Historic Northampton Application
HISTORIC NORTHAMPTON INFRASTRUCTURE RENOVATIONS
(Restoration, Renovation and Stabilization of Basements and Foundations)
September 8, 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GRANT NARRATIVE page 1
Introduction
Project location
Issues this project will address
Summary of proposed work 2
In Parsons House
In Damon House
In Shepherd House
Community Preservation criteria met by this project 3
Brief listing
How project meets historical preservation criteria
Historical significance 4
Restoration rather than maintenance 7
Addressing the historical function of the properties 10
Eligibility for Historic Register listing 13
Ability to provide long-term maintenance
[addresses question of ongoing maintenance]
Historic preservation restriction
[addresses question about specific preservation guarantees]
How project meets recreational use criteria 14
Residents served
Recreational opportunities
How project meets open space criteria
Preserve Northampton’s community character defining views
Provide valuable open space in urban neighborhoods
(i)
How project meets general criteria 15
Preserves city’s unique character, enhances community vitality/quality of life
Saves resources that would otherwise be threatened
Receives endorsement by community 16
[this also addresses the question of community support]
Leverages additional funds
[this also addresses the question of community support]
Can be implemented expeditiously and within budget 17
Feasibility
Community needs served by this project 18
How success of the project will be measured 19
PROJECT TIMELINE 20
PROJECT BUDGET
General Budget 24
Detailed Budget for Parsons basement project 25
Detailed Budget for mold remediation supplies 27
ATTACHMENTS
1. Mass Historic Commission inventory sheets including assessor’s map 29
2. Proof of control over site
Damon House deed 36
Parsons House - codicil to will of Anna Catharine Bliss 37
Shepherd House deed 38
3. Zoning
Map for Damon-Parsons-Shepherd properties 39
Zoning dimensional and use regulations for Damon (CB) 40
Zoning dimensional and use regulations for Parsons and Shepherd (URC) 43
4. Floor Plans
Parsons House (first and second floors) 48
Damon House 50
Shepherd House 51
(ii)
5. Contractor List with names and addresses 52
6. Abide
Estimate for asbestos removal 53
Qualifications 59
7. Wilson Services
Estimate for heating systems 61
Qualifications 64
8. Kris Thomson Restoration Carpentry
Description of Parsons basement and foundation work 66
Estimate for Parsons basement and foundation work 68
Qualifications 70
9. Top Hat Chimney Sweeps qualifications 71
10. Hazardous conditions
Abide mold observations recorded in January 2014 73
Baenziger Environmental Assessment and Recommendations, July 2014 75
Gordon Mycology Laboratory letter (not necessary to test for self-evident mold) 82
Envirotech Clean Air
Letter agreeing to assess and help create a plan 83
Qualifications 84
Clean Air client list 86
Mold remediation overview from Cornell University 88
11. Photographs and captions
-- Caption List 92
1. Historic Northampton, gateway to Northampton’s downtown. 95
2. Parsons House – view from Bridge Street
3. Parsons House – section supported by basement foundations
4. Parsons House – section still sitting directly on the ground
5. Parsons House – evidence that back wall is being pushed outward #1
6. Parsons House – evidence that back wall is being pushed outward #2
7. Parsons House – evidence that back wall is being pushed outward #3
8. Parsons House – badly deteriorated sill and critical post (below east parlor)
9. Parsons House – evidence of termites on buttery floor
10. Parsons House – exterior showing location of second rotting sill (kitchen)
(iii)
11. Parsons House – exterior of rear of house showing archaeological site
12. Parsons House – example of how deteriorating beams can be saved
13. Parsons House – water-damaged fiberglass in ell basement
14. Parsons House – 80-year-old asbestos-wrapped boiler in ell basement
15. Parsons House – view from southwest
16. Damon House – view from the east pointing out locations of basements 103
17. Damon Education Center basement – view from the stairs
18. Damon Education Center basement –west aisle
19. Damon Education Center basement – proximity of furnace to collections
20. Damon Education Center basement – proximity of oil tank to collections
21. Damon Education Center basement – sump pit with loose cover
22. Damon Education Center basement –water damage and mold from leaky
roof
23. Damon Education Center basement – water damage from grading
24. Damon Education Center basement – mold growing on scrapbook
25. Damon Education Center basement – account book storage
26. Damon Education Center basement – mold growing on account books (close-
up)
27. Damon Education Center basement – mold (?) on a pressing iron
28. Damon House front basement – proximity of furnace to collections
29. Damon House front basement – mold growing on a display case for silk
thread
30. Damon House front basement – mold growing on a reel
31. Damon Education Center – terrace where we can clean moldy collections
32. Shepherd House – view from the southwest 111
33. Shepherd House – view from the northeast
34. Shepherd House – basement showing fallen post
35. Shepherd House – basement showing boiler
36. Shepherd House – basement showing asbestos-wrapped pipes
12. Letters of Community Support (all are from Northampton unless otherwise
noted) 114-134
1. David Drake, chair, Northampton Historical Commission
2. William A. Flynt, architectural conservator, Historic Deerfield (Old
Deerfield MA)
3. Marla R. Miller, professor of history, University of Massachusetts Amherst
(Amherst MA)
4. David Tebaldi, executive director, Mass Humanities
5. Jessica Nicoll, director and chief curator, Smith College Museum of Art
(iv)
6. Elizabeth A. Myers, director of special collections, Smith College Libraries
7. Laurie Fenlason, vice president for public affairs & strategic initiatives,
Smith College
8. Janet Moulding, director, Forbes Library
9. Jane H. Wald, executive director, Emily Dickinson Museum (Amherst MA)
10. Steve Strimer, director, The David Ruggles Center for Early Florence
History & Underground Railroad Studies (Florence MA)
iv
11. Beth N. Choquette, principal, Bridge Street School
12. Bob Reckman, president, Ward Three Neighborhood Association
13. Suzanne Beck, executive director, Northampton Chamber of Commerce
14. Rich Cairn, director, Emerging America Program, Collaborative for
Educational Services
15. Judith Roberts, executive director, The Literacy Project (Greenfield MA)
16. Russell J. Peotter, general manager, WGBY (Springfield MA)
17. Gordon Thorne, director, & Lisa Thompson, associate director, A.P.E. Ltd.
18. Joe & Phyllis Wilhelm, Wilhelm, Shimel and King
19. Dylan Gaffney, Forbes Library
20. Joseph Blumenthal, Downtown Sounds
21. Craig Della Penna, Sugar Maple Trailside Inn (Florence MA)
13. 1993 Historic structure report by Clancey & Leeke and a wealth of other
historical information is freely available to the general public (in spite of the url
wording) at http://www.historic-northampton.org/members_only/parsons.html
(v)
HISTORIC NORTHAMPTON INFRASTRUCTURE RENOVATIONS
(Restoration, Renovation and Stabilization of Basements and Foundations)
INTRODUCTION
Project Location
Historic Northampton is requesting a Community Preservation Act grant to preserve its historic
houses and the collections stored in them. The proposed work will be done in the following three
adjacent buildings:
46 Bridge Street (Damon House) – Parcel 32A-175-001
58 Bridge Street (Parsons House) – Parcel 32A-260—001
66 Bridge Street (Shepherd House) – Parcel 32A-176-001
The assessor’s map of these properties is included with the Mass Historical Commission
inventory reports (see Attachments).
Issues this project will address
Currently the most dramatic issue is that rotting sills and posts are causing the back wall of the
1719 Parsons House to fall away from the rest of the building.
Closely related and equally important is the excessive moisture found in all three basements and
in those Parsons House first-floor rooms that are built directly over the ground. We see evidence
of what is probably termite damage in the Parsons buttery (room 110 on the attached floor-plan),
while in the basement of the Damon Education Center, the leather covers of 18th and 19th century
account books are spotted with mold, which in some cases has grown to the size of a nickel. Our
records over the past 40 years show constant efforts to fix roofs and gutters, correct grading,
close openings in the foundations, replace rotting sills, install and replace dehumidifiers, evict
rodents and combat insect infestations—all of these problems being side effects of unwanted
moisture—but the funding never seems to reach as far as the problems and the fixes were never
complete.
In addition, the collections are endangered by the proximity of oil-burning heating systems. In
Damon House, where most collections are currently stored, both the furnaces and the oil tanks sit
within a few feet of collection shelving. The oil burners pose dangers from puff-backs that can
send smoke and soot not only into the adjacent collections but throughout the house. In Parsons
and Shepherd Houses, the furnaces are covered with asbestos that has been identified as a health
hazard. In Parsons House, we believe the boiler dates from the 1930s and the burner from 1979.
In spite of regular annual maintenance, records for the Shepherd House system in 2010 described
cleaning out “soot-loaded boiler flue-pipe, chamber area, and chimney elbow.”
1
In light of these urgent and worsening problems, we are requesting support from the City of
Northampton through the Community Preservation Act to undertake restoration work that would
otherwise be far beyond our limited resources.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED WORK
Parsons House
Remove asbestos from current heating system
Replace current asbestos-covered boiler dating to the 1930s and its 1979 oil burner with a
safer and more efficient two-zone gas-fired boiler vented to the side
Remove 20th century porch to permit archaeological exploration of area directly behind
the old kitchen before equipment comes in to excavate a new basement cellar.
Have a professional assess the basement for mold issues and identify steps to be taken, if
any, in light of the planned excavation.
Extend the existing 1981 SW basement under the NE portion of the house that is still
sitting on the ground, replacing rotted portions of sills and posts with appropriate large
timbers.
Insulate and finish the walls of both the 1981 and new basement areas, sealing the floor
and installing a large industrial-strength dehumidifier. Install smaller dehumidifiers in the
two older basements.
Adjust grading and gutters to direct water away from the house.
Damon House
Obtain professional advice to develop a plan for dealing with mold-afflicted collections
in both basements.
Following that plan, remove collection items from both basement storage areas, remove
mold by washing, exposure to the sun, wiping down, brushing and/or vacuuming with a
HEPA-filtered abatement vacuum as appropriate.
Once we have removed the collections and can inspect the walls, reassess the basements
themselves and have them cleaned by a professional mold abatement company.
2
Remove oil tanks in each basement storage area and replace the two oil-burning furnaces
with clean and efficient gas furnaces not subject to soot accumulation and puff-back.
Install sealed cover on sump pits to reduce moisture (and radon) entering the basements.
Adjust grading and gutters as needed to direct water away from the house.
Replace cleaned collections in clean and well-organized storage
Shepherd House
Remove asbestos from heating system
Replace current oil burner with gas burner not subject to puff-back
Develop a plan to remediate the mold issues in the basement (the work itself is not within
the scope of this grant)
CPA CRITERIA MET BY THIS PROJECT
For convenience, we begin with a simple listing of the criteria met by this project. The
justification for each claim follows in separate sections numbered to match this list.
A. Historic preservation criteria
1. Protect, preserve, enhance, restore and/or rehabilitate properties, features or resources of
historical significance
2. Focuses on the historical function of a property or site
3. Demonstrate eligibility for a local, state or national Historic Register listing
4. Provide assurance of the ability to maintain the historic resource over the long term
5. Include the granting of a permanent historic preservation restriction or other preservation
guarantee
B. Recreational use criteria
1. Serve a significant number of residents
2. Expand the range of recreational opportunities available to city residents of all ages
C. Open space criteria
1. Preserve Northampton’s rural and agricultural character, scenic views and community
character defining views
2. Provide valuable open space opportunities in urban neighborhoods
3
D. General criteria:
1. Contributes to the preservation of Northampton’s unique character, boosts the vitality of
community, and enhances the quality of life for its residents
2. Saves resources that would otherwise be threatened
3. Receives endorsement by community groups, municipal boards and/or departments
4. Leverages additional public and/or private funds, or demonstrates that other funding
sources are not readily available or sufficient
5. Can be implemented expeditiously and within budget
HOW THIS PROJECT MEETS HISTORICAL PRESERVATION CRITERIA
Criterion A1: Protect, preserve, enhance, restore and/or rehabilitate properties, features or
resources of historical significance.
This criterion has two aspects. One demands that whatever is proposed for preservation be a
property, feature or resource of historical significance (discussed first below). The other relates
to the distinction between restoration and maintenance (discussed second).
Criterion A1, Part 1: Historical significance
We claim historical significance on three grounds: the importance of the organization as a whole
to the City of Northampton, the importance of the individual buildings, and the importance of the
collections housed in them.
(1) Importance of the organization
The organization itself promotes the continuation of historical knowledge as part of our local
culture, provides a place where the scholars and devotees of history can meet, and supplies a
supporting voice for historic preservation projects outside our own campus. Historic
Northampton makes its historical collections and archives available to researchers who visit the
museum, but in addition, a large portion of our collections have been digitized and are available
online, free of charge. We are committed to open access and to sharing our history with a wide
community.
(2) Importance of the buildings
While all three buildings make some claim to interest, most of the CPA funding we are
requesting will be spent on stabilizing Parsons House, so we limit the architectural argument to
that one building. Over the years, Historic Northampton has had many consultants come in to
help us understand this house and we have a wealth of information about it, much of which is
freely available to the general public on our website at http://www.historic-
northampton.org/members_only/parsons.html. Most notably, Parsons family genealogist Gerald
Parsons did intensive work on deeds, inventories and family history in the early 1980s, and a
4
thorough architectural assessment was done by Gregory Clancey from SPNEA and John Leeke
through an IMS grant in 1992.
What we now know is that the original home-lot assigned to Joseph Parsons in 1654/55
comprised the land now bounded by Bridge, Market, and Parsons Streets, and on the north by
Graves Avenue, though this boundary soon extended over to Union Street. This original parcel
was divided among his three sons, and by 1709 one of the parcels facing Bridge Street had
passed to his grandson Nathaniel, who is credited with building the core of the current house in
1719 (according to tree-ring analysis done by William Flynt in 2003). The original house had
only two rooms up and two rooms down with a massive central chimney (rooms 102, 112 and
202/3 and 210 in the attached floor-plan). Sometime in the later 18th century, a lean-to was added
(rooms 109, 110, 103 and 104). In 1811 the house was sold to the Wright family, and over the
next decade or two, the house was significantly altered by adding a second floor over the lean-to
(which altered the roofline), an ell off the back (rooms 105, 106 and 107) and a one-room wing
to the west (111).
According to Clancey and Leeke, “the most important discoveries made during the present
investigation—those which should prove most valuable to a larger understanding of domestic
architecture in this period—have mostly to do with finish materials. While neither the frame nor
plan of the house present any real surprises, the original interior and exterior finishing schemes
clearly do . . . [provide] unusually clear evidence about matters we know fairly little about.”
Among the exterior points of interest they listed were variations in exterior siding materials and
evidence of a pentice. A pentice is a shallow slanted roof or hood over a doorway to give
protection from the weather. We don’t know what the Parsons House pentice looked like, but
two mortises over the front door prove it was there. On the inside, the consultants were interested
to find that the west parlor was from the beginning covered in plaster with a baseboard and chair
rail, which makes Parsons House a very early example of what later became a typical Georgian
treatment. The plaster was bound together not with hair, as we have come to expect, but with
grass, and was painted white. This “modern” plaster, however, was combined with old-fashioned
diamond-paned casement windows and the woodwork was left unpainted. The horizontal
paneling in the keeping room, by contrast, was painted, but the upstairs chambers were not
finished at all. The consultants also found three early nineteenth century wallpaper patterns
coupled with their contemporary paints, among other details. This report is freely available on
Historic Northampton’s website at http://www.historic-
northampton.org/members_only/parsons/description&summary.pdf
We also have evidence about how people lived in this house. Inventories survive from the estates
of Cornet Joseph Parsons (1684), his son Jonathan Parsons (1694) and grandson Nathaniel, the
builder (1738). The Wright family is represented by the inventory of Ferdinand Hunt Wright
(1843) and by photographs from the late 19th and early 20th century. The last descendant of the
Wrights, Anna Catharine Bliss, died in 1941 and bequeathed the house to the Historical Society.
5
While the Parsons House may not be the oldest house in Northampton, as Anna Catharine Bliss
liked to claim (she had the date 1658 emblazoned on the chimney), it certainly belongs in the
very small handful of early 18th century houses surviving in the city, and it is the only one open
to the public in which the architectural and social history is so well researched, so clearly
evident, and so widely accessible.
(3) Importance of the Collections
Historic Northampton is the primary collector and caretaker of objects related to the history of
Northampton, and it shares with Forbes Library and the County Registries of Deeds and Probate
the responsibility for caring for archival materials documenting the town’s history. Most of the
collections are housed in Damon House. While the textiles are on the second floor, most of the
furniture is in the basement of the original 1813 house, while the basement of the 1987 Damon
Education Center is filled with smaller objects including china, glass, iron and metal
kitchenware, medical tools, dolls and toys, account books, Pro Brush ephemera, samples and
molds (the good kind), and a myriad of miscellaneous items. Frankly, none of them are doing
very well down there, though at least we now have dehumidifiers in both spaces.
Since our motto is “making history present,” we won’t take this opportunity to provide a dull
statistical overview of the collections. Instead, we’ll try to convey the richness and human
interest of the collections by noting a few items associated with a single family - the Pomeroys.
Foremost in age and importance is the anvil given by the town of Northampton to Medad
Pomeroy in 1660 to induce him to settle here as a blacksmith. Some evidence suggests that this
anvil was made in America 1646-1654, probably at the Saugus Ironworks, which makes it a very
rare piece indeed. We also have a musket (1749) and an intimidatingly large iron bear trap made
by Medad’s grandson Seth Pomeroy (1706-1777) who was also a blacksmith and who fought at
Bunker Hill. Historic Northampton is known for its
extensive costume collection and the Pomeroys are
represented by the silk wedding hat, cape and shoes of
Seth Pomeroy’s daughter Sally, who married Abraham
Burbank on December 26, 1770 (given into our care by
the Betty Allen Chapter of the DAR). Sally’s brother
Quartus continued the family tradition of blacksmithing,
and we have at least one of his account books (now
molding in the Damon basement), while another brother,
Asahel, became a local innkeeper, built a fine house where
Fitzwilly’s now stands, and had himself painted in the
1790s, quite stylishly dressed. Asahel Pomeroy also
owned our Shepherd House for more than 20 years before
his death in 1833.
