The URL can be used to link to this page

08-043 160 coles meadow rd,%WW HUNTLEY ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. & ASSOCIATES, INC. SURVEYORS • ENGINEERS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS September 15, 1999 Mr. John Bennett Senior Planner City Hall, City of Northampton 210 Main Street Northampton, MAO 1060 IiL: 160 Coles Meadow Road Huntley project no. 98236 Dear John: a/ 2/9l sCatitic� digitizes. checked -- Thank you for forwarding a copy of the letter addressed to Mr. John Skibiski regarding deficiencies associated with the septic system landscaping at 160 Coles Meadow Road. Just for information purposes, you should be aware that Mr. Skibiski declined using Almer Huntley Jr. & Associates services to correct/complete the landscaping site monitoring. Mr. Skibiski informed our firm that he would take care of the landscaping issues himself. Since our firm did not have any contract to oversee the landscaping services we are not currently in a position to rectify the landscaping. Again, thank you for keeping us informed. Sincerely Almer Huntlev Jr. & Associates A^" W"ft Andrew J. Kawczak Environmental Scientist CC: D. Stasz, D. Lori ng R. Sherer (800) 227 -7723 • (413) 584 -7444 • FAX (413) 586 -9159 0 30 INDu=AL DRWE EAST • P.O. Box 568 • NoRTHAmvrON, MA 01061 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT • CITY OF NORTHAMPTON City Haft • 2i o Main Street • Northampton, MA o1 060 • 14131587 -1266 • Fax: 14131587 - 1264 WagneFeiden,Director • email: plan ning @citg.nortbampton.mams • internet :wnwcitg.nortyampton.mams September 13, 1999 John Skibiski PO Box 381 Northampton, MA 01060 RE: 160 Coles Meadow Rd. Dear Mr. Skibiski, , scannt digi tized checked __.._-_____ The Conservation Commission received a complaint from Mr. Greg Stone regarding the repair of the septic system at 160 Coles Meadow Road. A subsequent site visit revealed that the septic system installation was not done according to plan. There were significant tree roots and brush left within the buffer zone of the wetland as shown on the plan entitled "Plan of Proposed Sewage Disposal System prepared for John Skibiski to be located at 160 Coles Meadow Road, Northampton Massachusetts," dated 10/30/98 and revised 12/28/98. There was no loam and seed over the repair area. Further delays in rectifying this problem may constitute a violation of the Wetlands Protection Act. If you have questions regarding this letter, please contact me at this office. Trul yours, J�Q ennett ior , en Planner / /- o r the Northampton Conservation Commission cc: Andrew Kawczak, Huntley and Assoc. planning board • conservation commission -zoning board of appeals • yousingpartnersyip • redevelop men tautyoritg economic development • communitgdevelopment - yistoricdistrictcommission •historicalcommission • nortyamptonGIS origina t printedon recycled paper `„ 'v+" Office of Planning and Development City of Northampton City Hall • 210 Main Street Northampton, MA 01060 • (413) 587 -1266 FAX (413) 587 -1264 • EMAIL planningOcity.northampton.ma.us -Conservation Commission -Historical Commission -Planning Board • Housing Partnership -Zoning Board of Appeals Northampton Conservation Commission Minutes of Meeting May 10, 1999 The Northampton Conservation Commission held a meeting on Monday, May 10, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, Wallace J. Puchalski Municipal Building, 212 Main Street, Northampton, Massachusetts. Present were Members: Chair Mason Maronn, Vice Chair Michael Reed, Allan Doe, Jim Kaplan and William Rosen. Staff: Senior Planner John Bennett and Board Secretary Laura Krutzler. Maronn opened the meeting at 7:03 p.m. Reed noted a nkor correction to the minutes of June 22, 1998. Rosen moved to appro the minutes of June 22, 1998. Reed seco ed. The motion passed unanimously 4:0. Reed noted two minor corrections to mies of Apri nut ' 1999. Reed moved to accept the minutes of Apri 1999. Rosen seconded. The motion passed unanimously 4:0. Discussion with of Northampton Country Club a ained that he redid an area of grass and took some pin ee Bob Bernic�e, 11, that area of grp< He noted that some of those trees were within two hundr Berniche exl<ained that he had thought the jurisdictional buffer zone of the Corry one 4pKdred feet and that there were a couple of trees which he thought were 1 ORIGINAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER out that were in �et of the river. iss was only tazardo He digitized -- - ,_hecked ---- ---- -- 10I Kohl explained the changes to the originally- approved plans. Particularly, he said that, before, parking wrapped around the side and houses were in a little. Now, houses were right to the edge of the hundred foot buffer, and some of the decks were a little over. The limit -of -work line had moved a little closer to the wetlands but was still sixty feet from the wetlands at the closest point, he said. Kohl observed that as people customized their houses, they tended to expand out. They began to hit grade problems on one side of the project, so, in order not to do that, they shifted the project toward the other side. He noted that the project had moved fifteen to twenty feet closer to the wetland. Members discussed the impacts of the change. Bennett suggested the idea of permanent markers along the limit -of -work line. Kohl said he had had rebars made that said wetlands on them. Members asked him to bring them in to show them at some point. Members noted that the length of the limit -of -work line was two hundred and twenty feet, and Reed suggested that permanent markers be placed every seventy feet. Bennett marked the location of the markers on the plans. Reed moved to approve the changes to the plans [without requiring the filing of an amended Notice of Intent]. Rosen seconded. The motion passed unanimously 5:0. at;41111r, T r digitize(' Turkey Hill Road. Chekej_,, Since Kohl was present, members noted that the detention basin had not been constructed for a proj ect on Turkey Hill Road. Kohl said the second driveway was not done either. Kohl offered to pass the word along to Todd Cellura but said that if members wanted to send a formal letter, that