Loading...
31B-201 AAB Cc: Prouty, Emily; cconantPsmith.edu; Epstein, Carl; Walker, Mike; Anderson, Dana Subject: Re: Smith College Existing Conditions Karen What is the angle at the bottom of the tread? Is that just a CADD error? On Nov 19, 2012, at 16:25, "Estabrook, Karen" < Karen. Estabrook Pperkinswill.com <mailto: Karen .EstabrookPperkinswill.com» wrote: Sean, Thanks. On Thursday, I took photos and dimensions of the stairs. Attached is a detail of how the treads could be modified (cut back the nosing) and add a metal riser to be code conforming. Karen From: Ditto, Sean [mailto:SDitto(aconsigli.com] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 2:11 PM To: Prouty, Emily; Estabrook, Karen Cc: 'cconant@ smith. edu <mailto:cconantPsmith.edu >'; Caputo, Michael; Epstein, Carl; Walker, Mike Subject: Smith College Existing Conditions All: I saved the photos taken of the existing stair / terrazzo condition on the project gateway under photos /existing terrazzo. If possible we need to see if the stairs can be modified to meet the code in lieu of replacing the treads which is very costly. Sean < image001 .jpg ><http: / /www.consigli.com /> Sean Ditto, P.E., LEED® AP Consigli Construction Co., Inc. 100 Allyn St 4th Floor Hartford, CT 06103 t. 860.239.0233 f. 508.244.4526 An Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer <Modified Terrazzo Tread Detail.pdf> 2 Havener, Don From: Estabrook, Karen < Karen .Estabrook @perkinswill.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 11:10 AM To: Havener, Don Subject: FW: Smith College Existing Conditions Original Message From: Ditto, Sean [mailto:SDitto @consigli.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:34 PM To: Estabrook, Karen Cc: Prouty, Emily; cconant @smith.edu; Epstein, Carl; Walker, Mike; Anderson, Dana Subject: RE: Smith College Existing Conditions Karen: I sent the detail to a terrazzo subcontractor that we use quite frequently and she indicated to me that they are not capable of cutting them. I have also sent the detail to a flooring subcontractor that suggested cutting them to provide feed back. I will let you know. Sean Sean Ditto, P.E., LEED® AP Consigli Construction Co., Inc. 100 Allyn St 4th Floor Hartford, CT 06103 t. 860.239.0233 f. 508.244.4526 An Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer Original Message From: Estabrook, Karen [mailto: Karen .Estabrook @perkinswill.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:32 PM To: Ditto, Sean Cc: Prouty, Emily; cconantCcsmith.edu; Epstein, Carl; Walker, Mike; Anderson, Dana Subject: RE: Smith College Existing Conditions The tread needs to be at a 60% angle then go straight aligning with the existing metal support and new riser. Original Message From: Ditto, Sean [mailto:SDitto @consigli.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 6:32 PM To: Estabrook, Karen 1 LEGEND PERKINS • z < 5�'� NwI + W I L L _ l ,5'.0' 19.0" : \. / \ /t NSW L.SIRUC110N % SL 210 21N4 EL.3 MA U2 TT" o * S 6" 11 n *3' a 3617 LOW . -2272-3/:_;F:0 C '''''° K 1617 VS L NwN-0EItl1uYrMLtem NE'NTLDGN -SEE CUTTER - ZISKIND 1 , , � 'n'ZI '' RENOVATION o i , '', ROOF PATCHT . A .11 ` '/ 9EY(NDOPENING BRA s nP 4 SMITH coil .C(JE 1- ill _ - - -_ TA r SMITH ! DRY DAIRY GENERAL NOTES COLLEGE MEAT 25 s>6 I 06 _ ,TOR GENERAL ROTEL SYMBOL.: AND ARCHITECTURAL KITCHEN TIT "P : ABBRE T ONSREFER TO S.E1 rove i ,24 6 -ex• 6KOSHER "i 0 w11ERE SNOWNON PLANS... CE OF INTERIOR FINISH ELM STREET 6 14 - -- - - -- -- KTICIICN. ' PARTITIONWDX FAGS OF EX S'NGPARTrtTays. TAO REMOVE NORTHAMPTON, MA 01063 In EX017) 560)600 SEAR, PATCH ANC REPAIR FOB 21ICNMFNT. •\\ 12 J.11P. 7)1Y I l ,1p -T t(I 3. TM£REPARIITIONS ALIGN . LOCATE PARTITIONS FLOSH..N FACE OAT _ h d 0`GVP BOaD 0 SURFACES 0865100 — 20 \ 4T� lr�µ 4ALL DISTIL. COROPer L'S OR CORE GOLOMNS ARE TO BE FURRED OUT WITH MR STUD.. OR HAT 110U 715MNMALLY AS DOSSIB0E nr� and 2 I Y 9' TOIOCATONSRFWIRING CORO, I BOXE3S. BLOCaNG, FECR ETC. -' � - —- -- — ■ r ! g . EXCEPT AT COL LIMNS THAT ARE REQUIRED TOALI. OR ARE ARUP / AA I L DINO/SIMST THE CONTRARY. 