6
While not all families were as prominent or as early as the Pomeroys, it is not uncommon at
Historic Northampton to have large groups of items related to a single family. Names such as
Clark, Watson, Shepherd, Burleigh, Whitmarsh, Stebbins, French, Bliss, Barrows and Stramesi
are common in the accession records. One of the reasons the collection is so important is that
letters, account books, photographs, textiles, clothing and household items all interrelate and
illuminate each other.
Criterion A1: Protect, preserve, enhance, restore and/or rehabilitate properties, features or
resources of historical significance.
Criterion A1, Part 2: This is restoration, not maintenance
We are making a case in this application that the work we are proposing goes beyond
maintenance, because ordinary maintenance does not meet the CPA standard that a historic
preservation project should “protect, preserve, enhance, restore and/or rehabilitate properties,
features or resources of historical significance.” To make this argument, we needed an
authoritative definition of the difference between maintenance and restoration/rehabilitation. We
found that distinction most clearly set out by the IRS. The term the IRS uses to contrast with
“maintenance” is a more general one—“improvement”—but the same concept seems to underlie
the words “restoration” or “rehabilitation” in the context of historic preservation.
For the IRS and for accountants, the primary distinction is that the full cost of maintenance work
can be recognized as an expense in the year the work is done while improvements
(restoration/rehabilitation) must be “capitalized,” which means that only a fraction of the full
expense can be recognized each year over the life of the asset. Because of this critical accounting
difference and the temptation to expense capital improvements as if they were maintenance, the
IRS published new guidelines (taking effect in 2014) to help businesspeople and accountants
distinguish between maintenance and improvements. The best brief explanation of the difference
that we have located appears in nolo.com’s legal encyclopedia and may be found at:
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/repairs-vs-improvements-how-tax-deductions-differ-
landlords.html
Under the new IRS regulations, property is improved whenever it undergoes a Betterment, an
Adaptation, or a Restoration. Adaptation is not germane to this project but Betterment and
Restoration are.
An expenditure is for a Betterment if it:
Ameliorates a material condition or defect in the property that existed before it was
acquired or when it was produced--it makes no difference whether or not you were aware
of the defect when you acquired the unit of property
7
Results in a material addition to the property--for example, physically enlarges, expands,
or extends it, or
Results in a material increase in the property's capacity, productivity, strength, or quality.
The “material condition or defect in the property” that existed in Parsons House before we
acquired it in 1941 was that the house was originally built on a shallow row of stones set on the
ground rather than a deep foundation. During the last 300 years, the soil level has gradually built
up covering these stones and putting the sills (the horizontal timbers that lie directly on the
stones) in contact with the damp earth.
In the 18th century, a basement was added under the west parlor (room 112 in the attached floor
plan) and a second basement was created at some later period in the 1811 ell (under rooms 105,
106 and 107). But the rest of the house sat on—almost in— the ground until 1981. In 1981, when
Ruth Wilbur was Director, a cellar with cinderblock foundation walls was dug under the east
parlor (room 102) and foyer (101) of Parsons House. This work stabilized the SE corner (near
the sidewalk and driveway), but it did not extend to the NW under the kitchen and buttery
(rooms 109 and 110). Putting a basement under the kitchen was part of the original plan (as we
can see from a surviving bill), but it is marked “not done.” The same bill shows additions to the
original plan, such as extending the basement under the foyer and pouring a concrete floor, but
these sensible improvements apparently increased costs to the point that the Society was forced
to leave the section under the kitchen incomplete.
Now, in 2014, restoration carpenters Kris Thomson and Alicia Spence report that the sill under
the back wall of the kitchen and buttery is rotting, as are almost certainly the joists that support
the kitchen floor. There is what appears to be termite damage in the buttery (room 110). The
back wall of the house is visibly separating from the rest of the structure, and large cracks are
opening up where the back wall meets the ceilings on the second floor. Thomson and Spence
believe that this is caused in part by a post whose base has rotted away after centuries of contact
with the damp earth. This post (a massive vertical timber that forms one of the chief supports of
the original four-room house) stands at the NE corner of the east Parlor, near the kitchen
fireplace, just beyond the reach of the 1981 basement (see illustration, next page). This post is
still connected to the rest of the building by its pegged joints, but it isn’t doing any work to hold
the house up. All of this damage could have been avoided if we had just had another $975 in
1981 to finish the job.
Putting a modern foundation under the kitchen and buttery will support the back half of the
house and correct the material defect in its original construction. The extension of the basement
results in an enlargement, and altogether the work results in a “material increase in the property's
capacity, productivity, strength, or quality” and therefore qualifies as restoration rather than
maintenance.
8
Returning to the IRS definitions, the third kind of capital improvement is a Restoration. An
expenditure is for a restoration if it:
Returns a property that has fallen into disrepair to its “ordinarily efficient operating
condition”
Rebuilds the property to a like-new condition after the end of its economic useful life, or
Replaces a major component or substantial structural part of the property
It is necessary to understand what the IRS means by a unit of property (UOP). An entire building
is of course a UOP, but the IRS also defines eight major building systems as separate UOPs
where improvements are considered capital improvements and must be depreciated, among
which are:
1. Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (“HVAC”) systems: This includes motors,
compressors, boilers, furnace, chillers, pipes, ducts, and radiators.
2. Gas distribution system: This includes pipes and equipment used to distribute gas to and
from the property line and between buildings.
The other six are plumbing systems, electrical systems, escalators, elevators, fire-protection and
alarm systems and security systems.
The proposed work on the furnaces/boilers in the three houses qualifies as a capital improvement
or restoration because it “replaces a major component or substantial structural part of the
property” or, in the case of the Parsons House 1930 boiler and 1979 burner, “rebuilds the
property to a like-new condition after the end of its economic useful life.” In spite of regular
annual maintenance and multiple repairs, neither the Parsons nor the Shepherd heating system is
in ordinarily efficient operating condition and in both cases, the asbestos wrapping parts of the
heating system is a “material defect.”
This framing sketch, found in Abbott
Lowell Cummings paper “Architecture in
Early New England” on the Old Sturbridge
Village website, is very similar to the original 1719 Parsons House before the kitchen lean-to was added and then
extended to the second floor. The post that
has the rotted base is here:
The rotted rear sill shown in Photo #8
is here, near the bottom of the post:
9
In Parsons House, we are planning to install a high-efficiency gas boiler that vents to the side,
rather than through the chimney. One of the reasons for this is that Parsons House residents have
noticed an unpleasant smell of exhaust near the tenants’ entrance, which the heating technicians
say is because air currents created by the taller front section of the house push the exhaust back
down toward the driveway. Cleaner gas side vents will solve this problem.
Criterion A2: Project enhances the historical function of the property
Since we have been discussing the heating systems, let’s start with them. It would be
disingenuous of us not to mention the significant savings that would result from converting the
oil furnaces/boilers to gas, which is likely to be much cheaper than oil for the foreseeable future.
In FY 2013-14 just ending, we had to spend 38% of our operating budget, excluding salary, on
fuel oil and furnace repairs and maintenance. That’s $21,400 out of the $56,900 we spent to
maintain four buildings and run all our programs. Even when salary is included, the heating
systems still ate up 20% of the total budget. Direct care and maintenance of the properties in
general cost over $40,000 this year.
In this context, the use of oil is not sustainable, and it has direct consequences for the “historical
function of the property.” The more we are forced to spend on oil and repairing old boilers, the
less we have left to pay for other badly needed maintenance, and our houses deteriorate because
of it. Beyond that, the extra money spent on oil is money that is NOT spent on services that
return value to the community. It has been deeply frustrating this past year to find ourselves,
instead of cataloguing and caring for our collections, developing historical exhibits or presenting
programs about our collections, spending all our resources to stoke our furnaces.
So yes, the money matters. However, as pointed out earlier, upgrading the furnaces also results
in benefits that are more direct. Our historical function is to preserve objects and documents
(including houses) and to share them with the general public through exhibitions and programs.
It is nobody's idea of good museum practice to store your collections cheek by jowl with your oil
tank, let alone your furnace, but we have nowhere else to put them. Oil burners are subject to
puff-back, and if we were so unfortunate as to experience one, it could cover the collections
stored near the furnace with greasy black soot. Since Damon House and Damon Education
Center are both forced hot air systems, the same soot could be blown through the ducts into the
rest of the building, including into the rooms where the fragile and hard-to-clean textiles are
stored. A serious puff-back could be a disaster of the first order for us. It is quite possible that a
single important costume or textile (Sally Pomeroy’s 1770 cape or hat, for example) might cost
well over a thousand dollars to clean. How do we do that for thousands of objects? While regular
maintenance can reduce the probability of such an event (and probably has), we are taking more
10
and more of a risk as our equipment gets older. For more information on puff-backs, including
pictures, see http://www.heatingoil.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/puffback.pdf
So much for the furnaces. Now to the mold. During the period between about 1975 and 1995,
directors Ruth Wilbur and Pamela Toma made collection and building care a high priority. Ruth
finished the front Damon basement which until 1975 had a dirt floor, excavated the new Parsons
basement and constructed the new education wing, creating three major new spaces for our
growing collections. At that time, they were kept clean and under controlled environmental
conditions. Pam had major assessments done on the architecture and physical condition of the
buildings and established increasingly professional operations throughout the organization, such
as the regular monitoring of five recording thermo-hygrographs, including three in the
basements.
After 1995, however, the organization went through nearly two decades in which the board and
director put much more emphasis on academic research and publications than on the collections.
This resulted in several books, a series of historic markers, a permanent exhibition on the history
of Northampton, and in general a greater understanding of many aspects of Northampton history.
In 1999, and then in 2008 with support from a CPA grant, major work was also done on our
public facade. Buildings were painted, banners were added, the fences were restored and the
gazebo built, and the balustrade was rebuilt on the Damon roof.
At the same time, however, the interiors (other than the public exhibit gallery) were being
dangerously neglected. Emptying Parsons to focus on architectural interpretation and emptying
Shepherd House so that the Mass Foundation for the Humanities could rent it as office space
meant that more objects were moved into Damon House. Storage areas were crowded and rarely
if ever cleaned. Due to the lack of interest in three-dimensional objects, accessioning and
cataloguing work atrophied, the former board decided to stop collecting objects at all, monitoring
of the environment lapsed, and in a disastrous development, when dehumidifiers failed, they
were not replaced. This is why we have mold in the basements. I assume I need not go on at
length about why the mold is bad for our “historical functions.” Who would want to pore over
Quartus Pomeroy’s account book when it is flocked with circular blooms of white fuzz? I note
only that the longer we wait to reverse the mold, the more damage will have been done to our
valuable objects. Mold is not just a surface event.
To complete this sad story, academic productions did not garner sufficient public support,
fundraising efforts were inadequate, 9/11 and 2008 were economic disasters that discouraged the
implementation of a planned capital campaign, the organization spent down its reserve, and the
director began selling off significant parts of the collection to stave off dissolution.
11
Our new director, Nan Wolverton, who took over on October 1, 2013, and the current board,
none of whose members has served as long as two years and most less than 8 months, have been
left in a very difficult position with a huge backlog of work to do on both buildings and
collections and little staff and no money to do it with. We are working very hard against great
odds, but we are working. Marie Panik, our long-term Museum Manager, continues to keep the
doors open, serving visitors and researchers as well as taking care of many office functions, but
we can afford to pay our director only one day a week. Nan has been remarkably successful in
mending damaged relationships with a number of local constituencies, but she continues to put in
more hours than she is paid for, and we are serious about finding a way to make her position
more sustainable. The board officers have worked essentially as unpaid employees, trying to
make up for the work that a one-day-a-week director cannot get to. President Kiki Smith has
conducted a series of “Jeffersonian Dinners” to re-connect with people in the town and develop a
wider base of support. Vice President Stan Sherer has kept public programming alive with his
series of contemporary art exhibits and with the well-received “Midnight to Midnight” photo-
documentation program. Treasurer Nancy Rexford has cleaned up governance, policies,
bookkeeping, filing systems, written grant applications (including this one) and personally
scrubbed much of Parsons House (with the president’s help – this board is not above the dirty
work). Michael Thurston has rolled up his sleeves to trim overgrown shrubs and weed the
grounds, Julia Mines has provided marketing guidance, Elizabeth Denny helped facilitate our ice
cream social, Steve Strimer has volunteered his time and expertise for abolition-era walking
tours, and Barbara Blumenthal will oversee the cleaning of mold-damaged books and papers. All
our board members are deeply engaged in solving the organization’s long-term problems, and
every board member has contributed or pledged cash as well as time toward turning this place
around.
By this summer, the new board was productively focused on balancing the budget, rebuilding a
base of support, developing programs suitable for the schools and the broader community, and
taking steps to spruce up the interiors so that Parsons House could be used for meetings and
classes. Then one day, when the treasurer was scrubbing woodwork in the back bedroom of
Parsons House, she noticed that a disturbing gap had opened up between the ceiling and the back
wall. She called in restoration carpenter Kris Thomson to investigate. Kris brought in timber
framer Alicia Spence. The verdict was that the problem was not at the top of the house, as it
appeared, but at the bottom: a rotting back sill and a badly damaged post in the interior framing.
On top of that, the mysterious damage discovered in the buttery floor when we moved 20 boxes
of books in another scrubbing crusade turned out almost certainly to be evidence of termites. We
knew this was expensive news. We also knew that we had no choice but to deal with it. The
alternative was the eventual collapse of the house, which would put a major crimp in our
historical function and would be an irreparable loss to Northampton.
12
We speak of it lightly, but this development is a serious financial blow. The board is ready and
willing to work, but none of us is wealthy, and without outside assistance such as this CPA grant,
we will be hard-pressed to hold things together at Historic Northampton.
Criterion A3: Demonstrate eligibility for a local, state or national Historic Register listing
The Parsons, Shepherd and Damon Houses, currently owned outright by Historic Northampton,
were recognized as a Historic District in the National Register of Historic Places in June 2001.
Criterion A4: Provide assurance of the ability to maintain the historic resource over the long
term [answers question “how will ongoing maintenance and upkeep be accomplished”].
Historic Northampton has been preserving Northampton’s history since 1905 and has cared for
the Parsons House since 1941, Damon House since 1943 and the Shepherd House and Barn since
1971. While caring for these buildings always has and probably always will pose financial
challenges, the essential organizational structure does exist for their support, and we have
managed to find the money to keep the buildings in reasonable repair for nearly 75 years. We are
recognized as a public charity by the IRS, allowing us to solicit tax-deductible contributions for
the support of the buildings and our historical programs, and are governed by a local Board of
Trustees charged with the preservation of the properties and collections for educational purposes.
The operating budget has always included sums for regular scheduled maintenance such as
inspecting and tuning up furnaces, air-conditioners, and the alarm system.
While reorganizing the files, we rediscovered a very helpful report done in 1992 that explains in
great detail how to create (and maintain!) a philosophically coherent maintenance plan. This will
be part of the new manual provided to the board of trustees. We have a buildings and grounds
committee responsible for overseeing maintenance and landscaping, and that committee will be
charged with conducting a spring and fall walkabout that inspects every room in every building
and the entire extent of the grounds, making written notes of the conditions found. The
committee will ask all board members to pledge a few hours twice a year to get the simpler
maintenance chores done – tasks such as raking, keeping weeds and bushes away from the
buildings, vacuuming, window-washing and touch-up painting, in order to save the funds in the
operating budget for jobs that must be done by a professional. Already the grounds look better,
and Parsons is cleaner than it has been in years.
Criterion A5: Include the granting of a permanent historic preservation restriction or other
preservation guarantee [this addresses the question of specific preservation guarantees]
13
Historic Northampton received a Community Preservation Act grant in 2008, and in compliance
with the terms for that grant, a permanent historic preservation restriction was placed on all three
properties.
HOW THIS PROJECT MEETS RECREATIONAL USE CRITERIA
Criterion B1 & B2 (Recreational Use): serve a significant number of residents, and expand
the range of recreational opportunities available to Northampton residents of all ages
While we didn’t list it in our eligibility form, the properties at Historic Northampton do offer
some recreational value to Northampton residents of all ages. Our exhibit rooms in the Damon
Education Center are open to the public Wednesday through Saturday, 10-4 and Sunday 12-5
and are handicap-accessible. Under the leadership of Vice President Stan Sherer, we have
produced a long series of very popular exhibitions that present work by local artists inspired by
aspects of local history. The most recent of these (as of this writing) was A River of Dreams, an
exhibition of photographs by Anthony Lee relating to the vanished Hampshire and Hampden
Canal, which ran from New Haven to Northampton before the advent of the railroad. Each
exhibition juxtaposes contemporary works of art with historical artifacts related to the theme and
features a related lecture focused on the historical material. These have been so well attended
that we have had to reorganize our space to accommodate larger audiences.
In addition to our onsite events, we are trying to take more programs into the community, as we
did on May 2-3 with Midnight to Midnight, the documentary project in which we invited
everyone who lives or works in Northampton to take photographs of the town during a 48-hour
period on May 2-3. (http://www.masslive.com/entertainment/index.ssf/2014/04/midnight_to_midnight_northampt.html)
The results of this crowd-sourced collection of historical documents were presented during an ice
cream social held in late August, in which more than 200 people gathered on the Historic
Northampton lawn, enjoyed Herrell’s ice cream with peach-blueberry sauce made on the spot
over an outdoor fire, wandered into the Damon Education Center to enjoy the exhibits and
watched an outdoor slide show displaying some 300 photographs from the project.
HOW THIS PROJECT MEETS OPEN SPPACE CRITERIA
Criterion C1 and C2 (Open Space): Preserve Northampton’s rural and agricultural character,
scenic views and community character defining views, and provide valuable open space
opportunities in urban neighborhoods
14
Open space is not the primary value provided by Historic Northampton and was therefore not
mentioned on our eligibility form, but it is still worth noting that the lawns around our buildings
provide an green space freely available to the general public and close to the densely-built
downtown. Townsfolk occasionally use the tables and chairs on our stone patio or the gazebo
behind Parsons House for eating, chatting or just relaxing, and people regularly come to do yoga
on the terrace.
