Loading...
06-040 291 haydenville rd zoningDate Filed File No. ZONING PRRNIT APPLICATION ( 510.2) 1. Name of Applicant: /�, y0vtic Address: �qr /Z-� �� /.�� H�, D _ - Telephone. 2. Owner of Property: �f/yJF Address- Telephone' 3. Status of Applicant: Owner Contract Purchaser _Lessee _Other (explain: ) 4. Parcel Identification: Zoning Map Sheett Parce Lf Zoning District(s) (include overlays) 1,t' Street Address �9 j 5. Use of Structure /Property (if project is only inter Building height %B1dg.Coverage (Footpri: Setbacks - front - side - rear Lot size Frontage Floor Area Ratio %Open Space (Lot area a. building and parking) Parking Spaces - -- -- Loading - signs Fill (volume a location) Required =b Zonin f l nus '6_-- Narrative Description of Proposed Work /Project: (Use additional sheets 7_ Attached Plans: x Sketch Plan Site Plan S. Certification: I hereby certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Date: 7 iYo✓ST iJ= - ,off _ �do-� 4/ Applicant's Signature. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - TRIs si&16N FOR OPPIC As8 d as presented /based an information presented as presented -or Denials -%M /9/ ENDUM FOR FLA LOT FILED BY R MARY A COMPLIANCE WITH ESTABLISHED CRITERIA FOR FLAG LOTS AND REQUESTED WAIVERS: Section 6.13 - Flag Lots (a) Both plans submitted illustrate and establish that the flag Lot has access frontage of at least 50 feet. (b) Both plans submitted illustrate and establish that there is access width from the front lot line to the principal structure of more than 50 feet. (c) The access roadway to the proposed single family dwelling on the flag lot has no curve, therefore complies with this sub - section, all as shown on the plan submitted. (d) The flag Lot has an area of 12.638 acres which far exceeds the criteria established by sub - section (d), all as shown on said plan submitted. (e) The plans submitted illustrate and show that the set -backs for the dwelling are equal to at least twice the see -back normally required for an SR district. (E) This criteria establishes that the maximum building coverage for a flag lot in an SR district shall not exceed 13.4% + / -. The oroposed flag Lot is 12.636 acres or 563,149.28 square feet x 13.4% equals an allowed maximum coverage of 75,462 square ize feet. The proposed single family residence is a norm 000 residence with square footage coverage of 3,000 to 5, feet, as shown on said plans. (g) Eighty -five percent (85A) of 12.636 acres equals a total required open space of 10.7423 acres. The plans illustrate that the open space exceeds this level. (h) The minimum frontage requirement for an SR district is 125 feet, therefore the circle shown on one of the clans sub mitted has a minimum diameter of one and one -half times that amount or 187.5 feet. The proposed single family residence to be erected is located within such circle in a manner such that no portion of said circle falls outside the oropertv's boundary lines. (i) Width criteria is not applicable since the proposal establishes only one flag lot without the utilisation of any common driveway to be shared by more than one flag Lot. (j) One of the plans submitted illustrates that the access driveway shall fallow existing grades on the property which does not exceed 4.5% and shall be of suitable construction in compli- ance with the zoning ordinance with a TRG surface and is adequate for vehicle access and turnaround, including moving vans, ambulances, fire and Police. If, in the opinion of the Planning Board, such is not the case, the applicant hereby requests a waiver of this provision inasmuch as this is a straight drivewav without curves to a single family residence. (k) The Plans submitted comply with the criteria estab- Lished under this sub - section and the recordable plan includes the required statements. (1) The Plans submitted illustrate the location and Lay -out of the proposed driveway and house and states that drainage will _follow the natural drainage Flow on the propert?. The tranrock gravel driveway is permeable and will allow drainage directly through its surface. PROCEDURES 4. The Applicant is normally required to submit a site plan together with the special hermit /site plan application. The Applicant respectfully requests a waiver of this requirement. Sketch Plans are attached to the Application which the Applicant believes are sufficient to meet the criteria established for the allowance of a flag lot. LL� Robes A. Young and Mao A. Yount, Applicants by Ro r A. Walassek. Their Attorney 76 Gothic Street Northampton, Massachusetts 01060 (413) 564 -8223 Date Filed: File #• JUL 24 1991 N /PH) SPECIAj MIT AND SITE PLAN APPLICAT I. ISSUING A=, ORI"" 3 Planning Scard_Council 2. Name of Applicant A. Yonne and Mary e. v,..