Who let the dogs out
American Planning Association
January 2005
James Krohe, Jr.
www.fordog.org/Dog_Park_Info/Who_Let_The_Dogs_out.pdf
“Dogs do present some unique planning issues, however. In some cases,
existing dog control rules must be amended to allow off-leash exercise.” (page 2)
“Advocates argue that dog parks offer a variety of public benefits. They note, for
instance, that dog parks are a way to ensure safety in marginal public spaces. As
examples, they cite Laurel Canyon in Los Angeles, downtown Seattle’s Regrade
Park, and Congressional Cemetery in Washington, D.C., three places where the
presence of eager dog owners and their animals have driven drug dealers out of
a park.” (page 2)
“A consensus is emerging about what makes a good dog park. When it comes to
size, “the bigger the better,” says Eugene’s Chris Girard. An acre is the minimum
recommended by experienced managers,” (page 2)
“For safety’s sake, a good dog park will not be situated next to a busy street
unless it is separated from it by dogproof barriers.” (page 3)
In smaller neighborhood parks, where a permanently fenced dog run would
preclude other uses, segregation is achieved by schedules rather than fences.
Dog can play tough, which is why most park agencies with experience of such
facilities say that dog exercise areas should not include a playground or other
children’s facility. Some bar young children from such areas altogether. Nor
should dog parks be situated next to sensitive wildlife areas or garden. (page 3)