Our buildings also stand right where the Bridge Street residential neighborhoods transition into
the downtown business district, so for people coming into town from Routes 9 and 91 they act
much like a welcoming gateway to the city. It is fair to say that they constitute one of our
“community character defining views.” By both their location and their function, our properties
play an important role in establishing the visual identity of Northampton, and their absence
would leave a hole like a lost tooth in the city’s public face.
HOW THIS PROJECT MEETS GENERAL CRITERIA
Criterion D1 (General): Contributes to the preservation of Northampton’s unique character,
boosts the vitality of community, and enhances the quality of life for its residents
Historic Northampton clearly contributes to the preservation of Northampton’s unique character
both by preserving and interpreting the historic buildings on Bridge Street and also by
preserving, cataloguing and exhibiting thousands of records and objects relating specifically to
the history of this town. While the extent of our outreach is limited by a very small operating
budget, our exhibitions and programs (some of them described above under B1 & B2,
Recreational Use) do boost the vitality of the community and enhance the quality of life for its
residents.
Criterion D2 (General): Saves resources that would otherwise be threatened
The structural work we are proposing for Parsons House is absolutely essential to its continued
existence as it is literally starting to come apart at the seams. While it is possible simply to
replace the rotten sill and prop up the post, that would do nothing to address the underlying
problem, which is the proximity of the soil to the framing members and the moisture that is
encouraging decay and insect infestation. In another ten years we would be doing the same thing
again. By building a proper foundation, we support the house. By creating a basement, we make
it easier to monitor conditions below the floors, make the underside of the framing visible to
people interested in early local architecture, and create additional much needed storage space.
15
The moisture and mold remediation we are planning in Damon House is essential to the survival
of the collections made of organic materials, especially those made of leather and paper. Left
alone, mold can seriously weaken historic objects. Remediation is also important for the health
of the staff. Most people hesitate to spend more than a few minutes in the basement because of
the musty atmosphere and visible mold. No one has gone down there to do substantial work in a
very long time.
The upgrading of the furnaces will also make the collections safer. It seems obvious that having
250 gallons of oil sitting within a yard or two of the artifact collections is not a good idea but this
is the case in both Damon basements. Oil-burning furnaces, unlike gas furnaces, are subject to
puff-backs in which unburned oil pools in the firebox and explodes upon ignition causing a spray
of soot and smoke that damages everything it touches. If this happens in the front basement, it
will coat not only the nearby furniture, but will also damage the nearby fragile Native American
basket collection which we do not have the money to conserve. If it happens in the back
basement, it will damage the dolls and toys which are difficult to clean because of their mixed
materials.
D3 (General): Receives endorsement by community groups, municipal boards and/or
departments [also answers the question about the level of community support]
We include in the attachments twenty-one letters of support. These are listed in the Table of
Contents for the reader’s convenience. These letters include endorsements from the Historical
Commission and from major local institutions such as Smith College, Forbes Library and the
Chamber of Commerce. Others come from area museums or cultural organizations such as
Historic Deerfield and the Emily Dickinson Museum. We count among our supporters local
businesspeople such as Gordon Thorne, Joe Blumenthal and Craig Della Penna as well as our
neighbors, the Ward 3 Neighborhood Association and the Bridge Street School.
D4 (General): Leverages additional public and/or private funds, or demonstrates that other
funding sources are not readily available or sufficient [this also address the level of
community support]
We began looking for funding for this project within our own board. One generous board
member offered a challenge gift of $2500, to be matched by the rest of the board. We have
received either gifts or pledges to meet this challenge, and can count on the $5000. The Parsons
Family Association has expressed its willingness to give $7000 toward the Parsons House
heating system. They will give $3500 now and the remainder after the work is in progress. Quite
soon, we will approach our membership and ask for their support as well. For this constituency,
16
we will suggest that they underwrite the supplies and equipment we will need for our volunteers
to safely move and clean the moldy collections. This list provides opportunities for both larger
and smaller gifts, including respirators, gloves, storage boxes, paper for packing, soft paper
towels for drying the objects, and the rental of climate-controlled storage space while the
basements are emptied for remediation. We expect total donations from the membership to range
between $1500 and $3000. We also plan to apply to the Beveridge Foundation for support in
their next cycle (due February 1). The Beveridge Foundation supports non-profit groups in
Hampshire and Hampden Counties. Judging from the history of awards published on their
website, it seems realistic to hope for another $5,000 or perhaps even $10,000 from this source.
D5 (General) Can be implemented expeditiously and within budget
Because the needs are urgent, our intention is get this work done within the calendar year 2015.
This fall, before the grant period begins, we will undertake the necessary preliminary work on
the mold problem, organizing a small group of volunteers to remove the collections from the
Damon basements, clean them, repack them and move them into temporary storage. This must
be done early not only for the good of the collections but also because we cannot determine the
extent of the remediation work that will be required until the space is opened up. Since both
Damon basements are likely to be in comparatively good shape structurally, we feel hopeful that
the scope of the job will be within the budget, but if it is not, we will concentrate on one of the
two, probably the newer one, and look for ways to store our collections more compactly in that
space.
If funding is adequate, and we are not presented with major surprises, the work on Parsons
House should be finished on time and within budget. But old houses are notorious for presenting
surprises. We are planning for rotten timbers and insect infestations, but there is no way to know
in advance how extensive the problems will be. For this reason, the budget includes a 10%
contingency item.
FEASIBILITY
We will of course need to pull the permits ordinarily required when any householder installs new
furnaces, new wiring, or excavates a basement. In addition, we will need to discuss the proposed
changes with the City of Northampton because of the preservation restriction put in place at the
time of our 2008 CPA grant. We believe that the elements most likely to require discussion are
the removal of the 20th century back porch and the addition of the basement under Parsons
House. The porch is a very late addition to the building, and one could justify its removal, but
17
replacing it would protect the bulkhead from rainwater pouring down the back slope of the roof.
We do not have many other options for positioning the bulkhead other than along the back wall.
WHAT COMMUNITY NEEDS DOES THIS PROJECT SERVE?
Historic Northampton meets three community needs: the need to educate our children, the need
to preserve the material culture of those who built and are still building this town, and the need to
have a clearly articulated identity and sense of place.
We help meet the educational needs of our children by collaborating with schools at all levels.
About ten years ago, Historic Northampton collaborated on a major project to teach children
about the late 17th century trials of Mary Bliss Parsons for witchcraft (see http://www.historic-
northampton.org/highlights/parsonstrial.html). The website presents facsimiles and transcripts of
court documents, maps and related documents. The online exhibit and educational website with
school curricula were created by the Center for Computer Based Technology at the University of
Massachusetts at Amherst and Northampton area teachers. This curriculum is why so many local
children are familiar with the Parsons witchcraft trial, one of the most dramatic incidents in our
very early history. This year we are providing garden space for students from Bridge Street
Elementary School where they will learn about sustainable food production and historical
gardening techniques. We also have a new project in the works to involve students of all ages
and their families in recording the histories of the houses they live in on an interactive online
map.
At the other end of the educational continuum, students from Smith College often make use of
the museum as a lab for understanding material culture in New England. This summer, an art
history major used her Praxis internship (paid for by the college) to work on three projects at
Historic Northampton: an expanded description of the women depicted in the Hestia Mural for
its 35th anniversary, a revised architectural tour of Main Street that will eventually be published
on our website, and the preparation of catalog entries for photographs relating to the Lathrop
sisters. The Lathrop sisters were both local artists, and one of them is shown sitting at her easel
in the Hestia mural – a detail based on a photograph owned by Historic Northampton. Earlier this
spring, Marla Miller brought her entire graduate class in public history here from U Mass. These
students, already experienced in studying historical documents, looked at baskets, furniture,
clothing and ceramics under the guidance of director Nan Wolverton, and discovered how
different a set of skills are required for analyzing and interpreting three-dimensional objects.
We also provide a repository for objects that local residents and museum staff agree are
important to save. While space is limited, we do accept objects with strong connections to
Northampton history. We were recently surprised to be offered a Pomeroy family sampler,
18
whose owner plans to fly cross-country to Northampton and deliver it by hand. But our mission
is by no means limited to founding families. This summer we accepted from a local resident the
gift of a collection of glass milk bottles from Northampton dairies, many having their original
cardboard tabs from the 1950s, and we are particularly interested in identifying and collecting
objects relating to populations that might not naturally think of giving their keepsakes to a local
historical society. Our goal is to balance the wonderful “colonial” items we have from early
families like the Pomeroys with objects from families who joined the community much more
recently. One such donation came from the Stramesi family, whose grandparents came from Italy
at the turn of the century. The Stramesi textiles were considered important enough to be sought
out by the National Park Service in the late 1990s, when they were shown as part of the
exhibitions at Ellis Island.
But when residents entrust us with their letters, diaries, clothing and business items, we owe it to
them to care for them responsibly, which is why we are so distressed at the current state of the
storage areas and feel so urgently the need to raise the money to renovate them. We cannot meet
the needs of our community when our collections are endangered to the degree they are now. We
need to improve conditions in our storage area if we are to be good stewards of what is donated
to us. People care about where their artifacts go and they bring them to us in good faith, trusting
that they will be cared for and preserved for others to appreciate.
The third and least tangible community need is for an institution that represents the identity of
the town, past and present. We have a long way to go to embody that ideal, but it is what we are
aiming for and where we believe we belong, representing not just the past but also the present,
not just our founding families but also our latest arrivals. By preserving and displaying objects
from all segments of the community, a museum validates them all and affirms that all the
communities that coexist within this larger community are important to our history and to our
sense of self.
HOW WILL THE SUCCESS OF THIS PROJECT BE MEASURED
This project is in some senses a hidden one. If all goes well, Parsons House will look exactly as
it does now, i.e., it won’t have collapsed. But to express this more positively:
(1) Parsons House is stabilized for many years to come.
(2) Parsons basement is usable for clean storage.
(3) Relative humidity levels in Parsons and Damon basements can be maintained at 50%
(4) Parsons House doesn’t smell musty, signaling that the environment is safer for both
objects and people and more conducive to regular programming
19
(5) Visible mold growth has been arrested on collection items from the Damon Basement
and the items most in need of intervention have been vacuumed, brushed, washed or
wiped clean as appropriate.
(6) The Damon basements are clean and collections can be returned to them in a safer,
more stable and more orderly condition than they were taken out.
(7) New furnaces are installed, the asbestos is no longer endangering health, and we don’t
have to worry about puff-backs and oily smoke.
(8) The board Buildings and Grounds Committee has created a schedule for regular
inspections of all parts of the property and has begun to use the resources in Leeke’s
pamphlet on Managing Maintenance.
(9) With all these improvements in place, the staff has more time and money to spend on
programs.
PROJECT TIMELINE
2014 September
Purchase and install two new temporary residential dehumidifiers in the two Damon
basement storage areas where many artifacts are showing mold growth. Open closed
cases to promote air circulation and prevent formation of micro-environments (done).
Obtain professional advice from Envirotech Clean Air to develop a plan for dealing with
mold-afflicted collections in both Damon basements (scheduled for mid-September, see
attached letter).
Purchase temporary storage boxes, packing materials, brushes, respirators, goggles,
gloves and a hepa-filtered abatement vacuum cleaner, all recommended by Envirotech as
essential to moving and cleaning moldy items in Damon basements. Purchase two or
three digital recording hygrometers to monitor basements. These purchases will be part of
our match to the grant.
As agreed in the Historic Preservation restriction, consult with city of Northampton about
the excavation of the cellar and specifically the removal of 20th century back porch
Discuss with Robert Paynter, Professor of Anthropology and Director of UMass
Archaeological Field School, how best to conduct an archaeological investigation of the
area directly behind Parsons house that will be disturbed by excavating the basement
(done).
20
Bring in a general contractor (probably Jim Flannery)
o to inspect all foundations for cracks and openings, all bulkheads, all gutters,
downspouts, and splash trays, and the grading surrounding the buildings
o to make a complete list/estimate of any work needed to keep water out of the
basements
o request donations or a small grant to support the repairs outlined
Abide comes in to remove asbestos from Parsons House.
Wilson replaces current asbestos-covered boiler dating to the 1930s and its 1979 oil
burner with a safer high-efficiency two-zone gas-fired boiler that vents to the side. This is
being funded in part by the Parsons Family Association, which is eager to see the work
done. We are too, since the current system required several expensive repairs last winter.
September is when Wilson has time to do the work.
2014 October – December
Take first steps in dealing with moldy collections from Damon basement, following the
plan developed with Envirotech Clean Air in September. We have discussed this plan and
it will probably include the following work that can be done by trained volunteers
wearing correct protective gear. This would be done gradually (the outdoor work to be
done earliest, while weather permits).
o Remove books and papers from the basement, bring them outdoors on tables and
sheets on the terrace, fan them out and expose all sides to bright sunlight on a dry
day; then brush off the mold, using a fan to blow the mold away from the worker.
This technique is suitable only when working outdoors but was specifically
recommended by Envirotech.
o Any cleaning that cannot be finished out doors must be done with a HEPA-filtered
abatement vacuum, not a brush.
o Remove china, glass and metals from the basement, take them outdoors, wash them
with ordinary dish soap and water and dry them thoroughly.
o Remove furniture from the basement, expose it to the sun and either brush off the
mold, vacuum it or wipe it down with a clean damp cloth and then dry thoroughly.
o Move cleaned collections into safe, climate-controlled temporary storage, making a
box-by-box inventory before they are moved, and noting their locations in temporary
storage when they are put in position.
These techniques will not remove ALL mold, but they will greatly lower the density, and
if collections are returned to a stable controlled, low-RH environment, it will not continue
to grow and damage the collections
21
2015 January-February
When collections are out of the basement and into safe temporary storage, it will be
possible to move storage units in the basements away from the walls to assess their
condition. At that point, we may have to have Envirotech return for another assessment.
2015 Spring, after grant funds becomes available
Professional mold abatement in Damon basements. The scope of work will be determined
based on the report from Envirotech and on available funds but is likely to include:
o Cleaning HVAC system
o Cleaning walls and floors
o Cleaning storage units and discarding those that cannot be cleaned
After heating season is over, remove oil tank from Damon basements and replace the
furnaces with gas-fired models. Install a proper cover for the sump pit.
Install industrial strength dehumidifiers in each Damon basement and monitor humidity
to keep it at a low level to discourage regrowth of the mold.
2015 April-June
As early as weather permits, remove 20th century porch of Parsons House to permit
archaeological exploration of area directly behind the old kitchen before equipment
comes in to excavate a new basement cellar.
As soon as weather permits, conduct an archaeological investigation of the ground under
the current Parsons porch and beyond the kitchen walls. Since an even earlier trash pit
could exist under the kitchen, this may involve removing kitchen floorboards to provide
access.
Remove as many collection items from Parsons House as possible, including everything
in the kitchen and all other items that might be exposed to dirt or that might fall and be
damaged due to vibration from the excavation. If any items are found to require mold
remediation, follow the same methods used for the Damon basement collections.
Clean out the 1981 basement, which is mostly filled with exhibit platforms now. Seal the
door to the ell basement where the new furnace is.
22
As soon as the heating season is over, bring in Abide to remove asbestos from the
Shepherd heating system.
Replace boiler in Shepherd House with a gas-fired unit.
Make any masonry repairs required in the Damon foundations.
2015 July-September
Extend the existing 1981 basement under the portion of Parsons House that is still sitting
on the ground, replacing rotted sills and posts with appropriate large timbers.
Insulate and finish the walls of both the 1981 and new basement areas, sealing the floor
and installing a large industrial-strength dehumidifier. Install smaller dehumidifiers in the
two older basements.
Adjust grading and gutters at Parsons House to direct water away from the house.
Gradually bring the cleaned collections back to the newly cleaned and dehumidified
basements.
23
24
25
26
27
28
FORM B − BUILDING
MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MASSACHUSETTS ARCHIVES BUILDING
220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125
Photograph
Topographic or Assessor's Map
Recorded by: Bonnie Parsons
Organization: Pioneer Valley Planning Commission
Date (month / year): March, 2010
Assessor’s Number USGS Quad Area(s) Form Number
32A-175 Easthampton NTH.2070
Town: Northampton
Place: (neighborhood or village)
Address: 46 Bridge Street
Historic Name: Isaac Damon House
Uses: Present: museum
Original: single-family residence
Date of Construction: 1812
Source: The Northampton Book
Style/Form: Federal
Architect/Builder: Isaac Damon, architect
Exterior Material:
Foundation: granite blocks, brick
Wall/Trim: clapboards
Roof: not visible and asphalt shingles
Outbuildings/Secondary Structures:
gazebo
Major Alterations (with dates): museum ell added.
Condition: good
Moved: no | x | yes | | Date
Acreage: 0.534 acres
Setting: This south-facing building is set on a deep lot. On its west is a shopping center. The tree-shaded section of
Bridge Street at this point begins the residential section of the street.
29
___ Recommended for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. This property is already on the National Register.
If checked, you must attach a completed National Register Criteria Statement form.
Use as much space as necessary to complete the following entries, allowing text to flow onto additional continuation sheets.
ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION:
Describe architectural features. Evaluate the characteristics of this building in terms of other buildings within the community.
This is one of Northampton’s finest examples of high-style Federal architecture. It is a two-story building under a low hipped roof that is encircled by a latticed balustrade topped by urn ornaments. There are two interior chimneys extending above the roof.
The main block of the house is five bays wide and three bays deep and windows have 6/6 sash. The center entry on the south façade has a portico with matching balustrade on its hipped roof and is supported on two Doric columns with respondent
pilasters. The door surround is an architrave surround that is repeated for the windows. The clapboard-sided house rests on dressed stone foundations. On the north side of the building are two ells. A two-story ell under a gable roof, followed by a one-
and-a-half story ell, which is a 20th century addition. There is a one-story entry addition in the angle between the main block and the ells. It has a circular brownstone stoop leading to its single-leaf door. The one-and-a-half story ell has an arcaded porch on
its east elevation. It is six bays long, three of which bays are French doors, two are windows with 6/6 sash and one bay is a secondary entry. There is an exterior wall chimney on the north end of the ell.
A gazebo is located at the north east corner of the property.
HISTORICAL NARRATIVE Discuss the history of the building. Explain its associations with local (or state) history. Include uses of the building, and the role(s) the
owners/occupants played within the community.