9£A sAIN. 1 , R V M - i .TOR C101 AND FlDOR3 GELNGS ANDIV.SESAi BI6of�9T r BEDROOM 1 I CUTYINSDA a RwoRNboa 03360000000 � - r - *I 704 ON t0i 6W3ERTOWALT.0 <O FORWALLPARTION SCHEDULE. REF ER / - 'i 7042 FOR DETAILS �a. n� 1 - I l I ('-' t ALT P,m Ions WALLS lo6E TYPE N�ssa1HE - xwsE ,•n4i o , . I TH NOTED AND GO TO STIR C RE Ground TO BE PAINTED / H _ _ - - + t - e. EXISTING ROLLS Im PAR' KKr fGE'.Afifl' TORE CONFIRMED Som 6C . Mp s. �-/ 1 r i _ I" I .�, AEI ORREPLACE ON. RUCiD MATE t. DETAILS. 5 80989 / T 1 / a 600.0 CaJ _.__._ I TfATf f T 0 9 9 ORS TOR1665 0RECEIVENEWL 7 TO Exu . . .. *I _, DOORS OR TO TO /RECEIVE EW OLSET T 11 I ' ' I - III _ 444 DCATIGNS IRE 0. ED STAR HANCRALS TO RECEDE NEW 1 _ I .— , tl TOJMIRYNT DUDE REWIPFLINTS,fNSH (G- b d 1 � , ME ,w. Cdbum B Guyette 0409 G _ i Fm �1I I - 0a ��' HEAD , J INI I I ROV DE A.L NICHE AT ALL L0.1iONs ADM P 00 o.,c.. ru9 OF i 11° °11 I 0 xacATED 02 1 12 'RONDE BROW. SLAVORTINGSLOCNNO WHERE WALL r 701 826 a HOUSE I OCCURS roMEPF?Aan s lxxu NARRATIVES wgxATE I 10 1 O: I c / -___ �` 6L0.S - -----E- - r, ,ow I I ,- OT? SCOPE a evoRR. LAM P artners I 0 06, \I I c g< . MA C2110 N.4N2 ;�. 1 011 003 6000 ' - , 3 ENTRY., i _, LORRY_ + \ TEST , } 100 / (ipi I 1 /+ L...Lw I \T f I Ow -A Tetra Tech Company Q KendA qN S.W. S .F / / , 4 ~E ' ^- L� 'Jr ��tY1 1 NEW PARTITIONS M T 4 NOTES Carte 4 6 .941 4 — NEW CONS_, UC Q4 ' - -- - �R SJL SR COAT PIASTER BOARD, META. SUDS 778 2285513 � INATIOR (REFER TO INTERIOR COTLINE AND FIN. SCHEDU FOR LE FOR 03 00137[0... INFORMATION) IQ STUDENTS s T� l 24. 2110 YY000 DOORS AND MEAL . FRAMES FRCEVIATK2TCHEN WORK r I I FF ROOM '.. 06 44 P20273TH METAL ERNE PAmmoNS __ DIT 44 PREP FLOOR TORECEIME NEW ELWRNG F 4� - " SNE'N PASSENGER ELFYATOR - -� Q 4 PATCH RID REP. EXISTING PARET10NSASNEEDEO _ ALFUICYSTI EXISTING FREMCE SURRWNDON THE TAW 61214457 _ ____ — PI" 1E Flroa 7_J . 46, RETRO.T EXISTING STAR NEW STL STEEL 041830. GLASS INFRA {y' STAFF j� 0 620RG. REFOR&517 EXISTING TERRAZZO OFFICE 441141078151 He5Lt Fgi,£RE MSH10 PP SURFACES RE 116 1060 ) NEW F N 5C £S . 6 ' 410. NEW CONCRETELANDING. STARS. ANO RAMPED SUREAF FWD B A SLWET 4 ,511: _ . 1 1 . NEWFRE RATED GLASS PICLCG'JRES A T STARE T. ails ( 0 i 1', - 1 4 1 2 3 70 TI5N EXISTING CONCRETE FLODRNG. ReMlSIOD- '� uawssArDlLLnerww FRAME STORE DDOr+s J. �. 14 . NOt USED 0.RENEE. R00F 0G AND 11.01.10W CM FASTING STRUCT,FE II Y \ (RL TO Mt P MR STRUC2URAL RARRA2NES FOR ADDITIONAL ROOM PI / 0730736011016 I l l ul l l 2 ( 01 LIVING 650W701emIONS AT 017.221 772 , A / ROOM _ 111 A NEW AIWA. ED SBA AIRS. __ 4,n 0000445 OFIREFER SOlANO 0547 AIAPRAINEI 1 I 15 NEW STARS 6061273 POOR CC, if uR F R TOS n uRU ro ARwc9 , uR R rvt x 5 e i ib 421 . REEURR6H. PATCH AND REPAIR AT FT OCRING I .TAIR I I . NEW SLAB ON GRADErLOU1INGAND(11AU'S AND SWAINJM STORE FRONT WAIL I '6100_ STa I HOUSE' ' % an EXISTING RAW TO NEON KITCHEN l — 1 ,tit 4 2 meeNwlouEN {ILO AIE 114 37115E I . , 1 4 25. FRONDS 700(30 ORNFF. sLOPE H00010DRAIN Street Information STIC*H i 461 SEE 1NLER.ELEVlrC)4S EON ' . TREATMENT DNA I T -- _ / 4— J .. - _' Rf - -1.. III Tun Number 9 .a B : in. NEW JAMt0R5 S NNAND MOP MJORS Drawn - - -__. r 1• 410 SKYLIGHT Checked f .. 