was okay with him. Maronn said the next step was an enforcement order. Bennett suggested sending him a nice letter. Maronn said the last sentence could be that the next letter would contain an enforcement order ordering Cellura to cease and desist unless drainage structures were installed according to plan. Bennett asked if members wanted any kind of time line? Commissioners decided to give Cellura until their next meeting (May 24') to complete the work. Greg Stone -160 Coles Meadow Road. Greg Stone was present to lodge some complaints about the work to install the septic system at his property on Coles Meadow Road. Particularly, Stone said that the tank had been put in the wrong place, and the area had not been reseeded. He said the work was done in the winter, and he never saw it because it snowed. He said the land was just covered with hay, and no seed was ever put 7 down, and you could see where soil had washed away. Stone said there was also an area where workers topped some trees and left stumps in the ground. scanne" /;? /v -; , Jigitizec— _ . _ He said Huntley was the engineer and Skibiski was the former owner. ; perked Bennett reminded Commissioners that the work had been an after - the -fact filing over the winter. Kaplan asked what Stone would like them to do, and Stone said he would like somebody to come in, put top soil where the dirt had washed away so badly, and seed. Maronn said the only way he knew to get rid of roots was to throw gallons of gas on them and light them up, but other members pointed out that it was no longer burning season. Maronn noted that a Cease and Desist order had to be issued to the owner of the property, so if they issued one, it would have to be to Stone, who would then have to go after the contractor. Stone said he thought Skibiski had put the tank where it was convenient for them... He said he had written to Huntley, and they had said their contract was not with him, [so they had no responsibility to repair the area]. He said he asked them to take some off the closing costs, but they declined. He said he talked to Skibiski and asked if Huntley was going to take care of the area, and Skibiski said he didn't think so. Maronn reviewed the determination, noting that Commissioners had issued a Negative Determination checking Box #3, with the condition that disturbed areas must be seeded and the silt fence must remain in place until the seed is established. Bennett noted that the applicant was Skibiski. Maronn said he supposed they would have to issue an enforcement order to Skibiski. Maronn suggested [first] sending a friendly letter addressed to Skibiski with a copy to Andrew Kawczak at Huntley. He suggested acknowledging the complaint of the landowner about the repair of the septic system and continuing as follows: "A subsequent site visit has revealed that the septic system installation was not done according to plan. There are significant tree roots and brush which are within the buffer zone of the wetland as shown on plan entitled, " " To date, there are no loam or seed over the repair area. Any further delays in rectifying this problem may constitute a violation of the Wetlands Protection Act." Correspondence. Maronn announced that the first Watershed conference addressing Biodiversity would be held May 28th at the Campus Center at UMass from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Also, he announced the dates for "Pulling Together, A Strategic Plan for the Connecticut River Watershed." N Nlftw L./ 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 10.99: continued DEP File No. 1 246- (To be provided by DEP) Form 2 City /Town: - Northamp Applicant =y i-i" sy.,'St'sfc +* Commonwealth 11/24/98 of Massachusetts Date Request Filed Determination of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, § 40 THE CITY OF NORTHAMPTON'S WETLAND PROTECTION ORDINANCE, c.24 FROM: Northampton Conservation Commission I ssuing Authority John Skibiski John Skibiski TO: _ c/o Andrew J. Kawczak, Almer Hu ntley, Jr. (NI u Y a A i re uest) Northampton, MA 01060 Address Address This determination is issued and delivered as follows: ❑ by hand delivery to person making request on (date) [Y by certified mail, return receipt requested on ,lanuary 6, 1 999 (date) Pursuant to the authority of G.L. c. 131, §40, the Northampton Con servation Commission has considered your request for a Determination of Applicability and its supporting documentation, and has made the following determinaties4sheek- whichever is applicable): Location: Street Address 160 Coles Meadow Road Lot/Map and Parcel Id Number: Map 8, Parcel 43 This Determination is positive. 1. ❑ The area described below, which includes all/part of the area described in your request, is an Area subject to Protection under the Act. Therefore, any removing, filing, dredging or altering of that area requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. 2. ❑ The work described below, which includes all/part of the work described in your request, is within an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act and will remove, fill, dredge or alter that area. Therefore, said work requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. (Na of Xop3 owner) Northampton, MA 01060 4/1/94 310 CMR - 401 401 310 CMR: Di..w-iRTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PtwTECTION 10.99: continued 3. ❑ The work described below, which includes all/part of the work described in your request, is within the Buffer Zone as defined in the regulations, and will alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. Therefore, said work requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. scanielt.. 1 This Determination is negative: digitize+. .±y�lPt`icPr` 1. ❑ The area described in your request is not an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. 2. ❑ The work you described in your request is within an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act, but will not remove, fill, dredge, or alter that area. Therefore, said work does not require the filing of a Notice of Intent. 