289.8 +
2 JAN 0224 265
I JAN 0630 bb
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1630 166
6177.
36.5
289.7 +
2 JAN 0230 266
-•
1 JAN 0636 67
0.
110.5
307.5 +
I JAN 1636 167
6119.
36.3
289.7 +
2 JAN 0236 ?67
I JAN 0642 68
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1642 168
6049.
36.0
289.6 +
2 JAN 0242 268
1 JAN 0648 69
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1648 169
5965.
35.7
289.5 +
2 JAN 0248 269
I JAN 0654 70
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1654 170
5869.
35.3
289.4 t
2 JAN 0254 270
1 JAN 0700 71
0.
110.5
307.5 +
1 JAN 1700 171
5764.
34.9
289.3 +
2 JAN 0300 271
1 JAN 0706 72
0.
110.5
307.5 + 1
JAN 1706 172
5653,
34.4
289.2 +
2 JAN 0306 272
I JAN 0712 73
0.
110.5
307.5 + 1
JAN 1712 173
5538.
34.0
289.1 +
2 JAN 0312 273
1 JAN 0718 74
0.
110.5
307.5 1
JAN 1718 174
5424.
33.5
288.9 +
2 JAN 0318 274
`
1 JAN 0724 75
0.
110.5
307.5 + I
JAN 1724 175
5313.
33.0
288.8 +
2 JAN 0324 275
1 JAN 0730 76
0.
110.5
307.5 + 1
JAN 1730 176
5206.
32.6
288.7 +
2 JAN 0330 276
1 JAN 0736 77
0.
110.5
307.5 + 1
JAN 1736 177
5103.
32.1
288.6 +
2 JAN 0336 277
1 JAN 0742 78
0.
110.5
307.5 + I
JAN 1742 178
5004,
31.7
288.5 +
2 JAN 0342 278
t
I JAN 0748 79
0.
110.5
307.5 + 1
JAN 1748 179
4908.
31.3
288.4 +
2 JAN 0348 279
1 JAN 0754 80
0.
110.5
307.5 + 1
JAN 1754 180
4812.
30.9
288.2 +
2 JAN 0354 280
1 JAN 0800 81
0.
110.5
307.5 t 1
JAN 1800 181
4719.
30.5
2B8.1 +
2 JAN 0400 281
._
1 JAN 0806 82
0.
110.5
307.5 + I
JAN 1806 182
4627.
30.1
288.0 +
2 JAN 0406 282
1 JAN 0812 83
0.
110.5
307.5 + 1
JAN 1812 183
4537.
29.7
287.9 +
2 JAN 0412 283
2lby.
2129.
2091.
2054.
2018.
1984.
1951.
1919,
1889.
1859.
1830.
1803.
1776.
M.O.
1725.
1701.
1677.
1654.
1632.
1611.
1590.
1570.
1551.
1532.
1514.
1496.
1479.
1461.
1444. .
1426.
1409.
1391.
1373.
1355.
1335.
1316.
1295.
1274.
1252.
1228.
1203.
1177.
1150.
1122.
1093.
1062.
1032.
1000.
968.
936.
903.
870.
838.
805.
772.
740.
708.
676.
645.
616.
M.
559.
532.
506.
481.
4!6.
le.
18.0 284.8
17.7 284.7
17.5 284.7
17.3 284.6
17.1 284.6
16.9 284.5
16.8 284.5
16.6 284.4
16.4 284.4
16.
16.
15.
15.1
15..
15.,
15.c
15.(
14.9
14.8
14,7
14.5
14.4
14.3
14.2
14.1
14.0
13.9
13.7
13.6
13.5
13.4
13.3
13.2
13.0
12.9
12.7
12.6
12.4
12.3
12.1
11.9
11.7
11.5
11.3
11.1
10.8
10.6
10.4
10.1
9.9
9.6
9.4
9.1
8.9
-8.6
8.4
8.1
7.9
7.6
7.4
7.1
6.9
6.7
6.4
I JAN
0818
84
U. 110.5 307.5 }
1 JAN 1818
184
4449.
29.3 287.8'# 2 JAN
0418
284
433.
6.2
281.:
'
1 JAN
0824
85
0. 110.5 307.5 }
1 JAN 182'4
185
4364.
29.0 287.7 4 2 JAN
0424
285
410.
6.0
281.6
►r
1 JAN
0830
86
0. 110.5 307.5 }
1 JAN 1830
186
4280.
28.6 287.6 } 2 JAN
0430
286
386.
5.8
281.5
1 JAN
0836
87
0. 110.5 307.5 {
I JAN 1836
I87
4196.
28.2 287.5 4 2 JAN
0436
297
368.
5.6
291.5
1 JAN
0842
88
0. 110.5 307.5 4
1 JAN 1842
188
4116.
27.9 287.4 { 2 JAN
0442
298
348.
5.4
281.4
1 JAN
0848
89
0. 110.5 307.5 4
1 JA4 1848
189
4 031,
27.5 287.3 4 2 J44
0448
289
:10.
5.2
291.4
I JAN
0954
90
0. 110.5 307.5 }
1 JAN 1954
190
3952,
27.1 287.2 4 2 JAN
0454
290
312.
5.0
231.3
-
I JAN
0900
91
0. 110.5 307.5 {
1 JAN 1900
191
3870.
26.7 287.1 } 2 JAN
0500
291
295.
4.8
281.3
I JAN
0906
92
0. 110.5 307.5 {
I JAN 1906
192
3789.
26.4 287.0 4 2 JAN
0506
292
280.
4.6
281.2
.!
1 JAN
0912
93
0. 110.5 307.5 }
1 JAN 1912
193
3708.
26.0 286.9 4 2 JAN
0512
293
265.
4.5
291.2
1 JAN
0918
94
0. 110.5 307.5 4
1 JAN 1918
194
3628.
25.6 286.8 { 2 JAN
0519
294
252.
4.3
281.2
-
I JAN
0924
95
0. 110.5 307.5 }
I JAN 1924
195
3549.
25.2 286.7 4 2 JAN
0524
295
239.
4.2
281.1
'
i JAN
0930
96
0. 110.5 307.5 }
1 JAN 1930
196
3470.
24.9 286.6 4 2 JAN
0530
296
226.
4.0
281.1
1 JAN
0936
97
0. 110.5 307.5 }
1 JAN 1936
197
3393.
24.5 286.5 } 2 JAN
0536
297
215.
3.9
281.0
Y
1 JAN
0942
98
0. 110.5 307.5 {
1 JAN 1942
198
3318.
24.1 286.4 } 2 JAN
0542
298
204.
3.8
281.0
1 JAN
0948
99
0. 110.5 307.5 }
I JAN 1948
199
3245.
23.8 286.3 } 2 JAN
0548
299
193.
3.6
281.0
-�^
I JAN
0954 100
0. 110.5 307.5 {
I JAN 1954
200
3174.
23.4 286.2 } 2 JAN
0554
300
183.
3.5
280.9
}
4
PEAK OUTFLOW IS
10973. AT TIME 15.38 HOURS
r
ITHE DAM BREACH
HYDROGRAPH WAS DEVELOPED USING
A TINE INTERVAL
OF .010 HOURS DURING BREACH FORMATION.
-�"
DOWNSTREAM CALCULATIONS WILL USE A TIME INTERVAL OF .100 HOURS.
THIS TABLE COMPARES
THE HYDROGRAPH FOR DOWNSTREAM CALCULATIONS
WITH THE
COMPUTED BREACH HYDROGRAPH.
INTERMEDIATE FLOWS
ARE INTERPOLATED FROM END -OF- PERIOD VALUES.
TIME FROM INTERPOLATED
COMPUTED
+
TIME BEGINNING
BREACH
-
BREACH
= ERROR ACCUMULATED
ACCUMULATED
OF BREACH
HYDROGRAPH
HYDROGRAPH
ERROR
ERROR
(HOURS) (HOURS)
(CFS)
(CFS)
(CFS) (CFS)
(AC
-FT)
'
15.000 .000
5361.
5361.
0. 0.
0.
15.010 .010
5478.
5452.
26. 26.
0.
15.020 .020
5595.
5548.
48. 73.
0.
■
15.030 .030
5712.
5646.
66. 139.
0.
15.040 .040
5829.
5749.
80. 219.
0.
15.050 .050
5946.
5855.
91. 311.
0.
15.060 .060
6063.
5975.
Be. 398.
0.
15.070 .070
6180.
6108.
72. 470.
0.
+�
15.080 .080
6297.
6245.
52. 522.
0.
15.090 .090
6414.
6386.
27. 549.
0.
+
15.100 .100
6531.
6531.
0. 549.
0.
�..
15.110 .110
6684.
6678.
6. 556.
0.
15.120 .120
6837.
6826.
10. 566.
0.
+
15.130 ' .130
6990.
6976.
13. 579.
0.
15.140 .140
7143.
7143.
-1. 579.
0.
�++r
15.150 .150
7296.
7309.
-13. 565.
0.
15.160 .160
7449.
7474.
-25. 540.
0.
'
15.170 .170
7602.
7630.
-29. 511.
0.
jw
15.180 .180
7755.
7749.
5. 517.
0.
15.190 .190
7908.
7867.
40. 557.
0.
15.200 .200
8061.
8061.
0. 557.
0.
15.210 .210
8236.
8269.
-33. 524.
0.
J "
15.220 .220
8412.
8469.
-57. 467.
0.
15.230 .230
8588.
8659.
-71. 396.
0.
15.240 .240
8764.
8872.
-109. 287.
0.
+•�
15.250 .250
9940.
9107.
-167. 120.
0.
15.260 .260
9115.
9325.
-210. -90.
0.
■
15.270 .270
9291.
9521.
-230. -319.
0.
15.280 .280
9467.
9637.
-170. -489.
0.
15.290 .290
9643.
9743.
-100. -590.
0.
15.300 .300
9819.
9819.
0. -590.
0.
15.310 .310
9893.
9880.
12. -577.
0.
15.320 .320
9967.
9859.
108. -469.
0.
15.330 .330
10041.
10043.
-3. -472.
0.
15.340 .340 1011.
10306.
-lYl.
-063.
-1.
15.350 .350 10189.
10537.
-348.
-1010.
-1.
15.360 .360 10263.
10737.
-474.
-1484.
-1.
15.370 .370 10337.
10909.
-572.
-2056.
-2.
15.380 .380 10411.
15.390 .390 10486,
10973,
10751.
-562.
-265.
-2 618.
-2883.
-2,
-2,
15.400 .400 10560.
10560.
0.
-2883.
-2,
15.410 .410 10462.
10393.
69.
-2814.
-2.
15.420 .420 10365.
10248.
117.
-2697.
-2.
15.430 .430 10268.
10122.
146.
-2551.
-2.
15.440 .440 10170.
10011.
159.
-2392.
-2.
15.450 .450 10073.
9915.
158.
-2234.
-2.
15.460 .460 9976.
9831.
145.
-2089.
-2.
15.470 .470 9678.
9757.
121.
-1967.
-2.
15.480 ,480 9781.
9693.
Be.
-1879.
-2.
15.490 .490 9684.
9636.
48.
-1831,
-2.
15.500 .500 9586.
9586,
0.
-1831.
-2.
1
STATION DAM
TFIE
(0) INTERPOLATED BREACH HYDROBRAPH
(f) POINTS AT NORMAL
TIME
INTERVAL
(HRS)
(B) COMPUTED BREACH HYDROSRAPH
5000.
6000. 7000. 8000. 9000. 10000.
11000.
0.
0.
0. 0. 0. 0.
15.00
1 .- _-
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
15.01
2 .
B
'
15.02
3.
80
.
15.03
4 .
B0
'
4 1
15.04
5 .
BO
1 ,
15.05
6 .
B.
15,06
7 .
BO
'
15.07
8 ,
.10
"
15.08
9
BO .
15.09
10
B
,
.
15.10
11 . .
. . . . . . #. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.....
.
15.11
12 .
B
-i
15.12
13
B
'
15.13
14 .
B
'
15.14
15
15.15
16.
B
15.16
17 .
OB
15.17
18 .
B
-
15.18
19 .
BO .
..,_
15.19
20 .
B.
,
15.20
15.21
21 . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .
.
22.
.OB
15.22
23 .
OB
'
15.23
24 .
OB
.
-
15.24
25 .
OB.
.
15.25
26 .
O.B
.....
15.26
27 .
.0 B
15.27
28 .
O B
'
-
15.28
29 .
OB
15.29
30 .
OB
'
15.30
15.31
31 . . . . . . . . . . .
32.
.
B.
15.32
33 .
BO
.ft-
15.33
34
B
,
15.34
35 .
.O B
15.35
36 .
. O B
15.36
37 .
0
B
15.37
38 .
. O
B.
_
15.38
39 .
0
8
,
15.39
40 .
O
B
15.40
41
,
15.41
. . .
42.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HBO
....
15.42
43 .
. B O
15.43
44 .
.B 0
15.44
45 ,
B 0
,
b.0
15.46 47
15.47 48
.
.
8 O
Bp,
15.48 49
BO .
,
15.49 50
.
BO
,
15.50 5!
1
...................{.,...
...............................
PEAK FLOW
TIME
MAXIMUM AVERAGE FLOW
6 -HR 24 -HR 72 -HR
29.90 -HR
+ (CFS)
(HR)
(CFS)
+ 10560.
15.40
5135. 1907. 1530.
1530.
(INCHES)
.959 1.424 1,424
1.424
(AC -FT)
2546. 3782. 3792.
3782.
,,.
PEAK STORAGE TIME
MAXIMUM AVERAGE STORAGE
6 -HR 24 -HR 72 -HR
29.90 -HR
161.
15.01
123. 83.
68.
68.
PEAK STAGE
TIME
MAXIMUM AVERAGE STAGE
6 -HR 24 -HR 72 -HR
29.90 -HR
+ (FEET)
(HR)
314.07
15.01
309,27 300.52 296.96
296.96
CUMULATIVE AREA = 49.80 Sp MI
{ 4 4 44 1 }'{{ # #}
1 {144444{44444
33 KK
} RCHI }
} # # # # # # # } # # # ##
i
34 KO
OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
IPRNT
3 PRINT CONTROL
,)
IPLOT
0 PLOT CONTROL
OSCAL
0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
FIRST D/S CHANNEL X- SECTION
HYDROGRAPH ROUTING
DATA
36 RS
STORAGE ROUTING
y
NSTPS
I NUMBER OF SUBREACHES
ITYP
FLOW TYPE OF INITIAL CONDITION
y '
RSVRIC
25.00 INITIAL CONDITION
X
.00 WORKING R AND D COEFFICIENT
,..
37 PC
NORMAL DEPTH CHANNEL ROUTING
ANL
.080 LEFT OVERBANK N -VALUE
ANCH
.045 MAIN CHANNEL N -VALUE
AMR
.080 RIGHT OVERBANK, N -VALUE
RLNTH
1880. REACH LENGTH
-
SEL
.0037 ENERGY SLOPE
ELMAX
.0 MAX. ELEV, FOR STORAGE /OUTFLOW
CALCULATION
CROSS - SECTION DATA
- -- LEFT OVERBANK - -- + - - - - -- MAIN CHANNEL
- - - - - -- + - --
RIGHT OVERBANK - --
.�-
39 RY
ELEVATION 300,00
290.00 275.00 270.00 270.00
275.00
280.00 300.00
38 RX
DISTANCE .00
280.00 520.00 540.00 610.00 630.00
1430.00 2190.00
ff}
COMPUTED STORAGE - OUTFLOW- ELEVATION DATA
STORAGE .00 5.20
OUTFLOW .00 311.12
ELEVATION 270.00 271.58
STORAGE 424.54 516.21
OUTFLOW 53529.41 69423.00
ELEVATION 285.79 287.37
11.26 11.18
1023.32 2089.29
273.16 274.74
613.69 717.06
87468.77 107581.20
288.95 290.53
32.24 64.9 116.67 184.38 258.62 338.67
3793.23 6682.60 11296.49 18492.95 28072.29 39752.77
276.32 277.89 279.47 281.05 282.63 284.21
827.24 944.52 1068.91 1200.39 1338.98 1484.67
29765.60 154384.60 181509.60 211217.00 243585.20 278693.70
292.11 293.68 295.26 296.84 298.42 300.00
ff} fff fff fff fff
HYDROGRAPH AT STATION RCH1
FOR P!AN I.. RATIO = 1.00
PEAK FLOW TIME MAXIMUM AVERAGE FLOW
6 -HR 24 -HR 72 -HR 29.90 -HR
+ (CFS) (HR)
(CFS)
+ 9619. 15.50 5132. 1905. 1529. 1529.