423.SOIARIUNE Approved ._- „TAN ' I Title 2 A uv 73 Level 01 Floor Plan I 1 , Shed[ 2 3 , ,5 A04 -01 n / FIRST FLOOR PLAN — - Cm/,§H.12011 F.wum,08 0 4 9112" 11` - 8" 6 MI Al2 -01 1 LI. ------ I i J(. ,,....,: f :,..•:- • :,-.., MI 4" 3' _ 7" 5" 3, - 7 ', M 4r - i ; . , !,i . ! ...,.....„ 1 Y (V r _ _ ___ ,, CLEAN AND REPAIR EXISTING Lill � TERRAZZO AS NEEDED, TYP. t , i �' NEW SSTL RAILINGS J i .__ � ' - " .- MOUNT TO WALL PATCH AND REPAIR N { I WALL, TYP. , r- "-•.: 1 1..°E _ 0_3) 0 STAIR 2 - LEVEL 02 LI 1/4" = 9' -0° Same conditions found it CUTTER - ZISKIND RENOVATION SMITH PERKINS COLLEGE + W I L L STAIR 2/4 - SHEETAE ..- . K` Gv�� ts col- GE `o1 o63 GO .� ` 1 a - ,. 4 � `YX L 4 ° t gyp. i 4, 4 �'. R i. >. ; r KM xii V. Picture 1 - Existing Terrazzo Stair Treads i }h 4110 : '' i• I: al, ijtat Ire �r ' S A M ° -a. Si * J ' ) E � � s sty. . , . , .. ,,,. ,, , , .„,..,„„„. . , . , „.. .....„,,,, :,„, tqf w — — . a � r ar J' �'�t ✓ i 9 { y 1 � fch�'�E f S - A F r . , _ . , 4 '„ , , ,,,,, , ; 4 .. ,,, , . .. • ailliw „.„i.,...„.", 1 _,,,..„.., 4 1 ,:. - , - ..,_,,,::::,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,. '",,.. ,4,' ' :1, ..'i' M nm 1 pp Picture 2 - Existing Terrazzo Stair Treads January 25, 2013 Page 4of4 Conclusion Section 26.6.3 MAAB Section 26.6.3 requires specific maneuvering clearances on both sides of all doors intended for user passage. The existing layout of stairways 2 and 4 do not allow for the required maneuvering clearances to be provided on the pull -side of the stairway access doors in accordance with MAAB Section 26.6.3. The non- compliant stairway doors will be relocated in order to improve usability. Additionally, after the proposed renovations, stairways 2 and 4 will otherwise comply with all applicable MAAB requirements. It is our opinion that due to the technical infeasibility of providing the required pull -side maneuvering clearance and the proposed improvements, stairways 2 and 4 will provide reasonably accessible conditions in accordance with applicable MAAB requirements. Section 27.3 MAAB Section 27.3 requires stair tread nosings to have a specific geometry; it is our understanding that this requirement is intended to mitigate tripping hazards. Although the existing stair tread nosings do not comply with MAAB Section 27.3, it is important to note that the building owner has neither been notified of any complaints nor reported any incidents associated with stairway tripping hazards. After the proposed renovations, stairways 1 and 3 will otherwise comply with all applicable MAAB requirements. It is our opinion that due to the technical infeasibility of providing the required stairway nosings, and the proposed improvements, stairways 1 and 3 will provide reasonably accessible conditions in accordance with applicable MAAB requirements. We respectfully request your approval of this matter. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, COSENTINI ASSOCIATES, INC. r a..... 4 ...2..11.,..L.:1 ° L.Z.,,,,„... a - ti , , ), rte: -. ;:; January 25, 2013 Page 3 of 4 Stair Tread Nosings Requirements For all stairways, MAAB Section 27.3 requires stair treads to have rounded leading edges, with a radius not greater than '/2 inch. Additionally, the underside of the nosing must have an angle not less than 60 degrees from the horizontal and must not project more than 1'/2 inches. The following figure illustrates these requirements: 3B "if 1 1 1 \ Radius Jf 60 60 Radius L � L. j _. '--' � 1 _ j i „. Angled Nosing Rounded Nosing V Nosings Figure 27b Discussion As stated in the Background section of this letter, the existing stair treads in Stairways 1 and 3 are approximately square -edged and constructed of a terrazzo material (see pictures 1 and 2). With