1000113609 City of Northampton Final Review_FEB 2022.pdf
LEED v4.1 Cities: Existing
Name: City of Northampton, Massachusetts
LEED Certification Review Report
City of Northampton, Massachusetts
LEED v4.1 CITIES: EXISTING
ATTEMPTED: 86, NOT AWARDED: 19, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 67 OF 110 POINTS
Project ID 1000113609
Rating System & version: LEED v4.1 Cities: Existing
Project Registration Date: December 18, 2018
INTEGRATIVE PROCESS 2 OF 5 ENERGY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 15 OF 30
Integrative Planning and Leadership 1/1 Power Access, Reliability and Resiliency Y
Green Building Policy and Incentives 1/4 Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Management 11/14
Energy Efficiency 0/4
NATURAL SYSTEMS AND ECOLOGY 9 OF 9 Renewable Energy 0/6
Ecosystem Assessment Y Low Carbon Economy 2/4
Green Spaces 2/2 Grid Harmonization 2/2
Natural Resources Conservation and Restoration 2/2
Light Pollution Reduction 1/1 MATERIALS AND RESOURCES 4 of 10
Resilience Planning 4/4 Solid Waste Management Y
Waste Performance 4/5
Special Waste Streams Management 0/1
TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE 11 OF 15 Responsible Sourcing for Infrastructure 0/2
Transportation Performance 6/6 Material Recovery 0/1
Compact, Mixed Use and Transit Oriented Development 0/2 Smart Waste Management Systems 0/2
Access to Quality Transit 1/1
Alternative Fuel Vehicles 0/2 QUALITY OF LIFE 15 OF 20
Smart Mobility and Transportation Policy 2/2 Demographic Assessment Y
High Priority Sites 2/2 Quality of life performance 5/6
Trend Improvement 4/4
WATER EFFICIENCY 6 OF 11 Distributional Equity 1/4
Water Access and Quality Y Environmental Justice 1/1
Water Performance 6/6 Housing and Transportation Affordability 1/2
Integrated Water Management 0/1 Civic and Community Engagement 2/2
Stormwater Management 0/2 Civil and Human Rights 1/1
Smart Water Systems 0/1
INNOVATION 3 OF 6
Innovation 3 /6
REGIONAL PRIORITY 2 OF 4
Regional Priority 2/4
This report contains the results of the technical review of an application for LEED® certification submitted for the specified project. LEED certification is an official
recognition that a project complies with the requirements prescribed within the LEED rating systems as created and maintained by the U.S. Green Building Council®
(USGBC®). The LEED certification program is administered by Green Business Certification Inc. (GBCI®).
GOLD
CERTIFIED: 40-49, SILVER: 50-59, GOLD: 60-79, PLATINUM: 80+
USGBC POPULATION CALCULATOR
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
The documentation sufficiently describes the population of the city.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
1. The population value for the year 2016 does not match the value indicated on data.census.gov (DP05). The
document ‘2016 Northampton city census’ indicated as the reference for the 2016 population, could not be
found in the supporting documentation.
Provide updated workbook with updated permanent population for the year 2016. Include relevant extracts
from documents/whole documents and/or links to websites, as necessary.
CREDIT DETAILS
Integrative Process
Integrative Planning and Leadership Awarded: 1
POSSIBLE POINTS: 1
ATTEMPTED: 1, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 1
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Awarded.
Green Building Policy and Incentives Awarded: 1
POSSIBLE POINTS: 4
ATTEMPTED: 3, NOT AWARDED: 2, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 1
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Option 01: Buildings Owned and/or Operated by the Local Government or Development Authority:
Withdrawn.
________
Option 2. Green Building Policy and Incentives:
Not awarded. The supporting documentation lists one incentive for projects pursuing green building
certification. The second identified incentive is for energy efficiency in buildings.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Option 2. Green Building Policy and Incentives:
1. The policy document and/or municipal ordinance indicating the adoption of incentive for higher density
construction for project pursuing LEED NC Gold certification, could not be found in the supporting
documentation.
Provide the policy document and/or municipal ordinance (or link to the webpage for the same) indicating the
adoption of the incentive for higher density construction for projects pursuing LEED NC Gold certification.
2. The supporting documentation indicates presence of only 1 incentive for buildings pursuing LEED or
equivalent green building certification. However, the credit requires the city to demonstrate presence of at
least 2 structural/financial incentives for projects pursuing LEED or equivalent green building rating systems.