(INCHES) .958 1.422 1.423 1.423
(AC -FT) 2545. 3778. 3779. 3779.
PEAK STORAGE TIME MAXIMUM AVERAGE STORAGE
6 -HR 24 -HR 72 -HR 29.90 -HR
+ (AC -FT) (HR)
98. 15.50 48. 18. 14. 14.
PEAK STAGE TIME MAXIMUM AVERAGE STAGE
6 -HR 24 -HR 72 -HR 29.90 -HR
+ (FEET) (HR)
278.90 15.50 276.98 273.34 272.68 272.68
CUMULATIVE AREA = 49.80 99 MI
fff fff fff fff }ff fff fff fff fff if* fff fff fff fff fff fff fff fff fff fff fff fff } }f fff }ff fff fff fff fff fff fff fff fff
fff }ffffffff }f
40 KK
} RCH2 f
f f
ffffffffffffff
41 KO
OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
IPRNT
3 PRINT CONTROL
IPLOT
0 PLOT CONTROL
9SCAL
0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
SECOND D/S CHANNEL X- SECTION
HYDROGRAPH ROUTING
DATA
43 RS
STORAGE ROUTING
NSTPS
1 NUMBER OF SUBREACHES
ITYP
FLOW TYPE OF INITIAL CONDITION
RSVRIC
25.00 INITIAL CONDITION
X
.00 WORKING R AND D COEFFICIENT
44 RC
NORMAL DEPTH CHANNEL
ROUTING
AML .U8U LEFT OVERBAMK M -VALUE
'
ANCH .045 MAIN CHANNEL N -VALUE
ANR .080 RIGHT OVERBANK N -VALUE
RLNTH 1730. REACH LENGTH
-
GEL .0116 ENERGY SLOPE
ELlAX .0 MAX. ELEV. FOR STORAGE /OUTFLOW CALCULATION
_
CROSS- SECTION DATA
-- LEFT OVERBANK - -- + - - - --- MAIN CHANNEL - - - - - -- + - -- RIGHT OVERBANK - --
�„�
46 P.Y
ELEVATION 300.00 270.00 255.00 250.00 250.00 255.00 270.00 300.00
-
45 P.X
DISTANCE .00 460.00 2150.00 2215.00 2285.00 2350.00 2460.00 3230.00
-
COMPUTED STORAGE - OUTFLOW- ELEVATION DATA
a.-
STORAGE
.00 10.89 29.06 69.77 143.48 250.19 389.91 562.64 766.63
985.81
OUTFLOW
.00 1541.20 6132.42 16475.39 34468,64 62375.73 102148.60 155W.0 227573.20 320939.60
ELEVATION
250.00 252.63 255.26 257.89 260.53 263.16 265.79 268.42 271.05
273.68
t
STORAGE
1216.26 1457.99 1711.00 1975.29 2250.85 2537.69 2835.80 3145.19 3465.86
3797.81
OUTFLOW
430170.40 554897.20 694996.40 850463. 501021365 .001207813.001409957.001627968 .001862036.002112369.00
ELEVATION
276.32 278.95 281.58 284.21 286.84 289.47 292.11 294.74 297.37
300.00
{## WARNING # #} MODIFIED PULS ROUTING MAY BE NUMERICALLY UNSTABLE FOR OUTFLOWS BETWEEN 1541. TO 2112369.
THE ROUTED HYDROGRAPH SHOULD BE EXAMINED FOR OSCILLATIONS OR OUTFLOWS GREATER THAN PEAK INFLOWS.
THIS
CAN BE CORRECTED BY DECREASING THE TIME INTERVAL OR INCREASING STORAGE (USE A LONGER REACH.)
# ##
# ## ### # ## # ##
L
HYDROGRAPH AT STATION RCH2
FOR PLAN 1, RATIO = 1.00
t
PEAK FLOW
TIME
MAXIMUM AVERAGE FLOW
`
6 -HR 24 -HR 72 -HR 29.90 -HR
+ (CF5)
(HR)
(CF5)
_
+ 9375.
15.50
5131. 1904. 1529. 1529.
(INCHES) .958 1.422 1.422 1.422
'._
(AC -FT) 2544. 3777. 3777. 3777.
PEAK STORAGE TIME
MAXIMUM AVERAGE STORAGE
6-HR 24 -HR 72 -HR 29.90 -HR
_
42.
15.50
25. 10. 8, B.
L.
PEAK STAGE
TIME
MAXIMUM AVERAGE STAGE
6-HR 24 -HR 72 -HR 29.90 -HR
+ (FEET!
(HR)
256.09
15.50
254.61 252.09 251.68 251.68
--
CUMULATIVE AREA = 4930 SA MI
t
47 KK
# RCH3
#
}
#
I
to
ar.
L.
ti..
L
L
L
48 KO
OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
IPRNT
3 PRINT CONTROL
IPLOT
0 PLOT CONTROL
OSCAL
0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
THIRD D/S CHANNEL X- SECTION
HYDROGRAPH ROUTING
DATA
50 RS
STORAGE ROUTING
NSTPS
) NUMBER OF SUBREACHES
ITYP
FLOW TYPE OF INITIAL CONDITION
RSVRIC
25.00 INITIAL CONDITION
X
.00 WORKING R AND D COEFFICIENT
51 RC
NnRnAL DEPTH CHANNEL ROUTING
ANL
.AC0 LEFT OVERBANK N -VALUE
ANCH
.045 MAIN CHANNEL 4-VALUE
ANA
.080 RIGHT OVERBO►IK N -VAI 1 ,1 1 E
RLNTH
6100. REACH LENGTH
SEL
.0025 ENERGY SLOPE
ELMAX
.0 MAX. ELEV. FOR STORAGEIOUTFLOW CALCULATION
CROSS - SECTION DATA
--- LEFT OVERBANK - -- + - - - - -- MAIN CHANNEL - - - - - -- + - -- RIGHT OVERBANK - --
53 RY
ELEVATION 260.00
240.00 238.00 235.00 235.00 240.00 250.00 260.00
52 RX
DISTANCE .00
210.00 650.00 750.00 820.00 1100.00 2410.00 2750.00
COMPUTED STORAGE - OUTFLOW - ELEVATION DATA
STORAGE .00 23.73 69.11 147.89. 291.16 479.16 701.47 959.09 1249.02 1574.25
OUTFLOW .00 262.13 1125.83 2934.44 6258.66 11894.90 19376.53 28771.91 40164.56 53644.75
ELEVATION 235.00 236.32 237.63 238.95 240.26 241.58 242.89 244.21 245.53 246.84
STORAGE 1933.79 2327.63 2751.55 3188.14 3635.51 4093.68 4562.63 5042.38 5532.91 6034.23
OUTFLOW 69305.78 87242.24 108225.60 131971.70 157952.90 186125.70 216458.60 248929.00 283521.10 320224.20
ELEVATION 248.16 249.47 250.79 252.11 253.42 254.74 256.05 257.37 258.68 260.00
**I
PEAK FLOW TIME
+ (CFS) (HR)
+ 7100. 15.80
PEAK STORAGE TIME
+ (AC -FT) (HR)
319. 15.80
PEAT; STAGE TIME
+ (FEET) (HR)
240.46 15.80
HYDROGRAPH AT STATION RCH3
FOR PLAN 1, RATIO = 1.00
MAXIMUM AVERAGE FLOW
6 -HR 24 -HR 72 -HR 29.90 -HR
(CFS)
5051. 1891. 1519. 1519.
(INCHES) .943 1.412 1.413 1.413
(AC -FT) 2505. 3750. 3753. 3753.
MAXIMUM AVERAGE STORAGE
6 -HR 24 -HR 72 -HR 29.90 -HR
238. 95. 76. 76.
MAXIMUM AVERAGE STAGE
6 -HR 24 -HR 72 -HR 29.90 -HR
239.77 237.39 236.92 236.92
CUMULATIVE AREA = 49.80 SA MI
Lm
PEAK FLOW AND STAGE (END-OF- PERIOD) SUMMARY FOR MULTIPLE PLAN -RATIO ECONOMIC COMPUTATIONS
FLOWS IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND, AREA IN SOUARE MILES
TIME TO PEAK IN HOURS
OPERATION STATION AREA PLAN RATIO 1 RATIOS APPLIED TO FLOWS
1.00
HYDROGRAPH AT
* BASIN 49.80 i FLOW 6288.
TIME 16.00
ROUTED TO
+ DAM 49.80 1 FLOW 15b0.
TIME 15.40
�# PEAK STAGES IN FEET
I STAGE 314.07
TIME 15.01
ROUTED TO
+ RCH1 49.80 1 FLOW 9619.
TIME 15.50
�} PEAK STAGES IN FEET f�
1 STAGE 278.90
TIME 15.50
ROUTED TO
+ RCH2 49.80 1 FLOW
TIME
�} PEAK S
1 STAGE
TIME
ROUTED TO
+ RCH3 49.80 1 FLOW 7100.
TIME 15.80
## PEAK STAGES IN FEET #f
1 STAGE 240.46
TIME 15.80
1 SUMMARY OF DAM OVERTOPPING /BREACH ANALYSIS FOR STATION
9375.
15.50
(AGES IN FEET ##
256.09
15.50
PLAN i ............... INITIAL VALUE
• ELEVATION 307.50
STORAGE 111.
OUTFLOW 0.
RATIO MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
OF RESERVOIR DEPTH STORAGE
PMF W.S.ELEV OVER DAM AC -FT
1.00 314.07 6.57 161.
SPILLWAY CRI
307.50
111.
0.
rAX I MUM
OUTFLOW
CFS
10973.
DAM
:ST TOP OF DAM
307.50
111.
0 .
DURATION TIME OF TIME OF
OVER TOP MAX OUTFLOW FAILURE
HOURS HOURS HOURS
3.72 15.38 15.00
*tf NORMAL END OF HEC -1 *f#
rn
O
r
N
Z
V
Z
F- .a
_co F }
-J Z
U Z w
w Q
Q_
= =
U�—
Z
Z w Q
O LLM °
�— G w
U (.. O
W
M w
\ p
V
V e
a a
e •
� o c
n _• 14 a
`1 c
•: o n
Z� i
V ° �c�
Q
IV)
X
Z
V
Z
O
e
Q
CO
v
n
e�
:
a
O
v
e
W
Z
ac
Z
•
W
Q
as
rN
�
Q
°
z
L.
O
O
w
H
Q
O
cA
`
Q
O
Z
J
7
•a �
°
v� e
e
_N t �1•,_ O
• °
O 4 ill!
�
Oa w
W
J
w
Q a
c
Q W a n Z N�\
3 — t,
Z 0
O c<1 c
Q Q w
w W 3
O ca �<
v� Z c- _ N;
J
_O
J U 1 Z
U — Q O
w c
o a w a
E
V
e
v
e�
:
v
e
W
Z
ac
Z
•
W
as
=
Z
e •
W
O
cA
A •
Z
e
4.
r
O
«
W
• e
�
E-
z
a _o
_�
. _
t c
�
a
Q
�
�
o
v
W
d
W
z
aC
�
IL
IC
W
qc
=
Q
W
H
W
4
H
qc
C
W
;
W
H
E
., atdd3a - - -
x 31V:)
- LLS3ANi = __
aO.LINOi:
� W
F
O
Z
O
F
V
W
d
2
W
a "
N
z
LU
Im, N
Y
Z
Q
m
2
w
a
_O
H
Q
W
av
m
O
1
O
N °
O
O
W
a
a
°
1
�L-
j
z
Z
CO w
O F Y F C rFr
cc
O
F- ►r
o z -
U O a O a d a
N N ki
ON W3,L _ N n s u, o �• -� a •.� .� s v. o
G3103d8N1 z
113!!1/ 183 d� 3d018 riva 118dn E:
52
rn
W
D
2
O
F
U
W
d
2
N Idd3ZI
'& = m - I.LS3:W I
U _
< z 11011NOW
O
W
2
W
2
O
W
O
v
7
Z
- ry
W
�
�
N
Z N
co
_
I
Lu
O
W
2
W
2
O
W
O
v
34
�
J %1"4.N
v
A
J
[a
_
I
3
Y
O
0
H
Z
y
t
Z
J
zzF
[s1
oOC
F
O
2
v
_
v
ow
v
O
�
O
►
°
E•
°
o
Ile
J
ow
F
w
j
Z
ca
3
V7
w
'sJl
*ON WUXI
34
�
J %1"4.N
v
A
G
vamv 3dO18 riva!l18NMOG NO111/1N31 nm.L8N1
U
J
a
a
0
S
C F
E
F
Z
[s[
0
F
Ew
J
[a
I
3
Y
O
U
H
�+
t/l
�
O
►
G
vamv 3dO18 riva!l18NMOG NO111/1N31 nm.L8N1
U
J
a
a
0
S
C F
E
F
Z
[s[
0
F
Ew
r
OD
r
W
o
0
W
4.
W
21
by
0
0
ti
O
O
W
2
YF 4
4: J 41
J < Z
U
0
z
Q
Q
W
Q
Q
W
cc
H
Z
O
D
2!!1/13a IA
UV9
- I.LS3ANI
HOII Now
Qa
It
F yTh \ �
ui
O vl
tea -
�1 fi ix
z �
_ "' z
O s7 < cn yy y oc Q
C Y�
Z4
< 61 y �
T. > >+ S Z CA y 0 :a �1 `
O O .°7 y
Z F y ca ce
S C s7 y F ►.. O> y .. v
F > > < y y F f� U V
< 4°. .n
'ON WIII
0
G31�3d8N1
1/3WV w1/3!l18NAA00 6A03Nvii3ooln S
1/3!!1/ < cn
54
.. atdd3a -
a F - IZS3ANI
... '� VOIINOW
W
z
O
W
IL
ZO }
co
Q O
O
O
C � •• H
m
4 � <
z
u .
a Zr
Z < O ►+
O y w F
F
z
O y C y < o x s
y F+
O ON WUI u, s ��. f 'C U
W -� N n s ,n .o r. c.
_z
< G 13NNVHD 13NN1/HD ..
113!!1/ 131N1 d0!!O
3181G0!!3 318100!!3 -NON �
0
in
an
ft-
Y D
J :v
m : m
J < Z
N
W
0
z
O
W
d
a
_ N
o_
0
_
J
V
i
O
W
O
W
z
Y
cc
O
t
0
W
O
NIVd3a
UVJ i
-IMANI
VOZ 1 NOW
�s
i
o I �
W
� v
o vi
� � Q
J.t F
F
Vol
w
O
H Z Y y Z
E' ►+ O O <
z z c o Q 5 :Y
G r N
_ O F F O V
j CA — jr z jr W
NZ
�-+ F to a q j t Z Q g
N V ` \
ON W31 I f. ^' r' v `� _ v V
r. ,. � ° � a x uoa o i �\
G °
8 xk'oA1 .L311A0 F
1/ 3 !! 1/
�il
- IZS3nrit
iJ
it � 'J
< ' HOZINOW
r
W
O (�
Z
O
z 2
i 0
O o °
_
rA
LU
Lu
cc
\
Z
cn
= z i t z F y ..
_ O F O z a 0 4 1-
w
F O ta J O Z
s:
_ H i
O °
V Jd w .�
�s N < < J .`. „ < Jf
cr
° %n J O < of J 4 O + =
V3 > :.J Z
U. .WUI s n .o f. cc a no a $ .. 0 0 a
O x ao �o o c^ m a a a a a s o r.
fi.