the proposed stainless steel perforated panels enclosing the risers, the stairway will comply with MAAB Section 27.2; due to the placement of these panels the stair treads will project approximately 1 '/2 inches, complying with the projection component of MAAB Section 27.3. The design team has determined that, without complete replacement of the existing stair treads and landings, compliance with the "60 degree angle" component of MAAB Section 27.3 is technically infeasible and offers the following points in support of this determination: • The existing terrazzo stair treads were originally precast to their current dimensions and subsequently finished to provide their current aesthetic. The treads are attached to steel support plates which extend to within 1 inch of the tread nosing. The location of the steel support plates make it impossible to cut the required 60 degree angle into the tread nosing without first cutting the steel support plates; according to contractors, cutting of the steel support plates cannot be done in the field and therefore, the terrazzo tread nosings cannot be cut in the field (see attached email message). • The existing terrazzo stair treads and attached steel support plates are subsequently attached to the inboard faces of the stringers. In this way, the stair treads would be difficult to remove in facilitation of off - site cutting. We are seeking a variance from the Massachusetts Architectural Access Board to maintain the existing non- conforming stair treads in stairways 1 and 3. After the proposed renovations, stairways 1 and 3 will otherwise comply with all applicable MAAB requirements. A k };a,i LC. - :trIP%N January 25, 2013 Page 2 of 4 The proposed scope of work includes remediation efforts for some of the items listed above. The open risers currently found in Stairways 1 and 3 will be in- filled with stainless steel perforated panels, providing closed risers in accordance with MAAB Section 27.2 (see drawing sheet Al). Additionally, the glass enclosures for stairways 1 and 3 will be upgraded to fire resistance rated glass enclosures complying with MSBC requirements for new construction. Doors leading to stairways 2 and 4 will be relocated in order to provide enhanced, though not compliant, maneuvering clearances on the pull -side (see drawing Sheet A2). New handrails and guards complying with applicable MAAB and Massachusetts State Building Code (MSBC) requirements will be installed in stairways 1, 2, 3, and 4. Pull Side Doorway Maneuvering Clearances Requirements When arranged for a front approach 521 CMR Section 26.6.3.a requires a clear floor space, on the pull side of the door, measuring at least 18 inches beyond the latch and 60 inches perpendicular to the door. The following figure illustrates the required clear floor space: `!<...__ p........de . - ....:.: . is Cs cw - 11 t, "_min r ( . . 45 .+�� r - • • t • Front Approach Discussion Due 10 existing conditions, the doors serving stairway 2 and stairway 4 are arranged such that a clear floor space, as required by MAAB Section 26.6.3 cannot be provided within the stairway (see drawing sheet A2). As shown in drawing sheet A2, the railing prohibits the 18 inch clear space from being provided for the full 60 inch dimension (measured perpendicular to the door). The design team has determined that compliance with 26.6.3, in this case, is technically infeasible and offers the following points in support of this determination: • The stairway doors in question must swing into the stairway in accordance with Massachusetts State Building Code requirements. Therefore, the door swing cannot be reversed to alleviate the