From Form B of 1970, “Isaac Damon, an architect of national renown, constructed this imposing house for his own home in
1812. In addition to the house, Damon erected 13 churches, 25 bridges, and 14 other buildings including several notable factories. The house was naturally built in the best fashion of the day, since Damon is thought to have studied under Asher
Benjamin and Ithiel Towne, two other early architects active in the Connecticut River Valley.” BIBLIOGRAPHY and/or REFERENCES
Beers, F. W. County Atlas of Hampshire Massachusetts, New York, 1873.
Hales, John G. Plan of the Town or Northampton in the County of Hampshire, 1831. Merrill, David Oliver. Isaac Damon and the Architecture of the Federal Period in New England, Yale Ph.D. dissertation, 1965.
Miller, D. L. Atlas of the City of Northampton and Town of Easthampton, Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Philadelphia, 1895. Putnam, Karl. The Northampton Book, Part III.
Registry of Deeds, Book 983, Page 378. Springfield Union, August 29, 1959.
Walker, George H. and Company. Atlas of Northampton City, Massachusetts, Boston, 1884. Walling, Henry F. Map of Hampshire County, Massachusetts, New York, 1860.
30
FORM B − BUILDING
MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MASSACHUSETTS ARCHIVES BUILDING
220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125
Photograph
Topographic or Assessor's Map
Recorded by: Bonnie Parsons
Organization: Pioneer Valley Planning Commission
Date (month / year): March, 2010
Assessor’s Number USGS Quad Area(s) Form Number
32A-260 Easthampton NTH.2125
Town: Northampton
Place: (neighborhood or village)
Address: 58 Bridge Street
Historic Name: Nathaniel Parsons House
Uses: Present: museum
Original: single-family residence
Date of Construction: 1719
• Source: Dendrochronology - the science or
technique of dating events, environmental change, and archaeological artifacts by using the
characteristic patterns of annual growth rings in timber and tree trunks.
Style/Form: Georgian
Architect/Builder:
Exterior Material:
Foundation: stone and brick
Wall/Trim: clapboards
Roof: asphalt shingles
Outbuildings/Secondary Structures:
Major Alterations (with dates):
Wings added on west and east.
Condition: good
Moved: no | x | yes | | Date
Acreage: 0.49 acres
Setting: Set behind a wood fence, this house faces south and is shaded by large maple trees.
31
__x_ Recommended for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
If checked, you must attach a completed National Register Criteria Statement form.
Use as much space as necessary to complete the following entries, allowing text to flow onto additional continuation sheets.
ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION:
Describe architectural features. Evaluate the characteristics of this building in terms of other buildings within the community.
The Parsons House as it appears today on the exterior is a modest Georgian style house. It is two-and-a-half stories in height under a low-pitched, side-gable roof with a large center chimney in front of its ridge. The roof has clipped eaves in the gable
ends, typical of the Georgian style. The house is set on stone foundations so low as to be almost invisible and is sided in wide clapboards or weatherboards. It is five bays wide and two bays deep and windows on the first floor are more elongated that
those of the second floor, which are placed close to the eaves. Sash on both floors of the façade is 12/12. The center door surround has a splayed lintel. Window surrounds are flat and without drip moldings. The door is six-panel. The east elevation
is three bays deep and on it is a hipped roof portico on Italianate chamfered posts. To it is attached a wing of two stories. It is only one bay wide but has a chimney and a single 6/6 window. An ell extends from the north elevation of the house and is one-
and-a-half stories in height. To the west elevation is attached a one-story wing under a side-gable roof.
Structural analysis of the house reveals that a 1719 First Period house remains within the current Georgian structure. In 1719 the house was two-and-a-half stories in height and only one room deep. It is believed to have had diamond pane casement
windows and there is evidence of a pentice or hood above the main entrance on the south façade. The first addition was ca. 1750: a lean-to on the north side of the house, adding a second kitchen to the house. Between ca. 1795 and 1815 a second
floor was added to the lean-to, which raised the rear roof and made the house two rooms deep on both stories, or a double-pile house. This alteration brought the house to its current Georgian style with double-hung windows replacing casements and
weatherboards added over the original siding materials.
The second addition was that of the ell and east wing, which occurred ca. 1815-1830. The ell contained a summer kitchen and the east wing provided a room – perhaps a dining room - at the end of the lean-to on the first floor and a second room – possibly
an office or bedroom - on its second floor.
The west wing was added to the house between 1815 and 1830 as well, but there is no evidence that it was added simultaneously. It contains a single room that may have served as an office or parlor.
HISTORICAL NARRATIVE Discuss the history of the building. Explain its associations with local (or state) history. Include uses of the building, and the role(s) the
owners/occupants played within the community.
From Form B of 1970, “To view Northampton architecture is to view the Northampton Historical Society’s Parsons House. The
house reflects the architecture of three centuries of American development. The social, economic and political changes of three centuries of national growth are manifested in the house’s history – from the early witchcraft trial of Mary Parsons in 1674 to the
saga of the Bliss family during the Victorian age of development. Thus, the Cornet Joseph Parsons House is truly ‘a house for the town’. This is the oldest house in Northampton. It contains portraits, furniture and weapons, gun smithing and blacksmithing
tools of General Seth Pomeroy, first General named by George Washington. The first child in the settlement was born in this house. It was in the Parsons family for 4 generations. In 1807 owned by the Wright family. In 300 years it was owned by only 2
families. Miss Anna Bliss willed it to the Historical Society in 1941. Original kitchen and stairway. “
Subsequent research by Historic Northampton has firmly dated the house as beginning construction in 1719 and lasting for several years thereafter. Research documents that the house stands on its original site on the eastern section of the homelot
granted to Joseph and Mary Bliss Parsons ca. 1654. Nathaniel Parsons (1686-1738) owned the property from 1709 to 1738, which changes its first attribution to Joseph and Mary Bliss Parsons to that of their grandson Nathaniel. Following Nathaniel’s
death, his second wife and widow Abigail Bunce Parsons and their children Nathaniel, Experience and Elisha inherited the
32
house. Experience in 1768 sold her share in the house to her brother Nathaniel and the two brothers Nathaniel and Elisha lived
in the house along with Nathaniel’s wife Sarah Rust Parsons. Elisha left in 1777. It is thought that the house may have been divided during this period into a two-family as there were two kitchens at that time. From 1785 Nathaniel began selling off the
homelot and then his sons Nathaniel and Luther bought what remained of the homelot and included the house from their father. Nathaniel Sr. died in1807 and the two halves of the house were sold. Luther sold his half to Seth Rust and in a series of sales it
came to Chloe Wright that year. Nathaniel, Jr. sold his half in 1808 to Chloe Wright’s stepson Ferdinand Hunt Wright. So in 1808 the house passed out of the Parsons family and into that of the Wright family. It remained in the Wright family through four
generations until it was willed to the Northampton Historical Society in 1941. BIBLIOGRAPHY and/or REFERENCES
Beers, F. W. County Atlas of Hampshire Massachusetts, New York, 1873.
Bliss, Anna C. The Oldest House in Northampton: The Home of Cornet Joseph Parsons, NHS Publication, n.d.. Daily Hampshire Gazette, October 19, 1953.
Hales, John G. Plan of the Town or Northampton in the County of Hampshire, 1831. Miller, D. L. Atlas of the City of Northampton and Town of Easthampton, Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Philadelphia, 1895.
Northampton Tercentenary Committee. The Northampton Book, 1954. Trumbull, James. History of Northampton, 2 v, 1898.
Walker, George H. and Company. Atlas of Northampton City, Massachusetts, Boston, 1884. Walling, Henry F. Map of Hampshire County, Massachusetts, New York, 1860.
Will of Anna Catherine Bliss, Hampshire County Case 23971, File 13, February 18, 1941. www.historic-northampton.org
Clancey, Gregory and John Leeke. Report on the architectural examination of the Parsons House, 1992.
33
FORM B − BUILDING
MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MASSACHUSETTS ARCHIVES BUILDING
220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125
Photograph
Topographic or Assessor's Map
Recorded by: Bonnie Parsons
Organization: Pioneer Valley Planning Commission
Date (month / year): March, 2010
Assessor’s Number USGS Quad Area(s) Form Number
32A-176 Easthampton NTH.2071
Town: Northampton
Place: (neighborhood or village)
Address: 66 Bridge Street
Historic Name: Asahel Pomeroy House
Uses: Present: museum
Original: single-family residence
Date of Construction: 1792
Source: Historical Society Records
Style/Form: Federal
Architect/Builder:
Exterior Material:
Foundation: brick and stone
Wall/Trim: clapboards
Roof: slate
Outbuildings/Secondary Structures:
Major Alterations (with dates): west porch added ca.
1900. Portico added ca. 1870.
Condition: good
Moved: no | x | yes | | Date
Acreage: 0.692 acres
Setting: South-facing house is set close to the street, behind a white picket fence.
34
_ _ Recommended for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. This property is on the National Register.
If checked, you must attach a completed National Register Criteria Statement form.
Use as much space as necessary to complete the following entries, allowing text to flow onto additional continuation sheets.
ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION:
Describe architectural features. Evaluate the characteristics of this building in terms of other buildings within the community.
This is a late Federal style house, two-and-a-half stories in height under a slate-covered, side-gable roof whose eaves make full returns to create pedimented gables. The house is five bays wide and three bays deep and it has two interior chimneys. The
windows have large 6/6 sash with architrave surrounds topped by lintels with crown moldings on the first story. On the second story the window surrounds are architrave without the added lintels. The center door surround is architrave with corner blocks.
It has a Gothic Revival style portico with slender corner posts supporting wood tracery at the top, mid-way along the sides and at the bottom of the portico. The door itself of the entry is six-panel and has its own louvered shutters and narrow flanking
sidelights. To this main block of the house is attached a one-and-a-half story shed roof addition on the north and a hipped Colonial Revival
style porch on the west. The porch rests on Doric columns and has fine, square baluster railings. HISTORICAL NARRATIVE Discuss the history of the building. Explain its associations with local (or state) history. Include uses of the building, and the role(s) the
owners/occupants played within the community.
From the Form B of 1976, “The builder of this house was Asahel Pomeroy, a son of General Seth Pomeroy, a famous soldier of
the Colonial Wars and one of the heroes of Bunker Hill. The house was given to the Historical Society in the will of Thomas M. Shepard (1856-1923).”
BIBLIOGRAPHY and/or REFERENCES
Beers, F. W. County Atlas of Hampshire Massachusetts, New York, 1873. Hales, John G. Plan of the Town or Northampton in the County of Hampshire, 1831.
Miller, D. L. Atlas of the City of Northampton and Town of Easthampton, Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Philadelphia, 1895. Northampton Historical Society. Representative Families of Northampton, “Seth Pomeroy”, lecture by Thomas Monroe Shepard;
file on Shepard House. Walker, George H. and Company. Atlas of Northampton City, Massachusetts, Boston, 1884.
Walling, Henry F. Map of Hampshire County, Massachusetts, New York, 1860.
35
36
37
38
DA
M
O
N
HO
U
S
E
(46
BR
I
D
G
E
)
PA
R
S
O
N
S
HO
U
S
E
(58
BR
I
D
G
E
)
SH
E
P
H
E
R
D
HO
U
S
E
(66
BR
I
D
G
E
)
Zo
n
e
d
CB
(C
e
n
t
r
a
l
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
)
Zo
n
e
d
UR
C
(U
r
b
a
n
Re
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
C)
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
CONTRACTOR LIST - see attached estimates and website pages showing qualifications
Asbestos remediation will be carried out by:
Abide
PO Box 886
East Longmeadow, MA 01028
Phone: 800-696-2243
Fax: 413-525-0678
Website: www.abideinc.com
Furnace and boiler work will be carried out by:
Wilson Services
474 Easthampton Rd.
Northampton, MA 01060
Phone: 413-584-3317
Website: www.wilsonph.com/
Structural repair of Parsons House framing and foundations will be carried out by:
Kris Thomson Carpentry, HIC 171543
362 Kennedy Rd.
Leeds, MA 01053
Phone: 413-695-6487
Website: www.kristhomsoncarpentry.com/
Chimney liner in Shepherd will be installed by
Top Hat Chimney Sweeps
10 Stowell Road
North Grafton, MA 01536
Phone: 508-839-9997
Email: TopHatCS@Charter.net
Website: www.tophatchimneysweepmass.com/
Mold advice and remediation will be provided by:
Envirotech Clean Air, Inc.
10 Spencer Street
Stoneham, MA. 02180
Phone: 800-698-1300
Fax: 781-279-2910
Email: sgoselin@breatheasier.com
Website: www.breatheasier.com
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Call Us Today 800-696-2243
Home
About Abide
Asbestos Abatement
Deleading
Mold Remediation
PCB Removal
Bio-Recovery
Contact Us
about asbestos
Asbestos can be found in many common building products including thermal system insulation, roofing materials, window caulking and glazing, floor tile and sheet
goods, electrical wire wraps, wall and ceiling plasters, sheetrock and joint compounds, and spray applied fireproofing.
asbestos removal experience
Abide has experience in asbestos projects of all types, ranging from small residential projects to large scale public and commercial abatements. We have worked
on private, residential, commercial and public projects, and have extensive experience working with health-care facilities, schools and college properties. We can
handle the asbestos abatement related to renovations, water and fire damage, or property demolition. Abide has successfully completed over 6,000 asbestos
abatement projects.
quality project environments
Abide follows all OSHA, EPA, and state accepted work practices. We manage all of the paper work and arrange proper waste disposal. We construct and
maintain barriers and decontamination enclosures for complete safety in, and around, the abatement site. By utilizing negative air filtration systems, wet methods,
and HEPA filtered vacuums, we minimize fiber release and maintain a clean project environment.
licensed technicians
Our skilled, licensed technicians utilize state-of-the-art equipment including mobile containment units, decrabators to remove flooring materials and membranes,
and shotblasting equipment for stripping floor tile mastic and carpet adhesives.
Abide Environmental Contracting provides abatement asbestos removal service for Western Massachusetts home owners and commercial properties in cities like
Chicopee, Springfield, West Springfield, East Longmeadow, Hampden, Somers, Enfield, Suffield, Holyoke, Agawam, Southwick and more.
Asbestos Abatement Case Studies
Northeast Industrial Plant
59
Call Us Today 800-696-2243
Home
About Abide
Asbestos Abatement
Deleading
Mold Remediation
PCB Removal
Bio-Recovery
Contact Us
Abide is a fully licensed, insured and bonded environmental contracting and restoration firm using the latest
equipment and technology to complete projects safely, efficiently and in compliance with all local, state and federal
regulations.
Abide provides abatement services to remove environmental hazards, as well as general contracting services to rebuild and restore your facility following
remediation.
Incorporated in 1991, Abide is proud to have over twenty years of experience in the environmental contracting and restoration industry. We have built an
excellent reputation serving both public and private clients. Our growth and success can be attributed to the quality of our service and the satisfaction of our
clients.
key personnel
Maria Tilli – President
Frank Tilli – Vice President, Sales
Christopher Coopee – Vice President, Operations
Jerry Gray – Division Leader, Lead and Mold Services
Gregory Lindsay – Operations Manager, Safety Director
woman business enterprise
Abide is certified by the Massachusetts Supplier Diversity Office as a Woman Business Enterprise (WBE). Maria Tilli started the business with her husband
Frank over twenty years ago. In 2005, Maria became President of the company.
Case Studies
60
61
62
63
WILSON SERVICES
474 Easthampton Rd.
Northampton, MA 01060
Northampton Phone: 413‐584‐3317
CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES OF WILSON
SERVICES
Air Conditioning Contractors of America – For over forty years, ACCA has
been the nationwide association representing the HVACR contracting industry. They help
members acquire and satisfy customers while upholding the most stringent requirements for
professional ethics, and advocating for improvements to the industry overall.
North American Technician Excellence – NATE-certified technicians are skilled, third-
party-certified professionals, the best in the heating, ventilation, air-conditioning, and refrigeration
industry. Remember, you can rely on NATE-certified technicians for skilled, thorough, and
dependable service.
The Radiant Panel Association – The mission of this organization is to facilitate
communication and cooperation among those interested in the advancement of the radiant panel
heating and cooling industry primarily in North America.
National Comfort Institute – An NCI certified contractor has taken
extensive training and has invested in the tools to make sure your comfort system is working as
comfortably, efficiently and safely as possible. Some contractors may say they’re doing these
things, but unless they give you written reports with information about air flow, system pressures,
temperatures, carbon monoxide and combustion efficiency, they’re simply guessing that your
existing or new system works properly.
64
Infrared Training Center – The Infrared Training Center (ITC) has invested in
the people, resources and technology to create a world class training program and facility. The ITC
originally emerged as an operator training course, but has evolved over the past 25 years into a
infrared predictive maintenance certification program that teaches operator training as well as
infrared theory and applications.
The Home Builders Association of Western Massachusetts is the “front door”
for services and information for the general public and consumers of residential construction and
remodeling services.
The Quality Installation Verification (QIV) analysis checks for proper refrigerant
charge and air flow of the central air conditioner or heat pump systems. A COOL SMART trained
air-conditioning technician who works for the installing contractor tests the system while it’s running
and takes a series of measurements which are analyzed via computer. Within a few minutes the
homeowner knows how their system is performing.
Massachusetts Registered Plumbing Corporation #2885
Massachusetts Registered Sheet Metal Business #56
Massachusetts Master Sheet Metal worker #954
Massachusetts Master Plumber #10839
Massachusetts Master Gas fitter #4515
Massachusetts Oil Burner Technician #028894
Environmental Protection Agency Universal Certification
NATE certified Air Conditioning technician #1034583
Trained Infiltrometer (Blower Door) technician, Comfort Institute
Trained Air Balancer, National Comfort Institute
International Ground Source Heat Pump Association Accredited Installer #17565-0508
Certified level One Thermographer #27777 (Infrared/Thermal Imaging) issued by Infrared
Training Center
65
362 Kennedy Rd.
Leeds, MA 01053
(413) 695-6487
Historic Northampton
46 Bridge St.
Northampton, MA 01060
(413) 584-6011
3 September 2014
Narrative: Parsons House
Kris Thomson has over fifteen years of experience working in the restoration of historically
important homes and regional vernacular architecture, including timber framing. In light of this
experience, Kris Thomson Carpentry was approached by Historic Northampton’s Nancy Rexford to
evaluate termite damage to the Parsons House, as well as a widening gap between the ceiling and
the sidewall in rooms 208 and 209. Due to the importance and historic value of the Parsons House,
Kris consulted a career timber framer and early timber framing expert with a broad base of
preservation experience, Alicia Spence of the Timber Framers Guild.