2 ' 301/d 3 rd o
z v3uv nvam18dn WV3l116NMOG 183wo c
DAM SAFETY INFORMATION SHEET
prepared by Haley & Aldrich, Inc.
for
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management
Office of Dam Safety
Country Club Dam
Description:
_ National ID No:
lCountry MA00756
(State ID No: I2 -8- 214 -18
Name of Dam:
Club Dam
Name of Impoundment:
I Mill River
River / Stream Name:
Mill River
Owner:
I Name:
Look Memorial Park Association
(Address:
300 North Main Street, Northampton, MA 01060
ITelephone No.:
(413) 584 -5457
Type of Ownership:
I Private Association
` Contact Person/
Name:
Mr. Brian Elliot, Superintendent, Look Memorial Park Association
Caretaker:
Address:
300 North Main Street, Northampton, MA 01060
Telephone No:
I(413) 584 -5457
— Site Information:
i Hazard Classification:
Significant
Size Classification: Intermediate
Type of Dam:
Istone masonry
Purpose of Dam:
I Recreation
— Structural Height:
132 ft
I Hydraulic Height: 32 ft
Crest Length:
199 ft
1 Drainage Area: 50 sq. miles
Normal Impoundment:
1110 acre -ft
I Maximum Impoundment: 110 acre -ft
_. Year Completed:
I unknown
Spillway Information:
(Type: Broad
crested weir
—
Width: Main spillway - 69 ft, Secondary spillway - 30 ft
ICapacity: 5,680 cfs at test flood
Page 1 of 2
DAM SAFETY INFORMATION SHEET
prepared by Haley & Aldrich, Inc.
for
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management
Office of Dam Safety
Country Club Dam
Location:
Low Level Outlet Condition:
Latitude: N42 °20'54"
I Spillway Discharge Capacity
Town: Northampton
I General Condition:
Inspection Information:
(Estimated Repair Cost:
Inspection Condition: Fair
Roadway:
Last Inspection Date:
2 March
1998
Army Phase 1: 1yes
Evaluation Information:
E1 Type of Design:
2
E2 I Level of Maintenance:
3
E3 I Emergency Action Plan:
2
E4 ICondition of Embankment:
4
E5 ICondition of Concrete:
5
E6 I Low Level Outlet Capacity:
1
R \12070 \013\FINAUDAMSAFE. WPF
Longitude: W72 °42'06"
USGS Quadrangle: I Easthampton, MA
Consultant: Haley & Aldrich, Inc.
DEM Phase 1: lyes
E7
Low Level Outlet Condition:
E8
I Spillway Discharge Capacity
E9
I General Condition:
E10
(Estimated Repair Cost:
E11
Roadway:
E12
I Bridge:
1
5
3
$61,000
yes
yes
Page 2 of 2
***W, -../
Office of Planning and Development
City of Northampton
City Hall • 210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060 • (413) 587 -1266
FAX (413) 587 -1264 • EMAIL planningOcity.northampton.ma.us
-Conservation Commission -Historical Commission
-Planning Board • Housing Partnership
-Zoning Board of Appeals
Northampton Conservation Commission
Minutes of Meeting
May 10, 1999
The Northampton Conservation Commission held a meeting on Monday, May 10, 1999 at 7:00 p.m.
in Council Chambers, Wallace J. Puchalski Municipal Building, 212 Main Street, Northampton,
Massachusetts.
Present were Members: Chair Mason Maronn, Vice Chair Michael Reed, Allan Doe, Jim Kaplan
and William Rosen.
Staff. Senior Planner John Bennett and Board Secretary Laura Krutzler.
Maronn opened the meeting at 7:03 p.m.
Minutes.
Reed noted a minor correction to the minutes of June 22, 1998.
Rosen moved to approve the minutes of June 22, 1998. Reed seconded. The motion passed
unanimously 4:0.
Reed noted two minor corrections to the minutes of April 26, 1999.
Reed moved to accept the minutes of April 26, 1999. Rosen seconded. The motion passed
unanimously 4:0.
Discussion with Representative of Northampton Country Club.
Bob Berniche, II, explained that he redid an area of grass and took some pine trees out that were in
that area of grass. He noted that some of those trees were within two hundred feet of the river.
Berniche explained that he had thought the jurisdictional buffer zone of the Commission was only
one hundred feet and that there were a couple of trees which he thought were hazardous. He
1
ORIGINAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
`1rrr
1400
maintained that he had not brought in any fill but had just used what was there.
Maronn asked about vista pruning, and Bemiche said he would like to take out some of the
underbrush so that you could see the river from the hole.
Jim Kaplan arrived.
Bennett commented that they needed to sort out was was considered the bank. He noted that there
were flood channels in there which were closer than the river was now, and Bemiche confirmed that
this was true.
Maronn stated that the definition of bank in the Rivers Act was the first observable change in
elevation. He observed that this would put it pretty close to the river most of the time.
Maronn explained that he was asking about vista pruning because this was considered a minor
project if it was not within fifty feet of a resource area. If it was within fifty feet, Bemiche would
at least need to file a Request for Determination to let the Commission know he was not going to
impact a resource area, Maronn advised.
Berniche said he would just stay away from that area.
Maronn advised Berniche that if he were going to be in that area all the time doing maintenance, he
would probably want to file a Notice of Intent for a maintenance permit.
Berniche said the other thing he had coming up was work on the pool area within two hundred feet
of the river. Maronn noted that this was an existing structure which he was allowed to maintain.
Bemiche said he also had a problem with ants in a tree and might need to take the tree down, since
he had kids and was scared. He said one tree was basically on the bank. Berniche commented that
these things came up again and again.
Reed expressed the opinion that this could be handled with a Request for Determination.
Bennett observed that they had not yet gotten to the issue of clean up of maintenance already
performed. He encouraged Berniche to file for a maintenance permit to allow him to perform
ongoing tasks. Members explained the procedure for filing a Notice of Intent, and Berniche agreed
to contact Bennett to initiate the process.
Kaplan stated that the seventh hole looked a lot better with those trees out.
Reed asked if they were putting rip rap in the river? Berniche said it had been there for a period of
time. Maronn suggested that as part of his work on the permit he might want to find an alternative
location for the material.
2
310 Cyic eo
Form 8 -
bFi MK No 246—
i to oe =vicec zy ^= ?1
- -- Commonwealth ca, Towr Northampton
of Massachusetts _ Ci o Narthammn
i MAP ID . $ _ --- JQ n - Parr.Pl 46
Certificate of Compliance
Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, C.L. c.131, §40
NORTEAMPTON WETLANDS PROTECTION ORDINANCE
From Northampton Conservation Commission Issuing Authority
To Citv of Northampton- 125 Locust Street
(Name) / Date of Issuance l0
1 !�
DENIED
This Certificate is issued for work reculated by an Order of Conditions iii %x to City o Nog ha mpton
dated 1 /9 4494--- an d issued by the Conservation Commission
1. = It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above- referenced Order of Conditions has
been satisfactorily completed.
2. = It is hereby certified that only the following portions of the work regulated by the above refer-
enced Order of Conditions have been satisfactorily completed: (if the Cert icate of Compliance
does not include the entire project. specify what portions are included.)
-- da," ,I '
3. $� It is hereby certified that the work ")P,:. y the above - referenced Order of Conditions was
never commenced.. iP+ _'e ■ "i _ i .. No future
work subject to reaulahon under the Act may be commenced without fiTinc 2 new Notice of Intent
and receivinc a new Order of Conditions. f
............................................................... ............................... _..._... .....- - --- -- ......
(Leave Soace Blank)
ffe=ve 11/10/E9
..1
CITY OF NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS
1 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
4
125 Locust Street
Northampton, MA 01060
Samuel B. Brindis, P.E.
413- 582 -1570
Director. City Engineer
Peter J. McNulty, Sr.
Assistant Director of Public Works
MEMO
TO: Penelope Kim, Director, OPD
6.A•
FROM: George Andrikidis, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Cooks Dam Bridge - Order of Conditions
DATE: December 19, 1994
The attached letter from Andrew Siegel describes a situation which
has affected Richard Caparso's record title for his condominium
units at Fairway Village. Since the DPW intends to comply with the
Conservation Commission's Order of Conditions, I wonder whether the
latter can issue a Certificate of Compliance as requested by Mr.
Siegel.
If there are any questions, please call me.
Thanks!
Enclosure: Letter from A. Siegel to DPW dated 12 -14 -94
cc: Sam Brindis, w/1
Peter McNulty, w/1
Kathleen Fallon, w/1
Andrew Siegel, w/0
MJLX \Memo10 \KimPenny
rW
G evf - � 1 L!1 `l 91t
c1 (Y �� )
BOWEN & SIEGEL ru"!
ATTORNEYS AT LAW C
40 CENTER STREET 9I DE 5 F {'1 12: SS
NORTHAMPTON. MASSACHUSETTS
01060
JESSE A. G. ANDRE TELEPHONE (413) 584 - 3384
1921
KENNETH B. BOWEN
ANDREW J. SIEGEL
December 14, 1994
George Andrikidis, Assistant City Engineer
Board of Public works
City of Northampton
125 Locust Street
Northampton, MA 01060
Dear George:
TELECOPIER (413) 584 -0139
Pursuant to our telephone conversation yesterday, enclosed
is a copy of the recorded Order of Conditions prohibiting work in
the Mill River near the Cooks Dam Bridge in Leeds.
For the record, you and I are in agreement that Richard
Caparso does not own any "land" in Leeds. As of this date he
d
NWMW
005245
ex) ' 39PG0233
310CMR 10.99 DEP Tile No. 1 246- 34 1 1
(To be provided by DXP)
Tors S City /Town -Iforthamcton
Applicant CttN of YCtth(unptoot
cossonreal tb (0 EN 1 EJ )
of !Massachusetts
Order of Conditions Pt"WHISITING AVIK
Xaeeachusetts Wetlands Protection Act
O.L. c. 131, 540
and the Northampton Wetlands Protection Ordinance
From Northampton Conservation Commission Issuing Authority To
ClEtlf of UL-tilai- . (Gt!( ?ii1C And * . t.S) "Zichi.td CQj.k2tS�'
(Name of.Applicant)• (Name of property owner)
Address 125 Locust $tiec't Address 135 lain Sttcct, Lads
This Order is issued and delivered as followst
(� by hand delivery to applicant or representative on (date)
( ) by certified mail, return receipt requested on (date)
This project is located in Northampton at _ CL%;Ls ►_�__�n I;tr_,( Ma il! 4t•ret- U eda
The property is recorded at the Registry of Hampshire County
Book &'579 Page 21
Certificate (if registered) N 1
The Notice of Intent for this project was filed on 11.'10.'93 (date)
The public hearing was closed on 1110!94 (date)
Findings • _
The Northarnnton Conservation Com.i9lion as reviewed the above - referenced Notice
of Intent and plane and has held a public hearing on the project. Based on the
information available to the Conservation Commission at this Lime, the Commission
has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is
significant to the following interests in accordance with the Presumptions of
Significance set forth in the regulations for each Axes Subject to Protection
Under the Act (check as appropriate)t
( ) Public water supply (X) Flood Control ( ) Land containing
shellfish
( ) water supply (X) Storm damage prevention ( ) Fiaheriea
( ) Ground water supply ( X) Prevention of pollution' ( j Protection of
Wildlife Babitat
Total Filinq tee Submitted 0 State Share 0
City Share (1 /2 tee in excess of $2S)
Total Aefund Due : City Portion i state Portion :
(1/2 total) (1/2 total)
Page 5-1 (memorex\wp\conscov\order.cc)
ex4432per ?34
rM
Therefore, the Northampton Conservation Comission hereby finds that the
following conditions are necessary, in accordance with the Performance Standards
set forth in the regulations, to protect those interests checked above. The
Conservation Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance
with said conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above. To the
extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans,
specifications or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the
conditions shall control.
General Conditions
1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related
statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or
modify this Order.
2. The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges,
it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of
private rights.
3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the
necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state or local
statutes, ordinances, by -laws or regulations.
AUS AA
The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three yeas from
the date of this Order unless either of the following applyt
(a) the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the
Acts or
(b) the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more
than three years, but less than five Years, from the date of
issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting
the extended time period are set forth in this Order.
XXX
XXX This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more
periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing
authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order.
Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill,
containing no trash, refuse, rubbish or debris, including but not limited
to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires,
ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing.
The applicant is prohibited from using demolition materials, asphalt,
large chunks of concrete, tree stumps and limbs, and general refuse]
7. No work shall be undertaken until all administrative appeal periods from
this Order have elapsed or, if such an appeal has been filed, until all
proceedings, before the Department have been - Omplotod.
•. No work shall be undertaken until the Final order has boon recorded in the
Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is
located, within the chain of title of the affected' property. In the case
of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's
Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the
propound work is to be done. In the case of registered -land, the Final
Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the
owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. 'The
recording information shall be proposed work is to be done. The recording
information shall be submitted to the Commission on the form at the and of
this Order prior to comnncemont of the work. The Coas.ission usually will
record the Order in the Registry of Deeds. It. is the applicant's
responsibility to insure the Order is properly recorded.
Yyy
A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square foot or
page 5-2 (memorex \wp \conscom \order.cc)
EK443�OG0235
more than three square feet in size bearing the works, 'Massachusetts
Department of = nvironmental Protection, Tile Number 246 - ql
10. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to make a
determination and to issue a Superseding order, the Conservation
Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before
the Department.
XY.Y.iC Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall
forthwith request in writing that a Certificate of Compliance be issued
stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed.
12. The work.shall conform to the following plane and special conditionst
PLANS TITLE
DATED SIGNED i STJU(PED DYt
ArrL.% Y I uu;s 1AP
AFL dI`( .) E`,SCoji ih-67 Alca, VcCtune i FUG. C,tiutt'.tttvtt5
0lFd
ArrE NIX 6 nt' Cii <ion .'.I�iSS. a ttt ,a ilC ".CtaiiiC Etlifcitl(1C e1i S Negiam
A11 Plans on rile with Northampton Conservation Coesission
Special Conditionst
XXXX Excavated material and topsoil stockpiles shall be located and stabilized
so as to minimize washing into wetland areas or waterways;
XXU Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent erosion and siltation of all
disturbed areas, and shall be implemented prior to any construction.
Sedimentation and erosion control devices shall be placed 'according to
standards set in the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, 'Guidelines for
Soil and Water Conservation in Urbanizing Areas of Massachusetts
Placement shall be directed at the site by the project engineer in order
to accomplish maximum control of erosion and ensure than no eroded
materials will reach wetland resource areas. May bales must be staked.
Silt fencing must be placed in a dug trench with sufficient porosity to
allow detained water to pass while trapping suspended sediments;
The areas of construction shall rimain in a stable condition at the close
of each construction day. Erosion controls shall be inspected at this
time, and maintained or reinforced to meet specifications in the plans and
this order;
ls) This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or
successor in control;
19) Members and agents of'the Conservation Commission shall have the right to
enter and inspect the premises to evaluate compliance with the Conditions
and to require the submittal of any data deemed necessary for that
evaluation;
page 5-3 (nQsrorex \wp \conecca \order.cc)
All construction areas
shall be
restored to original condition or better
upon completion of the
project,
including vegetation;
R u
No area within the 100
year floodplain, any wetland, or area within 100
feet of a wetland or 40 -feet of
a 100 year floodplain, as defined in 310
CMR 10, and Chapter 24,
shall be
permissible disposal sites, unless such
areas are specifically
approved
by the Commission;'
XXXX Excavated material and topsoil stockpiles shall be located and stabilized
so as to minimize washing into wetland areas or waterways;
XXU Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent erosion and siltation of all
disturbed areas, and shall be implemented prior to any construction.
Sedimentation and erosion control devices shall be placed 'according to
standards set in the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, 'Guidelines for
Soil and Water Conservation in Urbanizing Areas of Massachusetts
Placement shall be directed at the site by the project engineer in order
to accomplish maximum control of erosion and ensure than no eroded
materials will reach wetland resource areas. May bales must be staked.