non- conformity. • The existing stairway enclosures are of continuous concrete block construction, based at ground level and extending to the roof of the building. Due to the nature of this construction type, moving the south wall of each stair enclosure in order to provide the required pull -side clearance would present significant technical and economic challenges. We are seeking a variance from the Massachusetts Architectural Access Board to provide stairway access doors for stairways 2 and 4 that do not comply with MAAB Section 26.6.3, on the pull -side of the door. After the proposed renovations, stairways 2 and 4 will otherwise comply with all applicable MAAB requirements. i.� • January 25, 2013 Department of Public Safety Architectural Access Board One Ashburton Place, Room 1301 Boston, MA 02108 Re: AAB Variance — Existing Stair Tread Nosings and Stairway Door Maneuvering Clearance Cutter & Ziskind House Smith College 93 Elm Street Northampton, MA 01063 To Whom It May Concern: In accordance with M.G.L., c.22, § 13A, this letter and the accompanying Architectural Access Board Application for Variance documents our request for a variance from the following sections of 521 CMR Massachusetts Architectural Access Board (MAAB): • Section 26.6.3 — Pull side Doorway Maneuvering Clearances • Section 27.3 — Nosings Background The Cutter & Ziskind House at Smith College is an existing 3 -story building consisting of two dormitory wings, a dining hall, and residential common spaces (see drawing A04 -01). The building was originally constructed in 1957 and has undergone minor renovations since construction. The proposed scope of work includes renovations of the dormitory, dining, and some common spaces. The total cost of work is will be in excess of $100,000 and will be greater than 30% of the full and fair cash value of the building. As such, the renovations will comply with MAAB Section 3.3.2 to the fullest extent possible. Each dormitory wing is served by two (2) means of egress stairways; stairways 1 and 2 in the East Wing and stairways 3 and 4 in the West Wing. Stairways 1 and 3 are considered to be architecturally significant due to the ornate terrazzo treads and are currently enclosed in glass construction. As currently constructed, the stairways have a number of non - compliant conditions: • Stairways 1 and 3 have open risers which do not comply with MAAB Section 27.2 (see pictures 1 and 2). • Stairways 1 and 3 have Terrazzo risers which are approximately square -edged and do not currently comply with MAAB Section 27.3 (see pictures 1 and 2). • Access doors for stairways 2 and 4, at each floor level are arranged such that the landing railings prohibit the provision of doorway maneuvering clearances on the pull -side, as required by MAAB section 26.6.3 (see drawing 1). • 9 t ? A AND CERTIFY UNDER:THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENTS :TO THE: BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ARE TRUE AND ACCURATE. Signature: Appellapt or Petitioner On the 2 y-eti Day of 4 ua...7- y 20 / 3 PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME THE ABOVE NAMED (Type or Print the Name of the Appellant) cH p c< fo ._, 7," 10 ::%, tr G, I ,.;. :, /279/ /; ' '''' .:": 10 ', l.' ;, � � ‘ q,r ' - ' f• ..: 4 2 . NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ' � � ss,,c >�usS`�,s` Page 6 of 6 Rev, 08/12 ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS BOARD VARIANCE APPLICATION SERVICE NOTICE I, Rockwood J. Edwards , as Code Consultant for the Petitioner Smith College submit a variance application filed with the Massachusetts Architectural Access Board on January 18 20 12 . HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT I SERVED OR CAUSED TO BE SERVED, A COPY OF THIS VARIANCE APPLICATION ON THE FOLLOWING PERSON(S) IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON OR AGENCY METHOD OF SERVICE DATE OF SERVED SERVICE Louis Hasbrouck — Northampton Building Certified Mail January 18, 2013 1 Department 212 Main Street, Northampton, MA 01060 Boston Center for Independent Living Certified Mail January 18, 2013 2 _ c/o Bill Henning _ 60 Temple Pl., 5 Fl. Boston, MA 02111 Multi- cultural Independent Living Center of Certified Mail January 18, 2013 3 Boston, c/o Hang Lee 110 Claybourne St., Dorchester, MA 02124 Kristen McCosh Certified Mail January 18, 2013 Mayor's Commission for Persons with 4 Disabilities Boston City Hall, Room 967 Boston, MA 02201 Bryan Glascock Certified Mail January 18, 2013 5 Active Building Commissioner 1010 Mass Ave., Boston, MA 02118 Carl Richardson Certified Mail January 18, 2013 6 State House ADA Coordinator State House, Room 1 Boston, MA 02111 Page 5 of 6 Rev, 08/12 18. State the name and address of the building inspector responsible for overseeing this project: Louis Hasbrouck Northampton Building Department 212 Main Street Northampton, MA 01060 E- mail :Ihasbrouck @northamptonma.gov 7 Telephone: 413- 587 -1240 Date:_January 24, 2013 r' Signature of owner or authorized agent PLEASE PRINT: Rockwood J. Edwards Name Building 200, 2 FI. One Kendall Square., Suite B2204 Address Cambridge MA 02139 City /Town State Zip Code redwards ( cosentini - ma.com E -mail 617.494.9090 Telephone Page 4 of 6 Rev, 08/12 10. Has a building permit been applied for? No. Has a building permit been issued? No. 10a. If a building permit has been issued, what date was it issued? 10b. If work has been completed, state the date the building permit was issued for said work: 11. State the estimated cost of construction as stated on the above building permit: 11a. If a building permit has not been issued, state the anticipated construction cost: $22 million. 12. Have any other building permits been issued within the past 36 months? No. 12a. If yes, state the dates that permits were issued and the estimated cost of construction for each permit: 13. Has a certificate of occupancy been issued for the facility? No. If yes, state the date: 14. To the best of your knowledge, has a complaint ever been filed on this building relative to accessibility? yes X no 15. State the actual assessed valuation of the BUILDING ONLY, as recorded in the Assessor's Office of the municipality in which the building is located: $25,621,620. Is the assessment at 100 %? Yes. If not, what is the town's current assessment ratio? 16. State the phase of design or construction of the facility as of the date of this application: 100% Construction Documents to be submitted 2/22/13. 17. State the name and address of the architectural or engineering firm, including the name of the individual architect or engineer responsible for preparing drawings of the facility: Perkins + Will 225 Franklin Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02101 Karen Estabrook, Project Architect E -mail: Karen.Estabrook @perkiswill.com Telephone: 617- 406 -3488 Page 3 of 6 Rev, 08/12 2. State the name and address of the building /facility: 93 Elm Street Northampton, MA 01063 3. Describe the facility (i.e. number of floors, type of functions, use, etc.): Existing 3 -story steel and masonry dormitory building. 