Loading...
10D-017 BUILD PERMITS � jltas+�ct�mettf a DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR 212 Main Street Municipal Building '�,,, SV•�. Northampton, Mass. 01060 TACY PERMIT #553• 175 MAIN ST., LEEDS 10D - 1'7 ISSUED 8/29/88 ZONED SI PAGE 5-12 (Zoning Ordinance) Construction Supply Establishment "A" PAGE 1581 (Zoning Charter) CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY ESTABLISHMENT "A" DEFINITIONS (ZONING ORDINANCE) CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY ESTABLISHMENT PG. 2.3 (ZONING CHARTER) " " PG. 1554 DIMENSIONAL & DENSITY PAGE 6-5 (ZONING ORDINANCE) ANY PERMITTED USE FRONT DEPTH PAGE 1589 (ZONING CHARTER) MINIMUM. REQUIRED 20,000 120' 140' PRESENT 70,000 120' 285' SETBACKS REQUIRED 201FRONT 151SIDE 20'REAR PRESENT 150' 30' 30' PLUS BUFFER AS REQUIRED PAGE 6.6 ZONING ORDINANCE PAGE 1590 SEC. 6.5 ZONING CHARTER BOTTOM LINE IS THAT THERE ARE ASKING FOR NOTHING NOT ALLOWED BY RIGHT ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! LOT WAS SPLIT (AS PER SUGGESTED BY S. WEIL) AND ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CONCURRED IF LOT WAS DIVIDED ALL REQUESTS WOULD BE APPLICABLE. DID EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO APPEASE THE BOARDS WISHES: PLANNING BOARD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CITY COUNCIL (ALL INFAVOR EXCEPT RAYMOND LABARGE) STILL DENIED ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! WHY ??????????????????????? 6FAUL J. 5 BUILD-ING COMMISSIONER �Q„'SHNNP�� � � ,�Gtassxchttsette W 0 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR 212 Main Street Municipal Building Northampton, Mass. 01060 TACY RERMIT X553 175 MAIN ST. , LEEDS -- --°�°'""®" 10D - 17 ISSUED 8/29,/88 ZONED SI PAGE 5-12 (Zoning Ordinance) Construction Supply Establishment "A" PAGE 1581 (Zoning Charter) CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY ESTABLISHMENT "A" DEFINITIONS (ZONING ORDINANCE) CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY ESTABLISHMENT PG. 2.3 (ZONING CHARTER) " PG. 1554 DIMENSIONAL & DENSITY PAGE 6-5 (ZONING ORDINANCE) ANY PERMITTED USE FRONT DEPTH PAGE 1589 (ZONING CHARTER) MINIMUM REQUIRED 20,000 120' 140' PRESENT 70,000 120' 285' SETBACKS REQUIRED 201FRONT 151SIDE 20' REAR PRESENT 150' 30' 30' PLUS BUFFER AS REQUIRED PAGE 6.6 ZONING ORDINANCE PAGE 1590 SEC. 6.5 ZONING CHARTER BOTTOM LINE IS THAT THERE ARE ASKING FOR NOTHING NOT ALLOWED BY RIGHT ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! . ! . ! ! LOT WAS SPLIT (AS PER SUGGESTED BY S. WEIL) AND ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CONCURRED IF LOT WAS DIVIDED ALL REQUESTS WOULD BE APPLICABLE. DID EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO APPEASE THE BOARDS WISHES: PLANNING BOARD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CITY COUNCIL (ALL INFAVOR EXCEPT RAYMOND LABARGE) STILL DENIED t ! ! itt ! ! ! WHY ??????????????????????? AUL J. DU S BUILDING C MMISSIONER