Silt fencing must be placed in a dug trench with sufficient porosity to
allow detained water to pass while trapping suspended sediments;
The areas of construction shall rimain in a stable condition at the close
of each construction day. Erosion controls shall be inspected at this
time, and maintained or reinforced to meet specifications in the plans and
this order;
ls) This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or
successor in control;
19) Members and agents of'the Conservation Commission shall have the right to
enter and inspect the premises to evaluate compliance with the Conditions
and to require the submittal of any data deemed necessary for that
evaluation;
page 5-3 (nQsrorex \wp \conecca \order.cc)
6K4432PG02�,,;
.
The Applicant shall ewtify the Commission, is writing, as to the date that
work will be commencing on the project. Said notification must be
received by the Commission no sooner than ten (10) days and no later than
five (S) days prior to the commencement of the approved activityl
21) The owner of the property described in this Order must advise any
potential buyer of the property that any construction upon or alteration
to said property, including brush clearance, may require action by the
Northampton Conservation Commission and any instrument conveying any or
all of the owner's interest in said property or any portion thereof shall
contain language substantially as follows: •This property may be subject
to the Northampton Wetlands Protection Ordinance, the Wetlands Protection
Act, an Order of Conditions, and /or a Determination of Applicability from
the Northampton Conservation Commission'j
0 10 The contractor is responsible with the applicant and property owner for
any violation and the penalties under the law for such violation. while
all activities regulated by this Order ire being performed and during the
construction phase for this project, an on -site foreman, or project
engineer, shall have a copy of this permit at the alto, be familiar with
the conditions of thin permit, and adhere to such conditions. A copy of
the plans and Order must always be on -site and in all excavating machinery
when work is being performed;
23) All required permits must be obtained from the Planning Board, Zoning
Board, Department of Public works, G Building Inspector prior to the start
of this project and all permits must be complied with. Army 406 permits
and Water Quality Certifications must be obtained yrior to the start of
projects involving fill. within wetlands;
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall submit a statement
that all work has boon done in conformance with the provisions of the
approved order of Conditions and request a Certificate of Compliance. (if
chocked) statement shall be by a Professional Engineer or by a Wetlands
Consultant who has been approved by the Commission:
( )
YES ( ) NO
(if checked) An 'As Built' plan shall be included with the project
engineer's statement, detailing the post - development conditions of the
site: ( )YES ( ) NO.
fffffff�f•f �f ��f �f ���������� f•�����f��f.f�f�����ff��f •ff���f��••f••f���••ff��•
Z THIS :JOTICE OF INTENT HAS SEEM VE.V1Ed A.VJ THE OPOLR OF CONDITIONS _
PROHISING WORK ANO REASONS FOR DENIAL ARE ATTACHED AND CONTAINED
IN THE FOLL(XOI'dG:
DENIAL UNDER-THE WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT: ATTACNMENT A
DENIAL UNDER THE CITV OF NORTHAMPTON'S WETLA,VD PROTECTION ORDINANCE":
ATTACMIENT 8
page 5-4 (wAwores\wp\conscom\ordsr.co)
OK4r'32PCn23
Issued By Northam Co vat o Commission
Signatures:
f
This Order must be signed by a majority
of the Conservation Commission.
On this fig day of a 4- 199V, before me
personally appeared ^ee ;Wv .t to me known to be the
person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged
that he /she executed the same as his /her free act and deed.
• "WRVW2 W. n�osw
NoTANY wsLIc .. ,� +�s
Notary Public My cdMIld'5TW hk� 1rei
The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by this Order, any owner of land
abutting the land upon which the proposed work is to be done, or any ten
residents of the City or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified
of their right to request the Department of Environmental Protection to issue a
Superseding Order, providing the request is made by certified mail or hand
delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and Fee Transmittal
Form as provided in 310 C?SR 10.03(7), within ten days from the date of issuance
of this determination. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by
certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and the applicant.
Detach on dotted line and submit to the Northampton Conservation Commission prior
to commencement of work. PLEASE NOTE - -TBIS IS NOT REQUIRED It THE COMMISSION RAS
ALREADY RECORDED TQZ ORDER, AS IS 78EIR USUAL PRACTICE, UNLESS LAND IS REOISTM=
IN LAND COURT.
............................................... ...............................
To Northamoton Conservation Commission: Please be advised that the Order of
Conditions for the project at C -(-,ACy 15;n BQiUf, %! /h File Number has been
recorded at the Registry of Hampshire CounLr •,,a has been noted in the chain of
title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 8 on
, 19
If recorded land, the Gnstrument number which identifies this transaction is
If registered land, the document number which identifies this transaction is
Signature
.Applicant
P 5 -6 (memorex \wp \ccnsccm \crder.cc)
tK4432P-o2
City of Northampton, Massachusetts
Office of Planning and Development
City Hall - 210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060 - (413) 586-6950
FAX (413) 586 -3726
• Community and Economic Development
• Conservation • Historic Prasarvstion
• Planning Board • Zoning Board of Appeals
• Northampton Parking Commission
ATTACHMENT A
ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER OF CONDITIONS PROHIBITING WORK UNDERt
THE MASSACHUSETTS WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT FOR:
COOK'S DAM - MAIN STRERT LEEDS, MA
At its regularly scheduled meeting, held January 10, 1994, the
Northampton Conservation Commission voted 3 -2 -1 to DENY the
project as proposed within a Notice of Intent for the Cook's Dam
Bridge, and located on Main Street, Leeds, MA. This denial is in
accordance with the provisions contained within 310 CMR 10.05 (6)
(c). Additional reasons for the Commission's denial are listed
below.
1. The project has been denied under the Wetlands Protection
Act because the Commission determined that the requirements
under Section 10.03 (1) (a) of the Wetlands Protection Act's
Regulations were not met. Specifically, this section
requires any person who files a Notice of Intent to perform
work within an area subject to protection of the Act or
within the buffer zone, to demonstrate-to the issuing
authority:
(1) that the area is not significant to the protection of
any of the interests of the Act; or
(2) that the proposed work will contribute to the
protection of the interests identified in the act by
complying with the general performance standards
established by 310 CMR 10.00 for that area.
Z. The Commission found that the information submitted by the
applicant lacked sufficient, site specific data regarding
the impact of the proposed work upon downstream areas. The
Commission determined that these requirements were not met
because:
PACE 1 of 2
OP0004AL MNTEO CN RECVCLEO RAPER
SKI, 32 ?G X239
A. Inadequate information was supplied to the Commission
within the Notice of Intent and at the public hearing,
dealing with possible erosion of banks, turbulent flows
and the impact of proposed work upon downstream areas.
This information was considered integral in preventing
an alteration to the wetland resource area as defined
in 310 CMR 10.04 Alter (a);
3. In denying the proposed project under the Wetlands
Protection Act, the Northampton Conservation Commission
determined that no Order of Conditions could be issued for
the site, that would adequately protect the interests of the
Act, without a redesign of certain aspects of the project,
and without the submittal of additional information. The
applicant's representative did not request a continuance to
supply - the required information.
ISSUED: FEBRUARY 7 1994
e�443;,� ►0240
City of Northampton, Massachusetts
Office of Planning and Development
City Hail • 210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060 • (413) 586 -6950
FAX (413) 586 -3726
• Community and Economic Development
• Conservation • Historic Preservation
• Planning Board - Zoning Board of Appeals
• Northampton Parking Commission ATTACMUNT E
DENIAL OF AN ORDER OF CONDITIONS UNDER:
THE CITY OF NORTRMPTON'B
WETLANDS PROTECTION ORDINANCE
FOR
COOK'S DAM -.MAIN STRLET, LEEDB, NA
At its regularly scheduled meeting, held January 10, 1994, the
Northampton Conservation Commission voted 3 -2 -1 to DENY the
project as proposed within a Notice of Intent for the Cook's Dam
Bridge, and located on Main Street, Leeds, MA. This denial is in
accordance with the provisions contained within City of
Northampton's Code of Ordinances Chapter 24, Section 24:7.
1. As reasons for the denial of the proposed project under the
City of Northampton's Wetlands Protection Ordinance, the
Commission found specifically that the applicant failed to
supply adequate evidence in the form of necessary
information and plans to convince the Commission that-the
work as proposed would not have a significant, cumulative or
detrimental effect on the values protected by the Ordinance,
because:
A. The information submitted by the Applicant, within the
Notice of Intent and at the public hearing, lacked
sufficient, site specific data regarding the impact of
the proposed work upon downstream areas.
Specifically dealing with possible erosion of banks,
turbulent flows and downstream impacts from the actions
proposed. This• information was considered integral in
preventing an alteration to the wetland resource area
as defined in the City of Northampton's Code of
Ordinances Section 24:9 Alter (b), (c), (d), (e), (g),
(i) and (j);
2. The Commission determined that an Order of Conditions could
not be issued that would adequately protect the values
protected under the Ordinance, without a redesign.-of certain
portions of the project, and without the submittal of
additional information. The applicant's representative did
not request a continuance to supply the. required
information.
ISSUED: FEBRUARY 7 1994
CRGINM. PAINTEO ON RECVCLE0 PAPER
Dato v w Z 1 994 8 t--11. O'Clmk aa d.tJ;L nun
ucese -M.. Recd eat'd and euam'j
�310CMR 10.99 DEP File No. 1246- 341
.. (To be provided by DEP)
Form 5 City /Town Northampton
Applicant City o6 Northampton
Conwonvealth (DENIED)
of Massachusetts
Order of Conditions PROHIBITI14G WORK
Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act
G.L. c. 131, 540
and the Northampton Wetlands Protection Ordinance
From Northampton Conservation Commission Issuing Authority To
C c t y o6 Northampton (G eoag e Andtikidi ) Richard Capwu6 o
;.(Name of Applicant) (Name of property owner)
Address 1'25 Locu.dt StAeet Address 135 Main Street, Leeds
This Order is issued and delivered as follows:
[ ] by hand delivery to applicant or representative on (date)
r"
[ ] by certified mail, return receipt requested on (date)
This project is located in Northampton at Cooh Dam BAidae - Mara tftpe l I e eA
The property is recorded at the Registry of Hampshire County
Book 2579 Page 21
Certificate (if registered) N/A
,The - Notice of Intent for this project was filed on 11110193 (date)
,The public hearing was closed on 1110194 (date)
Findings
The NorthamDton Conservation Commission as reviewed the above- referenced Notice
of Intent and plans and has held a public hearing on the project. Based on the
information available to the Conservation Commission at this time, the Commission
has .determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is
significant to the following interests in accordance with the Presumptions of
Significance set forth in the regulations for each Area Subject to Protection
Under the Act (check as appropriate):
[ J Public water supply
[ ] Private water supply
[ J Ground water supply
Total Filing Fee Submitted
City Share
Total Refund Due $
[X] Flood Control [ ] Land containing
shellfish
[X] Storm damage prevention [ ] Fisheries
[X] Prevention of pollution [ ] Protection of
Wildlife Habitat
0 State Share 0
(1/2 fee in excess of $25)'
City Portion $ State Portion $
(1/2 total) (1/2 total)
page 5 -1 (memorex \wp \conscom \order.cc)
1%
Therefore, the Northampton Conservation Commission hereby finds that the
following conditions are necessary, in accordance with the Performance Standards
set forth in the regulations, to protect those interests checked above. The
Conservation Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance
with said conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above. To the
extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans,
specifications or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the
conditions shall control.
General Conditions
1.
2 .
3 .
.r
Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related
statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or
modify this Order.
The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges;
it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of
private rights.
This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the
necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state or local
statutes, ordinances, by -laws or regulations.
The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from
the date of this Order unless either of the following apply:
(a) the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the
Act; or
(b) the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more
than three years, but less than five years, from the date of
issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting
the extended time period are set forth in this Order.
This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more
periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing
authority at..least.30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order.
Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill,
containing no trash, refuse, rubbish or debris, including but not limited
to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires,
ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing.
.The, applicant is prohibited from using demolition materials, asphalt,
large chunks of concrete, tree stumps and limbs, and general refuse;
7. No work shall be undertaken until all administrative appeal periods from
this Order have elapsed or, if such an appeal has been filed, until all
proceedings, before the Department have been completed.
8. No work shall be undertaken until the Final order has been recorded in the
Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is
located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case
of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's
Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the
proposed work is to be done. In the case of registered land, the Final
Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the
owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. The
recording information shall be proposed work is to be done. The recording
information shall be submitted to the Commission on the form at the end of
this Order prior to commencement of the work. The Commission usually will
record the Order in the Registry of Deeds. It is the applicant's
responsibility to insure the Order is properly recorded.
A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or
page 5 -2 (memorex \wp \conscom \order.cc)
` wW ..r�
more than three square feet in size bearing the works, *Massachusetts
Department of Environmental Protection, File Number 246 -_,�5
10. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to make a
determination and to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation
Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before
the Department.
XM Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall
forthwith request in writing that a Certificate of Compliance be issued
stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed.
12. The work shall conform to the following plans and special conditions:
PLANS TITLE DATED SIGNED & STAKED BY:
=APPENDIX 1 USGS MAP
APPLA IX Z Sl l t MAN
APPENQT 3 Estimated H � M n _j 993
APPENDIX 4 ftoz i o n Hote Area, V of um e 9 Fitt CaZcu&t i o nos
' nnnt ,
APPENDIX 6 Reply 6Aam Mausz . Na tu.Aa,Q, Heh i t e 9 Endang eAed Species PAogAam
All Plans on File with Northampton Conservation Commission
Special Conditions:
All construction areas shall be restored to original condition or better
upon completion of the project, including vegetation;
No area within the 100 year floodplain, any wetland, or area within 100
-Meet of a wetland or 40 feet of a 100 year floodplain, as defined in 310
{ ) " "CMR and Chapter 24, shall be permissible disposal sites, unless such
~areas are specifically approved by the Commission;
XXU Excavated material and topsoil stockpiles shall be located and stabilized
so as to minimize washing into wetland areas or waterways;
XX@(,j( Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent erosion and siltation of all
disturbed areas, and shall be implemented prior to any construction.
Sedimentation and erosion control devices shall be placed according to
standards set in the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, "Guidelines for
Soil and Water Conservation in Urbanizing Areas of Massachusetts ".
Placement shall be directed at the site by the project engineer in order
to accomplish maximum control of erosion and ensure than no eroded
materials will reach wetland resource areas. Hay bales must be staked.
Silt fencing must be placed in a dug trench with sufficient porosity to
allow detained water to pass while trapping suspended sediments;
The areas of construction shall remain in a stable condition at the close
of each construction day. Erosion controls shall be inspected at this
time, and maintained or reinforced to meet specifications in the plans and
this order;
18) This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or
successor in control;
19) Members and agents of the conservation Commission shall have the right to
enter and inspect the premises to evaluate compliance with the Conditions
and to require the submittal of any data deemed necessary for that
evaluation;
page 5 -3 (memorex \wp \conscom \order.cc)
+�..► vow
The Applicant shall notify the Commission, in writing, as to the date that
work will be commencing on the project. Said notification must be
received by the Commission no sooner than ten (10) days and no later than
five (5) days prior to the commencement of the approved activity;
21) The owner of the property described in this Order must advise any
potential buyer of the property that any construction upon or alteration
to said property, including brush clearance, may require action by the
Northampton Conservation Commission and any instrument conveying any or
all of the owner's interest in said property or any portion thereof shall
'contain language substantially as follows: "This property may be subject
to the Northampton Wetlands Protection Ordinance, the Wetlands Protection
Act, an Order of Conditions, and /or a Determination of Applicability from
the Northampton Conservation Commission ";
The contractor is responsible with the applicant and property owner for
any violation and the penalties under the law for such violation. While
all activities regulated by.this Order are being performed and during the
construction phase for this project, an on -site foreman, or project
engineer, shall have a copy of this permit at the site, be familiar with
the coridition permit, and adhere to such conditions. A copy of
the plans and Order must .always be on -site and in all excavating machinery
when work is being performed;
23) All required permits must be obtained from the Planning Board, Zoning
Board, Department of Public Works, & Building Inspector prior to the start
of this project and all permits must be complied with. Army 404 permits
and Water Quality Certifications must be obtained prior to the start of
projects involving fill within wetlands; -.
