Phillips Place 50.pdf
Follow Massachusetts Historical Commission Survey Manual instructions for completing this form. FORM B − BUILDING MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION MASSACHUSETTS ARCHIVES BUILDING
220MORRISSEY BOULEVARD BOSTON,MASSACHUSETTS 02125 Photograph Topographic or Assessor's Map Recorded by: Bonnie Parsons Organization: Pioneer Valley Planning Commission Date (month /year):
May, 2011 Assessor’s Number USGS Quad Area(s) Form Number 32A-191 Easthampton NTH.2080 Town: Northampton Place: (neighborhood or village) Address: 50 Phillips Place Historic Name: J.W.
Reid House Uses: Present: Three-family residence Original: Single-family residence Date of Construction: 1894 Source: Daily Hampshire Gazette, Oct. 13, 1894 Style/Form: Colonial Revival
Architect/Builder: Putnam & Bayley, Architects, Northampton Exterior Material: Foundation: brick Wall/Trim: vinyl Roof: asphalt Outbuildings/Secondary Structures: Major Alterations (with
dates): North ell added, siding applied and some windows replaced, ca. 1990. Condition: good Moved: no | x | yes | | Date Acreage: 0.248 acres Setting: This house is on a short residential
street shaded by mature trees.
INVENTORY FORMB CONTINUATION SHEET [NORTHAMPTON] [50 PHILLIPS PLACE] MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Area(s) Form No. 220MORRISSEY BOULEVARD, BOSTON,MASSACHUSETTS 02125 Continuation
sheet 1 NTH.2080 _x__ Recommended for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. If checked, you must attach a completed National Register Criteria Statement form. Use as much
space as necessary to complete the following entries, allowing text to flow onto additional continuation sheets. ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION: Describe architectural features. Evaluate
the characteristics of this building in terms of other buildings within the community. This house stands out stylistically on Phillips Place as it is Colonial Revival in a neighborhood
of Italianate designs. Its scale also exceeds that of any of its neighbors; the house shares with at least two of its neighbors, however, having been architect-designed. The house is
two-and-a-half stories in height under a front-gabled roof. It has cross-gable wings on the east and and west elevations and an added, two-story ell on the north. The south façade is
a mere two bays wide but its proportions are grand. A steeply-pitched roof has a deep jetty overhang between the attic and second story. The jetty is supported on carved consoles and
in the gable field is a recessed porch opening that adds to the impression of its depth. A one-story porch with a rounded corner crosses the south façade and wraps around to the east
elevation. Its entry is pedimented and ¾ length columns support the roof and rest on high piers. The main entry has a trabeated door surround that encloses a leaded fanlight and half-length
sidelights. On the west elevation the shallow wing has a jetty in its gable field supported on carved consoles and immediately below the jetty at the second floor level is a rounded
oriel window. A leaded glass stair window mediates between second and first stories on this elevation. Rondel windows, Palladian window compositions and horizontal windows with heavy
cornices and leaded leaded glass add to the Colonial Revival style features of this well-designed house. HISTORICAL NARRATIVE Discuss the history of the building. Explain its associations
with local (or state) history. Include uses of the building, and the role(s) the owners/occupants played within the community. From Form B of 1975: “R.F. Putnam and L.D. Bayley had an
architectural practice which began to practice in Northampton in 1893, the Hammond House on Elm Street being one of their earliest designs. In the nineties, the firm was in competition
with H.R. Hayden, successor to W.F. Pratt & Son, and Curtis Page; all three firms appeared in town in the early nineties. Putnam & Bayley received the lion’s share of the commissions
in 1894, building numerous residences, remodeling several commercial blocks, and designing a large addition for the Nonotuck Silk Company. The firm submitted a design for the high school
competition, but Gardner, Pyne & Gardner of Springfield eventually captured the commission for what is now the D.A. A. Sullivan School.” BIBLIOGRAPHY and/or REFERENCES Beers, F. W. County
Atlas of Hampshire Massachusetts, New York, 1873. Hales, John G. Plan of the Town or Northampton in the County of Hampshire, 1831. Miller, D. L. Atlas of the City of Northampton and
Town of Easthampton, Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Philadelphia, 1895. Walker, George H. and Company. Atlas of Northampton City, Massachusetts, Boston, 1884. Walling, Henry F. Map
of Hampshire County, Massachusetts, New York, 1860.
INVENTORY FORMB CONTINUATION SHEET [NORTHAMPTON] [50 PHILLIPS PLACE] MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Area(s) Form No. 220MORRISSEY BOULEVARD, BOSTON,MASSACHUSETTS 02125 Continuation
sheet 2 NTH.2080 National Register of Historic Places Criteria Statement Form Check all that apply: Individually eligible Eligible only in an historic district Contributing to a potential
historic district Potential historic district Criteria: A B C D Criteria Considerations: A B C D E F G Statement of Significance by _____Bonnie Parsons___________________ The criteria
that are checked in the above sections must be justified here. The Reid House would contribute to a potential Pomeroy Terrace historic district that developed south and east of the Bridge
Street Cemetery from the second third of the 19th century as Northampton’s finest residential district. Original residents here were merchants, retired farmers, lawyers, and other professions.
As the century progressed the adjacent streets were laid out for the growing middle middle class with railroad personnel joining clerks, teachers, and others. Architecturally the potential
historic district is significant for the fine examples of the 19th century architectural styles from the Greek and Gothic Revivals, Italianate, Queen Anne and Colonial Revival styles.
The district includes significant examples of the work of Northampton architect William Fenno Pratt. The architectural firm of Putnam and Bailey is responsible for this house and for
at least one other in the district. This potential historic district has integrity of workmanship, feeling, setting, design and materials.