Provide revised documentation demonstrating that at least two structural/financial incentives are available for
all buildings achieving LEED or equivalent green building certification.
________
Option 03: Building Performance Disclosure:
Buildings owned and/or operated by the local government or development authority:
Awarded.
Natural Systems and Ecology
Ecosystem Assessment Awarded
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Awarded.
Green Spaces Awarded: 2
POSSIBLE POINTS: 2
ATTEMPTED: 2, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 2
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Awarded.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
1. Declaration from municipal official indicating that at least 70% of dwellings are within ½ mile walking distance
of a green space could not be found in the supporting documentation.
Provide declaration from concerned municipal official indicating that at least 70% of the dwellings within the
city are within ½ mile walking distance of a green space.
Natural Resources Conservation and Restoration Awarded: 2
POSSIBLE POINTS: 2
ATTEMPTED: 2, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 2
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Awarded.
Light Pollution Reduction Awarded: 1
POSSIBLE POINTS: 1
ATTEMPTED: 1, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 1
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Awarded.
Resilience Planning Awarded: 4
POSSIBLE POINTS: 4
ATTEMPTED: 4, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 4
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Vulnerability and capacity assessment:
Awarded.
_______
Resilience Plan:
Awarded.
Transportation and Land Use
Transportation Performance Awarded: 6
POSSIBLE POINTS: 6
ATTEMPTED: 6, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 6
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Awarded with a Performance Score of 100.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
1. Refer to the comment on ‘USGBC Population Calculator’ at the beginning of the document.
Revise and reshare the per capita VMT calculations using the correct population, if required. Revise values in
Arc, if necessary.
Compact, Mixed Use and Transit Oriented Development Not Awarded
POSSIBLE POINTS: 2
ATTEMPTED: 2, NOT AWARDED: 2, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 0
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Not Awarded. It is unclear from the supporting documentation whether at least 90% of residential and non-
residential buildings in the identified CCCs have access to 10 diverse uses.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
1. It is unclear from the supporting documentation how the total population residing within the identified CCC
has been determined.
Provide updated documentation with calculations describing the percentage of population residing within the
identified CCC.
2. Narrative on how the identified diverse uses reflect the socioeconomic profile (income, demographics, race
and ethnicity) of the population residing within the CCC could not be found in the supporting documentation.
Provide updated narrative describing the socioeconomic profile of CCC that is reflected in the identified diverse
uses.
Access to Quality Transit Awarded: 1
POSSIBLE POINTS: 1
ATTEMPTED: 1, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 1
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Option 2. Intermodal Connectivity
Awarded.
Alternative Fuel Vehicles Withdrawn
POSSIBLE POINTS: 2
Smart Mobility and Transportation Policy Awarded: 2
POSSIBLE POINTS: 2
ATTEMPTED: 2, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 2
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Awarded.
High-Priority Site Awarded: 2
POSSIBLE POINTS: 2
ATTEMPTED: 2, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 2
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Option 1. Historic Preservation:
Awarded.
Water Efficiency
Water Access and Quality Awarded
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Water and Sanitation Access
Case 1: Water & Sanitation Access: Awarded
_______
Drinking water Quality
Awarded
_______
Treated Wastewater Quality
Awarded
_______
Stormwater Quality
Awarded
Water Performance Awarded: 6
POSSIBLE POINTS: 6
ATTEMPTED: 6, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 6
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Awarded with a water performance score of 100.
Integrated Water Management Not Attempted
POSSIBLE POINTS: 1
Stormwater Management Not Awarded
POSSIBLE POINTS: 2
ATTEMPTED: 2, NOT AWARDED: 2, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 0
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Option 2: Green Stormwater Infrastructure
Not Awarded. It is unclear from the supporting documentation how the total land area being served by green
infrastructure was determined. The total land area under green spaces indicated in the supporting
documentation for NS Credit: Green Spaces is lesser than the required threshold.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Option 1: Flooding Incidences:
Case 1: No Reported Flooding Incidences in Past 5 years
1. The city is attempting this credit thought Option 1 Case 1. However, the supporting documentation
“Northampton HMP_2020_Update” indicates several instances of minor flooding in the past 5 years (page 24).
Provide updated documentation for the credit demonstrating compliance with the credit requirements.
Note the following:
I. The project team has attempted more than 1 option in the credit. In such instances, GBCI reviews the first
attempted option only.