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall submit a statement
that all work has been done in conformance with the provisions . of of the
,_ approved Order of Conditions and request a Certificate of Compliance. (if
checked) Statement shall be by a Professional Engineer or by a Wetlands
Consultant who has been approved by the Commission:
�... [ l YES [ l No .
A l_... , .
(if checked) An "As Built" plan shall be included with the project
engineer's statement, detailing the post - development conditions of the
site: [ ]YES ( j NO.
.26) THIS NOTICE OF INTENT HAS BEEN DENIED AND THE ORDER CONDITIONS
- - .- PROHIBING WORK AND REASONS FOR DENIAL ARE ATTACHED AND CONTAINED
- IN THE FOLLOWING:
DE�JIAL UNDER THE WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT: ATTACHMENT A
DENIAL UNDER THE CITY OF NORTHAMPTON'S WETLA0 PROTECTION ORDINANCE:
ATTACHMENT B
page 5 -4 (memorex \wp \conscom \order.cc)
'w,. ..rr
Issued By Nort
Signatures:
tLoA Commission
1
This Order must be si ned by a majority of the Conservation Commission.
WATg M; VKIOFli
GY A � F
NOTARY PUBLIC
Notary Public My ccIn3�3ib'lY"ekir� "s
On this 914#ti day of TAaysi� 199', before me
personally appeared .✓e to me known to be the
person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged
that he /she executed the same as his /her free act and deed.
The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by this Order, any owner of land
abutting the land upon which the proposed work is to be done, or any ten
residents of the City or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified
of their right to request the Department of Environmental Protection to issue a
Superseding Order, providing the request is made by certified mail or hand f
delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and Fee Transmittal
Form as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7), within ten days from the date of issuance
of this determination. A copy of the request shall_at . the same time be sent by
certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and the applicant. -
s•.
Detach on dotted line and submit to the Northampton Conservation Commission prior;':
to commencement of work. PLEASE NOTE- -THIS IS NOT REQUIRED IF THE COMMISSION HAS
.ALREADY RECORDED THE ORDER, AS IS THEIR USUAL PRACTICE, UNLESS LAND IS REGISTERED
IN LAND COURT.
To Northampton Conservation Commission: Please be advised that the Order of
Conditions for the project at CcvI<S p�ij, 1 " 4 1 N File Number 246- �� has been
recorded at the Registry of Hampshire County ai,a has been noted in the chain of
title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 8 on
19
If recorded land, the I ument number which identifies this transaction is
If registered land, the document number which identifies this transaction is
Signature
Applicant
page 5 -6 (memorex \wp \conscom \order.cc)
N..
City of Northampton, Massachusetts
Office of Planning and Development
City Hall • 210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060 • (413) 586 -6950
FAX (413) 586 -3726
• Community and Economic Development
• Conservation • Historic Preservation
• Planning Board • Zoning Board of Appeals
• Northampton Parking Commission
ATTACHMENT A
EM2
ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER OF CONDITIONS PROHIBITING WORK UNDER:
THE MASSACHUSETTS WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT FOR:
COOK'S DAM — MAIN STREET, LEEDS, MA
At its regularly scheduled meeting, held January 10, 1994, the
Northampton Conservation Commission voted 3 -2 -1 to DENY the
project as proposed within a Notice of Intent for the Cook's Dam
Bridge, and located on Main Street, Leeds, MA. This denial is in
accordance with the provisions contained within 310 CMR 10.05 (6)
(c). Additional reasons for the Commission's denial are listed
below.
1. The project has been denied under the Wetlands Protection
Act.because the Commission determined that the requirements
under.Section 10.03 (1) (a) of the Wetlands Protection Act's
Regulations were.not met. Specifically, this section
requires any person who files a Notice of Intent to perform
work within an area subject to protection of the Act or
within the buffer zone, to demonstrate to the issuing
authority:
(1) that the area is not significant to the protection of
any of the interests of the Act; or
(2) that the proposed
protection of the
complying with the
established by 310
work will contribute to the
interests identified in the act by
general performance standards
CMR 10.00 for that area.
2. The Commission found that the information submitted by the
applicant lacked sufficient, site specific data regarding
the impact of the proposed work upon downstream areas. The
Commission determined that these requirements were not met
because:
PAGE 1 of 2
ORIGINAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Nftw
rM
A. Inadequate information was supplied to the Commission
within the Notice of Intent and at the public hearing,
dealing with possible erosion of banks, turbulent flows
and the impact of proposed work upon downstream areas.
This information was considered integral in preventing
an alteration to the wetland resource area as defined
in 310 CMR 10.04 Alter (a);
3. In denying the proposed project under the Wetlands
Protection Act, the Northampton Conservation Commission
determined that no Order.of Conditions could be issued for
the site, that would adequately protect the interests of the
Act, without a redesign of certain aspects of the project,
and without the submittal of additional information. The
applicant's representative did not request a continuance to
supply the required information.
ISSUED: FEBRUARY 7 1994
PAGE 2 of 2
010- n
City of Northampton, Massachusetts
Office of Planning and Development
City Hall • 210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060 • (413) 586 -6950
FAX (413) 586 -3726
• Community and Economic Development
• Conservation • Historic Preservation
• Planning Board • Zoning Board of Appeals
• Northampton Parking Commission ATTACHMENT B
.,owl
DENIAL OF AN ORDER OF CONDITIONS UNDER:
THE CITY OF NORTHAMPTON'S
WETLANDS PROTECTION ORDINANCE
FOR:
COOK'S DAM — MAIN STREET, LEEDS, MA
At its regularly scheduled meeting, held January 10, 1994, the
Northampton Conservation Commission voted 3 -2 -1 to DENY the
project as proposed within a Notice of Intent for the Cook's Dam
Bridge, and located on Main Street, Leeds, MA. This denial is in
accordance with the provisions contained within City of
Northampton's Code of Ordinances Chapter 24, Section 24:7.
1. As reasons for the denial of the proposed project under the
City of Northampton's Wetlands Protection Ordinance, the
Commission found specifically -that the applicant failed to
*supply adequate evidence in the form of .necessary
information and .plans to.convince the Commission that the
work as proposed would not have a significant, cumulative or
detrimental .effect.on the values protected by the Ordinance,
because:
A. The information submitted by the Applicant, within the
Notice of Intent and at the public hearing, lacked
sufficient, site specific data regarding the impact of
the proposed work upon downstream areas.
Specifically dealing with possible erosion of banks,
turbulent flows and downstream impacts from the actions
proposed. This information was considered integral in
preventing an alteration to the wetland resource area
as defined in the City of Northampton's Code of
Ordinances Section 24:9 Alter (b), (c), (d), (e), (g),
(i) and (j);
2. The Commission determined that an Order of Conditions could
not be issued that would adequately protect the values
protected under the Ordinance, without a redesign of certain
portions of the project, and without the submittal of
additional information. The applicant's representative did
not request a continuance to supply the required
information.
ISSUED: FEBRUARY 7, 1994
ORIGINAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
4
G�
to
LLJ
o
K
r
<
<p
a r�
a � -
J
F � U
L�
N C
w UI
zo 'd
I
�I
I %
�f
I
I
�r
t
w�
2�
�1
Vf�
_ L
n
Y C]
< ri
3
O W
= h
V a6 N
W C
tA
W�
0
�-
V)
C�
a "
m
a
U
D
Z
.Q
d '
z
K
Ld
Z
t �
o '-
`��•
O O
+nW
i t w
/ sz
N
N
}�. wX
n N W
o +
1�
LL�
0
i
CN
r
o
M
h
N
i
L
0 r
Q
� G
4
W Q,
z
LJ
a
�--�
uj O Z
a
J �
Ln
O W
a
� Y
OQa O
E.. O ❑ C.
0
IEJ �� d
Z�LL) `Lw LL
g0m A
0
Z
to j
Q
Er a
nUH6K I9 'ON XV3 S31dI00SSv 30ISAH vs:91 03M H -H -030
Ji',�[- 4 -94 TUE 10:00
BAY" ' ASSOCIATES
SwImp-
FAX -, N0. 61 � "`'55095
P, 02
K
Bayside Engineering Associates, Inc,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS
January 3, 1994
Mr. George Andrikidis, P.E.
Department of Public Works
125 Locus Street
Northampton, MA 01060
5 MIDDLESEX AVENuE
SOMERVILLE, MASSACMUSETTS 02145.1 127
TELEPHONE t617� 525 -4r96
FAX t517� E ; -S S:c35
RE: Filling Mill River Bottom Erosion Dole at Cooks Dam Bridge, Northampton
Dear Mr. Andrikidis,
This letter is to confirm that no additional information has been requested by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (COE) for the project listed above. The letter dated December 23, 1993
from the COE states the requirements which must be met for the Massachusetts
Programmatic General Permit (PGP) to be authorized by the COE.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact our
office.
Very truly yours,
cc, APL
6:.W)EISDAM CA0103I,SJT
BAYSTDE ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
Steven J. Tyle . /Enviro�yfrental Manager
JEAN- 4 -94 TUE 10:00 BA )E ASSOCIATES FAX N0, 61 0 55095 P. 01
SAYSID
E:.EN�lNEERINC� .:.:
I
FAX
- ASSOC IA:TES'; ' INC:
...:..:..:.
:...:v...TRANS_ MITTAL I
Middlesex Avenue
Somerville, MA C2145 —1 1 271
date: 61 c5
6
c FAX � (C 17) 625 -50951
�X 41 S �Z loo
I Please Deliver To:
Company Name/
Address:
From:
.9 F:
- y\(1r �d
U
I Urgent Reply Requested
i Reply At Your Own Convenience
,Reply Today
l .
No Reply Necessary
Number Of Pages
Including This Cover Sheet =
If all pages are not received, please notify our firm as soon as possible
Covk� - Oam q"�-
WILLIAM F. WELD
GOVERNOR
ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
TRUDY COXE
SECRETARY
December 2 3 , 19 9 3 Tel: (617) 727 - 9800
Fax: (617) 727 -2754
CERTIFICATE OF THE SECRETARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS
ON THE
ENVIRONMENTAL NOTTFTCATTON FORM
PROJECT NAME : Cooks Dam Bridge and Mill River
PROJECT LOCATION : Northampton
EOEA NUMBER : 9698
PROJECT PROPONENT : City of Northampton
DATE NOTICED IN MONITOR : November 23, 1993
4
Pursuant to the Massachusetts Environmental Policy- .-- AQt,--- -. -
(G. L., c. 30, s. 61 -62H) and Section 11.06 of the MEPA
regulations (301 CMR 11.00), I hereby determine that the above
project does not require the preparation of an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR).
The project is the reconstruction of portions of the Cooks Dam
Bridge and the filling of a portion of a pool of Mill River which
is now used by persons jumping from the bridge 20 -30 feet above
and thus presents a safety problem. The deck of the stone arch
bridge is to be.reconstructed, including a sidewalk on the
downstream side. The masonry walls are to be removed and
replaced by steel railings. The second part of the bridge, which
spans the spillway, will need work on the supporting steelwork.
That section is not a stone arch construction. An existing gas
line and a new water line are to be attached to the downstream
side of the bridge. The upper portion of the river pool, about
10 by 20 feet is to be filled with 4 -5 ton rocks to above water
level to eliminate the pool area used for jumping. The remainder
of the pool is available for swimming from the ledge below. I
note that this description, provided by the Northampton DPW
Engineer, is at odds with the plan provided by Bayside
Engineering (undated, faxed on 12/22/93). The area to be filled
is owned by Look Park and the Northampton Country Club.
The ENF did not describe the bridge work, but the two projects
are to be pursued together. The city anticipates that most of
the cost of the projects will be borne by the Massachusetts
100% RECYCLED PAPER
r *"""
EOEA #9698
ENF Certificate December 23, 1993
Highway Department. The City considered a "suicide fence ", but
expects that it would be cut to once again provide access for
jumping. Also, the utilities on the side of the bridge could be
used for access. I would prefer that the City placed the
utilities on the upstream face, or placed a steep barrier over
the utilities to limit access. Filling a portion of a river to
discourage jumping seems excessive and even dangerous if carried
out according to the plan instead of the City engineer's
description. While water will occupy the spaces between the
rocks, the habitat . w _1 1 change. Additionally, if the ri are
not placed carefully, larger stream flows may relocate the rocks
into the remainder of the pool, or further downstream.
I expect these issues can and will be resolved in the permitting
process and conclude that an EIR is not necessary for that
purpose.
December 23. 1993
DATE, Trudy Coxe
Comments received : Planning & Development -
PVPC - 12/7/93
Mass Audubon - 12/13/93
TC /DES /ds
12/6 & 8/93
E
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
NEW ENGLAND DIVISION, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
..' 424 TRAPELO ROAD
WALTHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 02254 -9149
REPLY TO
\� ATTENTION OF
December 23, 1993
Regulatory Division
File No. 199302893
Mr Samuel B. Brindis, P. E.
Director of Public Works
City Of Northampton
125 Locust Street
Northampton, MA 01060
Dear Mr. Brindis:
6, - C_ cz - 2— 1( 1�3
It appears that your project shown on the plan entitled,
"APPENDIX 2 -SITE MAP COOKS DAM BRIDGE ", and dated "NOVEMBER 11,
1993 PLAN ", will have only minimal individual and cumulative
impacts on the waters and wetlands of the United States, and will
be authorized by the Corps of Engineers under the attached
Massachusetts Programmatic General Permit (PGP) as soon as you
have completed the following:
(1) obtained all necessary local and state approvals (see
pages 1 and 2 of the PGP for requirements and page 12 of the PGP
for addresses); and
(2) ensured that your project meets all applicable terms and
conditions of the Programmatic General Permit.
No additional authorization is needed under Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
It is your responsibility to ensure compliance with the
terms and conditions of this permit. Performing work not
authorized by this permit, starting work without obtaining other
applicable state and local approvals, or failing to comply with
the permit conditions may subject you to the enforcement
provisions of our regulations.
r11
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Laurie H. Suda
at (617) 647 -8213, or toll -free at 800 - 343 -4789 or 800 - 362 -4367
within Massachusetts.
Sincerely,
Q I-v 3�aren Kirk Adams
Chief, Permits Branch
Regulatory Division
Enclosure
Copy Furnished:
DEP Western Region
Wetlands
436 Dwight Street
Springfield. MA 0" 03
DEC -22 -93 WED 16:34 BAYME ASSGC i ATES FAX M. 61 55095
BAYSIDE ENGINEERING .
I. aSSOCIA.TEj; �INC: � � . � :.. <�P:.:• :f ; ..,� � .
P. 01
FAX'.:.:..:
:...TRANSIMITTAL
5 Middlesex Aver,uG
Date: ZZ �q Scr;e�ri1(s, MA 0214 17) 3 (617) 02- - -4 6 ^c;
FAX � (6 i 7) 625 -500=,
413 - 582
Please Deliver T 0: <�i r -2 R 1 t
Company Name/ P
AC' dras �.
Frcat: <, .T 12. U �.YI Ti
R`: �cok Do rn - Bt'iclam ep Hots
aE� FAQ
.. �. iS \.. K . �N.ti.. . � � A wl. � . \ � .rrl::..w. i %ql: �•. t����,w�::r J.:'w:Z� >• =A�J) �� • . ' •. ... ... " I
U �
f
I �� {ro Lam- s Cour c?1. l Z• 1 l • '� 3 �
I
i
r
i
I
Urgent Reply Requested i
Reply At Your Own Convenience
Reply T clay
No Reply Necessary
Number Of Paces
Including This Ccver Sheet =
i
If all paces are nct received, please notify our firm as soon as possible
i
i
2 V)
4 �$N 2
Q.
CBJ�
� } j•X
I c WC
I �
z
x b CS
a N z 1 �.