3. Sr The work you described in your-request is within the Buffer Zone, as defined in the regulations, but will not alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. Therefore, said work does r of r wire the film of a Notice. of Intent. *Disturbed areas must be seeded, and t e si tnce mus remain in place until the seed is established. 4. ❑ The area you described in your request is subject to Protection Under the Act, but since the work you describe therein meets the requirements for the following exemption, as specified in the Act and the regulations, no Notice of Intent is required: Issued by Northampton Conservation Commission Signature(s) C, O W/ J P c This Determination must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. On this _ 28th appeared Mason Maronn executed, the foregoing Notary Public December 98 day of 19 , before me personally to me known to be the person described in, and who acknowledged that he /she executed the same as his/her free act and deed. ? 1 7 e) My Commission Expires This Detenrtinatio./ZlVs not relieve the applicant from complying with all other applicable federal, state or local institutes, ordinances, by -laws or regulations. This Detemiinatio all be valid for three years from the date of issuance. The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by this Determination, any owner of land abutting the land upon which the proposed work is to be done, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to request the Department of Environmental Protection to issue a Superseding Determination of Applicability, providing the request is made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and Fee Transmittal Form as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7) within ten days from the date of issuance of this Determination. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and the applicant. 4/1/94 310 CMR - 402 402 I0'd 6S15 vuu `cetr - J4Jbts� r.� �1rv��n o =w 1rr wv ..-4... ,.,.... - - H ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. & ASSOCIATES, INC. ow SURVEYORS • ENGINEERS . LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS W" November 24, 1998 Northampton Conservation Commission, -- C/o Mr. John Bennett City Hall Main Street Northampton, MA 01060 RE: Request for Determination of Applicability 160 Coles Meadow Road Northampton, Massachusetts (Huntley Project No. 98 -236) Dear Mr. Bennett: On behalf of Mr. John Skibiski, Almer Huntley Jr. & Associates is submitting nine copies of a Request for Determination of Applicability for an upgrade to an existing Septic System located at 160 Coles Meadow Roarl. Prior lo construction, staked erosion control devices will be installed in the areas indicated on the attached plans. As an added note, the site is not listed as being in a flood prone area therefore the FEMA FIRM (floodplain maps) do not list this as an area of concern. No rare, threatened or special concern species are thought to reside in this area in accordance with the 1997/1998 edition of Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas. One copy of this Request for Determination of Applicability is being sent simultaneously to the Department of Environmental Protection, Western Regional Office. We look forward to meeting with the Commission to continue our discussion of this project in detail. If upon review of the enclosed information you have any questions, please call our office. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, T nr HUNTLEY, JR. & ASSOCIATES, INC. C Z ( _ J. K V avw CZE k Environmental Scientist _ (800) 227 -7723 • (413) 5847444 • FAX (413) 586 -9159 0 30 INDUSTRIAL DRrvE BAsr • P.O. Box 568 • NORTHAmvmN, MA 01061 *NW H'tJNTLEY ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. & ASSOCIATES, INC. SURVEYORS • ENGINEERS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS November 23, 1998 Mr. Karen Hirschberg - � - Department of Environmental Protection Western Regional Office '— Statehouse West, Wetlands Division -5�' Floor 436 Dwight Street Springfield, MA 01103 RE: Request for Determination of Applicability 160 Coles Meadow Road Northampton, Massachusetts (Huntley Project No. 98 -236) Dear Ms. Hirschberg: On behalf of Mr. John Skibiski;GrJme. Huntley Jr. & Associates is submitting one copy of a Request for Determination of Applicability for an upgrade to an existing Septic System located at 160 Coles Meadow Road. Prior to construction, staked erosion control devices will be installed in the areas indicated on the attached plans. As an added note, the site is not listed as being in a flood prone area therefore the FEMA FIRM (floodplain maps) do not list this as an area of concern. No rare, threatened or special concern species are thought to reside in this area in accordance with the 1997/1998 edition of Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas. If upon review of the enclosed information you have any questions, please call our office. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, _ ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. & ASSOCIATES, INC. Andrew J. Kawc k ... Environmental Scientist — (800) 227 -7723 • (413) 5847444 . FAX (413) 586 -9159 0 30 INDUSTRIAL DRrvE EAsr • P.O. Box 568 • NOR THAMPTON, MA 01061 low 10.99: Forms Form 1 Commonwealth ofMassachusetts DEP File No. (To be provided by DEP) ,,git izec City/Town: Northampton Applicant: Skibiski Request for a Determination of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, § 40 1. L the undersigned, hereby request that the Northampton Conservation Commission make a determination as to whether the area, described below, or work to be performed on said areas, also described below, is subject to the jurisdiction of the Wetlands Protection Act, G. L. c. 131, § 40. 2. The area is described as follows. (Use maps or plans, if necessary, to provide a description and the location of the area subject to this request). Location: Street Address 160 Cole Meadow Road Northampton C� Lot Number: existing home. -- upgrade septic system ly" V3 See attached report and plan 3. The work in said area is described below. (Use additional paper, if necessary, to describe the proposed work.) 