While investigating the separation of the wall from the rest of the structure, Kris and Alicia noted
that the roof structure of the Parsons House appears sound and stable, with visibly sound framing
evident in the attic. They recognized that the structural problems leading to the wall separation are
not coming from the attic or roof structure, and so their attention turned to the foundation.
A foundations serves many important functions within a building. It stabilizes the structure, so that
the building doesn’t move and shift with seasonal changes in temperature. It also provides a barrier
against moisture and insects that are natural and wanted in earth – but not in a house. Rooms 110
and 111, and half of room 109, does not have a “foundation,” in the modern sense. Without a barrier
between indoor space and the earth, moisture and pests can migrate freely into the structure. On
lifting the floorboards in room 109, Kris and Alicia found that the room’s joists are only about eight
inches directly over dirt – and the sill below the separating wall has rotted away over a length of
about twenty-five feet.
66
In the early 1980’s, the foundation beneath room 102 and the other half of room 109 was dug out to
create a full, modern, concrete wall and slab basement approximately eight feet high. Kris proposes
to extend this finished basement space below the rest of room 109, 110, and 111, including a three-
inch layer of spray foam insulation on the concrete walls to act as a vapor barrier. Finishing the
basement begun in the eighties will stabilize the building and minimize problems with moisture,
pests, and mold. In addition, the usable storage space created in the basement will free up valuable,
usable space elsewhere in the building.
Currently, the basement space is only accessible via a winding staircase, through the three hundred
year old parlor. This staircase is not up to current safety standards, and basement access is limited.
The addition of a bulkhead off the back of the building would increase basement accessibility, and
thus increase usable space.
Kris Thomson Carpentry is well-versed in historic renovation, and has extensive experience
enforcing best practices during historically important renovations. Every step in the process will be
carefully documented, with photos and measurements, and every effort will be made to save
original materials. The timber stock used will be solid, locally-sawn wood of similar species to the
original, and wherever possible, like materials will be used to replace building components that are
no longer sound.
By finishing the job begun in the eighties and extending a modern basement to the rest of the
house’s footprint, many threats to the structure will be minimized or eliminated, including sinking,
moisture, mold, pests, and extreme temperatures. This project will help ensure that the Parsons
House and its historic collections remain sound, stable, accessible, and usable for the future. Kris
Thomson Carpentry is honored to work with Historic Northampton to preserve the handiwork of
the past for future generations.
Sincerely,
Kris Thomson
Kris Thomson Carpentry
67
Estimate for work on Nathaniel Parsons House 9/6/14
Site Work and Structural Work
Demo porch, some siding and some flooring $ 3,000
Site contractor $29,000
Dig full-depth foundation (40' x 8') and basement slab
Back-fill to grade
Mason
Grade to sill brick $ 6,000
Shore exposed masonry mass $ 2,000
Kris Thomson Carpentry
Support building $ 4,000
Sister joists (rms 109 and 110) $ 3,500
Repair sills (25') $ 5,500
Repair posts (3) $ 3,000
Replace siding $ 3,000 Replace eaves $ 2,000
Replace flooring $ 1,800
Replace interior finish $ 1,400
Subtotal $64,200
10% margin for unanticipated expenses $ 6,420
TOTAL FOR SITE AND STRUCTURAL WORK $70,620 Basement
Empty basement $ 700
Build stud walls $ 4,500 Electrical $ 4,500 Insulate walls $ 4,500
Sheetrock $ 3,000
Paint walls $ 3,500
Paint floors $ 2,500 Subtotal $23,200
10% margin for unanticipated expenses $ 2,320
TOTAL FOR BASEMENT $25,520
68
Insulation
Build walls for insulation $ 4,025
Cellulose (R-60) in main attic and rm. 111 attic $ 2,300
Subtotal $ 6,325
10% margin for unanticipated expenses $ 633
TOTAL FOR INSULATION $ 6,958
PROJECT SUBTOTAL $103,098
Miscellaneous
General Contracting $15,465
Permit $ 500
Gutters $ 3,000
Set-up and clean-up $ 5,000
Trash removal $ 1,500
TOTAL FOR MISCELLANEOUS $25,465
ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL* $128,563 *Please note that this is an estimate only and not a bid.
Every effort will be made to stay within budget, however a few elements of the project are unknown at this time. There are potential additional expenses not included in this budget that are impossible to accurately quantify before the work is undertaken and the building's structure
is exposed. Specifically, the extent of the termite damage and the integrity of the central masonry
mass.
Historic Northampton can anticipate full transparency from, and shared decision-making with, Kris Thomson Carpentry throughout the project.
69
70
Home About Us Services Contact Us Gallery
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Services
Contact Us
Gallery
Our ServicesChimney Sweeping: We sweep fireplaces, wood stoves, pellet stoves, oil and
gas appliance chimneys. We guarantee no mess.
Our first concern is keeping your home, floors, carpets and belongings clean. We have
a specifically designed high powered vacuum to control soot and dust from entering
your home. We also carry drop cloths to protect your floors and furniture.
Chimney Caps: Chimney caps keep rain, snow, animals, and debris from
entering which cause water damage and blockages. We install high-quality stainless
steel chimney caps providing protection for your chimney.
Chimney Liners: We install high quality stainless steel liners for wood and pellet
stoves as well as oil and gas appliances. Clay tile liners that are improperly installed,
damaged by fire or deteriorated from use, need to be replaced to protect your home.
Deterioration of the interior chimney walls is more common due to higher efficiency oil
and gas appliances, which cause more corrosive condensation.
Waterproofing: Masonry surfaces are very porous and soak up water and
moisture. This can cause freeze-thaw damage to your chimney. In early Spring and
late Fall when the temperatures are above freezing during the day, and dip below
freezing at night, damage is done to masonry chimneys when the water trapped inside
them expands during freezing. Protect your masonry chimney with high-qualityChimneySaver water repellent.
Other Services
Chimney inspection and evaluation
stove installations
Minor masonry repair
Damper repair and installation
Glazed Creosote Removal
Firebox Repair
Smoking and Draft Problems
Committed to better serviceRated A+ By the Better Business Bureau
Top Hat is Top Notch!: Fast, professional and affordable. Cleaned up after job and
didn't try to sell me anything I didn't need :)
I expected to be cleaning up afterwards, but that big vacuum and your skill made it
unnecessary. Very personable and helpful, they explained all they were doing. We
enjoyed their visit.
PHONE:
508 839-9997
E-
mailTopHatCS@Charter.net
10 Stowell Road North
Grafton, MA 01536
Copyright 2011 Top Hat Chimney Sweep All Rights Reserved.
71
Home About Us Services Contact Us Gallery
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Services
Contact Us
Gallery
About Us
Top Hat Chimney Sweep is a small, family owned chimney service which began in
1982. We pride ourselves in providing quality, thorough cleaning, maintenance and
care.
Owner Randy Moore and assistant Andy are personally on each and every job.
Office Manager, Judy (Randy’s mother), takes care of answering the phone, emails and
all scheduling needs.
We are located in North Grafton, MA and we service the central Massachusetts area.
We are insured and members of the Massachusetts Chimney Sweep Guild and
Certified by the Chimney Safety Institute of America, #1529.
Please look at some of our references on Yahoo, Google, Merchant Circle and Angies
List.
Committed to better service
Rated A+ By the Better Business Bureau
Top Hat is Top Notch!: Fast, professional and affordable. Cleaned up after job and
didn't try to sell me anything I didn't need :)
I expected to be cleaning up afterwards, but that big vacuum and your skill made it
unnecessary. Very personable and helpful, they explained all they were doing. We
enjoyed their visit.
PHONE:
508 839-9997
E-
mailTopHatCS@Charter.net
10 Stowell Road North
Grafton, MA 01536
Copyright 2011 Top Hat Chimney Sweep All Rights Reserved.
72
73
74
Walt Baenziger
Expert in the Building Sciences
Environmental Investigation, Consultation
___________________________________
___________________
July 22, 2014
Nan Wolverton
Executive Director
Historic Northampton
Museum and Education Center
46 Bridge Street Northampton, MA 01060-2428
Re: Environmental Assessment and Recommendations: 46, 58, and 66 Bridge Street
Ms. Wolverton:
On July 10, 2014 I visited the three historic buildings on Bridge Street known as:
The Isaac Damon House, ca. 1812 The Nathaniel Parsons House, ca. 1719
The Asahel Pomeroy House, ca. 1792
The architecture and the present uses are different between the three individually important
structures but each is occupied in some way and many of the current environmental concerns
are similar. Given the immediate interest in obtaining an idea of the scope of work needed, I will point out some of the important environmental differences between the Damon House and
the other two houses, and recommend the actions needed in the Damon House. Then I will
describe in detail the work that is necessary in both the Parsons House and the Pomeroy House.
o The conditions in the basement of the Damon House are much closer to those
conditions necessary for the storage of items with value, and the healthy association with those items, than the conditions in the basements of the other buildings. Although
there is significant visible fungal material (mold) on some surfaces in this basement,
much less work is needed to bring this area up to a reasonably healthy condition than is
needed in the other basements:
Water infiltration and moisture migration has been more common in the basements of the Parsons House and the Pomeroy House, and consequently
Biological growth is much more prevalent there. The air in these two
basements is also more likely to contain lead, asbestos, fiberglass fibers, and
microbial contamination from the areas of open soil. While the basements of
each of the houses directly influences the air quality in the useable spaces above, it appears that the usual occupancy of the Parsons House may be
somewhat less directly affected by the lowest level.
There is a greatly elevated moisture content in some building materials and even
standing water in some locations in the basements of the Parsons House and the
Pomeroy House.
The Damon House basement will require:
Dehumidification that is monitored, energy efficient, filtering, and
automatic (cooling – “air conditioning” – is not necessary or helpful in
the basement, inasmuch as it lowers the temperature of surfaces and
thereby works directly against efforts to prevent dew point issues).
75
Minimizing moisture inputs:
Sealing unsealed building material surfaces, particularly the
foundation materials and the concrete floor.
Sealing the sump pit from communication with the basement air.
Preventing infiltration and moisture migration through the
foundation walls.
Careful removal of all fungal material using established guidelines for containment, personal protection, and cleaning techniques (see below).
Keeping all material surfaces above a minimum temperature and the air
around them below a maximum moisture content: thus avoiding dew
point issues, condensation, and the subsequent fungal growth (please
review the enclosed EPA and Commonwealth of Massachusetts information on Dew Point). The EPA states that materials that remain
damp for even 48 hours are suspected of mold growth.
Mold spores, Hyphae, and destructed cell parts in the basement will have been
distributed to other areas of the building through the HVAC system, by normal
traffic, by the “stack effect”, or by other convective or differential pressure induced air movements. All occupied spaces that have been within air
communication with moldy materials should HEPA vacuumed and damp wiped
to remove distributed particles.
o The Parsons House and the Pomeroy House are alike in that they will both require professional mold, lead, and asbestos abatement procedures. While lead and asbestos
abatement procedures are prescribed in the law and training is generally uniform and
comprehensive, mold remediation is not yet subject to government oversight in
Massachusetts and improper and incomplete remediation activities are common. It is
reported that in the past someone was paid to do mold remediation in the basement of the Pomeroy House. It may be instructive to keep that in mind while reviewing the
photos attached and the following important information.
Some building materials in these two basement have been directly wetted and
other materials throughout have received condensation on surfaces below an
elevated dew point temperature because of the excess moisture. Once mold grows on surfaces it must be removed by appropriate cleaning methods or by
removal of the affected materials under controlled conditions if the materials
cannot be adequately or cost effectively cleaned (not killed, “treated”,
“encapsulated”, or painted over). “Dead mold is still allergenic, and some dead molds are potentially toxic.” page 18; EPA: Mold Remediation in Schools and Commercial Buildings.
EPA: Mold Remediation in Schools and Commercial Buildings. Page 40:
All molds have the potential to cause health effects. Molds produce allergens, irritants, and in some cases, toxins that may cause reactions in humans. The types and severity of symptoms depend, in part, on the types of mold present, the extent of an individual’s
exposure, the ages of the individuals, and their existing sensitivities or allergies. Specific reactions to mold growth can include the following: Allergic Reactions: Inhaling or touching mold or mold spores may cause allergic reactions in sensitive
individuals. Allergic reactions to mold are common—these reactions can be immediate or delayed. Allergic responses include hay fever-type symptoms, such as sneezing,
runny nose, red eyes, and skin rash (dermatitis). Mold spores and fragments can produce allergic reactions in sensitive individuals regardless of whether the mold is
76
dead or alive. Repeated or single exposure to mold or mold spores may cause
previously non-sensitive individuals to become sensitive. Repeated exposure has the potential to increase sensitivity. Asthma: Molds can trigger asthma attacks in persons who are allergic (sensitized) to molds. The irritants produced by molds may also
worsen asthma in non-allergic (non-sensitized) people. Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis may develop following either short-term (acute) or long-term (chronic) exposure to molds. The disease resembles bacterial pneumonia and is
uncommon. Potential Health Effects Associated with Inhalation Exposure to Molds and Mycotoxins Allergic Reactions (e.g., •rhinitis and dermatitis or skin rash) Asthma• Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis• Other Immunologic Effects • Research on mold and
health effects is ongoing. This list is not intended to be all- inclusive. The health effects listed above are well documented in humans. Evidence for other health effects in humans is less substantial and is primarily based on case reports or occupational
studies. Irritant Effects: Mold exposure can cause irritation of the eyes, skin, nose, throat, and lungs, and sometimes can create a burning sensation in these areas. Opportunistic
Infections: People with weakened immune systems (i.e., immune-compromised or immune-suppressed individuals) may be more vulnerable to infections by molds (as well as more vulnerable than healthy persons to mold toxins). Aspergillus fumigatus, for
example, has been known to infect the lungs of immune-compromised individuals. These individuals inhale the mold spores which then start growing in their lungs.
Trichoderma has also been known to infect immune-compromised children. Healthy individuals are usually not vulnerable to opportunistic infections from airborne mold exposure. However, molds can cause common skin diseases, such as athlete’s foot, as
well as other infections such as yeast infections. Mold Toxins (Mycotoxins) Molds can produce toxic substances called mycotoxins. Some mycotoxins cling to the surface of mold spores; others may be found within
spores. More than 200 mycotoxins have been identified from common molds, and many more remain to be identified. Some of the molds that are known to produce mycotoxins are commonly found in moisture-damaged buildings. Exposure pathways for
mycotoxins can include inhalation, ingestion, or skin contact. Although some mycotoxins are well known to affect humans and have been shown to be responsible for human health effects, for many mycotoxins, little information is available. Aflatoxin B1
is perhaps the most well known and studied mycotoxin. It can be produced by the molds Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus and is one of the most potent carcinogens known. Ingestion of aflatoxin B1 can cause liver cancer. There is also some evidence
that inhalation of aflatoxin B1 can cause lung cancer. Aflatoxin B1 has been found on contaminated grains, peanuts, and other human and animal foodstuffs. However, Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus are not commonly found on building
materials or in indoor environments.
The EPA suggests further that “In cases in which a particularly toxic mold
species has been identified or is suspected, when extensive hidden mold is
expected, when the chances of the mold becoming airborne are estimated to be high, or sensitive individuals (e.g. those with severe allergies or asthma) are present, a more cautious or conservative approach to remediation is indicated. Always be sure to protect Remediators and building occupants from exposure to
mold.”
Recommendations:
While these buildings represent significant historical importance and substantial
current monetary value, there are elevated mold levels in the indoor spaces, and
until the mold is properly remediated it can pose a significant health risk.
77
While small amounts of mold growth can be easily cleaned up with minimal
containment using the methods described in the enclosed information, all
significant areas of mold growth in the basements and any distribution into the
occupied spaces should be carefully remediated in accordance with the
ANSI/IICRC S520-2008 Standard and Reference Guide for Professional Mold
Remediation. Particular attention should be paid to the appropriate level of
personal protection and containment procedures described. All moldy or water
damaged porous materials should be discarded and some other materials must
be removed in order to access areas reasonably expected to have been
dampened. Non-porous materials and semi-porous materials that have not
been degraded should be cleaned using the methods detailed in the Standard.
After all remediation is complete every interior surface within air
communication of the moldy materials (all occupied spaces) should be damp
wiped or HEPA vacuumed to remove any distributed spores and Hyphal
fragments (Condition 2).
Several steps can be taken to protect the indoor air quality in the buildings by
limiting the excess moisture caused by leakage or condensation. Please review
the previous recommendations for the Damon House and refer also to the
information on indoor air quality issues and solutions attached.
o Basement and Crawlspace Remediation:
All water damaged and moldy materials should be remediated in strict
accordance with the ANSI/IICRC S520-2008 Standard and Reference Guide for
Professional Mold Remediation with particular attention paid to the containment
and personal protection procedures described (please review Chapter 11:
“Structural Remediation” and Chapter 13 “Contents Remediation” attached).
After the establishment of appropriate containment (negative air and critical
barriers) in the basement and crawlspaces, and the sealing of any HVAC
openings, all superfluous materials should be removed and discarded and all
valuable contents should be cleaned, wrapped, and sealed, or cleaned and then
moved to an approved clean storage location.
NOTE: no item currently in the subject areas should be moved to any occupied
space without proper cleaning.
Next all moldy or water damaged porous building materials should be removed
along with any semi-porous or non-porous materials that cannot be effectively
cleaned (all affected insulation, wallboard, degraded or compromised plaster or
wood/wood products, etc., should be carefully bagged and then discarded). At
that time adjacent surfaces that may have been affected but are currently hidden
can be inspected to see if more removal is required (e.g. studs, joists, framing,
blocking, sheathing, and subflooring). Some materials must be removed in
order to access surfaces reasonably suspected to have been dampened by either
direct wetting or condensation. Note: if structural materials must be removed,
qualified professionals should supervise the work to protect the integrity of the
building. When all removal is completed, the remaining surfaces should be
78
cleaned in accordance with the Standard. Every interior surface and all contents
that have been within air communication of the moldy materials should be damp
wiped or HEPA vacuumed to remove any distributed spores and Hyphal
fragments (Condition 2 surfaces: all living spaces, furnishings, and personal
contents).