.t P (
2 �•j',, y+� R< O �v
w I Ot d 4+ 1 r- a 0
0 0. 0 �?
a o
h N, '
O W
1 a
LA-
��. a
I C o�o
i V) X N } G
Z W G.r
0Uw
{OW A
3 z
IL
Z O 1 mW 'JO
cr
� ice NNE y IAU
z < O 4 __-
W z3 v Esc
ED
r
v~i a g •�� n i rr ,� Z<
u N 3:
o P O ,
N-,
x
h W m
ZO 'd 960SHH19 'ON�Xdd S4VOOSSd 301SAV8 b6:9I 03M 66 -zz -034
a im lftw�
Bayside Engineering Associates,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS
Inc,
5 MIDDLESEX AVENUE
SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS 02145-1127
December 16, 1993
Northampton Conservation Commission
Northampton City Hall
210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060
RE: Filling Underwater Erosion Hole at Cooks Dam Bridge
EOEA File No. 9698; DEP File No. 246 -341
Dear Commission Members,
The following information is submitted in behalf of the City of Northampton for the project
listed above. This information verifies the information presented to the Conservation
Commission on December 13, 1993. This information is intended to show that the stones
used to fill the erosion hole would stay in place even if a 100 year flood occurred.
A 100 year flood would produce a stream velocity of 8.9 feet per second (fps). A 2 foot
diameter stone will resist up to a 13.5 fps velocity. This project proposes using 4 -5 foot
diameter stones to fill the river bottom hole. This size stone will resist approximately 20 fps
of velocity (Reference: River Mechanics Volume II, page 23 -17). The likelihood of stone
movement is further reduced due to the fact that the stones will fill a hole below the river
bottom therefore, they will be below the river flow profile and will not be subject to the full
force imposed by the water velocity.
A copy of the table from River Mechanics Volume II, referenced is included for your
convenience. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to
contact our office.
Very truly yours,
BAYSIDE ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
CC:: GA, APL, DQ
R. Carparso
Northampton Cons. Comm.
Jeremiah Mew, EOEA, Western Region
MEPA Unit, Boston
DEP Wetlands, Western Region
Encl.
Steven J. T e �/
TELEPHONE (617) 625 -4696
_ FAX (617) 625 -5095
The following information is submitted in behalf of the City of Northampton for the project
listed above. This information verifies the information presented to the Conservation
Commission on December 13, 1993. This information is intended to show that the stones
used to fill the erosion hole would stay in place even if a 100 year flood occurred.
A 100 year flood would produce a stream velocity of 8.9 feet per second (fps). A 2 foot
diameter stone will resist up to a 13.5 fps velocity. This project proposes using 4 -5 foot
diameter stones to fill the river bottom hole. This size stone will resist approximately 20 fps
of velocity (Reference: River Mechanics Volume II, page 23 -17). The likelihood of stone
movement is further reduced due to the fact that the stones will fill a hole below the river
bottom therefore, they will be below the river flow profile and will not be subject to the full
force imposed by the water velocity.
A copy of the table from River Mechanics Volume II, referenced is included for your
convenience. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to
contact our office.
Very truly yours,
BAYSIDE ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
CC:: GA, APL, DQ
R. Carparso
Northampton Cons. Comm.
Jeremiah Mew, EOEA, Western Region
MEPA Unit, Boston
DEP Wetlands, Western Region
Encl.
Steven J. T e �/
w
1 ,�/
RIVER MECHANICS
VOLUME II
Edited and Published by
HSIEH WEN SHEN
Professor of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University
H. W. Shen, P.O. Box 606, Fort Collins, Colorado
U.S.A. 80521
plaza and Sanchez (1964) determined the following size
.requirements for riprap in a flume study.
Table 23 -1 Riprap Requirement after Maza and Sanchez (1964)
Mean flow Velocity Size of Riprap Required
feet per second feet
3 0.2
4.5 0.33
6.0 0.39
7 . 5 0.60
9.Q- 0.85
10.5 1.2
12.0 1.5
13.5 1.9
3 N"Opi
Bayside Engineering Associates,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS
December 16, 1993
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
100 Cambridge Street, 20th Floor
Boston, MA 02202
ATTN: MEPA Unit, File No. 9698
-4mo/'
Inc.
5 MIDDLESEX AVENUE
SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS 02145-1127
TELEPHONE (617) 625 -4696
FAX (617) 625 -5095
RE: Filling Underwater Erosion Hole at Cooks Dam Bridge, Northampton
EOEA File No. 9698
Reuly to issues in December 8,1993 Memorandum from Paulette L. Kuzdeba. Northampton
Senior Planner. to MEPA.
Dear Sir:
This letter is written on behalf of the project applicant to answer the questions raised by Paulette
L. Kuzdeba, Northampton Office of Planning, in her December 8, 1993 memorandum to MEPA
regarding the project listed above.
The ENF application does not list Open Space/Recreation, Fisheries/Wildlife or Water Supply/Use
as being affected by this project for the following reasons. The river bottom hole is located on
private property, therefore, this location is not part of the designated open space /recreation land
in the area. As stated in the September 9, 1993 letter from the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife
regarding this project; "Filling of a single 20'x10'x10' erosion hole with large diameter boulders at
Cooks Dam Bridge represents an insignificant loss of fish habitat ". This project will not alter the
water supply or the use of the water supply. On August 27, 1993 Octavio Santos of DEP Water
Supply was contacted regarding this project, he confirmed the Mill River in Northampton did not
contribute to a surface water drinking water supply.
As indicated in the narrative on the first page of the ENF, the hole was caused by water flowing
in the river. Filling the hole with rocks will prevent further erosion of the river bottom. This will
have no impact on the velocity and typical flow of the river. The banks boundaries of the river in
the area are primarily rock ledge. The potential for other erosion impacts caused by filling this hole
are minimal.
The hole is 20'x10'x10', therefore, it is believed that filling in the entire hole is necessary to
complete the job. No studies have been conducted regarding how far a child can jump or how far
he /she thinks they can jump.
The consistency of this project with local planning should be answered by Northampton DPW and
other Northampton planners. As we understand it, the project has been reviewed and approved
by the Mayor. We do not know what other Northampton departments are involved with this
project. The site is on private property according to the assessors map provided and any form of
swimming or diving in this area is extremely dangerous.
`ft. - ,Mw,,
The following method of work is proposed. The erosion hole (site) is directly adjacent to Cooks
Dam Bridge. The boulders will be brought in by truck. The truck will be parked on the bridge
near the site. A crane will also be parked on the bridge adjacent to the site and the boulder truck.
The boulders will be rigged, raised out of the truck, lowered to the river and released into the
erosion hole using the crane. Personnel access to the site will be along a footpath at the southeast
end of the bridge and leading down to the river.
Because of the proposed methodology for lowering the boulders and filling the erosion hole. There
are no anticipated impacts by this project that would alter any land at the site, therefore, mitigative
measures for the prevention of erosion from adjacent land should not be required.
The primary impact of this project, referring to the letter dated September 9, 1993 from the
Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, would be the potential for situation during the filling operation.
This potential impact will be minimized by scheduling the project to occur during the months of
June through September as recommended by the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife to protect
spawning fish and downstream spawning habitat.
If you should have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours,
BAYSIDE ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
.
Steven J. Tyler, vironm�tal Manager
SJT /pt
cc: APL, DQ, GA
R. Carparso
Jeremiah Mew, EOEA, Western Region
DEP Wetlands, Western Region
Northampton Cons. Comm.
Bayside Engineering Associates, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS
December 16, 1993
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
100 Cambridge Street, 20th Floor
Boston, MA 02202
ATTN: MEPA Unit, File No. 9698
5 MIDDLESEX AVENUE
SOMERVILLE. MASSACHUSETTS 02145-1127
TELEPHONE 16171 625 -4696
FAX f617T 625 -5095
RE: Filling Underwater Erosion Hole at Cooks Dam Bridge, Northampton
EOEA File No. 9698
ReMv to information noted in EOEA DEP Western Rezions letter dated December 3. 1993.
Dear Sir:
This letter is written on behalf of the project applicant to provide a description of the method of
work and access to the site for the project listed above. The need for this information was noted
in the December 3, 1993 Notification of File Number from Jeremiah Mew, EOEA, DEP Western
Region to the project applicant.
The following method of work is proposed. The erosion hole (site) is directly adjacent to Cooks
Dam Bridge. The boulders will be brought in by truck The truck will be parked on the bridge
near the site. A crane will also be parked on the bridge adjacent to the site and the boulder truck
The boulders will be rigged, raised out of the truck, lowered to the river and released into the
erosion hole using the crane. Personnel access to the site will be along a footpath at the southeast
end of the bridge and leading down to the river.
Because of the proposed methodology for lowering the boulders and filling the erosion hole, there
are no anticipated impacts by this project that would alter any land at the site, therefore, mitigative
measures for the prevention of erosion from adjacent land should not be required. The primary
impact of this project, referring to the letter dated September 9, 1993 from the Division of Fisheries
and Wildlife, would be the potential for situation during the filling operation. This potential impact
will be minimized by scheduling the project to occur during the months of June through September
as recommended by the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife to protect spawning fish and downstream
spawning habitat.
If you should have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours,
BAYSIDE ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
"Steven J. Tylit4nviro#mental Manager
cc: APL, DQ, GA
R. Carparso
Jeremiah Mew, EOEA, Western Region
DEP Wetlands, Western Region
Northampton Cons. Comm.
Massachusetts Audubon Society
South Great Road
Lincoln, Massachusetts 01773
(617) 259 -9500
December 13, 1993 .1 L.
Trudy Coxe, Secretary
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
20th Floor
100 Cambridge St.
Boston, MA 02202
Attention: MEPA Unit
Re: EOEA # 9698, Cooks Dam Bridae, Northampton
Dear Secretary Coxe:
On behalf of the Massachusetts Audubon Society, I submit the
following comments on the Environmental Notification Form (ENF) for the
above referenced project.
The Mill River is an important resource area. As recently as the
early 1970s, it contained a high diversity of freshwater mussel species.
The river was an historic site of the dwarf wedge mussel, a federally
endangered species which has been eliminated from the Mill River but is
being considered for reintroduction efforts there. The mussels and other
species associated with the river were severely affected over a period
of years by a series of disturbances, including several oil spills and
major sedimentation problems associated with pond dredging. However, the
river recently has shown signs of a dramatic comeback, including revival
of populations of several species of mussels.
While this project does not occur in the known habitat of any rare
species, the sensitive nature of this water body should be taken into
account. The effects of the project on potential rare species habitat
(including downstream habitat), bank and streambottom stability, water
quality, sedimentation, and other potential impacts to aquatic resources
should be carefully considered before the project moves forward. For
example, has the hole in the riverbed been surveyed for potential mussel
Populations? Will filling of this hole result in the redirection of the
energy of the water falling over the dam, causing erosion in adjacent
areas and sedimentation downstream?
While this project has a public safety purpose, care must be taken
so that it does not work against that very purpose. The area should be
clearly posted so that people who do not know that the work has been done
will not harm themselves jumping into a swimming hole that no longer
exists. If feasible, the City should also provide alternative water
based recreation for area youths and mention the availability of such
recreational sites on signs posted at this location.
Printed on Recycled Paper
1%wo, •...e
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Sincerely,
E. Heidi Roddis
Environmental Policy Specialist
CC: George Andrikidis, Northampton Dept. of Public Works
Northampton Conservation Commission
Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program
.a aRVR+A'!11 r
Bayside Engineering Associates,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS
December 10, 1993
Mr. George Andrikidis, P.E.
Department of Public Works
125 Locus Street
Northampton, MA 01060
Dear Mr. Andrikidis:
5 MIDOLESEX AVENUE
SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS 02145-1127
TELEPHONE 16171 625 -4696
FAX (617) 625.5095
RE: Filling Mill River Boston Erosion Hole at Cooks Dam Bridge, Northampton
EOEA File No. 246 -341
Reply to information noted in EOEA letter dated December 3. 1993.
The following method of work is proposed. The erosion hole (site) is directly adjacent to
Cooks Dam Bridge. The boulders will be brought in by truck. The truck will be parked on
the bridge near the site. A crane will also be parked on the bridge adjacent to the site and
the boulder truck. The boulders will be rigged, raised out of the truck, lowered to the river
and released into the erosion hole using the crane. Personnel access to the site will be along
a footpath at the southeast end of the bridge and leading down to the river.
Because of the proposed methodology for lowering the boulders and filling the erosion hole,
there are no anticipated impacts by this project that would alter any land at the site,
therefore, mitigative measures for the prevention of erosion from adjacent land should not
be required.
The primary impact of this project, referring to the letter dated September 9, 1993 from the
Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, would be the potential for situation during the filling
operation. This potential impact will be minimized by scheduling the project to occur during
the months of June through September as recommended by the Division of Fisheries and
Wildlife to protect spawning fish and downstream spawning habitat.
If you should have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact our office.
Very truly yours,
BAYSIDE ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
� l `7
Steven J. Type , Environmental Manager
SJT /pt
Inc.
cc: APL, DQ, MC
Bayside Engineering Associates, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS
December 10, 1993
Mr. George Andrikidis, P.E.
Department of Public Works
125 Locus Street
Northampton, MA 01060
_4W1
5 MIDDLESEX AVENUE
SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS 02145-1127
TELEPHONE 16171 625 -4696
FAX(617)625 -5095
RE: Filling Mill River Boston Erosion Hole at Cooks Dam Bridge, Northampton
EOEA File No. 246 -341
Reply to issues in December 8. 1993 Memorandum from Paulette L. Kuzdeba,
Northampton Senior Planner. to MEPA.
Dear Mr. Andrikidis:
The ENF application does not list Open Space/Recreation, Fisheries/Wildlife or Water
Supply/Use as being affected by this project for the following reasons. The river bottom
hole is located on private property, therefore, this location is not part of the designated open
space /recreation land in the area. As stated in the September 9, 1993 letter from the
Division of Fisheries and Wildlife regarding this project; "Filling of a single 20'x10'x10'
erosion hole with large diameter boulders at Cooks Dam Bridge represents an insignificant
loss of fish habitat ". This project will not alter the water supply or the use of the water
supply. On August 27, 1993 I contacted Octavio Santos of DEP Water Supply regarding this
project, he confirmed the Mill River in Northampton did not contribute to a surface water
drinking water supply.
As indicated in the narrative on the first page of the ENF, the hole was caused by water
flowing in the river. Filling the hole with rocks will prevent further erosion of the river
bottom. This will have no impact on the velocity and typical flow of the river. The banks
boundaries of the river in the area are primarily rock ledge. The potential for other erosion
compacts caused by filling this hole are minimal.
The hole is 20'x10'x10', therefore, it is believed that filling in the entire hole is necessary to
complete the job. No studies have been conducted regarding how far a child can jump or
how far he /she thinks they can jump.
The consistency of this project with local planning should be answered by DPW and other
Northampton planners. As we understand it, the project has been reviewed and approved
by the Mayor. We do not know what other Northampton departments are involved with this
project. The site is on private property according to the assessors map provided and any
form of swimming or diving in this area is extremely dangerous.