'The applicant wishes to upgrade an existing septic system to meet Title 5 requirements. No work to occur in wetland resource areas however some work would be required within-the 100 -foot buffer zone of a Bordering Vegetated Wetland. This work is required to install/connect together a septic tank and Soil Absorption System with associated piping. The new Soil Absorption System would be located at a distance greater than 80 feet away from any wetlands. This site is serviced by City water thus drinking water wells are not located onsite. Erosion control devices will be installed down gradient of all excavated areas as shown on the drawings. \ \HUNTL6Y1 \ADMIN \PROJINFO \PROJECTS \98 - 236 \rda.doc am 1*0W -moll am 10.99: continued 4. The owner(s) of the area, if not the person making this request, has been given written notification of this request on 11/24/98. The name(s) and address(es) of the owner(s): Mr. John Skibiski �cd�lalk 12 �o rl� P.O. Box 381 Sigitize. „�� Northampton, MA 01060 5. I have filed a complete copy of this request with the appropriate regional office of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on DEP Northeast Regional Office DEP Southeast Regional Office 10 Commerce Way Lakeville Hospital _ Woburn, MA 01801 Route 105 Lakeville, MA 02347 _ DEP Central Regional Office DEP Western Regional Office 75 Grove Street State House West, 5th Floor Worcester, MA 01605 436 Dwight Street Springfield, MA 01103 _ Signature: Name: Mr. John Skibiski Address: P.O. 381 Tel: (413) 584 -3428 _ Northampton, MA 01060 Represented by: Andrew J. Kawczak/ Environmental Scientist Almer Huntley Jr. & Associates Industrial Drive East Northampton, MA 01060 Tel. (413) 584 -7444 \ \HUNTLEYI \ADMIN \PROJINFO \PROJECTS \98 - 236 \rda.doc Um an November 9, 1998 Request for Determination of Applicability Narrative for 160 Coles Meadow Road rng►tizec _ Northampton, MA Ked.__.._e . SITE CONDITIONS The existing septic system under study does not meet Title 5 requirements and requires an upgrade. The site is located at 160 Coles Meadow Road, Northampton, MA. Coles Meadow Road connects with Route 5/10 near the Massachusetts State Police Barricks. See attached plans. The existing home is located on a gently sloping piece of land with slopes of approximately 1 - 3 percent. The current septic system is adjacent the house, southerly side. WETLAND DELINEATION On October 21, 1998, Andrew I Kawczak a wetlands scientist working for Almer Huntley Associates performed a wetlands delineation of the parcel. The results of the delineation are shown in the table below and on the attached drawing. The delineation was performed in accordance with the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act 310 CMR 10. Wetland vegetation, topography and general hydrology was used to evaluate the site. The site was reviewed for the normal signs of wetland vegetation associated with low lying wetland areas. The Bordering Vegetated Wetlands (BVW) were evaluated using the 50% vegetative criteria specified in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (MGL Chapter 131, Section 40) and its' resulting regulations (3 10 CMR 10.0). (i.e., Section 10.55 (2) (c) of the regulation states "The boundary of Bordering Vegetated Wetlands (BVW) is the line with which 50% or more of the vegetational community consists of wetland plant indicator plants and saturated or inundated conditions exist. ") %.r -"Pool The wetland area was evaluated for the presence of hydrophytes and an inventory developed. The wetland indicator status for each species was determined using the '- "National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands" for the state of Massachusetts 1988 distributed by Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of '- Wetlands and Waterways dated April 1995. - The land in the westerly direction slopes to the rear of the parcel where a flat area supports an intermittent stream and Bordering Vegetated Wetland. The following terminology is used to explain the indicator status and the frequency of occurrence for each species. Obligate (OBL) - Always found in wetlands under natural (not planted) conditions (frequency greater than 99 %), but may persist in non wetlands if planted there by man or in wetlands that have been drained, filled, or otherwise transformed into non wetlands. Facultative Wetland (FACW0 - Usually found in wetlands (67% - 99% fre uenc but occasionally found in non wetlands. Facultative (,FACE - Sometimes found in wetlands (34% - 66% frequency), but also occurs in non wetlands Facultative Upland (FACU) - seldom found in wetlands (1% - 33 1 /o) frequency and usually occurs in non wetlands Jigitize,- �--1 N .1 A positive ( +) sign after the Wetland Indicator Status categories indicates an occurrence toward the higher percentage of frequency, while a negative ( -) sign indicates an occurrence rate toward the lower end of the percentage of frequency. The following species were identified in the Bordering Vegetated Wetland area to the rear of the house. Common Name Scientific Name Wetland Indicator Status Red Osier Dogwood Cornus stolonifera FACW+ Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum FACW Cinnamon Fern Osmunda cinnamomea FACW Red Maple Acer rubrum FAC Speckled Alder Alnus ru osa FACW+ Sensitive Fern Onoclea sensibilis FACW Touch -Me -Not Spotted Impatiens ca ensis FACW Skunk Cabbage Symplocarpus foetidus OBL Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvania FACW Joe -P a Weed, Spotted Eu atoriadel hus maculatus FACW PROPOSED WORK: The applicant wishes to install a new 1500 gallon septic tank chamber adjacent to the house (on the west side) and Soil Absorption System to the northerly side of the house. Both the septic tank and Soil Absorption System would be within the buffer zone but at distances greater than 60 feet away from the wetland area. Staked erosion control devices will be installed prior to any excavation. �K,.,dlllt� jigitize+ . WF A -0 W ZI Mai i a i o � a I r Q _11 a a Q WF A -5 dob ,Aapm�7 Cb. i" WF a -8 / 0 : 1 l CURRENT DATE: 10/30/98 HORIZ SCALE: 1'• 10 VERT SCALE: N/A FIELD WORK: 8.H /M FINAL DATE: X0 SD 14a sommon COMPS: JM /CG CHECKED: SURVEYM P.0 /P.N. DESIGN: R.L.S. ENGINEER: R.LS. DRAFTING: CDG/TR /ok TM&-T s\A 4A 1 4EACH AEA 12'x40' q48O SF) FINISHED GRADE �LEV-=9p.47 TO BE PRADED TO DR .. N AROUND �S �YSTE� V'� I �TP I I I r . w � -�1 J 0) i, �2 - q<c 0 cot) 0 3 Q Q CLJ W J U • Fvf.i / • r • a o 1 p r • • G D r • . LOCUS APPROX. LOCATION EXISTING SEPTIC TANK TO BE ABANDONED, PUMPED, CRUSHED AND FILLED W /GRAVEL .r_ O V ! , r •mil a R �Qo ` es A �E It Cld l , s let � if V- VER r c.11. /fir • � ia.na r G 41 v °l � W H 1) 1. Y aft, ftmft 'f I 0) cc� I I 1 vA of v�� . All �• COA SHERER 0 ' R 372 1 d • No. Pb •• 9 ECIStt PLAN OF PROPOSED SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PREPARED FOR SITE PLAN JOHN SKIBISKI TO BE LOCATED AT 160 COTES MEADOW ROAD NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT N0: 98 -236 DRAWING N0: 98236SP FILE N0: Al R HUNTLEY, JR. &ASSOCIATES, INC. SURVEYORS ENGIIIEERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS SHEET N0. 