Smart Water Systems Not Awarded
POSSIBLE POINTS: 2
ATTEMPTED: 1, NOT AWARDED: 1, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 0
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Not Awarded. No additional documentation, on water audits, was submitted for final review.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Option 1: Water Audit
1. The submitted documentation “wma-awwa.m36-notice-fy21" appears to be an “Expression for Interest”
inviting applications to conduct water audit in the city. However, it is unclear from the supporting
documentation if the water audit has been conducted at the time of certification.
Provide water audit report and/or other supporting documentation on the water audit undertaken by the water
supply and management utility. Include information on the strategies adopted to improve system efficiency.
Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Access: Case 1:
Awarded.
_______
Reliability Performance Monitoring:
Awarded
_______
Power Surety and Resiliency:
Awarded
Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Performance Awarded: 11
POSSIBLE POINTS: 14
ATTEMPTED: 11, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 11
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Awarded with an energy performance score of 87.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
1. Refer to the comment on ‘USGBC Population Calculator’ at the beginning of the document.
Revise and share the updated per capita GHG emissions calculation using the correct population. Revise values
in Arc, if necessary.
2. The per capita GHG emissions value estimated in the supporting document ' 6_LFC_Existing_ENERGY.xlsx’
does not match the value entered in Arc. Additionally, the total annual GHG emissions value, as determined in
Power Access, Reliability and Resiliency Awarded
01/26/2022 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
the supporting document “Northampton2017.xls”, has not been accurately converted into the units indicated
in the supporting workbook ‘6_LFC_Existing_ENERGY.xlsx’.
Provide updated documentation confirming the daily per capita GHG emissions for the city with correct unit
conversions. Revise values in Arc, if necessary.
3. The supporting GHG inventory documentation ‘Northampton2017.xlsx’ does not appear to include the GHG
emissions generated from transportation sector. It is unclear from the supporting documentation if GHG
emissions from transportation sector have been included in the overall GHG emissions value.
Provide updated GHG inventory documentation for total annual GHG emissions for all scope 1 and scope 2
activities within the city boundary. Revise the value in ARC, if necessary.
Energy Efficiency Not Awarded
POSSIBLE POINTS: 4
ATTEMPTED: 2, NOT AWARDED: 2, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 0
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Option 1. Street Lighting and Public Area Lighting
Not Awarded. Information on the luminous efficacy of the lamps used for street and public area lighting could
not be found in the supporting documentation.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Option 1. Street Lighting and Public Area Lighting
1. It is unclear from the supporting narrative whether 70% of street lighting in the city meets the efficiency
related requirements of ANSI/IESNA RP-8-14 Roadway Lighting or CIE standard as adopted. Additionally, it is
unclear if the lamps used in street lighting and public area lighting have a minimum luminous efficacy of 100
lumens per watt.
Provide signed and stamped letter from the concerned municipal official with authority for public works and/or
energy infrastructure confirming 70% of the street lighting meets the efficiency related requirements of
ANSI/IESNA RP-8-14 Roadway Lighting or CIE standard as adopted. Also provide narrative indicating the
luminous efficacy of the lamps used in street and public area lighting.
Renewable Energy Not Awarded
POSSIBLE POINTS: 6
ATTEMPTED: 3, NOT AWARDED: 3, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 0
1/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Not Awarded. Calculations demonstrating achievement of threshold based on the total power consumption
and thermal energy consumption met by renewable energy for the city of Northampton could not be found in
the supporting documentation.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Local renewables and off-site renewable energy generation: Pending.
1. The supporting documentation demonstrates that 5% of the total city’s total electrical power consumption
is met through local solar. However, the credit requirements refer to the total power supply and thermal energy
supply (includes cooling and heating) met through renewable energy sources.
Provide updated documentation highlighting the total power supply and thermal energy supply (includes
cooling and heating) for the city of Northampton. Provide updated calculation demonstrating achievement of
the point threshold.
Low Carbon Economy Awarded: 2
POSSIBLE POINTS: 4
ATTEMPTED: 2, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 2
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Option 1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity
Awarded
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Option 1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity
1. EN Prerequisite: Energy and GHG Performance is pending for the city.
See the review comments under EN Prerequisite Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Performance and
update the credit documentation as necessary. GBCI will revisit this credit during the final review depending on
the final review status of EN Prerequisite: Energy and GHG Performance.