The following method of work is proposed. The erosion hole (site) is directly adjacent to
Cooks Dam Bridge. The boulders will be brought in by truck. The truck will be parked on
the bridge near the site. A crane will also be parked on the bridge adjacent to the site and
the boulder truck. The boulders will be rigged, raised out of the truck, lowered to the river
and released into the erosion hole using the crane. Personnel access to the site will be along
a footpath at the southeast end of the bridge and leading down to the river.
t+W
`�►�
DANIEL S. GREENBAUM
Commissioner t
JOHN HIGGINS Jd�"OO
Regio Director
RE: NOTIFICATION OF FILE NUMBER
WETLANDS/
(city /town)
DATE: 1 7 ? / 3
The Department of Environmental Protection has received a Notice of Intent filed in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act
(M.G.L. c. 131, §40):
APPLICANT: • r�
ADDRESS:
KiA
PROJECT LOCATION:
OWNER: KCSArD F
ADDRESS: 135
t71f 3
IF CHECKED, THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S) APPLY TO THIS NOTICE OF INTENT:
A. This project has been assigned the following file #: ZA� — 3 4 ` t )
Although a file # is being issued, please note the following: ACV S h> t 4C } 61 C4 14611', 40 1 We — '1h {
ISSUANCE OF A FILE NUMBER INDICATES ONLY COMPLETENESS OF SUBMITTAL, NOT APPROVAL OF
APPLICATION
B. No File # will be assigned to this project until the following missing information is sent to this office, to meet the minimum
submittal requirements in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Regulations at 310 CMR 10.00:
( ) copy(s) of a completed Notice of Intent (Form 3 or Form 4 of Sect. 10.99, whichever is applicable) and a cony of the
Fee Transmittal Form, with a 01Dv of the check for the State's share of the Notice of Intent filing -f=
( ) copy(s) of plans, calculations, and other documentation necessary to completely describe the proposed work and
mitigating measures to protect resource areas.
( ) copy(s) of an 8 -1/2 x 11" section of the USGS map of the area.
( ) copy(s) of plans showing compliance with Title 5 of the State Environmental Code, 310 CMR 15.00.
( ) Proof that a copy of your Notice of Intent has been mailed or hand delivered to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species
Program.
COMMENTS:
(see page 2 for additional information)
1
C : _ Other Regulatory Jurisdiction `-" _ -. woo l
Application has been forwarded to Waterways Regulatory Program to determine if a Chapter 91 License is required.
( ) Applicant is advised to forward a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Corps of Engineers for review (call 1- 800 - 362 -4367 for
information).
D. "'_ 401 Water Quality Certification
The project described in your Notice of Intent requires a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Department of Environmental
Protectipp and may require submittal of a 401 application form. See below for further details:
Based upon the information submitted in and with your Notice of Intent a separate 401 Water Quality Certification
application form is not required. The Department of Environmental Protection has reviewed the plans submitted by the
applicant and finds that there is reasonable assurance that the project or activity will be conducted in a manner that will not
violate the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards, provided that:
a) the applicant receives and complies with a Final Order of Conditions from the local conservation commission or the
Department;
b) the Order of Conditions does not cause the loss of more than 5,000 sq. ft. of bordering vegetated wetlands and land
under water and/or the dredging of more than 100 cubic yards of land under water;
c) any loss of vegetated wetlands has been mitigated with a minimum replication of 1:1; and
d) the project is not exempt from the M.G.L. c.131, §40 - the Wetlands Protection Act: is not part of a subdivision; does
not cause the loss of any wetlands designated as Outstanding Resource Waters; and does not cause the loss of any salt
marsh.
Therefore, provided that the above conditions are satisfied, the Final Order of Conditions will serve as the Water Quality
Certification for this project. This does not relieve the applicant of the duty to comply with any other statues or regulations.
( ) Before the activity described in the Notice of Intent can commence, you must obtain a Water Quality Certification from this
Regional Office. Please complete the enclosed 401 Water Quality Certification appliWion form and file it with this
Regional Office for review. -
( ) Your project involves dredging of greater than 100 cubic yards of material or requires a permit from the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission for work in "waters of the Commonwealth." Therefore, your proposed project is subject to 314 CMR
9.00 and requires a Water Quality Certification. Please complete the enclosed 401 Water Quality Certification
application form and file it with the Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water Pollution Control,
One Winter Street, Boston, MA 02108. Contact the Division of Water Pollution Control at 617 - 292 -5655 if you have any
questions.
For more information please contact: i tf ilk,
cc: Conservation Commission ( ) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
( ) Owner: ( ) Representative:
( ) DEP - Water Pollution Control ( ) DEP Waterways
( ) Other:
Page 2
s
BAYSIDE ENGINEERING ASSOC., INC. JOP
5 MIDDLESEX X SHEETNl O F 2
SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSwww'S 02145
(617) 625 -4696 CALCULATED BY DATE
FAX (617) 625.5095 CHECKED By �^ DATE
+si�7
J
P.=: 'A- NYC. 9a 12"S 1' Pm ' 4�kg +c eom We J141i 'o -i w — * TOLL RH i MM 4=
Appendix 4
Page 1 of 2
1-/
c "
Form 3
commonwealth
of XassachuBetts
i
DIU I.;te r+o . '�(� '3 UI
(1 be prwwol by D
Gty /roM-n Northampton
Appiwnnt Citv of No - = t—
Departstent of
Dafeaae
United States
Notice of Intent of Ameri
Under the
Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, 540
and
Application for a Department of the Array Permit
part I: General Information
1. Location: Street Address
Lot Number 10 -D -46
Public
2. Project: Type Safetv
Cooks Dam Bride, Main Street
Description See Attachment 1
3. Registry: countyHampshi.re current Book 7579
Certificate (if Registered Land)
4. Applicant City of Northampton
Address 125 Locust Street, Northampton, MA
5. Property owner Richard Caparso
Address 135 Main Street: Lppdq . MA 01093
6. Representative Mr. Geor rikidis. P.F.
Address 125 Locus Street, Northampton, MA
t Page ?)
Tel. (413) 582 -1570
Tel. (413) 586 -1898
LM
7. a. Have the conservation Commission and the Depart- ment's Regional office each
been sent, by certified mail or hand deliver, Z copies of completed Notice of
Intent, with supporming plans and documents?
Yes Q No Cl
b. Has the fee been submitted? Yes ® No Cl
c. Total Filing Fee Submitted 0
d. City /Town Share of Filing Fee 0* State Share of Filing Fee 0*
(sent to City /Town) (:4 of fee in excess of S25, sent to OEP)
e. Is a brief statement attached indicating how the applicant calculated the
fee? ® Yes ❑ No
*Municipality exempt from filing fees
I
NOTICE OF INTENT
Attachment 1
2. Project Description:
The project consists of backfilling an eroded hole in the Mill River bed below Cooks Dam
Bridge with large diameters boulders making the erosion hole area level with the rest of the
river bed. The hole in the bottom of Mill River has eroded over time to its current depth
of approximately 10 feet below the normal river bottom. The erosion hole does not
contribute to the river flow path. The hole eroded due to the turbulent flow caused by
water flowing over the dam, adjacent to the bridge, and falling to the river bottom. This
project will not alter water flow in the Mill River. The need to fill the river bottom erosion
hole is to prevent persons from climbing on the bridge, 20 -30 feet above the river surface,
and jumping into the river bottom hole and risking serious personal injury.
`••w .a/
Roadways and parking areas
Property boundaries, easements and rights -of -way
other
part 2IZ: work Description
Indicate which of the following information has been provided (on a plan, in
narrative description or calculations) to clearly, completely and accurately
describe work proposed within each of the resource areas checked in Part I,
item 11 above.
Identifying
Number /Letter
(of plan, narrative
or calculations)
Appendix 1
Appendix 4
?lanview and cross Section of:,
structures (such as build -ngs, piers, towers and headwalls)
Drainage and flood control facilities, including culverts
and open channels(with inverts), dams and dikes
subsurface sewage disposal systems & underground utilities
Tilling, dredging and excavating, indicating volume and
composition of material
compensatory storage areas, where required in accordance
with Part III, section 10.57(4) of the regulations.
wildlife habitat restoration or replication areas
other
?oint source Discharee
Description of characteristics of discharge from point
source (both closed and open channel), when point of
discharge falls within resource area checked under Part I,
item 11 above, as supported by standard engineering
calculations, data and plans, including but not limited to
the following:
1. Delineation of the drainage area contributing to the point of discharge;
2. Pre-and post-development peak run-off from the drainage area, at the point of discharge, for at least
the 10 -year and 100 -year frequency storm;
3. Pre- and post- develocwnt rate of infiltration contributing to the resource area checked under Part 1,
item 11 above;
4. Estimated water quality characteristics of pre- and post-developmer + t run -off at the point of
discharge.
Part IV: Mitigating Measures
rM
1. Clearly, completely and accurately describe, with reference to supporting plans and calculations where
necessary:
(a) All measures and designs proposed to meet the performance standards set forth under each
resource area specified in Part 11 or Part III of the regulations; or
(b) Why the presumptions set forth under each resource area specified in Part II or Part III of the
regulations do not apply.
0 Coastal Resource Area ':'ype: Identifying number or
3 Inland letter of support
Land Under Waterway documents
The project will fill a 20'long x 10'wide x 10'deep river bottom
erosion hole adjacent to Cooks Dam Bridge. The surface area
of the hole is approximately 200 ft .2 and the volume is Appendix 2
approximately 2,000 ft.'. The hole is being filled to prevent Appendix 3
persons from climbing on the bridge, 20 -30 feet above the Appendix 4
river surface, and jumping into the river bottom hole and Appendix 5
risking serious personal injury. The erosion hole will be filled Appendix 6
with large diameter boulders during a low flow month (June -
September) to reduce potential harm due to siltation. This
project will not present a significant environmental impact.
0 Coastal Resource Area Type: Identifying number or
0 Inland letter of support
documents
❑ coastal
❑ Inland
2.
Resource Area Type:
,.,/
Identifying number or
letter of support
documents
Clearly, coeoletely and accurately cescribe, with reference to supporting plans and calculations .mere
necessary:
(a) all measures and designs to regulate wort within the Buffer Zone so as to ensure that said wort
does not alter an area specified in Part 1, Section 10.020)(a) of these regulations; or
(b) if wort in the Buffer Zone will alter such an area, all measures and designs proposed to meet
the performance standards established for the adjacent resource area, specified in Part 11 or
Part III of these regulations.
❑ coastal Resource Area Type Bordered Identifying number or
❑ Inland By 100 -Feet Discretionary Zone: letter of support
documents
`..-
,.,/
part V: Additional Information for a Department of the Army Permit
1. CoE Application No.
(to be provided by COE)
2. Mill River
(Name of waterway)
3. Names and addresses of property owners adjoining your property:
Richard Caparso Frank Look Memorial Park
135 Main Street North Main Street
Leeds, MA 01053 Florence, MA 01060
4. Document other project alternatives (i.e., other locations and /or
construction methods, particularly those that would eliminate the
discharge of dredged or fill material into waters or wetlands).
5. 8h x I1 drawings in planview and cross - section, showing the resource
area and the proposed activity within the resource area. Drawings must be
to scale and should be clear enough for photocopying.
Certification is required from the Division o= water Pollution Control before
the Federal permit can be issued. Certification may be obtained by contacting
the Division of water Pollution Control, 1 winter Street, Boston,
Massachusetts 02108.
where the activity will take place within the area under the Massachusetts
approved Coastal Zone Management Program, the applicant certifies that his
pr000sod activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner that is
consistent with the approved program.
Information provided will be used in evaluating the application for a permit
and is made a matter of public record through issuance of a public notice.
Disclosure of this information is voluntary; however, if necessary information
is not provided, the application cannot be processed nor can a permit be
issued.
Z hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that the foregoing
Notice of Intent and accompanying plans, documents and supperting data are
t =ae and complete, to the best of my knowledge.
signature of Applicant Date
signature of ,kppli-cant's Representative Date
FORM "Exception to EHG Form 4345 approved by HCUSACE, 6 May 1982"
YET„ 100 (TEST)
1 MAY 82 "This document contains a joint Department of the Army and State of
Massachusetts aoollcacion for a permit to obtain permission to perform
activities in United States waters. The Office of Management and
9udget(CM6) has acoroved those questions required Dy the US Army :orps of
Engineers. omS mumoer 0702.0036 and exciraclon dare of 3G Septemoer 1983
aeplies ". This statement will oe sec in 6 point type.
2 Hai deny 1 — . ✓ ' l
Hen �. .�•
APPENDIX 1 - USGS
I, /n 1, i F _ ✓�// ,� /�:, �, / lip. " - -� / it ,
I ' I f ,/ �, i 1� e � _ 1 ~ .lvi - ^' lJ % � �' hr1; _� If• / %� ��� � �- +',' I Ij% j ��,.-� -
'
i
I s:�llli \•\ J i J 'Iun�Yl� , \� O r �_ S t J`
— >_ r.San rigm�+ar.• /' /Y. //' Cem
<a �
0 'l
. �) j \��'�/�'� '•: %f �/ \ \''•� `.1 ��� //_
'O ' ',� \1 t �/ i �' \�.' J -'`� t c \,�• _ 4 ;� ��:i� ;! 't .• , /��' � yl �I( . j \
P 2� i .vlT �I �r� Y.T.. • °• ry �'
�� „(� it Ir � ` ;,'� /i':,;�j� ^t` \. \ 1 \`,•. � la \ 1 / \ v '• - .,� <�� _ / A. �. .f % �� I�,
\ 11' �� �--° ,.I �r%� i� - \, ''.,; �I ;•, y \ 1 Li l\`r' P.
Leeds
�� ! )', w, f. -; , / • _. � � �R66ert !tea ,; ; , �' _ � ::;;�•: � 'ate' \'`'
yy ��'� -
---�.J , , J �;�;' j �/ i � �%� ��/ ��% C \ ..�:1 �(- {•I1,, "�i 'ire r�'I �, J
N .
�';� \ ��
�� �i fJ s ND_rihampton\
- 77 - . 1
�.0 •r'r' li{ �,./ /!1 , 0� �.. �. •\.L.�� ISJ ,r Geountry Cis•' \\ �_ I \ \
�� I r u i ��\ (/ �`i/ nr .•. �F� .�/ / /�' �\ji�` _� •' �f.. •� 1 MEMORIAL
• `\ \ \�\ D PARK d J
COOKS DAM BRIDGE
°( (PROJECT LOCUS)
�` 2 it / �/ �� \�.' ^_: ;nom l �) — •. J j
Meadow
o �
1
--� •�- - 17, ) "'� 1 • E LF 1 f \,,,, ., �.V.a� ;"-- .•�- ., =1' �� 1� 1 �" \ '� / o • R -
t
i � //� % r 'ill O ~ 'I,''" J� / /i, ��`•�'� /,' /, j \ \J 1 ` �'� / �� � f �.'� :� 'i�
�\01'1:;�11111�11��}
, 6 �. %r EASTHAMPTON QUADRANGLE
)
;•, j;!•i5�� ANGLE !c�� iJ} ' � ; ' �?`•.�\
�,, ` fly ^ -- ;rj' `.\ r r�• -0 � Zo _ /:; ,i MASSACHUSETTS 1,�
7.5 MINUTE SERIES TOPOGRAPHICP�t.
r
�/ i;�• ���` � - i� �r ��- s?Y7;i': _ui.',nv..., � - ( � �`•-
'1// ; EASTHAMPTON, MASS.
-�_- lJ i • ~ %�`'\ N4215— w7237.5/7.5 ■ MASS
c In
1964
P D H•
�i \ '\ \ i' - v. \ \�•;' PHOTOREVISEO 1979 1 �„ ,
•�, ;�' j am\ i" 1 \ `\ \1 ^ ":c ^ AMS 6468 1 SW- SERIES V814 Vb QOACRANGL_ LCCALON \
SCALE 1.24000
0 1 MILE
1000 0 1000 2000 30l:U 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET % — —
\ M i n e-r � 0 — I KILOMETER ` Appendix 1
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET f; /• " -_ :.,_,
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL �'` _��`•- ��, -
APPENDIX 2 - SITE MAP
COOKS DAM BRIDGE
sl
N
U
2
\ N �
W ;
../
FILL ERODED HOLE,
20 DEEP,
WITH LARGE DIA.
BOULDERS
,
1 ,
F
7 v
Erosion Hole Site Plan
November 11, 1993
Appendix 2
C
n�
k
° a
�i
o
�
1
I�
1 N
�
V
Y
2
FJ
N <
W ;
1
i
�
o
I
,
RIVER BANK
<
= i
(ROCK LEDGE)
'
1
F
<
o
�<
<
� Y
1
I J
WI
WI 8
1 J
< N
rfl
N
U
2
\ N �
W ;
../
FILL ERODED HOLE,
20 DEEP,
WITH LARGE DIA.