All open soil within the envelope of the building should be covered with a
substantial vapor barrier (15 mil or better). The relative humidity and
temperatures should be monitored and strictly controlled in the basements and
crawlspaces to prevent future condensation and biological growth. Wireless
thermo-hygrometers and powerful, energy efficient, automatic, filtering, low-
temperature dehumidifiers are available.
Following the remediation work, Clearance Criteria should include:
o All sources of excess moisture should have been addressed. Leakage
from plumbing, foundation, roof, walls, and windows should be
successfully addressed and dew point issues (condensation on cooler
surfaces) should be prevented through monitoring and control of indoor
ambient relative humidity (the EPA and Commonwealth of
Massachusetts information on dew point enclosed). In any case, the
indoor relative humidity must be monitored and controlled in direct
correlation to surface temperatures to avoid dew point issues and further
fungal growth.
o All lead and asbestos must be handled in the appropriate manner.
o No “target” fungal types should be present anywhere.
o Visible mold, mold damaged materials, water damaged materials, and
moldy odors should not be present.
o The kinds and concentrations of mold and mold spores should be similar
to those found outdoors.
o The subject areas should be returned to Condition 1 status as described in
the ANSI/IICRC S520-2008 Standard.
After all moldy or water damaged materials have either been removed under
controlled conditions or cleaned; every mechanical system component and any
ductwork should be cleaned by a qualified company in accordance with EPA
and NADCA guidelines. If possible, all air filtration should be MERV 12 or
better.
Several steps can be taken in the future to protect and improve the indoor air quality in these
buildings. Please refer also to the general outline of indoor air quality issues and solutions
attached.
Some Additional Suggestions for Good Indoor Air Quality
While the buildings are generally constructed of good quality materials some additional
actions will be beneficial.
o Monitor all regions of the living spaces with several wireless thermo-
hygrometers. Adjustments can be made to the mechanical systems to prevent
dew point issues using the enclosed dew point chart.
79
o Prevent any moisture intrusions through the building envelope. Take all
necessary actions on the exterior of the buildings to move water away from the
foundations: sloped compacted soils, gutter and downspout improvements, etc.
o All point sources of moisture should be vented directly to the outdoors through
smooth walled metal duct material, insulated or heated to the point of exit, and
protected from insect and weather entry: baths, break-rooms/food preparation
areas, any clothes driers.
o Cleaning of the occupied spaces should include damp wiping and HEPA
vacuuming or exhaust vacuuming only. Dry dusting and sweeping should be
avoided indoors.
o Air conditioning creates condensation on the heat exchange elements as the air
is cooled. If this moisture is immediately drained and if effective pre-filtering of
the air prevents the collection of fungal food sources (dust, etc.) on the internal
AC parts, then fungal development will be prevented. Window mounted and
through the wall AC units can affect the indoor air quality even when they are
not operating.
o HVAC filtration should be MERV-8 or better if practical.
o Water damaged, moldy or compromised materials should be removed and
discarded wherever they are found (baths, kitchen, laundry, basement, attic,
closets, cabinets, etc.).
o After proper cleaning, unfinished and porous surfaces should be sealed with a no
or low-VOC sealer to prevent out-gassing and odors (I recommend AFM
products).
o Efficient bath fans should be operational and utilized during but also after
bathing for a time sufficient to remove excess moisture.
o Any artificial humidification should be periodically checked and strictly
controlled to prevent future dew point problems. Condensation on windows in
the winter is evidence of elevated relative humidity relative to outdoor
temperatures
o Uniform heat distribution and insulation is important: there may be “cold” spots
in the insulation layer due to the inevitable settling of material or the
inaccessibility of some spaces due to framing anomalies. Lack of insulation will
cause unnecessary heat loss but, along with obstructions to heated air flow, it
can also allow interior building surfaces to cool below the dew point on the
coldest winter days, possibly encouraging condensation.
o Future control of the relative humidity and temperature in closed closets and
storage areas will prevent biological growth. Wireless thermo-hygrometers can
be placed at several locations to allow monitoring from a central point (I
recommend the Meade TM005X units).
o If the existing foundation walls and the concrete floors have inadequate vapor
barriers beyond them, a sealer can be applied to facilitate cleaning, to retard
moisture evaporation, and to minimize odors. All sealers, caulks, and finishes
80
should be no or low-VOC. Sealing the foundation walls and concrete floor will
lessen the dehumidification load and save electricity.
o After all work is completed in the basements/crawlspaces, tests should be
conducted to determine the amount of Radon present during normal operation of
the combustion devices.
o All sealers, caulks, and finishes should be no or low VOC.
o Simplify the indoor environment and reduce porous materials. Dense surface
flooring (that does not outgas VOC’s) is better than carpeting. Excess complex
or porous surfaces like linens, fabric furniture, carpets, books, and papers can
produce or harbor fine particles. The smaller the particle, the easier it is
disturbed by normal activity, and the longer it will stay airborne. We can strive
for less complexity in our environment without giving up aesthetics and utility.
o While there may be a lot of unintentional fresh air exchange in the above ground
portions of these buildings (leaky windows, doors, siding, etc.), some portions
may have been tightened or sealed up. The EPA, the CDC, and ASHRAE, all
recommend at least one third fresh air exchange per hour in all occupied spaces,
or 20 CFM per person. The EPA found that in a majority of cases indoor air
quality can be significantly improved simply through the introduction of
additional fresh air. Note: HRVs and ERVs are designed to bring in fresh air but
should not be operated in humid weather, and most of these units have less than
adequate filters and none significantly dehumidifies moist incoming air.
Please review all the enclosed information and then call me with any questions or to discuss
any particular issue in greater detail.
Sincerely,
Walt Baenziger
Enclosures, Attachments, Additional Information Provided by email or USPS:
Photographs EPA and Commonwealth of Massachusetts Information on Dew Point.
The IICRC S520-2008 Standard Chapter 11 “Structural Remediation”
The IICRC S520-2008 Standard Chapter 13 “Contents Remediation”
EPA: Mold Remediation in Schools and Commercial Buildings
EPA: Final Report: Factors Controlling the Dust Mite Population EPA: Should You Have the Air Ducts In Your Home Cleaned
EPA: Building Air Quality, A Guide for Building Owners and Facility Managers
A List of Qualified and Experienced Remediation Companies
Environmental Services for Home and Business
4 School Street, Westfield, MA 01085
413-568-7701 fax 413-568-6416
homeenvironmentalservices.com
walt@hesnow.net
81
P.O.
Box
310,
Groton,
MA
01450
Phone:
978-‐448-‐9954
Fax:
978-‐448-‐9152
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
September 4, 2014
Historic Northampton
Northampton, MA
To Whom It May Concern:
Gordon Mycology Laboratory, Inc. (GML) performs mold inspections with the primary goal of
identifying and characterizing moisture and mold conditions in indoor environments. Based on
inspection findings (visual evaluation, mold testing laboratory results, moisture parameters, history
of the building and water intrusion issues, etc.), a written scope of remediation for the inspected
areas (mitigating mold growth on building materials and stored contents) is developed.
Based on my telephone conversation this afternoon with Nancy Rexford, I concluded that our
inspections services are not warranted at this time. The basement mold and moisture condition is
apparent, and severe enough to go directly to a specialized mold remediation company. All stored
items and building materials in the basements need to be professionally remediated by a qualified,
experienced company that follows the AIHA/ANSI Document S520: Standard and Reference Guide
for Professional Mold Remediation (2008). A moisture mitigation plan (water intrusion and relative
humidity management) is needed as well as mold remediation for building materials and contents
stored in the basements. If remediation is completed but moisture continues to accumulate, mold
growth will recur on cleaned materials.
Please call our office if you have any questions. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Deborah Gordon
Microbiologist, Owner
Gordon Mycology Laboratory, Inc.
82
10 Spencer Street · Stoneham, MA 02180 · 800.698.1300 · 781.279.2900 · fax: 781.279.2910 www.breatheasier.com
Nancy Rexford Historic Northampton 46 Bridge Street
Northampton, MA 01060
413-584-6011
9/5/2014,
Dear Ms. Rexford,
This letter is to confirm that I have agreed to perform an initial inspection of the basements and contents at the Damon House, Parsons House and Shepherd House. The purpose of the initial inspection is to determine, by visual means only, the
extent and severity of suspected mold growth at those locations. Based upon this
inspection I will subsequently provide a recommended scope of work based upon
procedural standards as set forth in the Institute of Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC) S520 Standard and Reference Guide for
Professional Mold Remediation. I will also assist Historic Northampton in
determining which activities would require the assistance of professionals and which
activities could be undertaken in house, utilizing appropriate precautions, as set
forth in the above mentioned Standard. There will be no charge for this initial inspection. However, any subsequent
reports could incur a charge depending upon the time involved and the extent
required.
Best Regards, Steve
Steven Goselin, ASCS
Vice President
Envirotech Clean Air, Inc. 10 Spencer St. Stoneham, MA 02180
(781) 279-2900 www.breatheasier.com
83
RESIDENTIAL
AIR DUCT
CLEANING
COMMERCIAL
AIR DUCT
CLEANING
MOLD
REMEDIATION
SPECIALTY
ENVIRONMENTAL
CLEANING
HOME • BLOG • CERTIFICATIONS • AFFILIATIONS • CLIENTS • NEWS & EVENTS • REVIEWS • STAFF • CONTACT US
Our Certifications
See What Envirotech Clean Air Is Doing To Stay On Top Of Education & Training
NADCA TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION - ENVIROTECH has more NADCA certified professionals than
any other company in New England .
AIR SYSTEMS CLEANING SPECIALIST : Air Systems Cleaning Specialist (ASCS) certification by NADCA
signifies a high level of professionalism in the cleaning and restoration industry. Through
certification, trained personnel demonstrate requisite knowledge of HVAC system cleaning, NADCA
standards, and OSHA regulations. By passing a rigorous certification examination, Envirotech
professionals achieve a reputation of reliability and competence.
CERTIFIED VENTILATION SYSTEM INSPECTOR : NADCA Certified Ventilation System Inspectors
(CVSI) undergo training based on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) I-BEAM program,
which provides a structured method of performing inspections, in compliance with NADCA's
standards and guidelines. The training and certification examination covers applicable building and
Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) standards and codes, maintenance and housekeeping programs, diagnosing
IAQ problems and reporting findings to building owners.
VENTILATION SYSTEM MOLD REMEDIATOR : The ENVIROTECH professionals that hold a NADCA
Ventilation System Mold Remediator (VSMR) certification undergo training that ensures an
understanding of basic microbiological contamination, project assessment, and how to apply NADCA
and other industry standards. VSMRs have passed a rigorous examination that tests complete
understanding of basic microbiological agents, how to perform project assessment, and the proper
application of industry guidelines and standards. Every ENVIROTECH professional taking the VSMR
certification examination must be ASCS certified and must have attended the VSMR training class, or
a recognized mold remediation and abatement training program.
MASSACHUSSETS MASTER SHEET METAL WORKERS
84
MASSACHUSSETS and MAINE LICENSED PESTICIDE APPLICATORS
• Certified Mold Remediator
• MRS: CERTIFIED MOLD REMOVAL SPECIALIST
• WRT: Water Damage Restoration Technician
• SRT: Fire & Smoke Damage Restoration Technician
• OCT: Odor Control Technician
• CCT: Carpet Cleaning Technician
• ASD: Applied Structural Drying Technician
• Certified Restorer (CR)
• Certified Mechanical Hygienist (CMH)
• Lead Safe Certified Firm
• Certified Lead RRP
• Certified Vortex Drying
• Applied Structural Drying Certified
85
RESIDENTIAL
AIR DUCT
CLEANING
COMMERCIAL
AIR DUCT
CLEANING
MOLD
REMEDIATION
SPECIALTY
ENVIRONMENTAL
CLEANING
HOME • BLOG • CERTIFICATIONS • AFFILIATIONS • CLIENTS • NEWS & EVENTS • REVIEWS • STAFF • CONTACT US
Partial Client List
Health Care and Hospitals
Winchester Hospital
Shriners Hospital for Children
University of NH Medical
Center
Heywood Hospital
Gardner Hospital is Heywood
Kent County Memorial
Hospital
Arbour - HRI Hospital
Sudbury Pines Extened Care
Brigham and Woman's
Goddard Memorial Hospital
Mount Auburn Hospital
Cambridge Health Alliance
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical
Center
Harvard Vanguard Medical
Associates
Retail
Ann & Hope
Stop & Shop
Filenes
Museums
Museum of Fine Arts
Harvard Fogg Museum
Museum of Science
Concord Museum
Isabella Stuart Gardner
Boston Children's Museum
Commercial
Hewlett Packard
Fidelity
MA COM
Boston Globe
Boston Herald
General Electric
American Express
Boston Scientific
Genzyme
BAE Systems
Elbit Systems of America
Fairpoint Communications
US Government
Federal Aviation Agency (FAA)
Insurance
Amica Insurance
Arabella Insurance
Travelers Insurance
Chubb Insurance
Liberty Mutual Insurance
Property Management
C.B. Richard Ellis
Equity Office
Fortis
Beal Companies
City State
Thayer Associates
Winn Residential
Street & Company
Barkan Management
Finard & Company
86
Dunkin Donuts
Table Talk Pies
Uno Chicago Grill
Boston Private Bank
Century Bank
Citizens Bank
Lawrence Savings Bank
Schools and Universities
Boston College
Massachsetts Institute of
Technology
Harvard University
Wellesley College
University of New Hampshire
Dartmouth College
Sanborn Regional School
District
Milton Academy
Belmont High School
NE College of Optometry
Lighthouse School
Montessouri School
Northeastern University
Lesley University
Municipalities
Medford Housing Authority
Concord, NH
Manchester, NH
Framingham Housing Authority
Seabrook NH
Cambridge Housing Authority
Dedham Housing Authority
Danvers Town Hall
HVAC Contractors
Poirier & Springer Inc
P. J. Dione
Gas Associates
Dry Air Systems
EMCOR
Lake HVAC
JJ Bafaro
Central Cooling
Lincoln Management
Bio-Tech
Vertex
Genzyme
Biogen idec
Boston Scientific
Builders and Contractors
Toll Brothers
MF Reynols
Boger Construction
Groom Construction
Winn Development
Shawmut Construction
Woodmeister
Parsons
F H Perry Builders
E-Mail: DGreenblatt@BreathEasier.com
Envirotech Clean Air, Inc. • 10 Spencer Street • Stoneham, MA. 02180 • Phone: 800-698-1300 • Fax: 781-279-2910
Residential Air Duct Cleaning | Commercial Air Duct Cleaning | Mold Remediation | Specialty Environmental Cleaning
Blog | Certifications | Affiliations | Clients | News & Events | Reviews | Staff | Contact Us
We are proud members of:
ASCR International |Indoor Air Quality Association | National Air Duct Cleaners Association American Indoor Air
Quality Association |Boma Boston | Institute Of Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification
Designed & Maintained By WebMarc Solutions
87
METHODS FOR TREATING MOLD ON BOOKS
https://www.library.cornell.edu/preservation/librarypreservation/mee/management/mold.html
One of the most common problems in libraries and archives in humid tropical
regions is mold. Mold is a general term given to a wide variety of fungi
common to most parts of the world. Mold grows through the propagation of
its spores, which are always present in the air waiting for the right
opportunity to germinate. Moisture provides the necessary conditions for
mold germination. The visible signs of mold result from the "flowering" of
the spores into mycelium, the familiar, velvet-like surface covering. The
mycelium, in turn, becomes powdery and generates more mold spores that
become airborne to continue the cycle. At this point, mold spores can be
dangerous, and the treatment of mold-infected material must be handled
with care to avoid inhalation. Although not all molds are toxic to humans, it
is important to regard all infestations as possibly toxic and take the
appropriate precautions (respirator and gloves) when entering an infested
area.
It is important to remember that mold is usually the result of high humidity
and poor air circulation. Temperature is less of a factor, except, of course, as
it affects relative humidity (low temperatures result in moisture
condensation on surfaces). Mold can grow on any moist surface, including
materials such as paper, leather, and book coverings, causing disfiguring,
multicolored stains and greatly reducing the material's strength.
Detecting mold
Mold grows in conditions of high humidity, direct wetting, and poor air
circulation. Sometimes mold develops in a small, isolated area within a
larger space served by a generally efficient HVAC system. In this case, a
survey of the area will usually reveal inadequate air circulation. In some
cases, a micro-environment such as an exhibit case can be conditioned to
control humidity through means of a desiccant like silica gel, which absorbs
moisture and thereby reduces humidity. This approach is only effective in an
enclosed system.
Mites known as book lice can be a useful indicator of mold. These tiny
grey/white insects inhabit the inner margins of damp books and feed on
microscopic mold embedded in the paper. Hidden mold can also be detected
with ultraviolet light, exposure to which causes the fungi to turn
fluorescent. Mold can also be detected by the musty odor common to damp
basements.
88
If mold is discovered, take immediate steps to discover the cause. Check for
water infiltration (wet floors, ceiling, or walls). Is the HVAC functioning
correctly? Does it provide the appropriate level of air flow, and are the pre-
heat coil and misting unit working? Is there a structural problem causing
rising damp or condensation?
Preventing mold
The only way to prevent mold is by altering conditions conducive to its
growth. For example, paper collections should not be stored in a basement
with a low temperature, high humidity, little light, and very low air
circulation—ideal conditions for the growth of mold. Even if remedial
treatment is undertaken, the material will quickly deteriorate again if
returned to the environment in which the mold first developed.
When the cause has been traced, take immediate steps to remove it.
Vacuum or mop up standing water, adjust the HVAC, and/or activate electric
fans to speed up the circulation of air. If dehumidifiers are available, they
should be employed with both HVAC and fans.