30 INDUSfRiAt, DRIVE EAST 1 O F 3 NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS 01061 � iy'K 1r , 4 • r : . r r. 1Y yr• f r r( r r� r r� f ,. 'r r Y i r I �, a•] - O OJ U J CL uj p p I n U o rc: ° i+ W ov- (n N Cr c°na -' rnm CL in � S o V S 0 O H g�?p 0 Q z m ZQ ?�0 II 2 II W W LZ:W O Co � LAJ V � �� j WW CL V) CL pia W n �� lil0W� O J JCL PROFILE HORIZ. & VERT. SCALE: 1 " =10' 11' -0" 4" P.V.C. SCHEDULE 40 INLET TEE. FASTEN TO WALL WITH TWO 24" DIA. COVER STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS. POSITION UNDER CLEANOUT. 5" OIA. 3.5 OIA. OUTLET KNOCKOUTS 0 4" P.V.C. SCHEDULE INLET i 40 OUTLET TEE. FASTEN TO WALL WITH TWO STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS. POSITION UNDER CLEANOUT. 4" P.V.C. SCHEDULE PLAN VIEW 4" P.V.C. SCHEDULE 40 OUTLET TEE. FASTEN 40 INLET TEE. FASTEN TO WALL WITH TWO TO WALL WITH TWO STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS 24" DIA. COVER STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS. 24" DIA. COVER INSTALL 20" C.I. FRAME AND COVER TO FINISHED GRADE 6 0 In --� 12" 13" I MIN. 3•� 10 f MIN. 1'— 2* MIN. ` orj --�_ •- � I 4 '_ 0. LIQUID GAS BAFFLE TO BE LEVEL INSTALLED, BOTH TEES, AS PER TITLE V 6" WALLS REQUIREMENTS L 6" CROSS SECTION 1,500 GALLON SEPTIC.; TANK N.T.S. SEPTIC TANK TO BE DESIGNED do CONSTRUCTED TO WITHSTAND MIN. OF H -10 LOADING, AS PER TITLE V REQUIREMENTS. IF TANK IS TO BE INSTALLED WHERE POTENTIAL FOR HEAVY 'VEHICLES, TANK TO BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO WITHSTAND H -20 LOADING, AS PER TITLE V REQUIREMENTS. 30 1/2" LO d It J w O k OUTLETS � —1 � 2' WALLS �2 15' 6 8 � L2 CONCRETE MINIMUM STRENGTH - 4,000 P.S.I. O 28 DAYS STEEL REINFORCEMENT - A- 615 -75, GRADE 60, 1' MIN. COVER PRECAST DISTRIBUTION BOX WITH BAFFLE N.T.S. NO. I DATE I BY REVISIONS NOTES: SEPTIC TANK DISTRIBUTION BOX TO BE SET LEVEL., SUMP TO BE 66_1 , —0 6' -0" BETWEEN DISTRIBUTION X LINES '( l 1 I . PLAN VI EW CURRENT DATE: 10/30/98 I HORIZ SCALE: AS NOTED VERT SCALE: �ZH OF ��' REBECCA SSE 1 CML N 1 9 NO 37218 (�I�ut4 Scc 101;01% FIELD WORK: AH /MG FINAL DATE: I,ot 3o14g COMPS: O � O N O 0 Z '- i +I DRAFTING: TR V) II O •� V) Q j z U � W Q O Z W .-- n. OC2� +� 110 100 a•] - O OJ U J CL uj p p I n U o rc: ° i+ W ov- (n N Cr c°na -' rnm CL in � S o V S 0 O H g�?p 0 Q z m ZQ ?�0 II 2 II W W LZ:W O Co � LAJ V � �� j WW CL V) CL pia W n �� lil0W� O J JCL PROFILE HORIZ. & VERT. SCALE: 1 " =10' 11' -0" 4" P.V.C. SCHEDULE 40 INLET TEE. FASTEN TO WALL WITH TWO 24" DIA. COVER STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS. POSITION UNDER CLEANOUT. 5" OIA. 3.5 OIA. OUTLET KNOCKOUTS 0 4" P.V.C. SCHEDULE INLET i 40 OUTLET TEE. FASTEN TO WALL WITH TWO STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS. POSITION UNDER CLEANOUT. 4" P.V.C. SCHEDULE PLAN VIEW 4" P.V.C. SCHEDULE 40 OUTLET TEE. FASTEN 40 INLET TEE. FASTEN TO WALL WITH TWO TO WALL WITH TWO STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS 24" DIA. COVER STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS. 24" DIA. COVER INSTALL 20" C.I. FRAME AND COVER TO FINISHED GRADE 6 0 In --� 12" 13" I MIN. 3•� 10 f MIN. 1'— 2* MIN. ` orj --�_ •- � I 4 '_ 0. LIQUID GAS BAFFLE TO BE LEVEL INSTALLED, BOTH TEES, AS PER TITLE V 6" WALLS REQUIREMENTS L 6" CROSS SECTION 1,500 GALLON SEPTIC.; TANK N.T.S. SEPTIC TANK TO BE DESIGNED do CONSTRUCTED TO WITHSTAND MIN. OF H -10 LOADING, AS PER TITLE V REQUIREMENTS. IF TANK IS TO BE INSTALLED WHERE POTENTIAL FOR HEAVY 'VEHICLES, TANK TO BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO WITHSTAND H -20 LOADING, AS PER TITLE V REQUIREMENTS. 30 1/2" LO d It J w O k OUTLETS � —1 � 2' WALLS �2 15' 6 8 � L2 CONCRETE MINIMUM STRENGTH - 4,000 P.S.I. O 28 DAYS STEEL REINFORCEMENT - A- 615 -75, GRADE 60, 1' MIN. COVER PRECAST DISTRIBUTION BOX WITH BAFFLE N.T.S. NO. I DATE I BY REVISIONS NOTES: SEPTIC TANK DISTRIBUTION BOX TO BE SET LEVEL., SUMP TO BE 66_1 , —0 6' -0" BETWEEN DISTRIBUTION X LINES '( l 1 I . PLAN VI EW CURRENT DATE: 10/30/98 I HORIZ SCALE: AS NOTED �.�) 5" DIA. INLETS "110 100 . 80 SEWER PIPE — SIZE AS NOTED ON PLAN, ALL JOINTS TO BE WATERTIGHT SLOPE = 1 /8 " /FT. (MIN.) HEADER PIPES FROM THE DISTRIBUTION BOX TO BE NON PERFORATED AND LAID LEVEL FOR AT LEAST ONE LENGTH OF PIPE 4" PERFORATED PIPE — SLOPE — 0.005 . 4' — 5' MIN. TO GROUND WATER Z TING OR IMPERVIOUS LAYER BASED GROUND ON PERCOLATION RATE SIDE VIEW 2% FINISH GRADE-------%, (MIN.) 1/8 TO 1/4 WASHED STONE 3/4' TO 1 WASHED STONE ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CODE, TITLE 5 DESIGN NOTES, DETAILS & PROFILE 27 FINISH GRADE (MIN.) BOTTOM OF FIELD TO BE HORIZONTAL 12" COVER (MIN.) r 2" MIN. 4" our PERFORATED • - . • PIPE T __ 60 MIN. EFFECTIVE DEPTH THESE PLANS ARE PREPARED AS AN ENGINEERING DESIGN AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DETERMINATION OF PROPERTY UNES. ALL WORK TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE SANITARY CODE, TITLE 5. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE CODE OR THESE PLANS WILL IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THE BOARD OF HEALTH AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER. ONt WEEK NOTICE PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION TO BE GIVEN TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER. FIELD INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILL OF SYSTEM, AS PER TITLE 5, SECTION 15.021. ADDITIONAL $100 FEE FOR FAILURE TO NOTIFY AS NOTED. SEPTIC TANK SHOULD BE INSPECTED AND CLEANED ON A REGULAR BASIS AS PER TITLE 5, SUBPART D: INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SYSTEMS, 15.351, SYSTEM PUMPING AND ROUTINE MAINTENANCE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT "DIG -SAFE" PRIOR OF START OF CONSTRUCTION. THESE PLANS MAY NOT SHOW ALL UTILITIES EXISTING OR THOSE TO BE INSTALLED ON THIS SITE. THE ENGINEER TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. ALL PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS ARE TO BE MADE BY ROTONDO do SONS, INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL. THE CONTRACTOR WILL OBTAIN ALL THE NECESSARY PERMITS AND LICENSES BEFORE THE START OF THIS PROJECT. ALL SEWER PIPING FROM THE SEPTIC TANK TO THE DISTRIBUTION BOXES TO BE 4" PVC, SCHEDULE 40 RING —TITE PIPE. ALL HEADER PIPING TO BE 4" PVC, SDR -35 RING -TITS PIPE, AND IS TO BE LAID LEVEL. DISTRIBUTION LINES PIPE TO BE 4" PVC, SDR -35 RING -TITS PIPE (PERFORATED). ALL CONCRETE STRUCTURES TO BE WATERTIGHT. HYDRAULIC CEMENT WILL BE USED TO FIX PIPES IN PLACE. LEACHING FIELDS WILL BE COVERED WITH A MINIMUM OF 1' -0" COVER, 6" WHICH WILL BE SCREENED LOAM do SEED. CLEANOUT MANHOLES TO BE INSTALLED TO WITHIN 6" OF GRADE OVER THE SEPTIC TANK. (20" DIAMETER REQUIRED). NO WELLS OBSERVED WITHIN 200' OF DISPOSAL AREAS. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL PERTINENT EXISTING INFORMATION TO BE FIELD CHECKED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SURVEY WORK RELATIVE TO THE ESTABUSHMENT OF LAYOUT AND GRADES FOR CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROLS TO BE USED AS NECESSARY. DISPOSAL SYSTEM IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN FILL, INSTALLATION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 5. SECTION 15.255. THE EXCAVATION OF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 5 LATERALLY IN ALL DIRECTIONS BEYOND THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM TO THE DEPTH OF NATURALLY OCCURRING PERVIOUS MATERIAL. SEE SOIL LOGS. THIS SEPTIC REPAIR DESIGN IS SUBMITTED UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LOCAL UPGRADE APPROVAL, 310 CMR. 15.403 404 405. THE FOLLOWING LOCAL UPGRADE WAS REQUESTED: 15.405 (1) W REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED FIVE FOOT SEPARATION BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF SAS AND HGWE WITH CONDITIONS 1 THROUGH 5. DAILY DESIGN FLOW do EFFLUENT LOADING RATE 3. BEDROOMS x 2 PERSONS /BEDROOM = _._6 PERSONS (HOUSE) 6 PERSONS x 55 GALLONS OF WASTEWATER /PERSON /DAY = 3_ 30 TOTAL GALLONS OF WASTEWATER /DAY PERCOLATION RATE: <2 MIN. /INCH (CLASS I SOILS) GALLONS OF WASTEWATER /SQUARE FEET OF LEACH AREA FOR A PERCOLATION RATE OF: ... <2 MIN. /INCH 9 GAL/SF BOTTOM AREA (LOADING RATE) LEAC HING AREA, DESIGN TOTAL DAILY FLOW MD GAL. /DAY .4- LOADING RATE .a GPD /S.F. ;.F. AREA LEACHING (REQUIRED) _4M LEACH FIELD AREA DESIGN �Q SO. FT.: JZ WIDE x AV LONG. SEF i fC TANK „QESjGN - y TlrHQLl? GA.R ^.I^ DIc%ol m Q GALLONS OF WASTEWATER /DAY x 2007 = ,Q GALLONS REQUIRED EFFECTIVE LIQUID CAPACITY OF SEPTIC TANK. MINIMUM TANK SIZE REQUIRED WITHOUT GARBAGE GRINDER: 150 GALLON SEPTIC TANK SECTION X —X � ONE WEEK NOTICE WILL BE GIVEN TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR � TO THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. � LEACHING FIELD AN ADDITIONAL $100.00 FEE WILL BE CHARGED IF THE REQUIRED N.T.S. PERIOD OF NOTICE IS NOT GIVEN, PLAN OF PROPOSED SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROJECT N0: 98 -236 PREPARED FOR DRAWING N0: 98236D1 JOHN SKIBISKI FILE No: TO BE LOCATED AT ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. &ASSOCIATES, INC. 160 COLES MEADOW ROAD st►�v�roRS Eric s t.nxnscnPE n�tct�crs SHEEP N0. NORTHAMPTON. MASSACHUSETTS 30 WDUSTRLIL DRIVE EAST 2 of 3 .& L NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS ,.,, o v (� �s ` lJ—l.3 I� j VERT SCALE: �ZH OF ��' REBECCA SSE 1 CML N 1 9 NO 37218 (�I�ut4 Scc 101;01% FIELD WORK: AH /MG FINAL DATE: I,ot 3o14g COMPS: CHECKED: SURVEYOR: PC /PN DESIGN: RLS ENGINEER: RLS DRAFTING: TR �.�) 5" DIA. INLETS "110 100 . 80 SEWER PIPE — SIZE AS NOTED ON PLAN, ALL JOINTS TO BE WATERTIGHT SLOPE = 1 /8 " /FT. (MIN.) HEADER PIPES FROM THE DISTRIBUTION BOX TO BE NON PERFORATED AND LAID LEVEL FOR AT LEAST ONE LENGTH OF PIPE 4" PERFORATED PIPE — SLOPE — 0.005 . 4' — 5' MIN. TO GROUND WATER Z TING OR IMPERVIOUS LAYER BASED GROUND ON PERCOLATION RATE SIDE VIEW 2% FINISH GRADE-------%, (MIN.) 1/8 TO 1/4 WASHED STONE 3/4' TO 1 WASHED STONE ALL WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CODE, TITLE 5 DESIGN NOTES, DETAILS & PROFILE 27 FINISH GRADE (MIN.) BOTTOM OF FIELD TO BE HORIZONTAL 12" COVER (MIN.) r 2" MIN. 4" our PERFORATED • - . • PIPE T __ 60 MIN. EFFECTIVE DEPTH THESE PLANS ARE PREPARED AS AN ENGINEERING DESIGN AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DETERMINATION OF PROPERTY UNES. ALL WORK TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE SANITARY CODE, TITLE 5. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE CODE OR THESE PLANS WILL IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THE BOARD OF HEALTH AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER. ONt WEEK NOTICE PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION TO BE GIVEN TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER. FIELD INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILL OF SYSTEM, AS PER TITLE 5, SECTION 15.021. ADDITIONAL $100 FEE FOR FAILURE TO NOTIFY AS NOTED. SEPTIC TANK SHOULD BE INSPECTED AND CLEANED ON A REGULAR BASIS AS PER TITLE 5, SUBPART D: INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SYSTEMS, 15.351, SYSTEM PUMPING AND ROUTINE MAINTENANCE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT "DIG -SAFE" PRIOR OF START OF CONSTRUCTION. THESE PLANS MAY NOT SHOW ALL UTILITIES EXISTING OR THOSE TO BE INSTALLED ON THIS SITE. THE ENGINEER TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. ALL PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS ARE TO BE MADE BY ROTONDO do SONS, INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL. THE CONTRACTOR WILL OBTAIN ALL THE NECESSARY PERMITS AND LICENSES BEFORE THE START OF THIS PROJECT. ALL SEWER PIPING FROM THE SEPTIC TANK TO THE DISTRIBUTION BOXES TO BE 4" PVC, SCHEDULE 40 RING —TITE PIPE. ALL HEADER PIPING TO BE 4" PVC, SDR -35 RING -TITS PIPE, AND IS TO BE LAID LEVEL. DISTRIBUTION LINES PIPE TO BE 4" PVC, SDR -35 RING -TITS PIPE (PERFORATED). ALL CONCRETE STRUCTURES TO BE WATERTIGHT. HYDRAULIC CEMENT WILL BE USED TO FIX PIPES IN PLACE. LEACHING FIELDS WILL BE COVERED WITH A MINIMUM OF 1' -0" COVER, 6" WHICH WILL BE SCREENED LOAM do SEED. CLEANOUT MANHOLES TO BE INSTALLED TO WITHIN 6" OF GRADE OVER THE SEPTIC TANK. (20" DIAMETER REQUIRED). NO WELLS OBSERVED WITHIN 200' OF DISPOSAL AREAS. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL PERTINENT EXISTING INFORMATION TO BE FIELD CHECKED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SURVEY WORK RELATIVE TO THE ESTABUSHMENT OF LAYOUT AND GRADES FOR CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROLS TO BE USED AS NECESSARY. DISPOSAL SYSTEM IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN FILL, INSTALLATION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 5. SECTION 15.255. THE EXCAVATION OF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 5 LATERALLY IN ALL DIRECTIONS BEYOND THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM TO THE DEPTH OF NATURALLY OCCURRING PERVIOUS MATERIAL. SEE SOIL LOGS. THIS SEPTIC REPAIR DESIGN IS SUBMITTED UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LOCAL UPGRADE APPROVAL, 310 CMR. 15.403 404 405. THE FOLLOWING LOCAL UPGRADE WAS REQUESTED: 15.405 (1) W REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED FIVE FOOT SEPARATION BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF SAS AND HGWE WITH CONDITIONS 1 THROUGH 5. DAILY DESIGN FLOW do EFFLUENT LOADING RATE 3. BEDROOMS x 2 PERSONS /BEDROOM = _._6 PERSONS (HOUSE) 6 PERSONS x 55 GALLONS OF WASTEWATER /PERSON /DAY = 3_ 30 TOTAL GALLONS OF WASTEWATER /DAY PERCOLATION RATE: <2 MIN. /INCH (CLASS I SOILS) GALLONS OF WASTEWATER /SQUARE FEET OF LEACH AREA FOR A PERCOLATION RATE OF: ... <2 MIN. /INCH 9 GAL/SF BOTTOM AREA (LOADING RATE) LEAC HING AREA, DESIGN TOTAL DAILY FLOW MD GAL. /DAY .4- LOADING RATE .a GPD /S.F. ;.F. AREA LEACHING (REQUIRED) _4M LEACH FIELD AREA DESIGN �Q SO. FT.: JZ WIDE x AV LONG. SEF i fC TANK „QESjGN - y TlrHQLl? GA.R ^.I^ DIc%ol m Q GALLONS OF WASTEWATER /DAY x 2007 = ,Q GALLONS REQUIRED EFFECTIVE LIQUID CAPACITY OF SEPTIC TANK. MINIMUM TANK SIZE REQUIRED WITHOUT GARBAGE GRINDER: 150 GALLON SEPTIC TANK SECTION X —X � ONE WEEK NOTICE WILL BE GIVEN TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR � TO THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. � LEACHING FIELD AN ADDITIONAL $100.00 FEE WILL BE CHARGED IF THE REQUIRED N.T.S. PERIOD OF NOTICE IS NOT GIVEN, PLAN OF PROPOSED SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROJECT N0: 98 -236 PREPARED FOR DRAWING N0: 98236D1 JOHN SKIBISKI FILE No: TO BE LOCATED AT ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. &ASSOCIATES, INC. 160 COLES MEADOW ROAD st►�v�roRS Eric s t.nxnscnPE n�tct�crs SHEEP N0. NORTHAMPTON. MASSACHUSETTS 30 WDUSTRLIL DRIVE EAST 2 of 3 .& L NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS ,.,, o v (� �s ` lJ—l.3 I� j DEEP HOLE # 1 TOWN DATE: 10/20 98 CSE: ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. OBSERVER: PETER McERLAIN DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Depth from Surface (inches) Soil Horizon Soil Texture (USDA) Soil Color (Munsell) Soil Mottling Other (Structure, Stones. Boulders. NO. 3 OF 3 1.10 Consistency. x Growl) 0 -8" A LOAM 7.5YR 3/1 - - - -- TOP SOIL OLD GARDEN AREA 8 B FILL, SILTY 1OYR 4/6 - - - -- LOOSE SINGLE GRAIN, LOAM FEW STONES C D -38" C 1 SILT 5YR 4/2 <1 Ox COMPACT, SOME STONES 38" -72" C2 SAND 7.5Y 4/2 - - - -- COMPACT, STONES, COBBLES Parent Material (geologic): OUTWASH Ledge: 72_ Percolation Rate: FAILED Standing Water.. N/O Weeping from Pit Face: NZg Percolation Depth: 48' Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water. 20" Percolation Design Rate: DEEP HOLE DATE: 10/20/98 CSE; ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. BS�R PETER McERLAIN DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Depth from Surface (inches) Sal Horizon Soil Texture (USDA) Soil Coior (Munsell) Soil Mottling Other (Structure. Stones. Boulders. NO. 3 OF 3 1.10 Consistency. % Gravel) 0-11 Ap LOAM 1 OYR 3/2 - - - -- TOP SOIL OLD GARDEN AREA 11 " -24" B S —LOAM 1 OYR 5/4 - - - -- LOOSE SINGLE GRAIN, LOAM FEW STONES 24 — 87 0 C11 M —SAND 10YR 4/4 - - - -- SINGLE GRAIN SAND 87" -108 C2 SILT 2.5YR 5/1 - - - -- DENSE PLATEY, STONES BR> 108 C2 SILT 2.5YR 5/1 5YR 4/6 5% MOTTLING. COMPACT Parent Material (geologic): OUTWASH Ledge: -_ Percolation Rate: _2 min. /inch Standing Water. NZO Weeping from Pit Face: N& Percolation Depth: 50' Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water. 108" Percolation Design Rate: _2 minjjWh EL =*94.30 G.W. AT 20" 1 SO. OAK PO ST SUP INDUST PO FA FILTER MIRAFI .• AP EOUAL r BACKFILL i 6 ' 0 N 50. Op►K � COU A / M Me ER F4 90 OVEO C E 10 OR OppR E4 ON SON 5E 8- SE� BACKFILL SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FENCE N.T.S. EL =196.34 #44$4 a' 0 G.W. AT 108 BALED HAY HE` dft TOGETHER BY WOODEN STAKE 1 " SQ. OAK Pt -SUPPORT NET INDUSTRIAL POLYPROPYLEN - FILTER FABRIC MIRAF] 100 OR APPROVED EQU - 1/8 TO 1/4' CRUSHED STON BACKFILL DIRECTION OF /, AM SECTION PLAN SEDIMENTATION CC iNTROL FENCE W BALED HAY BACKING N.T.S. BAI BU' T0( DEEP HOLE # 3 DATE: 10/20/98 CSE: ALMER -HUNTLEY. JR. oasir N RvIm. PETER McERLAIN DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Depth from Surface (inches) Soil Horizon Soil Texture (USDA) Soil Color (Muneell) Sou Mottling Other (Structure, Stones, Boulders, NO. 3 OF 3 1.10 Consistency, % Gravel) 0 -11 Ap LOAM 1 OYR 3/2 - - - -- TOP SOIL OLD GARDEN AREA 11 " -18" B SANDY 1 OYR 5/4 - - - -- MED SAND, FEW SMALL LOAM STONES 18" 70" C 1 SANDY 10YR 4/4 - - - -- SINGLE GRAIN SAND LOAM 70 C2 SILT 2.5YR 5/1 5YR 4/6 5% MOTTLING. COMPACT Parent Material (geologic): OUTWASH Ledge: N/0 Percolation Rate: >2 min, /inch Standing Water: NZO Weeping from Pit Face: Percolation Depth: 50 Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water. 