BOULDERS
,
1 ,
F
7 v
Erosion Hole Site Plan
November 11, 1993
Appendix 2
MAP OF ESTIMATED HABITATS E A S T H A M P T O N Q U A D
Of STATE-LISTED RARE WETLANDS WILDLIFE
Use only In reference to the Wetlands
Protection Act Regulations (310 CMR 10)
Natural Heritage i Endangered Species Program
rhusetls Division of Fisheries & Wlldlile
APPENDIX 3 - ESTIMATED HABITATS OF STATE- LISTED J
LL RARE WETLANDS WILDLIFE, 1993 EDITION
NORT FAAt��
COOKS DAM BRIDGE
(PROJECT LOCUS) LA°
Ro its _ p
Me
Res !ousts at ' •�'•. .• .
• d
savunL RBIs
Per R r L
df 6-
I Pond
�. •' ALE!
nd ,.
t 'NiiiL HILLS
i PAR d
_ _Rocky Hill
_Pond
PINE
1
H • • fi.ul ta • '
LLE L . ••
W T WIIA Y / a. ►IAI
�5 Appendix 3
. /DI(Dt0► ���iJ.
I
• BAYSIDE ENGINEERINb,�SSOC., INC. Boa
5 MIDDLESEX AVE. SHEET NO � o Z
SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS 02145
(617) 625 -4696 CALCULATED BY D' Ouo ra 9 ` 0.. DATA 8 /!�j' 9 3
FAX (617) 625 -5095
CHECKED BY pgTG
s�„ c MTS
_ ......... _ ................ ...
�..._... _--
PNf.'7tL::14� iYgr Slec6� 2^S I , Al l =AO" .2 mac. V= 01471 74 HW rX fv(E 103-M 41V
i
Appendix 4
BAYSIDE ENGINEERING ASSOC., INC.
5 MIDDLESEX AVE.
SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS 02145
(617) 625 -4696
FAX (617) 625 -5095
JOP
1 ../
SHEET Nn 2 1 Of
CALCULATED BY QU Q ra 4
CHECKED BY
_._:._......... .._.. .......__._.._.._. ....:_..._...�....._..._....... _.._._._._ _........_ ..:.........._ _..___ . ... .... ... .... —.
_ _
L
`�- �
Va /c/5
i
�r e,4
OAT=
... ......... : ........... :._...._._._ Appendix 4 .
_..... .... _... ....... _ Page 2 of 2
// T 3
Id
°r ',
3r � s _
P1100uCt;YFi �nsn I tA.+M 1K. Gi Wa f1411 rO a," of TOU FYR 1 44,154M
Commonwealth 377
Divisionot
..
Fisheffies&Wildlife _
Wayne F. MacCallum, Director R E G E- I V E- D
�SGC., INC.
September 9, 1993
SEPIjI3
Mr . Steven J. Tyler
Environmental Manager s ,,.�
Bayside Engineering Associates, :r_c, `M!D0L'=. --- -X A,VE- S0,MER�' :_ -._, MA
5 Middlesex Avenue
Somerville, Massachusetts 02145 -1127
RE: Filling Mill River Erosion Hole at Cooks Dam Bridge,
Northampton
Dear Mr. Tyler:
A search of our files indicates that the Mill River supports trout,
and an assortment of common fish species There are no known rare
or endangered fish species present. Filling of a single
20'x10 "x10" erosion hole with large diameter boulders at Cook's Dam
Bridge represents an insignificant loss of fish habitat. My
primary concern would be the potential for siltation during the
filling operation. To protect spawning fish and downstream
spawning habitat, I recommend this operation occur during summer
low flows during the months of June through September.
Sincerely,
g&o,d -�. I
Richard L. Keller
Aquatic Biologist
cc: Ralph Taylor, MDFW Conn. Valley District Supervisor
Appendix 5
Field Headquarters
One P abbit Hill load, Westborough, Massachusetts 01581 (508) 792 -7270
An Agcncy of the Department of Fisheries. Wildlife & Environmental Law Enforcement
y Commonwea`P f Massachusetts '.w Natural Heritage and
Division of Fisheries and Wildlife._ Species Program
100 Cambridge Street
Boston, MA 02202 ' ' -\ tel (617) 727 -9194
fax (617) 727 -72x8
NHESP No.:93 -704 __ _ - -• _ ; I;
Steven J. Tyler
Bayside Engineering Associates
5 Middlesex Avenue
Somerville, MA 02145 -1127
17 September 1993
Re: Filling Mill River Bottom Erosion Hole
Cooks Dam Bridge, Northampton, MA
Dear Mr. Tyler:
Thank you for contacting the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program for information
regarding rare or endangered species in the vicinity of the project referred to above.
At this time we are not aware of any rare or endangered plants or animals or exemplary natural
communities that would be adversely affected by the proposed project.
This review concerns only rare or endangered species of plants and animals and ecologically
significant natural communities for which the Program maintains site - specific records. This review
does not rule out the possibility that more common wildlife or vegetation might be adversely
affected by the project, especially if it will modify currently undeveloped areas. Should project
plans change, or new rare species information become available, this evaluation may have to be
reconsidered. Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Jay Copeland
Environmental Reviewer
Form: IPROJNP.JC
This response to your request for rare species information has been prepared for you as a free service. However, funding
for this service comes largely from voluntary contributions. Those wishing to help support the program's work, including the
preparation of responses to requests for rare species information such as this, can do so by making out a check to the
"Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Fund" and sending it to: THE NHES FUND, 100 Cambridge Street, Room 1902 -
MDFW-HP, Boston, MA 02202. Contributions are tax deductable on federal income tax returns. Thank you for your
support.
Appendix 6
Form 3
Commonwealth
of Massachusetts
�t� Cam„
1)JU t'lic No.
(1 oc providcd by Da)
Gtyfro%-n Northampton
Applw2nt Citv of NorT nn�_
Department of
Defense
United States
Notice of Intent of 1Wmerica
Under the §40
Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131,
and
Application for a Department of the Army Permit
Part I: General Information
1. Location: Street Address
Lot Number 10 - -
Public
2. Project: Type Safetv
Cooks Dam Bridge, Main Street
Description See Attach t
3. Registry: CountyHaWsh Current Book 7574
Certificate (if Registered Land)
a. Applicant City of Northampton
Address 125 Locust Street, Northampton, MA
5. Property owner Richard Caparso
Address 135 Main Street: T,g?�q.
6. Representative Mr. Geor Andri i rtic. P.F.
Address 125 Locus Street, Northampton, MA
t Page I)t
Tel. (413) 582 -1570
Tel. (413) 586 -1898
Te1. (413)98 2 -0570
ommission a
7. a. Have the Conservation C de the Department's Regional
copies Ofcompleted Notice each
been sent, by certified ma
i_ or hand deliver,
Intent, with supporting plans and documents?
Yes ® No ❑
b. Has the fee been submitted? Yes ® No ❑
C . Total Filing Fee Submitted 0*
d_ City /Town Share of Filing Fee 0* State Share of Filing Fee 0*
(sent to City /Town) (Y, of fee in excess of 525, sent to OEP)
e. is a brief statement attached indicating how the analicant calculated the
fee? ® Yes ❑ No
*Municipality exempt from filing fees
`%me
NOTICE OF INTENT
Attachment 1
2. Project Description:
The project consists of backfilling an eroded hole in the Mill River bed below Cooks Dam
Bridge with large diameterX boulders making the erosion hole area level with the rest of the
river bed. The hole in the bottom of Mill River has eroded over time to its current depth d�
of approximately 10 feet below the normal river bottom. The erosion hole does not 03, Kn °�
contribute to the river flow path. The hole eroded due to the turbulent flow caused by r
water flowing over the dam, adjacent to the bridge, and fal to the river bo ttom. This
p ro j ect vv� l�not alter wa er ow m the Mill River. The need to fill the river bottom erosion
hole is to prevent persons from climbing on the bridge, 20 -30 feet above the river surface,
and jumping into the river bottom hole and risking serious personal injury.
`'`° A°o
��� l ?
``✓ ..I'
S. Have all obtainable permits, variances and approvals required by local by - law
been obtained?
Yes ® No ❑
obtained Applied For: Not Applied For:
MEPA
9. Is any portion of the site Ls ubje t to$1053tlanddss R order pursuant
to G.L. C. 131, $ 4 o
10. List all plans and supporting documents submitted with this Notice of
Intent.
Identifying Title, Date
Number /Letter
Appendix 1 USGS Map
Appendix 2 Site Map
Appendix 3 Estimated Habitat Map, 1993
AppanrliY 4 p— n ^`nn• unla_ p nlrnma F Fill C-
Appendix 5 Reply: from Mass Division of Fisheries & Wildlife
Appendix 6 Reply from Mass. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program
11. check those resource areas within which work is proposed:
(a)
❑ Buffer Zone
(b)
Inland:
Land
Subject to Flooding
❑ Bank'
❑ Bordering vegetated wetland -
❑
Bordering
Land Under water Body &nw�at�erway�
C5 - I
❑
Isolated
(c)
Coastal: /
7
❑
Designated Port Area*
❑ Land Under the ocean-
i
❑ Coastal Beach
❑
Coastal Dune
❑ Beach,
❑
Coastal Bank
Barrier
❑
❑ Rocky Intertidal Shore-
Salt Marsh-
❑ Land Under Salt Pond-
❑
Land Containing shellfish-
❑ Fish Run' \ /
*Likely to involve U.S. A_^ny corps of Engineers concurrent jurisdiction.
See
General Instructions for completing
Notice
of Intent.
O.i
rn
12. Is the project within estimated habitat which is indicated on the most
recent Estimted Habitat Map
Natural Heritagetand EndangeredeSpeciesaProg Wildlife (if any) of Program?
P
YES ( No [ XJ Date printed on the Estimated Habitat Hap
No MAP AVAILABLE [ J (if any)
sent a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage
If yea, have you
and Endangered Species
Program via the U.S. Postal Service by certified or
priority mail (or otherwise sent it in a manner that guarantees delivery
within two days) no later than the date of the filing of this Notice of
tntent with the conservation commission and the DEP regional office?
YES [ J No [ J
If yes please attach evidence of timely mailing or other delivery to the
Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program.
part II: Site Description
Indicate which of the following information has been provided ( on a plan, in
narrative description or calculations) to clearly, completely and accura *_ely
describe existing site conditions.
Identifying
Number /Letter
(of plan, narrative
or calculations)
Natural Features
soils
Vegetation
Topography
open water bodies(including ponds and lakes)
Appendix 2 - lowing water bodies(including streams and rivers)
Public and private surface water and ground water supplies
on or within 100 feet o! site
Maximum annual ground water elevations with dates and
location of test
Appendix 2 Boundaries of resource areas checked under Part 1, item II
above
other
Nan -made Features:,
Appendix 2 Structures (such as buildings, piers, towers and
headwalls)
Drainage and flood control facilities at the site and
immediately off the site, including culverts and open
channels (with inverts), dams and dikes
subsurface sewage disposal systems
Underground utilities
Roadways and parking areas
Property boundaries, easements and rights -of -way
other
Part III: Work Description
Indicate which of the following information has been provided and accurately
in
narrative description or calculations) to clearly, y, completely y
describe work proposed within each of the resource areas checked in Part I,
item 11 above.
Identifying
Number /Letter
(of plan, narrative
or calculations)
Appendix 1
Appendix 4
?lanview and cross section of :,
structures(such as build -ngs, piers, towers and headwalls)
Drainage and flood control facilities, including culverts
and open channels(with inverts), dams and dikes
subsurface sewage disposal systems i underground utilities
Filling, dredging and excavating, indicating volume and
composition of material
Compensatory storage areas, where required in accordance
with Part III, section 10.57(4) of the regulations.
Wildlife habitat restoration or replication areas
Other
?oint source oischarge.
Description of characteristics of discharge from point
source (both closed and open channel), when point of
discharge falls within resource area checked under Part I,
item 11 above, as supported by standard engineering
calculations, data and plans, including but not limited to
the following:
1. Delineation of the drainage area contributing to the point of discharge;
Z. Pre -and post-develoCment peak run-off from the drainage area, at the point of discharge, for at least
the 10-year and 100-year frequency Storm;
3. Pre- and post - develocn+ent rate of infiltration contributing to the resource area checked under Part 1,
i tern 11 above;
G. Estimated water quality characteristics of pre- and post-cevelopment run -off at the point of
discharge.
'low
Part IV: Mitigating Measures
... 0 '
1. Clearly, coapletely and accurately describe, with reference to supporting plans and calculations where
necessary:
(a) ALL measures and designs proposed to Beet the performance standards set forth under each
resource area specified in Part It or Part III of the regulations, or
(b) Why the presumtions set forth under each resource area specified in Part It or Part III of the
regulations do not apply.
Cl Coastal Resource Area Type: Identifying number or
Inland letter of support
Land Under Waterway documents
The project will fill a 20'long x 10'wide x 10'deep river bottom
erosion hole adjacent to Cooks Dam Bridge. The surface area
of the hole is approximately 200 ft.' and the volume is Appendix 2
approximately 2,000 ft. The hole is being filled to prevent Appendix 3
persons from climbing on the bridge, 20 -30 feet above the Appendix 4
river surface, and jumping into the river bottom hole and Appendix 5
risking serious personal injury. The erosion hole will be filled Appendix 6
with large diameter boulders during a low flow month (June -
September) to reduce potential harm due to siltation. This
project will not present a significant environmental impact.
❑ Coastal Resource Area Type: Identifying number or
❑ Inland letter of support
documents
0 coastal
0 Inland
Resource Area Type:
Identifying number or
letter of support
documents
2. Clearly, cwvi etely and accurately oescribe, with reference to supporting plans and calculations .There
necessary:
(a) all measures and designs to regulate wort within the Buffer Zone so as to ensure that said wort
does not alter an area specified in Part 1, Section 10.020)(a) of these regulations; or
(b) if work in the Buffer Zone will alter such an area, all measures and designs proposed to meet
the performance standards established for the adjacent resource area, specified in Part 11 or
Part 111 of these regulatiom.
0 coastal Resource Area Type Bordered Identifying number or
0 Inland By 100 -Feet Discretionary Zone: letter of support
documents
1 ..
i
.../
Part V: Additional Information for a Department of the Army Permit
1. COE Application No.
(to be provided by COE)
2. Mill River
(Name of waterway)
3. Names and addresses of property owners adjoining your property:
Richard Caparso Frank Look Memorial Park
135 Main Street North Main Street
Leeds, MA 01053 Florence, MA 01060
4. Document other project alternatives (i.e., other locations and /or
construction methods, particularly those that would eliminate the
discharge of dredged or fill material into waters or wetlands).
5. 8� x 11 drawings in planview and cross - section, showing the resource
area and the proposed activity within the resource area. Drawings must be
to scale and should be clear enough for photocopying.
Certification is required from the Division of Water Pollution Control before
the Federal permit can be issued. Certification may be obtained by contacting
the Division of Water Pollution Control, 1 Winter Street, Boston,
Massachusetts 02108.
Where the activity will take place within the area under the Massachusetts
approved Coastal Zone Management Program, the applicant certifies that his
proposed activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner that is
consistent with the approved program.
information provided will be used in evaluating the application for a permit
and is made a matter of public record through issuance of a public notice.
Disclosure of this information is voluntary;' however, i! necessary information
is not provided, the application cannot be processed nor can a permit be
issued.
I hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that the foregoing
No -ice of Intent and accompanying plans, documents and supperting data are
trse and complete, to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of Applicant Date
r- 441 1
Signature of IAppli-6 Representative Date
FORM "Exception to EWG form 4345 approved by HOUSACE, 6 May 1982
ME7D 100 (TEST)
1 MAY 82 "This document Contains a joint oeoartment of the Army and State of
Massachusetts acatication for a permit to obtain permission to perform
activities in united States waters. The Office of Management and
Sudget(OM8) has aporoved those cuestions required by the US Army Corps of
Engineers. CMS wurcer 0702-0035 and exoiration date of 30 Septemoer 1983
acpl ". This statement will be set in 6 point type.
I=