Grid Harmonization Awarded: 2
POSSIBLE POINTS: 2
ATTEMPTED: 2, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 2
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Option 3: Net Metering and Interconnection Policy
Awarded.
Materials and Resources
Solid Waste Management Awarded
02/17/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Awarded.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
1. Information on construction & demolition waste management strategies and diversion rate could not be
found in the supporting documentation.
Submit updated narrative with data on construction and demolition waste from infrastructure works (new,
renovation, repair, or demolition) which was diverted away from landfills. Include information on the key
strategies being adopted for C & D waste diversion.
Waste Performance Awarded: 4
POSSIBLE POINTS: 4
ATTEMPTED: 4, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 4
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Awarded.
Special Waste Streams Management Not Attempted
POSSIBLE POINTS: 1
Responsible Sourcing for Infrastructure
Not Attempted
POSSIBLE POINTS: 2
Material Recovery
Not Attempted
POSSIBLE POINTS: 1
Smart Waste Management Systems Not Attempted
POSSIBLE POINTS: 2
Quality of Life
Demographic Assessment Awarded
01/26/2022 EXISITNG FINAL REVIEW
Awarded
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
1. The supporting maps do not appear to indicate the location of healthful retail food outlets.
Provide updated maps highlighting location of healthful retail food outlets.
Quality of Life Performance Awarded: 5
POSSIBLE POINTS: 6
ATTEMPTED: 5, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 5
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Awarded with a quality of life performance score of 86.
_______________
Note the following:
I. The violent crime/capita value comes out to be different upon recalculation. Given that the recalculated value
does not impact the total points being achieved by the project, it is being accepted for this submission only. For
future submissions, ensure that correct values are uploaded.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
1. It is unclear from the supporting documentation how the value of violent crime/capita has been calculated
for year 2018 and 2019.
Provide updated documentation indicating the violent crime/capita calculation for 2018 and 2019.
Trend Improvements Awarded: 4
POSSIBLE POINTS: 4
ATTEMPTED: 4, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 4
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Population with a High School Degree: Awarded
_______
Graduation Rate: Awarded
_______
Unemployment Rate: Awarded
_______
Violent Crime: Awarded
Distributional Equity Awarded: 1
POSSIBLE POINTS: 4
ATTEMPTED: 2, NOT AWARDED: 1, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 1
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Option 4. Access & Proximity
Awarded.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Option 3. Equitable Employment
Not awarded. The unemployment rate for people of “Hispanic and Latin origin” is outside the required range as
per the option requirements.
Option 4. Access & Proximity
1. It is unclear from the supporting documentation whether various identified community facilities, such as
parks, libraries, recreation centers, and schools, and healthful retail food outlets are as accessible to low-income
residents as they are to the broader community.
Provided updated master plan indicating the density (dwelling units per acre) of dwelling units in different parts
of the city and highlighting walk distances from dwelling units to the listed community facilities for an overall
zone and one low-income zone.
Environmental Justice Awarded: 1
POSSIBLE POINTS: 1
ATTEMPTED: 1, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 1
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Awarded
Housing and Transportation Affordability Awarded: 1
POSSIBLE POINTS: 2
ATTEMPTED: 2, NOT AWARDED: 1, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 1
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Option 1. Comprehensive Housing Policy
Not Awarded. It is unclear from the supporting documentation whether higher density affordable housing has
been provided with ¼ mile of walking distance to public transit stations.
Option 4. Affordable Rental Housing Preservation
Awarded
_______
Note the following:
I. The option has been attempted during final review.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Option 1. Comprehensive Housing Policy
1. Information on construction of higher density (12 DU per acre) affordable housing within ¼ mile (400 meters)
of walking distance to public transit stations could not be found in the supporting documentation“350
Attachment 8”.
Provide updated documentation indicating that construction of higher density (12 DU per acre) affordable
housing with ¼ mile (400 meters) of walking distance to public transit stations is included in the affordable
housing policy.
Civic and Community Engagement Awarded: 2
POSSIBLE POINTS: 2
ATTEMPTED: 2, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 2
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Option 1. Diversity in Appointment to Local Advisory Board
Awarded
Option 3. Conduct Survey on Neighbourhood Cohesion
Awarded
Civil and Human Rights Awarded: 1
POSSIBLE POINTS: 1
ATTEMPTED: 1, NOT AWARDED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 1
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Awarded
Innovation
Innovation Awarded: 3
POSSIBLE POINTS: 6
ATTEMPTED: 6, NOT AWARDED: 3, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 3
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Option 1: Innovation
Zoning incentives beyond usual zoning efforts:
Awarded.