70" Percolation Design Rate: EL =195.10 C.W. AT 70" • 'L- Uisnr,c GROUND SECTION A-A BALED HAY FOR EROSION CONTROL AT TOE OF PROPOSED SLOP N 0. 1 DATE 1 BY REVISIONS CURRENT DATE: 10/30/98 HORIZ SCALE: AS NOTED VERT SCALE: FlELD WORK: AMH /AEG FlNAL DATE: Lp(yp/q,8 COMPS: CHECKED: R4tj SURVEYOR: DESIGN: RLS ENGINEER: RLS DRAFTING: TR 0 PLAN BALE HAY HELD IN PLACE WITH 2 "x2 "x3' -0" STAKES — 6' -0• 2 PER BALE FLOW r OE OF SLOPE ell FILL TOE OF SLOPE SOIL EVALUATION LOGS, EROSION CONTROL DETAILS AND NOTES GENERAL EROSION CONTROL GUIDELINES 1) ALL AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED DURING GRADING OPERATIONS WHICH WILL NOT BE PAVED WILL RECEIVE 6' MIN. LOAM AND SEED. 2) EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER FROM LEAVING THE SITE. 3) NATURAL VEGETATION SHALL. BE RETAINED WHENEVER FEASIBLE UP TO THE SCHEDULED START OF A CONSTRUCTION ACTMTY IN THE AREA. WHERE POSSIBLE, CLEARING SHALL IMMEDIATELY PRECEED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY• AREAS SUBJECT TO EROSION SHALL BE MINIMIZED IN TERMS OF TIME AND AREA. S) IN GENERAL. WORK REQUIRING EROSION CONTROL INCLUDES EXCAVATIONS, FILLS, DRAINAGE. SWALES AND DITCHES, ROUGH AND FINISH GRADING, AND STOCKPILING OF EARTH. 6) EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL, WHERE APPLICABLE, INCORPORATE AT LEAST THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES DETAILED ON THIS DRAWING. A TEMPORARY BARRIER OF FLAY BALES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT —LADEN WATER FROM ENTERING INCOMPLETE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 8 TEMPORARY BARRIER OF HAY BALES TO ACT AS EROSION CHECKS AT THE TOES OF EMBANKMENTS AND SLOPES. C TEMPORARY EARTH BERMS TO ACT AS SEDIMENT TRAPS IN AREAS OF EXTREME RUNOFF. D) TEMPORARY EROSION CHECKS IN DITCHES AND SWALES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT —LADEN WATER FROM ENTERING BODIES OF SURFACE E) PROVIDE TEMPORARY SLOPF. EROSION CONTROL WHERE REQUIRED. � F 7 7 FILL AND GRADING SHALL bE TREATED WITH SLOPE STABILIZATION SEEDING OR GROUND COVER AND HAY MULCH UPON COMPLETION. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INCORPORATED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER WHEN THE EXISTING MEASURES ARE INADEQUATE. e) E ROSION M EASURES SHALL THEN M BE REMOVED AND THE AREAS ARE 0 U NTIL E EMBANKMENT OR FINISHED GRADE IS STABILIZED. EROSION CONTROL BE FINISH GRADED AND PUNTED AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS OR AS NOTED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. NOTES: WORK IN OR NEAR WETLANDS 1) "WORK IN OR NEAR WERANDS" IS DEFINED AS ANY AREA WHERE CONSTRUCTION IS WITHIN A WETLAND OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WETLAND (BUFFER) AS DEFINED M.G.L. CH. 131 S.40 WETLAND PROTECTION ACT OR AS DEFINED BY CITY/TOWN BYLAW IN THE CITY/rOWN THE PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED. 2) MAJOR WETLANDS AND BUFFERS SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE RESTRICTIONS OF THIS CONTRACT ARE INDICATED ON THE PLANS AND THE 'SCHEDULE OF WETLAN AREAS. 3) NO MATERIALS SUBJECT TO EROSION SHALL BE STOCKPILED OVERNIGHT WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WETLAND, BROOK, TOP OF RIVER BANK, OR OTHER AREA DEEMED AS WETLANDS OR BUFFERS BY THE ENGINEER. 4) ALL EXCAVATED MATERIALS SHALL BE CASTED AWAY FROM WETLANDS, BROOKS, RIVERS, OR OTHER AREAS DEEMED WETLANDS OR BUFFERS BY THE ENGINEER. 5) PIPE TRENCHES SHALL BE TOTALLY BACKFILLED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6) SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING. SEE PLANS FOR LIMIT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THESE FENCES UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE ENGINEER. 7) DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE GRADED, LOAMED AND SEEDED AND RESTORED WITHIN ONE (1) WEEK OF INSTALLATION OF PIPE. g' THE FIt►;rSuEn GRADE OF DIST'_ R9ED AREAS SHALL MATCH EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY OF THE AREA PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, UNLESS INDICATEC OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. 9) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY CROSS DITCHES, CULVERTS AND SWALES, AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN EXISTING SURFACE WATER LEVELS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. 10) THE FUNCTIONING OF TEMPORARY CULVERTS, DITCHES, SWALES OR CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL NOT CAUSE NOTICEABLE SEDIMENTATION PLUMES. IF PLUMES OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STOP WORK AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATELY TO PREVENT FURTHER SEDIMENTATION. 11) ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHUILL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 12) TRANSFER AND /OR STORAGE OF FUELS, LUBRICANTS, ETC., WILL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN SENSITIVE AREAS WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. TRANSFER WILL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN 100 FEET OF A POND, LAKE, A FLOWING BROOK OR RIVER AND NO STORAGE WILL BE ALLOWED EXCEPT IN APPROVED FENCED — SECURED AREAS. 13) EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE Pi WITHIN WETLANDS OR BUFFER AREAS EXCEPT DURING ACTUAL OPERATIONS REQUIRING SAID EQUIPMENT. ONE WEEK NOTICE WILL BE GIVEN TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. AN ADDITIONAL $100.00 FEE WILL BE CHARGED IF THE REQUIRED PERIOD OF NOTICE IS NOT GIVEN. PLAN OF PROPOSED SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PREPARED FOR JOHN SKIBISKI TO BE LOCATED AT 160 COLES MEADOW ROAD NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS HUNTLEY ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. & ASSOCIATES, INC. SURVEYORS ENGUMRS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 30 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE FAST NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT NO: 98 -236 DRAWING NO: 98236D2 FILE NO: SHEET NO. 3 OF 3 1.10 •o a� C N U � � o