Mold is the prime enemy of film materials, attacking the surface and
emulsion. If film is unprocessed and in a moisture-proof container, it is
usually safe from mold. However, when the package is broken, mold threads
or filaments develop and immediately become apparent when the film is
exposed. Film left in a camera in humid conditions is especially susceptible
to mold. Coating microfilm during processing is regarded as a useful
preventive measure, as this reduces the risk to theemulsion layer and
allows the mold to be removed before serious damage occurs. One such
coating is polysulfide, developed by the Image Permanence Institute of
Rochester, New York (USA).
Treating mold-infected books
In the past, various chemicals were used to "kill" mold spores, including
ethylene oxide in a vacuum chamber (now effectively banned because of
health concerns) and heated thymol and para-dichlobenzine (now recognized
as mostly ineffective). No matter what chemicals were used to kill mold,
materials would again become moldy if returned to the same environment.
If a large number of books are wet or damp, freezing is a way of quickly
stabilizing the infestation until appropriate treatment can be dispensed.
The treatment of mold-infected books requires that they be taken to a well-
ventilated area with electric fans to increase air movement. A good
arrangement is to stand the books on edge with the boards slightly opened
have a fan blow across them through an open window or to handle the
89
books inside a running fume hood
(cupboard). Rapidly moving air will dry out the
moisture and desiccate the mold spores, rendering
them inactive. If necessary, take the books
outdoors and place in the sun and a mild breeze for
a short time, and if possible, remove the mold
outdoors. Ultraviolet rays from the sun will kill
mold. In handling infected books, staff should wear
HEPA face masks or respirators and plastic or
rubber gloves.
When the books are dry, a HEPA
filter vacuum cleaner should be used to remove as much of
the inactive mold as possible from the covers of the books.
If the library does not have a HEPA filter vacuum, activated
dusters (dusters with an electrostatic charge, or containing
a mild adhesive) can be used. The dusters should be laid
over the infected area and the mold spores gently picked
up. This procedure prevents mold spores from being released into the air.
When the soft mold has been removed, the outside of book covers can be
wiped with a solution of ethyl alcohol. This acts as a mild solvent to remove
some of the outer staining. Care must be taken not to wet the area too
much.
The inside of the books can now be examined. In many cases, mold stains
will be seen on the inside of the binding, near the joints and at
the head and tail. The stains can be gently swabbed with ethyl alcohol, but
it is unlikely that they will be completely removed. Although mold stains can
be treated with chemical bleach, this is not recommended because bleach
can cause the paper to deteriorate rapidly, especially in humid conditions.
Returning treated books
Books should not be returned to their shelf location until the space is
declared completely free of mold and the cause identified and rectified.
Affected surfaces in the room can be washed down with liquid bleach (Lysol),
but this should be completely dry before the room is again occupied.
Following the return of books to the shelf, the room should be inspected
periodically to ensure that mold has not returned. HVAC components should
be checked, especially in vent areas, and HVAC filters changed on a regular
basis. In the absence of HVAC, ensure that air circulation is improved.
90
What not to do
Unfortunately, there are numerous rough and ready approaches to mold
removal that should be avoided. For example: Do not brush off dried-out
mold spores. This will launch them into the air where they can be inhaled.
• Do not spray or swab the books with bleach of any kind. This can cause
severe damage.
• Do not use a chemical fumigant without checking to see if it is toxic.
• Do not inhale mold spores when cleaning off books, and do not enter a
mold-infested area without an approved face mask.
Mold damage to non-book materials
Prints, maps, framed items, and other artwork needs to be handled with
great care, as careless vacuuming or dusting can damage fragile surfaces. A
useful mold removal method is to place a piece of fiberglass insect screening
over the piece, then vacuum through the screen to remove as much of the
inactive mold as possible. If you are working outdoors and wearing a
respirator, a soft brush may be employed to gently remove the mold. Take
care not to grind the spores into the medium or the paper fibers. If framed
materials show signs of mold on the inside of the frame enclosure, the
artifact should be unframed, treated, and reframed using new matting and a
frame that has been thoroughly cleaned and dried.
91
PHOTOGRAPHS WITH CAPTIONS
These are full captions for the photographs which follow. Brief captions appear with the photographs.
1. Historic Northampton, gateway to Northampton’s downtown.
2. Parsons House, 1719, 58 Bridge Street, view from the street (south).
3. Parsons House from the east, showing the east parlor at the left and the ell with its screened porch at
the right. The boiler is located in an old fieldstone basement under the ell. In 1981 a new basement
was dug under the east parlor. This corner of the house is therefore now well supported.
4. Parsons House from the northwest, showing the one-room west wing and the early 20th century
porch on the back of the house. This section of the house still sits on stones on the ground, and when
you take up the kitchen floor boards, the soil is only about 8” below them. The west wing has a brick
frost wall on the south and west, but the entire rear wall of the house along the porch and beyond has
apparently never had its sills replaced.
5. Parsons House, second floor, center back room (#208 on floorplan). Photographs 5, 6 and 7 all show
views of an 8-foot stretch of the back wall of the house where a crack has opened up between the
ceiling and the rear plate (the rear plate is the cased beam you can see where the back wall meets the
ceiling). Photo #5 shows the outward movement of rear plate to the left of the window where it is
less severe, #6 over the window, and #7 to the right of the window, where it is more severe. If you
drew a line from the corner you can see in photo #7 straight back to the front of the house, it would
pass right through the post that has rotted away and is no longer providing any support (described in
the caption to photo #8).
6. See caption for #5.
7. See caption for #6.
8. Parsons House, badly deteriorated sill under the NW corner of the east parlor (room 102), more or
less under the doorway to the kitchen (room 109). This photograph was taken from the new
basement under room 102. The pipes are running along the basement ceiling and they bend
downward to pass under the two large visible beams. The deteriorated beam, which is higher, is the
rear sill of the original 1719 house. The one behind it and a little lower is the front sill of the kitchen
lean-to that was added later in 18th century. The deteriorated timber is supposed to be supporting a
vertical post at this position or a little to the left of this view. The pipes are blocking the view. The
vertical post is a huge timber two stories tall standing at the NE corner of the chimney pile. It is still
connected to the other timbers at the top, but the bottom has rotted away so it is no longer supporting
the center of the house. This is one of the reasons the back wall is pulling away.
9. Parsons House “buttery” floor (room 110). For several years, boxes of books were piled on this floor.
When we moved them this summer, we found that both the floor and the bottom of the book boxes
were eaten away, leaving the pattern you see here. Termites are the most likely explanation of the
evidence. The dampness and proximity to the soil beneath the floor create ideal conditions for them.
92
The wall to the right of the damaged floor is the back wall of the house, and it is the sill under this
wall where we expect to find very serious damage. This damaged sill, along with the damaged
interior post and sill in photo 8, is the reason the back wall is falling out of position.
10. Parsons House rear wall of the kitchen (room 109), exterior view where we know we have a rotting
sill. Notice how the wood of the house is in contact with the ground, which has risen over the
centuries.
11. Parsons House rear wall, showing back door and east end of the 20th century porch. This area is a
potential archaeological site, since people often used to throw their trash out a back door or window.
However, it is also the place where the excavating equipment will need to dig a ramp to create a
basement under the kitchen. We will need to remove the porch and schedule a controlled dig here
before the construction team is allowed to start work.
12. Parsons House, basement under the east parlor (room 102). This old beam shows the kind of
deterioration we expect to find under the kitchen. Notice how new supporting joists have been butted
up against each side of the old one, so that they can carry the load of the floor. The insect situation
permitting, this is likely to be done under the kitchen as well so that the original framing will still be
available for study.
13. Parsons House, basement under the ell, showing water-damaged fiberglass due to poor grading.
14. Parsons House, basement under the ell, showing the old c.1930 “snowman” boiler, wrapped in
asbestos.
15. Parsons House from the southwest, looking serene and dignified, the way we hope to keep it for
another 200 years.
16. Damon House from the east. There is a full basement under the two-story 1813 house at the left.
There is a new basement under the one-story 1987 education wing at the far right.
17. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, view from the stairs.
18. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, view along the west aisle showing the density of the
storage.
19. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing the proximity of the furnace to the collection
storage.
20. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing the proximity of the oil tank to the collection
storage (more units are just out of the frame).
21. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing the sump pit with loose cover. This needs to be
properly sealed to prevent moisture (and radon) coming up from the ground. The tube entering it is
93
the drain for the new dehumidifier.
22. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing water damage and mold from a leaky roof just
over the entry to the DEC, near the basement door.
23. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing damage from water that came in because the
covered brick-floored porch directly next to the building has tilted slightly toward the building over
the years.
24. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing mold growing on a scrapbook.
25. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing storage shelves full of account books, some
going back to the early 18th century.
26. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing a close-up view of mold growing on a group of
19th century account books. Leather items have been particularly affected.
27. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing mold (?) on a pressing iron.
28. Damon House, basement under 1813 house, showing the proximity of the oil-burning furnace to the
collections.
29. Damon House, basement under 1813 house, showing mold growing on a display case for spools of
silk thread.
30. Damon House, basement under 1813 house, showing mold growing on a reel for measuring spun
yarn.
31. Damon Education Center showing the terrace where we plan to set up tables and spread out sheets to
expose moldy books and papers to the sun. The sun kills the mold and we can then brush loose
fragments away.
32. Shepherd House from the southwest. This house is now home to the Massachusetts Foundation for
the Humanities and produces regular income for the operations of Historic Northampton.
33. Shepherd House from the northeast.
34. Shepherd House basement, showing fallen post.
35. Shepherd House basement showing boiler.
36. Shepherd House basement showing asbestos-wrapped pipes.
94
1. Historic Northampton, gateway to Northampton’s downtown.
2. Parsons House, 1719, 58 Bridge Street, view from the street (south).
95
3. Parsons House from the east, showing the east parlor at the left and the ell with its screened porch at the right.
4. Parsons House from the northwest, showing the one-room west wing and the
early 20th century porch on the back of the house
96
5. Parsons House, second floor, center back room (#208 on floorplan). Photographs 5, 6 and 7 all show views
of an 8-foot stretch of the back wall of the house where a crack has opened up between the ceiling and the rear
plate (the rear plate is the cased beam you can see where the back wall meets the ceiling).
6. (above) and 7. (right)
97
8. Parsons House, badly deteriorated sill under the NW corner of the east parlor (room 102), more or
less under the doorway to the kitchen (room 109).
9. Parsons House “buttery” floor (room 110). Termite (?) damage and damaged sill.
98
10. Parsons House rear wall of the kitchen (room 109), exterior view where we know we have a rotting
sill. Notice how the wood of the house is in contact with the ground, which has risen over the centuries.
11. Parsons House rear wall, showing back door and east end of the 20th century porch.
99
12. Parsons House,
basement under the
east parlor (room
102). This old beam
shows the kind of deterioration we ex-
pect to find under
the kitchen.
13. Parsons House, basement under the ell, showing water-damaged fiberglass due to poor grading.
100
14. Parsons House, basement under the ell, showing the old c.1930 “snowman” boiler,
wrapped in asbestos.
101
15. Parsons House from the southwest, looking serene and dignified,
the way we hope to keep it for another 200 years.
102
16. Damon House from the east. There is a full basement under the two-story 1813 house at the left.
There is a new basement under the one-story 1987 education wing at the far right.
17. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, view from the stairs.
103
18. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, view along the west aisle showing the density of the storage.
19. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing the proximity of the furnace
to the collection storage.
104
20. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing the proximity of the oil tank to the
collection storage (more units are just out of the frame).
21. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing the sump pit with loose cover.
105
22. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing water damage and mold from a leaky roof
just over the entry to the DEC, near the basement door.
23. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing damage from water that came in because
the covered brick-floored porch directly next to the building has tilted
slightly toward the building over the years.
106
24. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing mold growing on a scrapbook.
25. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing storage shelves
full of account books, some going back to the early 18th century.
107
26. Damon Education
Center (DEC)
basement, showing a
close-up view of mold
growing on a group of 19th century account
books. Leather items
have been particularly
affected.
27. Damon Education Center (DEC) basement, showing mold (?) on a pressing iron.
108
28. Damon House, basement under
1813 house, showing the proximity of the oil-burning furnace to the collections.
29. Damon House, basement
under 1813 house, showing
mold growing on a display case
for spools of silk thread.
109
30. Damon House, basement under 1813 house, showing mold growing on a reel for measuring spun yarn.
31. Damon Education Center showing the terrace where we plan to set up tables
and spread out sheets to expose moldy books and papers to the sun.
110
32. Shepherd House
from the southwest.
This house is now
home to the Massa-
chusetts Foundation for the Humanities
and produces regu-
lar income for the
operations of His-
toric Northampton.
33. Shepherd House from the northeast.
111
34. Shepherd House basement, showing fallen post.
112
35. Shepherd House basement showing boiler..
36. Shepherd House basement showing asbestos-wrapped pipes.
113
114
11
5
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST AMHERST Marla R. Miller
y
Marla R. Miller
y
Professor of History
or
Professor of History
orDepartment of HistDepartment of Hist
Herter Hall 704
161 Presidents Drive
Herter Hall 704
161 Presidents Drive
Amherst, MA 01003-9312 Amherst, MA 01003-9312
voice: 413.545.4256
fax: 413.545.6137
mmiller@history.umass.edu
voice: 413.545.4256
fax: 413.545.6137
mmiller@history.umass.edu
ommittee
ommittee
pton Community Preservation C
lanning & Sustainability
pton Community Preservation C
lanning & Sustainability
NorthamNortham
Department of PDepartment of P
City Hall
10 Main Street
City Hall
10 Main Street 22
Northampton, MA 01060 Northampton, MA 01060
Dear Committee Members,
I am writing in support of Historic Northampton’s application to the Community
Dear Committee Members,
I am writing in support of Historic Northampton’s application to the Community
Preservation Committee for the funds necessary to restore and preserve its three
buildings: the historic properties in the Parsons, Shepherd and Damon Houses Historic
District as designated in the National Register of Historic Places. For more than 100
years, Historic Northampton has preserved these homes (on their original sites) and
collections of objects, photographs, clothing, and archives within them. In spite of
challenging financial circumstances, the museum and research center continues to serve
as a guardian of Northampton’s many histories and to create exhibitions and public
programs to share with and welcome all communities in Northampton, as well as
visitors to the city.
The new Board of Trustees at Historic Northampton is currently determining priorities
for preserving its heritage resources in Northampton. At this time, the Parsons,
Shepherd, and Damon Houses require much‐needed infrastructure repairs and
upgrades. Members of the Board are donating their time, and money, to support this
project, and they are gathering contributions from others in the community. But, they
also need funding from the Community Preservation Act. As a faculty member who has
brought students to Historic Northampton to enrich my courses, I can attest to the value
of these structures in helping to convey important lessons about this region’s important
history and cultural heritage, and as an area resident who has benefited from the
programs Historic Northampton offers, I believe that the investment will be appreciated
by many constituencies.
Please help Historic Northampton to preserve its historic buildings so that they can
continue to make history present for generations to come.
Sincerely,
Marla R. Miller
116
David Tebaldi
Executive Director
September 5, 2014
Northampton Community Preservation Committee Department of Planning & Sustainability
City Hall
210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060
Dear Committee Members,
I write to express our support for Historic Northampton’s application to the Community
Preservation Committee to obtain funds to restore and preserve its three oldest buildings: the
historic properties in the Parsons, Shepherd and Damon Houses Historic District as designated in
the National Register of Historic Places. For more than 100 years, Historic Northampton has
cared for these homes and the collections of objects and memories within them. In spite of
extremely challenging financial circumstances, Historic Northampton continues to serve as a
guardian and interpreter of the stories that give the city, and the region, its unique character.
Historic Northampton’s new Board of Trustees is currently determining priorities for preserving
its historic properties in Northampton. At this time, the Parsons, Shepherd, and Damon Houses
require much-needed infrastructure repairs and upgrades. (As the tenant of the Shepherd House,
we are acutely aware of both its value to the city and its need for ongoing care.) Members of the
Board are donating their time and money to support this project, and they are soliciting
contributions from others in the community. But, additional funding from the Community
Preservation Act is needed.
Please help Historic Northampton preserve its historic buildings so that they can continue to
make history present for generations to come.
Sincerely,
David Tebaldi
Executive Director
117
3 September 2014
Northampton Community Preservation Committee
Department of Planning & Sustainability
City Hall
210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060
Dear Committee Members,
I am writing in support of Historic Northampton’s application to the Community
Preservation Committee for funds to restore and preserve its three buildings: the historic
properties in the Parsons, Shepherd and Damon Houses Historic District as designated in
the National Register of Historic Places. For more than 100 years, Historic Northampton
has preserved these homes (on their original sites) and collections of objects, photographs,
clothing, and archives within them. In spite of difficult financial circumstances, the museum
and research center continues to serve as a guardian of Northampton’s many histories and to
create exhibitions and public programs to share with and welcome all communities in
Northampton, as well as visitors to the city.
A Community Preservation Act grant would provide crucial support for much-needed
infrastructure repairs and upgrades to the Parsons, Shepherd, and Damon Houses. It would
also be a powerful endorsement of the importance of preserving sites that embody
Northampton’s unique history. Such a vote of support would assist the members of the
Historic Northampton Board in their efforts to raise additional monies from others in the
community. Please help Historic Northampton to preserve its historic buildings so that they
can continue to make history present for generations to come.
Sincerely yours,
Jessica Nicoll
Director and Chief Curator
Smith College Museum of Art
JN/lmk
118
O SMTTH CoLLEGE
Special Collections
Smith College Lihraries
Northanpton. N{assachusetts 0 I 063
N ortha mpton Com mu nity Preservation Committee
Department of Planning & Sustainability
City Hall
210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060
Dear Committee Members,
I am writing in support of Historic Northampton's application to the Community Preservation
Committee to obtain funds to restore and preserve its three oldest buildings: the historic
properties in the Parsons, Shepherd and Damon Houses Historic District as designated in the
National Register of Historic Places. For more than 100 years, Historic Northampton has
preserved these homes (on their original sites) and collections of objects, photographs, clothing,
and archives within them. In spite of difficult financial circumstances, the museum and research
center continues to serve as a guardian of Northampton's many histories and to create
exhibitions and public programs to share with and welcome all communities in Northampton, as
well as visitors to the citv.