Affordable housing incentives:
Not Awarded. It is unclear from the supporting documentation how this strategy’s requirements avoid overlap
with requirements of QL Credit: Housing and Transportation Affordability and fossil-free home requirements
of Innovation 1: Zoning incentives beyond usual zoning efforts.
Open space to reduce need to drive:
Awarded.
Open space to accommodate climate induced plant and animal migration:
Awarded
Shared Use Path Development:
Not Awarded. It is unclear from the supporting documentation how the strategies for this innovation option are
different from those identified for the other innovation option: “Open space to reduce need to drive”.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Option 1: Innovation
Zoning incentives beyond usual zoning efforts:
1. The policy document (or link for the webpage for the same) supporting incentives for developers who
voluntarily build fossil-free homes and approval of fossil-fuel free projects could not be found in the supporting
documentation.
Provide updated narrative with the policy document (or link to the webpage for the same) highlighting
implementation of Zoning incentives.
Affordable housing incentives:
1. It is unclear how the strategies mentioned here are different from the requirements addressed in the rating
system through QL Credit: Housing and Transportation Affordability.
Provide updated documentation explaining how the strategies mentioned here are different than the strategies
addressed in the rating system.
Open space to reduce need to drive:
1. The strategies being adopted by the city to shorten the effective walking and bicycling distances could not be
found in the supporting documentation.
Provide updated documentation describing the strategies adopted to shorten effective walking and bicycling
distances. Include information on how the strategies are different from the requirements of credits NS: Green
Spaces and TR Credit: Compact, Mixed Use and Transit Oriented Development.
Open space to accommodate climate induced plant and animal migration:
1. The policy document supporting the implementation of ‘preservation efforts and regulatory restrictions’
could not be found in the supporting documentation.
Provide updated documentation that includes the policy document (or link to the webpage for the same)
supporting the ‘preservation efforts and regulatory restrictions’. Provide examples of areas within the city
preserved to benefit plant/animal migrations.
Extreme Zoning to prevent development in floodplains:
Not Awarded. Prohibiting or restricting development in floodplains is a strategy already addressed in the rating
system through NS Credit: Natural Resources Conservation and Restoration, Option 2. Natural Resource
Conservation and Restoration Plan.
Shared Use Path Development:
1. It is unclear from the supporting narrative how the strategies for this innovation option would be different
from those identified for the other innovation option: “Open space to reduce need to drive”.
Provide updated documentation explaining how the strategies mentioned here are different from the strategies
adopted in Innovation Strategy: ‘Open space to reduce need to drive’. Provide reference documentation
supporting the implementation of the identified strategies in the city.
_______________
Note the following:
I. Projects can achieve a maximum of 6 points under the Innovation credit category. Project team may choose
to attempt fresh innovation strategies. However, please do remember that any new credit submissions will be
reviewed only once during the final review.
Regional Priority
Regional Priority Awarded: 2
POSSIBLE POINTS: 4
ATTEMPTED: 4, NOT AWARDED: 2, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 2
01/26/2022 EXISTING FINAL REVIEW
Option 2: Innovative Regional Priority
ValleyBike share:
Not Awarded. No additional information could be found in the supporting documentation.
Regional Health Perspective
Not Awarded. No additional information could be found in the supporting documentation.
10/20/2021 EXISTING PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Option 1: Regional Priority
Regional Trails:
Awarded.
________
Option 2: Innovative Regional Priority
ValleyBike share:
1. The policy document (or link to the webpage for the same) supporting the implementation of ‘ValleyBike
share’ program could not be found in the supporting documentation.
Provide updated narrative with link to the webpage for the policy document or upload the policy document
supporting the implementation of ‘ValleyBike share’ program in the documentation folder.
________
Regional Health Perspective
1. The documentation supporting exploration and investment in healthy living and eating strategies could not
be found.
Provide updated documentation such as reports and/or link to the webpage for the same describing exploration
and investment in healthy living and eating strategies.
________
Community Resilience Hub:
Awarded.
_______________
Note the following:
I. Projects can achieve a maximum of 4 points under the Regional Priority credit category. Project team may
choose to attempt fresh regional priority strategies. However, please do remember that any new credit
submissions will be reviewed only once during the final review.