4. Total square footage of the building: 49,359 sf Per floor: approximately 16,000 sf a. total square footage of tenant space (if applicable): N/A 5. Check the work performed or to be performed: New Construction X Addition X Reconstruction /Remodeling /Alteration Change of Use 6. Briefly describe the extent and nature of the work performed or to be performed (use additional sheets if necessary): Renovation of and addition to existing dormitory/dining hall building. 7. State each section of the Architectural Access Board's Regulations for which a variance is being requested: 26.6.3 and 27.3 7a. Check appropriate regulations: 1996 Regulations 2002 Regulations X 2006 Regulations SECTION NUMBER LOCATION OR DESCRIPTION 521 CMR Section 26.6.3 Maneuvering Clearance (pull -side requirements) 521 CMR Section 27.3 Stairs - Nosings 8. Is the building historically significant? X yes no. If no, go to number 9. 8a. If yes, check one of the following and indicate date of listing: National Historic Landmark Listed individually on the National Register of Historic Places X Located in registered historic district Listed in the State Register of Historic Places Eligible for listing 8b. If you checked any of the above and your variance request is based upon the historical significance of the building, you must provide a letter of determination from the Massachusetts Historical Commission, 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA 02125. 9. For each variance requested, state in detail the reasons why compliance with the Board's regulations is impracticable (use additional sheets if necessary), including but not limited to: the necessary cost of the work required to achieve compliance with the regulations (Le. written cost estimates); and plans justifying the cost of compliance. Please see attached sheet. Page 2 of 6 Rev, 08/12 ia C TTER, Z[JKI! \) The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Public Safety Docket Number Architectural Access Board _ One Ashburton Place, Room 1310 (Office Use Only) � ' " Boston Massachusetts 02108 -1618 Phone: 617 - 727 -0660 JAN 2 2013 Fax: 617- 727 -0665 DAFT. 7 _- -F - FiA - www.mass.gov/dps . ,. , -� r '� � NORTHAMPTON, MBA O1060 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE In accordance with M.G.L., c.22, § 13A, I hereby apply for modification of or substitution for the rules and regulations of the Architectural Access Board as they apply to the building /facility described below on the grounds that literal compliance with the Board's regulations is impracticable in my case. PLEASE ENCLOSE: 1) A filing fee of $50.00 (Check /Money Order) made payable to the "Commonwealth of Massachusetts" and all supporting documentation (e.g. plans in 11" x 17" format, photographs, etc.). In addition, the complete package (including plans, photographs and the completed "Service Notice ") must be submitted to all parties via compact disc. 2) If you are a tenant seeking variance(s), a letter from the owner of the building authorizing you to apply on his or her behalf is required. 3) The completed "Service Notice" form provided at the end of this application certifying that a copy of your complete application has been received by the Local Building Inspector, Local Disability Commission (if applicable), and Local Independent Living Center for the city /town that the property in question resides in. A list of the local entities can be found by calling the Architectural Access Board Office or the Local City /Town Clerk. For a list of the Local Independent Living Centers you can either call the Architectural Access Board Office or visit the Massachusetts Statewide Independent Living Council website 1. State the name and address of the owner of the building /facility: Smith College, 126 West Street Northampton, MA 01063 E - mail: cconnant @smith.edu Telephone: 413- 585 -2424 Page 1 of 6 Rev, 08/12