__ 3. Owner of nrooer *v : 3obert A. Young and Mar+ d. y oun g Address: -'91 Haydenville Rd. Telephone: 364 -9271 4. Status of -Appl % Owner Contract Purchaser Lessee Other (Explain) S. Parcel Ident Zoning Map ,# 06 Parcel 40 and 4 Street Address: 291 Mavdenville Rd. Zoning Dist.: SR 6. Special Permit is being requested under Zoning Ordinance Section 6.13 P age 6 -13, 6 -14, and 6 -1, 7. Site ?Ian is for:Intermediate Project S or Major Project_ S. Narrative Description of the Proposed roiect additional sheets _ f necessary) Applicant oronose t a c . 1a t t d n _ _ eep .ar the construction of a single tam" v residence on a cartel containing 12.636 acres with - ronta e or 50 =eet on 3avdenville Road. 9. State now work /nr000sai complies with Spec P ermit r ter a (See Applicant s Guide for criteria -use additional sheets is necessary) the proposed flag lot is allowed by Special Permit and all the Soecral _'erm ie trite r_a are met by the site and the plan presented. lo. Site Plan, with any requests for waivers must be attached. 11. Abutters (See Instructions. Use attached abutters' list, It must be certified by the Assessor's office). 12. I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Date; iwe 1991 Applicant's Signature- Rooept A. Young Young ) DECISION OF NORTHAMPTON PLANNING BOARD r• At a meeting held on August 22, 1991, the Planning Board of the City of Northampton voted unanimously to GRANT the request of Robert A. Young and Mary A. Young for a Special Permit under the Provisions of Section 6.13 of the Northampton Zoning Ordinance to allow the creation of a flag lot at 291 Haydenville Road, more specifically Parcels 40 and 41 of Sheet 6 of the Northampton Assessors maps. Present and voting were Chairman J. Beauregard, A. Crystal, W. Larkin, D. Welter, M. Mendelson, and J. Hale. The Planning Board found: 1 • The Plan submitted, described as: "Plan of land Northampton, Massachusetts prepared for Robert A. Young by Richard J. LaBarge, Sr., LS dated in divides nd M Parcel Jul Mary A. s 40 and 41 of Sheet 6 into two lotss one of ' now 1991 which is a three acre lot on which the a sits, ich and a flag lot of 12.638 acrespplicants , dwelling 2 • Looking to the requirements and criteria of §6.13, the Board finds that the proposed flag lot has access fronts Haydenville Road of fifty feet; that access width lot line to roa the 4e on feet; the access proposed principal structure from the has at le dway is perfectly straight; the flag District; least 16 times the required lot area for g lot all setbacks are equal to at least two the SR setbacks required for the SR District; the maximum times the j coverage will not exceed two- thirds b rurally uilding permitted . the SR Distr' of that no percentage is District. the min' requirement of far more than the 85% imam open space § is adequately equired; and the y met. 3. The r equirements of §10.10(3)(a) through (f) are met FORM A NORTHAMPTON, MA APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO RBQDIRE APPROVAL File five completed forma and plans and one mylar with the City Clerk and the Planning Board in accordance with the requirement. of Section 3.02. To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his /her property in the City of Northampton does not constitute division within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law, herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Applicant Robert A. Young -r, Punt or type name Signature Haydenville Rd. Leeds, Ma. 58 -9271 Address Phone 2. owner Robert A. Young Print or type name Signature Haydenville Rd. Leeds, Ma 584 -9271 Address Ph 3. Surveyor Richard J LaBarge S Print or type name Signatu 1_.Stadler St. Belchertown, Ma. 323 -8550 Address Phone 4. Deed or property recorded in Hamoshirc Re ist 4 ry, Book 3398 .— 36 5. Location and Description of Property: 2 Parcels Of 3 acres & 12.6 acres located easterly of intersection 6. Assessors Map ID: 6 Lot(s): 40 of Haydenville Rd. & Leonard S Leeds. Date Submitted for Planning Board Approval: City Clerk: (Signature) (4/11/91) Date Planning Boa Decision T-klad: a ]. 3 1991 City Cler ,i o S'4.