The new Board of Trustees at Historic Northampton is currently determining priorities for
preserving its heritage resources in Northampton. Atthis time, the Parsons, Shepherd, and
Damon Houses require much-needed infrastructure repairs and upgrades. Members of the Board
are donating theirtime, and money, to supportthis project, and they are gathering contributions
from others in the community. But, they also need funding from the Community Preservation Act.
Please help Historic Northampton to preserve its historic buildings so that they can continue to
make history presentfor generations to come.
Qmi+h Cnllana
emyelsggCIrXh.edu
413-585-2978
Director of Special CollectionE
119
A'W SrrnrrH CoLLEGE
v
Offi ce ol' (bllegc Relations
$rnith {hllcgt'
Nonlt:.trtiPtr rrt. N l.lss.rt lrr rsr.tts il I tXr I't' (,ii l.2r) 51J5-ll 70
F (.113) if5-2l7r
August 2I,201"4
Northa m pton Com mu n ity Preservat ion Co m m ittee
Department of Planning & Sustainability
City Hall
2L0 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060
Dear Committee Menrbers,
I write in support of Historic Northampton's application to the Community preservation
Committee to obtain funds to restore and preserve its three buildings: the historic properties
in the Parsons, Shepherd and Damon l-louses Historic District as designated in the National
Register of Historic Places.
Historic Northampton is a vital resource for the citizens of Northampton and for students
and faculty of local educational institutions - including the Five Colleges - to learn about
local history and nnaterial culture. Preservation of its buildings would enable Hlstoric
hlorthanrpton to continue serving as a guardian of Northampton's cultural and physical
history.
Vice President for Fublic Affairs and Strategic Initiatives
120
Northampton Community Preservation Committee Department of Planning & Sustainability City Hall
210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060
Dear Committee Members,
I am writing in support of Historic Northampton’s application to the Community
Preservation Committee to obtain funds to restore and preserve its three buildings: the historic properties in the Parsons, Shepherd and Damon Houses Historic District as designated in the National Register of Historic Places.
Northampton’s unique and irreplaceable history must be preserved for future generations,
and we, the citizens of Northampton, must be its caretakers. Preservation and maintenance of historic buildings is particularly expensive but vital. Without it, the buildings deteriorate very quickly. The Trustees at Historic Northampton recognize the
importance of their trust and have made suitable plans to restore these buildings. Their
work to provide access to Northampton’s history by preserving these houses and
mounting exhibits is commendable and deserving of support.
I strongly urge you as members of the Community Preservation Committee to approve
and fund Historic Northampton’s request to allow them to restore and preserve the
Parsons, Shepherd and Damon Houses.
Sincerely,
Janet Moulding
Director, Forbes Library
20 West Street
Northampton, MA 01060
413-587-1016 jmoulding@forbeslibrary.org
121
122
“Florence has emerged as one of the most important Northeast locations for the interpretation of African
Americans’ cause for freedom. Establishing an historical education center on Nonotuck Street will serve
to signifi cantly deepen the civic-engagement and learning experiences of students, teachers and the
general public.”
Neil Larson
President, Larson Fisher Associates, Inc.
Historic Preservation and Planning Services
The David Ruggles Center
Committee
Lisa Baskin
Brian Boyd
Nancy Capron
Faith Deering
Tom Goldscheider
Tristram Metcalfe III
Terry O’Toole
Marie Panik
David Rosenberger
Steve Strimer
Emikan Sudan
Kris Thomson
Marie Troppe
Mark Wamsley
Reynolds Winslow
Linda Ziegenbein
www.davidrugglescenter.org Ruggles image courtesy Periodyssey
www.periodyssey.com225 Nonotuck Street • Box 60405 • Florence, MA 01062
Dear NEH Landmarks of American History Review Panel:
The David Ruggles Center is pleased to be included as a partner in the “Forge of Inno-
vation: The SpringÀ eld Armory and the Genesis of American Industry, Four Models of
Development”.
Our Center is located in Florence, Massachusetts and is grounded in history from early
industry through the late 19th century. Our archives and rotating galleries feature
primary sources and records that highlight the history of this area, focusing particularly
on the life of David Ruggles and his work with the Underground Railroad. In the early
1840s, three vital À gures from the abolitionist movement – Frederick Douglass, Sojourner
Truth and David Ruggles – visited or lived in this area, making it a hotbed of abolitionist
activities.
Our organization believes strongly in the value of historical study and teaching that is
grounded in the use of primary sources and connects these sources to a larger historic
narrative. By learning how history actually happens through diaries, maps, letters and
other primary sources, students can see the impact of national events through the lens
of personal experience. Abstract concepts become tangible and accessible when viewed
from this perspective.
We look forward to working with scholars and other museums to provide the resources
teachers need to develop their own links to local history resources.
This program promises to provide the best in scholarship-based content and innovative
teaching resources. We look forward to working with you on this project.
Sincerely,
Steve Strimer
Director, The David Ruggles Center for
Early Florence History & Underground Railroad Studies
The David Ruggles
Center for Early
Florence History
& Underground
Railroad Studies
March 2, 2014Northampton Community Preservation Committee
Department of Planning & Sustainability
City Hall
210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060 September 3, 2014
Dear Committee Members,
The David Ruggles Center benefi ts constantly from the help offered by the
staff at Historic Northampton. We have sponsored programs and exhibits and
worked together to interpret the antislavery struggle as it played out in Florence
and Northampton. We look forward to widening our collaboration.
But fi rst things fi rst. Preserving the historic buildings on the campus of Historic
Northampton must be a priority and we in Northampton are lucky to have
a board that has a clear view of the situation as the group begins to work
together. So, I write in support of Historic Northampton’s application to the
Community Preservation Committee to obtain funds to restore and preserve its
three oldest buildings: the historic properties in the Parsons, Shepherd and Damon
Houses Historic District as designated in the National Register of Historic Places.
For more than 100 years, Historic Northampton has preserved these homes (on
their original sites) and collections of objects, photographs, clothing, and archives
within them. In spite of diffi cult fi nancial circumstances, the museum and research
center continues to serve as a guardian of Northampton’s many histories and to
create exhibitions and public programs to share with and welcome all communities
in Northampton, as well as visitors to the city.
The Board of Historic Northampton is the custodian of these properties which
really belong to the entire Northampton community. Preserving them and making
them effi cient repositories for the large, in some cases delicate, collections of the
museum is worthy of support from the Community Preservation Committee and
City Council.
123
Bridge Street School
Beth Choquette, Principal
2 Parsons Street
Northampton, MA 01060
Phone: 413-587-1460
Fax: 413-587-1474 Cross the Bridge to Learning
Northampton Community Preservation Committee
Department of Planning & Sustainability
City Hall
210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060
Dear Committee Members,
I am writing in support of Historic Northampton’s application to the Community
Preservation Committee to obtain funds to restore and preserve its three
buildings: the historic properties in the Parsons, Shepherd and Damon Houses
Historic District as designated in the National Register of Historic Places. For
more than 100 years, Historic Northampton has preserved these homes (on their
original sites) and collections of objects, photographs, clothing, and archives
within them. In spite of difficult financial circumstances, the museum and
research center continues to serve as a guardian of Northampton’s many
histories and to create exhibitions and public programs to share with and
welcome all communities in Northampton, as well as visitors to the city.
In addition to being a place for the community to learn about the history of
Northampton, it is also a place for our students to learn and explore about the
history of Northampton. Bridge Street School has partnered with the
Northampton Historical Society for our gardening program. Having these
buildings preserved would enhance the education for our students and provide
enrichment opportunities for them to become more familiar with their city and it’s
history.
The new Board of Trustees at Historic Northampton is currently determining
priorities for preserving its heritage resources in Northampton. At this time, the
Parsons, Shepherd, and Damon Houses require much-needed infrastructure
repairs and upgrades. Members of the Board are donating their time, and money,
to support this project, and they are gathering contributions from others in the
community. But, they also need funding from the Community Preservation Act.
Please help Historic Northampton to preserve its historic buildings so that they
can continue to make history present for generations to come.
Sincerely yours,
Beth N. Choquette
Principal Bridge Street School
124
ward three neighborhood association
Northampton, MA
great neighbors . visit us at www.wardthree.com . great neighborhoods
August 28, 2014
Northampton Community Preservation Committee
Department of Planning & Sustainability
City Hall
210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060
Dear Committee Members,
I am writing in support of Historic Northampton’s application to the Community
Preservation Committee to obtain funds to restore and preserve its three buildings: the
historic properties in the Parsons, Shepherd and Damon Houses Historic District as
designated in the National Register of Historic Places. For more than 100 years, Historic
Northampton has preserved these homes (on their original sites) and collections of objects,
photographs, clothing, and archives within them. In spite of difficult financial circumstances,
the museum and research center continues to serve as a guardian of Northampton’s many
histories and to create exhibitions and public programs to share with and welcome all
communities in Northampton, as well as visitors to the city.
Historic Northampton has been very supportive of the activities of the Ward Three
Neighborhood Association since our inception, offering us the use of their campus for a
number of social events. Their former director, Kerry Buckley, served a moderator for one
of our election forums. They serve a critical role as custodians of important parts of our
historic fabric.
The new Board of Trustees at Historic Northampton is currently determining priorities for
preserving its heritage resources in Northampton. At this time, the Parsons, Shepherd, and
Damon Houses require much-needed infrastructure repairs and upgrades. Members of the
Board are donating their time, and money, to support this project, and they are gathering
contributions from others in the community. But, they also need funding from the
Community Preservation Act. Please help Historic Northampton to preserve its historic
buildings so that they can continue to make history present for generations to come.
Sincerely yours,
Bob Reckman
President
Ward Three Neighborhood Association
125
August 29, 2014 Northampton Community Preservation Committee Department of Planning & Sustainability City Hall 210 Main Street Northampton, MA 01060
2014 Board of Directors Christine Aubrey
Coldwell Banker Upton-Massamont
Realtors Donna Bliznak, TREASURER
Charles Bowles, ex officio
Bowles Enterprises
Patricia Canavan
United Personnel
Julie Cowan
TD Bank
Jay Czelusniak
Czelusniak Funeral Home
David DeSwert
Smith College
Jody Doele, VICE PRESIDENT
Thornes Marketplace
John Ebbets
UMass Fine Arts Center
Kathy Elkins
Web’s America’s Yarn Store
Bob Fazzi Fazzi Associates
Debra Flynn
Eastside Grill Ann Latham
Uncommon Clarity, Inc.
Don Lesser
Pioneer Training
John Majercak
Center for EcoTechnology
Noreen Mickiewicz Hayes
ServiceNet, Inc.
Russell J. Peotter – ex=officio
WGBY Public Television for Western
New England Robert Reckman
Sandra Smith
Florence Savings Bank
Bud Stockwell
Cornucopia
Janet Warren PRESIDENT
MarCom Capital
Al Williams
NCTV
Dan Yacuzzo
Northampton BID
Dear members of the Committee: I have been invited recently by Nan Wolverton and members of the Historic Northampton Board to re-envision how this organization can serve our community as the steward of Northampton’s incredible history. In writing to support their application to the Community Preservation Committee, I am grateful to have the opportunity to do my small part to help advocate the importance of this project. There’s nothing more important than the historic homes that are the living monuments to Northampton’s history. I can attest to the amount of interest among visitors and residents about our history and their interest in Historic Northampton as the place to discover it. Funding from the Community Preservation Act will be used to restore and preserve the historic properties in the Parsons, Shepherd and Damon Houses Historic District as designated in the National Register of Historic Places. For more than 100 years, Historic Northampton has preserved these homes (on their original sites) and collections of objects, photographs, clothing, and archives within them. In spite of difficult financial circumstances, the museum and research center continues to serve as a guardian of Northampton’s many histories and to create exhibitions and public programs to share with and welcome all communities in Northampton, as well as visitors to the city. I hope you will join me in looking at this application as an investment not only in the past history of Northampton, but also of the history we’re making now and into the future. Thank you for considering the Chamber’s support. Best,
Suzanne Beck Executive Director
126
12
7
128
129
August 28, 2014
Northampton Community Preservation Committee Department of Planning & Sustainability
City Hall
210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060 Dear Committee Members,
We are writing in support of Historic Northampton’s application to the Community
Preservation Committee to obtain funds to restore and preserve its three buildings: the historic properties in the Parsons, Shepherd and Damon Houses Historic District as designated in the National Register of Historic Places. For more than 100 years, Historic
Northampton has preserved these homes (on their original sites) and collections of
objects, photographs, clothing, and archives within them. In spite of difficult financial
circumstances, the museum and research center continues to serve as a guardian of Northampton’s many histories and to create exhibitions and public programs to share with and welcome all communities in Northampton, as well as visitors to the city.
The new Board of Trustees at Historic Northampton is currently determining priorities
for preserving its heritage resources in Northampton. At this time, the Parsons, Shepherd, and Damon Houses require much-needed infrastructure repairs and upgrades. Members of the Board are donating their time, and money, to support this project, and they are
gathering contributions from others in the community. But, they also need funding from
the Community Preservation Act. Please help Historic Northampton to preserve its
historic buildings so that they can continue to make history present for generations to come.
Sincerely yours,
Gordon Thorne, Director Lisa Thompson, Associate Director
A.P.E.
130
WILHELM,SHIMEL&KING
AttorneysatLaw
74KingStreet
Northampton,MA0I060
ARTHUR J.KING(1944-1983)
JOSEPHA.WILHELMIII
BRADA.SHIMEL
NorthamptonCommunityPreservationCommittee
DepartmentofPlanning &Sustainability
CityHall
210MainStreet
Northampton,MA01060
DearCommitteeMembers,
TELEPHONE
(413)580)480
FAX
(413)586-9540
AspastTrusteesoftheBoardofHistoricNorthampton,wehavecontinuouslybeenawareoftheongoing
needformaintenance,repair,andrestorationofthethreehouseswhichcomprisethemuseum.Anyone
whohaseverownedanolderhomeunderstandsthechallenges,andinthisinstance,thereisaspecialdutyto
protectNorthampton'shistoricpropertiesintheParsons,ShepherdandDamonHousesHistoricDistrictas
designatedintheNationalRegisterofHistoricPlaces.
WearewritinginsupportofHistoricNorthampton'sapplicationtotheCommunityPreservationCommittee
toobtainfundstorestoreandpreserveitsthreebuildings.Formorethan100years,HistoricNorthampton
haspreservedthesehomes(ontheiroriginalsites)andcollectionsofobjects,photographs,clothing,and
archiveswithinthem.Inspiteofdifficultfinancialcircumstances,themuseumandresearchcentercontinues
toserveasaguardianofNorthampton'smanyhistoriesandtocreateexhibitionsandpublicprogramsto
sharewithandwelcomeallcommunitiesinNorthampton,aswellasvisitorstothecity.
ThenewBoardofTrusteesatHistoricNorthamptoniscurrentlydeterminingprioritiesforpreservingits
heritageresourcesinNorthampton.Atthistime,theParsons,Shepherd,andDamonHousesrequiremuch-
neededinfrastructurerepairsandupgrades.MembersoftheBoardaredonatingtheirtime,andmoney,to
supportthisproject,andtheyaregatheringcontributionsfromothersinthecommunity.But,theyalsoneed
fundingfromtheCommunityPreservationAct.PleasehelpHistoricNorthamptontopreserveitshistoric
buildingssothattheycancontinueto makehistarypresent forgenerationstocome.
131
TRUSTEES
Russell W. Carrier Bonnie M. Burnham
Peter N. Rowe
Marjorie R. Hess
Joseph Twarog
20 WEST ST. NORTHAMPTON, MA 01060
DIRECTOR
Janet Moulding
SECRETARY
Elizabeth Barone
TREASURER
Scott Morin
Dear Committee Members,
I am writing in support of Historic Northampton’s application to the Community Preservation Committee
to obtain funds to restore and preserve the historic properties in the Parsons, Shepherd, and Damon
Houses Historic District.
Historic Northampton serves a vital and irreplaceable role in the community and these historic structures,
the artifacts and documents they house, and the research and display space they provide are unique and
essential to citizens’ and historians’ understanding of the community and its history.
Historic Northampton’s continued commitment to serving the community with a limited budget and
extraordinarily challenging circumstances is exemplary. The resources they provide for the community
are truly at risk without urgent preservation measures. The Parsons, Shepherd, and Damon Houses, each
of which are historic artifacts of Northampton history in their own right, require much-needed
infrastructure repairs and upgrades to properly house archival materials and provide a safe and stable
environment for documents, researchers and staff.
As the new Board of Trustees at Historic Northampton thoughtfully focuses its efforts on how best to
preserve its historical resources, they need the help of the community to achieve these goals. Members of
the board and the community are donating time and money to these efforts but to succeed in preserving
the properties they need funding from the Community Preservation Act.
I urge you to help Historic Northampton to preserve its historic buildings so that they can continue to
make history present for generations to come.
Sincerely yours,
Dylan Gaffney
Forbes Library
132
nolilvrolYil)41fivNDS
21 Pleasant St.
Northampton, MA 01060
413-586-0998 FAX 413-586_880s
September 2,2014
Northampton Community Preservation Committee
Department of Planning & Sustainability
City Ha1l
210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060
Dear Committee Members,
I'm writing in support of Historic Northampton's application for CommunityPreservation Act funds to help in the restoration and pt.r.*ution of its three historic houses onBridge St: the Damon, Parsons, and Shepherd houseJ. They have worked to preserve thesetmportant properties and their contents for over 100 years, and continue to serve the cause ofpreservation with exhibitions and public programs..
The n-tuseum's Board of Trustees is working to determine what the greatest need is in thepreservation of its properties, and has come up with a plan to improve the infrastrucfure of thethree buildings' This is very tmportant for the pr..".uution of Historic Northampton,s extensrvecollections' rvhich require stable temperature and humidity to remain in good condition. TheBoard is making substantial donations of time and money, and doing fun-draising in thecommunity, but the needs exceed what these sources can provide at the moment. Hence theimportance of support from the Community Preservation Act, which can help ensure thecontinued viability of these important properties, and help Historic Northampton in its imponantmission of making history.,present" for future generations.
Thank-you for considering my views.
Very kulyyours,
Joseph Blumenthal
,"-
133
134